http://lawschoolnumbers.com/jumpinjill
Here's another one from today--apparently a 1/24 letter. No location though.
http://lawschoolnumbers.com/jumpinjill
Huge effect, I would imagine.ahduth wrote:I have this vague sense that the professors might be marginally better, although I can't really back that up specifically. Just a lot of the talk about the textbooks all being written by NYU profs got to me I think lol.lshamlet wrote:Why's that?ahduth wrote:So am I the only person in this thread who would be picking NYU over CLS at equal money?
The student body seems more diverse - for example, I love the fact that a lot of people do PI, even though I personally probably won't do PI.
Part of it is definitely a personal thing - I went to NYU for UG, and I know how dynamic the school is overall. I'm sure Columbia is just as energized but...
The downtown aspect is also huge for me personally, as you mention. To me, downtown is New York. Morningside is very, insular and isolated feeling. It's not bad, it's just not me.
All in all, a whole lot of nothing to be sure, but since CLS and NYU are basically equal in the eyes of firms doing hiring, I'd see myself heading back down there?
Just wondering if it was a rankings/lay prestige thing for everyone picking CLS, or if there was something else.
Numbers too good. Can't compare.c_dubya_s wrote:http://lawschoolnumbers.com/jumpinjill
Here's another one from today--apparently a 1/24 letter. No location though.
At least that person's still pending at UVA. We have that in common.Confused7 wrote:Numbers too good. Can't compare.c_dubya_s wrote:http://lawschoolnumbers.com/jumpinjill
Here's another one from today--apparently a 1/24 letter. No location though.
I like that NYU is big in PI, but I also like that CLS has sent a graduate on to be a Supreme Court Justice (yes, that is kind of silly, but it's a dream. Not that an NYU grad couldn't go on to do the same, so I guess it's just a superstitious thing). I also think I prefer the Morningside area, though I have only ever hung out there, not lived there (same with the Village). I can sort of see why you would say that downtown is New York, but I'd love to hear it in your words if you feel like expounding. Lastly, I definitely prefer the Columbia campus.ahduth wrote:I have this vague sense that the professors might be marginally better, although I can't really back that up specifically. Just a lot of the talk about the textbooks all being written by NYU profs got to me I think lol.lshamlet wrote:Why's that?ahduth wrote:So am I the only person in this thread who would be picking NYU over CLS at equal money?
The student body seems more diverse - for example, I love the fact that a lot of people do PI, even though I personally probably won't do PI.
Part of it is definitely a personal thing - I went to NYU for UG, and I know how dynamic the school is overall. I'm sure Columbia is just as energized but...
The downtown aspect is also huge for me personally, as you mention. To me, downtown is New York. Morningside is very, insular and isolated feeling. It's not bad, it's just not me.
All in all, a whole lot of nothing to be sure, but since CLS and NYU are basically equal in the eyes of firms doing hiring, I'd see myself heading back down there?
Just wondering if it was a rankings/lay prestige thing for everyone picking CLS, or if there was something else.
Want to continue reading?
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
c_dubya_s wrote:At least that person's still pending at UVA.We haveEveryone has that in common.
Northeast. Technically arrived on Saturday...got the slip in my mailbox, but couldn't get the package until today.c_dubya_s wrote:http://lawschoolnumbers.com/jumpinjill
Here's another one from today--apparently a 1/24 letter. No location though.
Congrats!swfangirl wrote:Northeast. Technically arrived on Saturday...got the slip in my mailbox, but couldn't get the package until today.c_dubya_s wrote:http://lawschoolnumbers.com/jumpinjill
Here's another one from today--apparently a 1/24 letter. No location though.
IIRC, at least two people have reported receiving letters postmarked 1/26, and I don't think they were scholarships. Someone correct me if I'm wrong.Mailbox101 wrote:Does anyone know if the letters sent after 1/24 (without scholarships) are real? I know about the 1/25 batch, but it seems to be predominantly large scholarship recipients, and the 1/26 I'm not sure of... does anyone know/have an opinion?
I have lived in Berkeley and now I live in NYC and from a quality of life standpoint Berkeley wins in my book by far. Quality of life there is just great in general. That being said, Columbia was still my first choice and I think its a stronger school than Berkeley (although Berkeley is absolutely a great school). I also find Morningside Heights to be a very livable place and much more mangable than other parts of the city. It's a more family friendly area, a little quieter, safe and great parks so I really enjoy it.GinaTheresa wrote:This comparison of NYU vs Columbia is actually really helpful! Can you guys also start a comparison of NYCity vs Berkeley?![]()
I checked that topic from previous years, but the thread got totally derailed. I don't know much about New York City or Northern CA, and I'm planning to visit both, but just from a quality-of-life standpoint, I'd love to hear other opinions. . . . (please??)
Register now!
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
Pretty sure you're correct. I don't think there was a 1/25 batch. The only letters so far have been dated 1/24 and 1/26.Excellence = a Habit wrote:IIRC, at least two people have reported receiving letters postmarked 1/26, and I don't think they were scholarships. Someone correct me if I'm wrong.Mailbox101 wrote:Does anyone know if the letters sent after 1/24 (without scholarships) are real? I know about the 1/25 batch, but it seems to be predominantly large scholarship recipients, and the 1/26 I'm not sure of... does anyone know/have an opinion?
Yeah some of the people who came to NYU from northern California had a hard time of it, didn't really like New York at first. Not so much the people from LA though, I dunno. Downtown versus Morningside is definitely a personal preference thing - I like downtown for a lot of very reasons it's not as quiet or family-friendly. I want a lot of bars, clubs, coffeeshops, art galleries, theatres, restaurants, delis, people, people and people. All the noise and activity can be a culture-shock, and some people thrive on it, some people hate it.annie2010 wrote:I have lived in Berkeley and now I live in NYC and from a quality of life standpoint Berkeley wins in my book by far. Quality of life there is just great in general. That being said, Columbia was still my first choice and I think its a stronger school than Berkeley (although Berkeley is absolutely a great school). I also find Morningside Heights to be a very livable place and much more mangable than other parts of the city. It's a more family friendly area, a little quieter, safe and great parks so I really enjoy it.GinaTheresa wrote:This comparison of NYU vs Columbia is actually really helpful! Can you guys also start a comparison of NYCity vs Berkeley?![]()
I checked that topic from previous years, but the thread got totally derailed. I don't know much about New York City or Northern CA, and I'm planning to visit both, but just from a quality-of-life standpoint, I'd love to hear other opinions. . . . (please??)
Please PM me if you have specific questions!
ahduth wrote:Yeah some of the people who came to NYU from northern California had a hard time of it, didn't really like New York at first. Not so much the people from LA though, I dunno. Downtown versus Morningside is definitely a personal preference thing - I like downtown for a lot of very reasons it's not as quiet or family-friendly. I want a lot of bars, clubs, coffeeshops, art galleries, theatres, restaurants, delis, people, people and people. All the noise and activity can be a culture-shock, and some people thrive on it, some people hate it.annie2010 wrote:I have lived in Berkeley and now I live in NYC and from a quality of life standpoint Berkeley wins in my book by far. Quality of life there is just great in general. That being said, Columbia was still my first choice and I think its a stronger school than Berkeley (although Berkeley is absolutely a great school). I also find Morningside Heights to be a very livable place and much more mangable than other parts of the city. It's a more family friendly area, a little quieter, safe and great parks so I really enjoy it.GinaTheresa wrote:This comparison of NYU vs Columbia is actually really helpful! Can you guys also start a comparison of NYCity vs Berkeley?![]()
I checked that topic from previous years, but the thread got totally derailed. I don't know much about New York City or Northern CA, and I'm planning to visit both, but just from a quality-of-life standpoint, I'd love to hear other opinions. . . . (please??)
Please PM me if you have specific questions!
edit: NYU is also closer to Brooklyn and all the stuff going on there too.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
Yeah, its already enough of a pain to get downtown from Columbia (well especially if you are hitting up East Village/LES) getting to Brooklyn is even worse...Excellence = a Habit wrote:ahduth wrote:Yeah some of the people who came to NYU from northern California had a hard time of it, didn't really like New York at first. Not so much the people from LA though, I dunno. Downtown versus Morningside is definitely a personal preference thing - I like downtown for a lot of very reasons it's not as quiet or family-friendly. I want a lot of bars, clubs, coffeeshops, art galleries, theatres, restaurants, delis, people, people and people. All the noise and activity can be a culture-shock, and some people thrive on it, some people hate it.annie2010 wrote:I have lived in Berkeley and now I live in NYC and from a quality of life standpoint Berkeley wins in my book by far. Quality of life there is just great in general. That being said, Columbia was still my first choice and I think its a stronger school than Berkeley (although Berkeley is absolutely a great school). I also find Morningside Heights to be a very livable place and much more mangable than other parts of the city. It's a more family friendly area, a little quieter, safe and great parks so I really enjoy it.GinaTheresa wrote:This comparison of NYU vs Columbia is actually really helpful! Can you guys also start a comparison of NYCity vs Berkeley?![]()
I checked that topic from previous years, but the thread got totally derailed. I don't know much about New York City or Northern CA, and I'm planning to visit both, but just from a quality-of-life standpoint, I'd love to hear other opinions. . . . (please??)
Please PM me if you have specific questions!
edit: NYU is also closer to Brooklyn and all the stuff going on there too.
That is a very good point. Thanks for expounding.
Nope, there have been more confirmed 1/25 than 1/26s, on which there were only 2. With the second 1/26, I assume that that is legit.c_dubya_s wrote:Pretty sure you're correct. I don't think there was a 1/25 batch. The only letters so far have been dated 1/24 and 1/26.Excellence = a Habit wrote:IIRC, at least two people have reported receiving letters postmarked 1/26, and I don't think they were scholarships. Someone correct me if I'm wrong.Mailbox101 wrote:Does anyone know if the letters sent after 1/24 (without scholarships) are real? I know about the 1/25 batch, but it seems to be predominantly large scholarship recipients, and the 1/26 I'm not sure of... does anyone know/have an opinion?
Hm, no idea, but now I am living in fear of my email!ugbadger wrote:I just received a fall grade request email from Columbia. First of all, it seems really strange that they would wait this long to ask me (especially considering I already sent an update to LSAC).
Do you think this is a good or bad sign for being admitted? Also, what sort of impact does this have on when I will hear a decision. I got the impression that this was going to be the last big week for admissions and then mostly WL/rejections after that.
Are we talking about postmark date or letter date? There have been a bunch where the postmark date on the envelope was 1/25--I was just referring to the date on the letter itself.LinzerTorte wrote:Nope, there have been more confirmed 1/25 than 1/26s, on which there were only 2. With the second 1/26, I assume that that is legit.c_dubya_s wrote:Pretty sure you're correct. I don't think there was a 1/25 batch. The only letters so far have been dated 1/24 and 1/26.Excellence = a Habit wrote:IIRC, at least two people have reported receiving letters postmarked 1/26, and I don't think they were scholarships. Someone correct me if I'm wrong.Mailbox101 wrote:Does anyone know if the letters sent after 1/24 (without scholarships) are real? I know about the 1/25 batch, but it seems to be predominantly large scholarship recipients, and the 1/26 I'm not sure of... does anyone know/have an opinion?
Update on the mail in general for any NYC peeps still here--got the Columbia viewbook today, no postmark date, and got the infamous GULC package today, postmarked (priority) 1/28. Remember, I have the super-fast mailman--that being said, everything was on the floor in front of the mailboxes AGAIN, all wrapped up in one rubber band, and I had to dig through everyone in the building's mail to get it. It looks like the mail person just chucked the mail in the building and ran out again, haha.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Already a member? Login
Ah, I think we are referring to the 1/25 postmark, but that seems to be the more relevant datapoint, no?c_dubya_s wrote:Are we talking about postmark date or letter date? There have been a bunch where the postmark date on the envelope was 1/25--I was just referring to the date on the letter itself.LinzerTorte wrote:Nope, there have been more confirmed 1/25 than 1/26s, on which there were only 2. With the second 1/26, I assume that that is legit.c_dubya_s wrote:Pretty sure you're correct. I don't think there was a 1/25 batch. The only letters so far have been dated 1/24 and 1/26.Excellence = a Habit wrote:
IIRC, at least two people have reported receiving letters postmarked 1/26, and I don't think they were scholarships. Someone correct me if I'm wrong.
Update on the mail in general for any NYC peeps still here--got the Columbia viewbook today, no postmark date, and got the infamous GULC package today, postmarked (priority) 1/28. Remember, I have the super-fast mailman--that being said, everything was on the floor in front of the mailboxes AGAIN, all wrapped up in one rubber band, and I had to dig through everyone in the building's mail to get it. It looks like the mail person just chucked the mail in the building and ran out again, haha.
When did you go complete? I think you're one of the first RDers to get the request. Was it through email?ugbadger wrote:I just received a fall grade request email from Columbia. First of all, it seems really strange that they would wait this long to ask me (especially considering I already sent an update to LSAC).
Do you think this is a good or bad sign for being admitted? Also, what sort of impact does this have on when I will hear a decision. I got the impression that this was going to be the last big week for admissions and then mostly WL/rejections after that.
I went complete 12/15, RD, and got a grade request on 1/5. Nothing since then...I took it as a relatively good sign though, at least if your new grades are as good or better as your prior levels.Confused7 wrote:When did you go complete? I think you're one of the first RDers to get the request. Was it through email?ugbadger wrote:I just received a fall grade request email from Columbia. First of all, it seems really strange that they would wait this long to ask me (especially considering I already sent an update to LSAC).
Do you think this is a good or bad sign for being admitted? Also, what sort of impact does this have on when I will hear a decision. I got the impression that this was going to be the last big week for admissions and then mostly WL/rejections after that.
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login