Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014) Forum
- neprep

- Posts: 1066
- Joined: Fri Jul 26, 2013 11:16 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
Oh it's too late to change it now. I already sent a letter to H with our official decision letter and changed their status to "DLS."
- lawschool22

- Posts: 3875
- Joined: Thu Jul 25, 2013 5:47 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
^abdistotle wrote:Completely forgot I applied to H (most likely due to how slim of a shot I had/have at admission). As someoneyet to be ddinged, here is me hoping to receive a #JSW... JSJK sounds like something you'd hear from the movie 'mean girls' imo, and thus, is probably not what it ought to be called
We must re-open this poll
- neprep

- Posts: 1066
- Joined: Fri Jul 26, 2013 11:16 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
abdistotle wrote:Completely forgot I applied to H (most likely due to how slim of a shot I had/have at admission). As someoneyet to be ddinged, here is me hoping to receive a #JSW... JSJK sounds like something you'd hear from the movie 'mean girls' imo, and thus, is probably not what it ought to be called
- midwest17

- Posts: 1685
- Joined: Sat Aug 31, 2013 5:27 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
neprep wrote:Oh it's too late to change it now. I already sent a letter to H with our official decision letter and changed their status to "DLS."
- db1990

- Posts: 54
- Joined: Wed Jan 08, 2014 9:55 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
JSjk brings levity to an otherwise grim situation. That's science. 
- lawschool22

- Posts: 3875
- Joined: Thu Jul 25, 2013 5:47 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
But it's so ambiguousdb1990 wrote:JSjk brings levity to an otherwise grim situation. That's science.
-
edwardt1988

- Posts: 378
- Joined: Thu Jan 05, 2012 9:59 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
Respect the authoritah of JSJk
-
virago22

- Posts: 2
- Joined: Fri Jan 17, 2014 3:39 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
JSnubbed > JSNo.
- The-Specs

- Posts: 1039
- Joined: Tue Oct 30, 2012 12:55 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
I still want the two way run-off.
- db1990

- Posts: 54
- Joined: Wed Jan 08, 2014 9:55 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
It's mysterious...much like the Harvard admissions process.lawschool22 wrote:But it's so ambiguousdb1990 wrote:JSjk brings levity to an otherwise grim situation. That's science.![]()
![]()
![]()
- paglababa

- Posts: 888
- Joined: Tue Jun 18, 2013 11:34 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
Wait what happened today? We have Harvard dings? Were there any JS2s or waitlisting?
- koalacity

- Posts: 1162
- Joined: Wed Aug 07, 2013 9:56 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
The-Specs wrote:I still want the two way run-off.
- db1990

- Posts: 54
- Joined: Wed Jan 08, 2014 9:55 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
Not yet. Just dings to non-JS1spaglababa wrote:Wait what happened today? We have Harvard dings? Were there any JS2s or waitlisting?
- paglababa

- Posts: 888
- Joined: Tue Jun 18, 2013 11:34 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
Ah sorry to all of those dinged. I'm sure you'll end up at a great place anywaydb1990 wrote:Not yet. Just dings to non-JS1spaglababa wrote:Wait what happened today? We have Harvard dings? Were there any JS2s or waitlisting?
No one with a JS1 got dinged yet?
- drawstring

- Posts: 1933
- Joined: Tue Apr 09, 2013 4:52 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
Those third-party candidates eh? Taking yer votes...The-Specs wrote:I still want the two way run-off.
- db1990

- Posts: 54
- Joined: Wed Jan 08, 2014 9:55 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
Are you suggesting that JSW got "Nadered?"drawstring wrote:Those third-party candidates eh? Taking yer votes...The-Specs wrote:I still want the two way run-off.
- lawschool22

- Posts: 3875
- Joined: Thu Jul 25, 2013 5:47 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
koalacity wrote:The-Specs wrote:I still want the two way run-off.
- drawstring

- Posts: 1933
- Joined: Tue Apr 09, 2013 4:52 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
Possibly!db1990 wrote:Are you suggesting that JSW got "Nadered?"drawstring wrote:Those third-party candidates eh? Taking yer votes...The-Specs wrote:I still want the two way run-off.
- phillywc

- Posts: 3448
- Joined: Tue Feb 19, 2013 12:17 am
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
I am not a fan of either.
Hi BoM!
Hi BoM!
- The-Specs

- Posts: 1039
- Joined: Tue Oct 30, 2012 12:55 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
Could be but I just figure that a two-way runoff is a small price to pay for an amicable reunion between the two factions.db1990 wrote:Are you suggesting that JSW got "Nadered?"drawstring wrote:Those third-party candidates eh? Taking yer votes...The-Specs wrote:I still want the two way run-off.
- Gary

- Posts: 338
- Joined: Wed May 22, 2013 8:47 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
this thread gets bumped so much i keep expecting JS2s 
-
Howl

- Posts: 296
- Joined: Fri Jan 20, 2012 1:11 am
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
lawschool22 wrote:koalacity wrote:The-Specs wrote:I still want the two way run-off.
- lawschool22

- Posts: 3875
- Joined: Thu Jul 25, 2013 5:47 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
Nope just quibbling over a few letters.Gary wrote:this thread gets bumped so much i keep expecting JS2s
- The-Specs

- Posts: 1039
- Joined: Tue Oct 30, 2012 12:55 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
Welcome to Lawyeringlawschool22 wrote:Nope just quibbling over a few letters.Gary wrote:this thread gets bumped so much i keep expecting JS2s
- neprep

- Posts: 1066
- Joined: Fri Jul 26, 2013 11:16 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
Hmm, these JSW types are an unscrupulous bunch. I bet if there's a runoff there will be a slew of fake accounts that adulterate the poll and upturn the voice of the people.