Share Your Experiences, Read About Other Experiences. Please keep posts organized by school and expected year of graduation.
-
mudiverse

- Posts: 196
- Joined: Thu Jun 27, 2013 9:31 am
Post
by mudiverse » Fri Dec 16, 2016 2:27 pm
hellohalo wrote:no offense but that 169=177 speculation makes the law school admission process look so pathetic
The whole thing is a joke.
And since I'm the one cycling through 10 status checkers a day (including ED NW) I feel like the butt of it.
I try to remind myself that the name of your school doesn't define who you are or could be, but it's gets harder every day.
-
hellohalo

- Posts: 516
- Joined: Fri Jun 17, 2016 3:53 pm
Post
by hellohalo » Fri Dec 16, 2016 2:31 pm
88234 wrote:hellohalo wrote:no offense but that 169=177 speculation makes the law school admission process look so pathetic
Relying 90% on two numbers is kind of pathetic in itself; while I think you're right to call into question not differentiating a 177 from a 169, I think his general logic probably stands.
I found his/her speculation very interesting and "makes sense"...
but it just made the admission process appear to be "nothing but" a number game for the school's 509 report
-
hellohalo

- Posts: 516
- Joined: Fri Jun 17, 2016 3:53 pm
Post
by hellohalo » Fri Dec 16, 2016 2:33 pm
mudiverse wrote:hellohalo wrote:no offense but that 169=177 speculation makes the law school admission process look so pathetic
The whole thing is a joke.
And since I'm the one cycling through 10 status checkers a day (including ED NW) I feel like the butt of it.
I try to remind myself that the name of your school doesn't define who you are or could be, but it's gets harder every day.
agree
it never hurts to get into a bigger name
but the name doesn't define us
-
sp5000

- Posts: 9
- Joined: Wed May 04, 2016 1:24 pm
Post
by sp5000 » Fri Dec 16, 2016 2:35 pm
88234 wrote:hellohalo wrote:no offense but that 169=177 speculation makes the law school admission process look so pathetic
Relying 90% on two numbers is kind of pathetic in itself; while I think you're right to call into question not differentiating a 177 from a 169, I think his general logic probably stands.
I'm not trying to say that 177=169 across the board. If the ED program is being used to begin building a class to meet certain goals for GPA/LSAT, a splitter is not of much value at this point in the cycle. That's all.
-
jjcorvino

- Posts: 1459
- Joined: Fri Oct 14, 2016 9:49 am
Post
by jjcorvino » Fri Dec 16, 2016 2:36 pm
hellohalo wrote:mudiverse wrote:hellohalo wrote:no offense but that 169=177 speculation makes the law school admission process look so pathetic
The whole thing is a joke.
And since I'm the one cycling through 10 status checkers a day (including ED NW) I feel like the butt of it.
I try to remind myself that the name of your school doesn't define who you are or could be, but it's gets harder every day.
agree
it never hurts to get into a bigger name
but the name doesn't define us
I think the problem with the whole process is that in a way, the name does define us. In undergrad, you can go to a much larger number of schools that will give you adequate job outcomes. Law school has a much smaller window, and the name matters a whole lot more.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
88234

- Posts: 386
- Joined: Fri Sep 09, 2016 5:02 pm
Post
by 88234 » Fri Dec 16, 2016 2:37 pm
sp5000 wrote:88234 wrote:hellohalo wrote:no offense but that 169=177 speculation makes the law school admission process look so pathetic
Relying 90% on two numbers is kind of pathetic in itself; while I think you're right to call into question not differentiating a 177 from a 169, I think his general logic probably stands.
I'm not trying to say that 177=169 across the board. If the ED program is being used to begin building a class to meet certain goals for GPA/LSAT, a splitter is not of much value at this point in the cycle. That's all.
Also, apologies if you're a woman. My pronoun game needs work.
-
hellohalo

- Posts: 516
- Joined: Fri Jun 17, 2016 3:53 pm
Post
by hellohalo » Fri Dec 16, 2016 2:39 pm
sp5000 wrote:88234 wrote:hellohalo wrote:no offense but that 169=177 speculation makes the law school admission process look so pathetic
Relying 90% on two numbers is kind of pathetic in itself; while I think you're right to call into question not differentiating a 177 from a 169, I think his general logic probably stands.
I'm not trying to say that 177=169 across the board. If the ED program is being used to begin building a class to meet certain goals for GPA/LSAT, a splitter is not of much value at this point in the cycle. That's all.
I'm sincerely curious about the # of ED they accept every circle
so that I could better understand how much effect of ED admission on building a class
-
2000andBeyond

- Posts: 604
- Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2016 7:52 pm
Post
by 2000andBeyond » Fri Dec 16, 2016 2:40 pm
I hear you all, but I still don't get why the status couldn't just say: "Law school wide holiday party this afternoon. The office will be closed from 1pm on. No round of ED decisions today."?
-
jjcorvino

- Posts: 1459
- Joined: Fri Oct 14, 2016 9:49 am
Post
by jjcorvino » Fri Dec 16, 2016 2:49 pm
10 minutes before the office closes and all hope is lost.
Want to continue reading?
Register for access!
Did I mention it was FREE ?
Already a member? Login
-
mudiverse

- Posts: 196
- Joined: Thu Jun 27, 2013 9:31 am
Post
by mudiverse » Fri Dec 16, 2016 3:04 pm
EinassA wrote:I hear you all, but I still don't get why the status couldn't just say: "Law school wide holiday party this afternoon. The office will be closed from 1pm on. No round of ED decisions today."?
Honestly this. I'm not waiting for Kanye to drop his new album, so I don't understand why they are building hype like this.
It's law school admissions. Have some transparency for crying out loud.
-
guynourmin

- Posts: 3434
- Joined: Wed Jan 06, 2016 11:42 pm
Post
by guynourmin » Fri Dec 16, 2016 3:19 pm
Held, officially.
-
88234

- Posts: 386
- Joined: Fri Sep 09, 2016 5:02 pm
Post
by 88234 » Fri Dec 16, 2016 3:23 pm
Held.
-
2000andBeyond

- Posts: 604
- Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2016 7:52 pm
Post
by 2000andBeyond » Fri Dec 16, 2016 3:24 pm
guybourdin wrote:Held, officially.
Held or rejected. Just saw status update and no fees under my header. Just waiting for that letter...
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
jjcorvino

- Posts: 1459
- Joined: Fri Oct 14, 2016 9:49 am
Post
by jjcorvino » Fri Dec 16, 2016 3:25 pm
It says that my decision letter is sent, haven't received an email.
-
arthrod

- Posts: 37
- Joined: Sun Feb 22, 2015 8:56 pm
Post
by arthrod » Fri Dec 16, 2016 3:25 pm
Held.
-
guynourmin

- Posts: 3434
- Joined: Wed Jan 06, 2016 11:42 pm
Post
by guynourmin » Fri Dec 16, 2016 3:26 pm
jjcorvino wrote:It says that my decision letter is sent, haven't received an email.
Try logging into the decision letter delivery system - that's how I got mine.
-
2000andBeyond

- Posts: 604
- Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2016 7:52 pm
Post
by 2000andBeyond » Fri Dec 16, 2016 3:27 pm
guybourdin wrote:jjcorvino wrote:It says that my decision letter is sent, haven't received an email.
Try logging into the decision letter delivery system - that's how I got mine.
Held.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
arthrod

- Posts: 37
- Joined: Sun Feb 22, 2015 8:56 pm
Post
by arthrod » Fri Dec 16, 2016 3:27 pm
You guys can check directly from the decision, I didn't receive from the e-mail either, but the letter was there.
-
jjcorvino

- Posts: 1459
- Joined: Fri Oct 14, 2016 9:49 am
Post
by jjcorvino » Fri Dec 16, 2016 3:29 pm
guybourdin wrote:jjcorvino wrote:It says that my decision letter is sent, haven't received an email.
Try logging into the decision letter delivery system - that's how I got mine.
Thanks, held.
-
jaynejayne

- Posts: 1
- Joined: Fri Dec 16, 2016 11:21 am
Post
by jaynejayne » Fri Dec 16, 2016 3:38 pm
how good are odds of being held ED then admitted?
-
notsolawful

- Posts: 284
- Joined: Sun Jun 22, 2014 4:11 pm
Post
by notsolawful » Fri Dec 16, 2016 3:39 pm
jjcorvino wrote:guybourdin wrote:jjcorvino wrote:It says that my decision letter is sent, haven't received an email.
Try logging into the decision letter delivery system - that's how I got mine.
Thanks, held.
Me too.
Last edited by
notsolawful on Fri Dec 16, 2016 3:49 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
-
88234

- Posts: 386
- Joined: Fri Sep 09, 2016 5:02 pm
Post
by 88234 » Fri Dec 16, 2016 3:39 pm
jaynejayne wrote:how good are odds of being held ED then admitted?
It isn't uncommon. If they didn't like something about you, they'd have just rejected you outright.
-
chargers21

- Posts: 3760
- Joined: Wed Oct 26, 2016 10:54 pm
Post
by chargers21 » Fri Dec 16, 2016 3:42 pm
.
Last edited by
chargers21 on Thu Jun 22, 2017 1:33 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
btruj777

- Posts: 332
- Joined: Tue Oct 18, 2016 9:31 am
Post
by btruj777 » Fri Dec 16, 2016 3:43 pm
I think I shared this before but Ill share it once more. A really good friend of mine applied ED at NU and was held, but sometime after the hold in December and the start of Spring Semester at my UG (Jan 9 or 10) he was accepted and then eventually offered 120k to attend.
Pretty sick deal right?
-
USMC2Law

- Posts: 18
- Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2016 8:08 pm
Post
by USMC2Law » Fri Dec 16, 2016 3:44 pm
Held.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login