You aiming for HYS? I'd imagine your 171+3.5+URM(I'm assuming AA?) would be a lock.John_rizzy_rawls wrote:Retaking Oct and possibly Dec/Feb.wtrcoins3 wrote:Checking in. Going to be a good 6 months with y'all.
Who else is retaking (or taking) October?
Columbia c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle) Forum
- t-14orbust
- Posts: 2130
- Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2012 4:43 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)
- John_rizzy_rawls
- Posts: 3468
- Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2012 2:44 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)
Yep, aiming for HYS. Plus I just think I can do better.t-14orbust wrote:You aiming for HYS? I'd imagine your 171+3.5+URM(I'm assuming AA?) would be a lock.John_rizzy_rawls wrote:Retaking Oct and possibly Dec/Feb.wtrcoins3 wrote:Checking in. Going to be a good 6 months with y'all.
Who else is retaking (or taking) October?
- t-14orbust
- Posts: 2130
- Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2012 4:43 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)
Hopefully I'll see you there, I think you're already in but aim for the stars I suppose. Was 171 your first take? If so, I'm willing to wager you go 173+John_rizzy_rawls wrote:Yep, aiming for HYS. Plus I just think I can do better.t-14orbust wrote:You aiming for HYS? I'd imagine your 171+3.5+URM(I'm assuming AA?) would be a lock.John_rizzy_rawls wrote:Retaking Oct and possibly Dec/Feb.wtrcoins3 wrote:Checking in. Going to be a good 6 months with y'all.
Who else is retaking (or taking) October?
- Monochromatic Oeuvre
- Posts: 2481
- Joined: Fri May 10, 2013 9:40 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)
CLS '16 with some data you all might find useful w/r/t the notion that CLS favors strong UGs. We have access to a census of UGs for each matriculant, which I don't think CLS publishes. IMO, it represents good evidence that CLS places a decent amount of weight on a strong UG.
Minus those who have withdrawn their information, don't have a UG listed for whatever reason, or attended international schools (mostly Canadian), there are 345 1Ls with a listed UG.
Top 10 most represented UGs:
1. Columbia
2. Brown
3. Cornell
4. Dartmouth
T5: Duke
T5: Georgetown
T5: Harvard
T5: Penn
T5: Yale
T10: Berkeley
T10: Princeton
UG Type:
USNWR Top 10 LAC: 24 (7.0%)
Ivy: 114 (33.3%)
Columbia: 28 (8.2%)
HYP: 32 (9.4%)
Other Ivy: 54 (15.8%)
Other USNWR Top 25: 95 (27.8%)
USNWR 26-50: 50 (14.6%)
All other schools: 62 (18.1%)
Interesting tidbit: 18 of the schools in USNWR's T25 sent six or more students, whereas no non-T50 school sent more than three.
Decide for yourselves to what extent CLS is deliberately selecting those students versus the extent to which 170+ scorers come disproportionately from strong UGs.
Minus those who have withdrawn their information, don't have a UG listed for whatever reason, or attended international schools (mostly Canadian), there are 345 1Ls with a listed UG.
Top 10 most represented UGs:
1. Columbia
2. Brown
3. Cornell
4. Dartmouth
T5: Duke
T5: Georgetown
T5: Harvard
T5: Penn
T5: Yale
T10: Berkeley
T10: Princeton
UG Type:
USNWR Top 10 LAC: 24 (7.0%)
Ivy: 114 (33.3%)
Columbia: 28 (8.2%)
HYP: 32 (9.4%)
Other Ivy: 54 (15.8%)
Other USNWR Top 25: 95 (27.8%)
USNWR 26-50: 50 (14.6%)
All other schools: 62 (18.1%)
Interesting tidbit: 18 of the schools in USNWR's T25 sent six or more students, whereas no non-T50 school sent more than three.
Decide for yourselves to what extent CLS is deliberately selecting those students versus the extent to which 170+ scorers come disproportionately from strong UGs.
- John_rizzy_rawls
- Posts: 3468
- Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2012 2:44 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)
T14orbust: yeah first take. Good luck on the retake.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 186
- Joined: Thu Nov 01, 2012 9:07 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)
I did a cursory check for people from my undergrad (and anyone who posted in the forum) but wouldn't mind finding the rest of the Canadian school students. Did you just go through LawNet?Monochromatic Oeuvre wrote:Minus those who have withdrawn their information, don't have a UG listed for whatever reason, or attended international schools (mostly Canadian)
- Tariffs
- Posts: 95
- Joined: Sat Jun 08, 2013 1:55 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)
Retaking a 159 from last December (I had never even heard of powerscore, etc.) Tryna get that 170+ broWho else is retaking (or taking) October?
- Dr. Dre
- Posts: 2337
- Joined: Mon Feb 18, 2013 7:10 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)
Tariffs wrote:Retaking a 159 from last December (I had never even heard of powerscore, etc.) Tryna get that 170+ broWho else is retaking (or taking) October?
what did you use bro?
- bbkk
- Posts: 728
- Joined: Wed Dec 26, 2012 4:28 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)
+1Tariffs wrote:Checking in. Here's hoping that my October LSAT goes well!
-
- Posts: 432
- Joined: Sat Jul 10, 2010 10:14 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)
bbkk wrote:+1Tariffs wrote:Checking in. Here's hoping that my October LSAT goes well!
-
- Posts: 432
- Joined: Sat Jul 10, 2010 10:14 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)
jbagelboy wrote:Hey good luck!MoMettaMonk wrote:Checking in, retaking the October LSAT. 82,000 for the first year... here's hoping for lots and lots of scholarship money.
CLS '16 here (same as banjo). Re: financial aid, columbja $ comes in two forms:
1) the named fellowships given in your acceptance letter, which are half (butler) and full (hamilton) tuition scholarships -- historically these are exclusively to poach HYS kids, i.e. for 175+/3.75+. About 20 hamiltons are offered each year. Theres nothing in-between half and full.
2) everyone else applies separately w/ fafsa/needaccess and received finaid grants in April. These range from $30K up to $85K, but Ive only seen a handful that high. If you are at CLS medians, expect $30-50K total over three years -- not actually a huge dent in tuition, but they spread it out to a large number of people in the class so most admitted students can expect $10K/year off that $80K CoA, but not much more (as you can see on lawschoolnumbers).
Lastly, Columbia claims (and to some extent, actually does) to incorporate need-based in a similar fashion to HYS. The grants in 2) are a combination of need and merit, whereas 1) is strictly numbers. If you are from an extremely low income family, your aid may be higher than your numbers would dictate.
Its also worth noting that Columbia CoA projection is higher than necessary. After receiving my housing/rent/utilities and budgeting ALL my living expenses, mine comes to ~$76K total (rather than $82K, and you can make it lower -- I have higher than average expenditures) before deducting grants. Hope this helps and best of luck!
Even at 76K, how the hell do people go here for sticker and sleep at night? That's nearly a quarter MILLION in student loans!!! Getting in at sticker would almost feel like rejection for me...
- jcccc
- Posts: 181
- Joined: Thu Mar 29, 2012 7:42 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)
160k starting salary, 100k post-tax. Yea yea economy is shit but it still is CLS, I'm pretty sure only the bottom 20% or 15% have a hard time getting big law after gradding. The thing is, if you really want to make it work, you will.
-
- Posts: 432
- Joined: Sat Jul 10, 2010 10:14 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)
But if Biglaw is the goal, then why not try for Cornell with a significant scholarship? I understand it's a numbers game and Columbia just gives you a better chance to be able to pay off the loans. But Cornell does pretty well in NYC Biglaw. They tend to throw pretty big money around.jcccc wrote:160k starting salary, 100k post-tax. Yea yea economy is shit but it still is CLS, I'm pretty sure only the bottom 20% or 15% have a hard time getting big law after gradding. The thing is, if you really want to make it work, you will.
Either way, the important thing is that Breaking Bad is less than two weeks away. lol
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- jcccc
- Posts: 181
- Joined: Thu Mar 29, 2012 7:42 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)
Then I guess it all comes down to prestige. We all hate to admit it but prestige is a huge factor for some of us.blink wrote:But if Biglaw is the goal, then why not try for Cornell with a significant scholarship? I understand it's a numbers game and Columbia just gives you a better chance to be able to pay off the loans. But Cornell does pretty well in NYC Biglaw. They tend to throw pretty big money around.jcccc wrote:160k starting salary, 100k post-tax. Yea yea economy is shit but it still is CLS, I'm pretty sure only the bottom 20% or 15% have a hard time getting big law after gradding. The thing is, if you really want to make it work, you will.
Either way, the important thing is that Breaking Bad is less than two weeks away. lol
- Tariffs
- Posts: 95
- Joined: Sat Jun 08, 2013 1:55 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)
A Princeton Review LSAT book I found in Barnes and Noblewhat did you use bro?
- NYU_Ugrad_Paralegal
- Posts: 86
- Joined: Thu Aug 01, 2013 11:53 am
Re: Columbia c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)
Checking IN. Hoping for Columbia or NYU since I'm aiming for the NY market. GL everybody.
- lastsamurai
- Posts: 978
- Joined: Tue Jun 25, 2013 11:17 am
Re: Columbia c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)
Anybody make it to the information session today? Got stuck at work unfortunately. How was it?
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 407
- Joined: Sat Jun 19, 2010 3:46 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)
I was there. It was good, though not much new information, particularly if you are a regular to this website. It took place in one of their lecture halls - probably about 100 people or so showed up (mostly college students or recent grads, by the look of it). Additionally, they are undergoing some pretty significant renovation in the main lobby of the law school building. It looks nice, from what I could tell.lastsamurai wrote:Anybody make it to the information session today? Got stuck at work unfortunately. How was it?
- SteelPenguin
- Posts: 1089
- Joined: Wed Dec 12, 2012 12:37 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)
Yup. I learned a bit about the Columbia overall, but for applications it was mostly stuff already covered by TLS. I'm still glad I went though. Additionally, some of the questions asked towards the end, especially revolving around character and fitness had me holding back laughter.Humbert Humbert wrote:I was there. It was good, though not much new information, particularly if you are a regular to this website. It took place in one of their lecture halls - probably about 100 people or so showed up (mostly college students or recent grads, by the look of it). Additionally, they are undergoing some pretty significant renovation in the main lobby of the law school building. It looks nice, from what I could tell.lastsamurai wrote:Anybody make it to the information session today? Got stuck at work unfortunately. How was it?
Last edited by SteelPenguin on Thu Aug 01, 2013 5:02 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- NYU_Ugrad_Paralegal
- Posts: 86
- Joined: Thu Aug 01, 2013 11:53 am
Re: Columbia c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)
SteelPenguin wrote:Humbert Humbert wrote:lastsamurai wrote:
Yup. I learned a little about the Columbia overall, but for applications it was mostly stuff already covered by TLS. I'm still glad I went though. Additionally, some of the questions asked towards the end, especially revolving around character and fitness had me holding back laughter.
What kind of questions were people asking?
- SteelPenguin
- Posts: 1089
- Joined: Wed Dec 12, 2012 12:37 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)
What kind of issues must be disclosed?NYU_Ugrad_Paralegal wrote:SteelPenguin wrote:Humbert Humbert wrote:lastsamurai wrote:
Yup. I learned a little about the Columbia overall, but for applications it was mostly stuff already covered by TLS. I'm still glad I went though. Additionally, some of the questions asked towards the end, especially revolving around character and fitness had me holding back laughter.
What kind of questions were people asking?
Do I have to disclose anything that wasn't a felony (paraphrasing)?
Do I have to disclose all of my speeding tickets?
What if I can't remember all of my speeding tickets in the past 20+ years?
Some of these questions had the applicant asking follow ups.
There were also about 7 different questions about letters of recommendation. Danielle's initial explanation, plus one or two other questions seemed sufficient to me.
Maybe it's just from my experience on TLS, but I would feel a bit strange asking a school like Columbia questions that I could find out with a quick google search. I don't really know any non-TLS law students or applicants though, so my perception is probably very skewed.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 297
- Joined: Thu Aug 01, 2013 7:58 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)
Checking in! CLS is my top choice.
GPA is slightly above median, hoping that my October LSAT will be as well (currently studying, so much pressure
)
GPA is slightly above median, hoping that my October LSAT will be as well (currently studying, so much pressure

- TheMostDangerousLG
- Posts: 1545
- Joined: Thu Nov 22, 2012 4:25 am
Re: Columbia c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)
Truuuuuuth. So many questions were just asking the same shit over and over. You could tell the lady was getting frustrated. And seriously, a bunch of the questions asked were just absolute fucking basics about the law school admissions process.SteelPenguin wrote:There were also about 7 different questions about letters of recommendation. Danielle's initial explanation, plus one or two other questions seemed sufficient to me.
Maybe it's just from my experience on TLS, but I would feel a bit strange asking a school like Columbia questions that I could find out with a quick google search. I don't really know any non-TLS law students or applicants though, so my perception is probably very skewed.
- mindarmed
- Posts: 957
- Joined: Sun May 27, 2012 2:16 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)
In NYC it's more like 90k post tax FYI.jcccc wrote:160k starting salary, 100k post-tax. Yea yea economy is shit but it still is CLS, I'm pretty sure only the bottom 20% or 15% have a hard time getting big law after gradding. The thing is, if you really want to make it work, you will.
- mindarmed
- Posts: 957
- Joined: Sun May 27, 2012 2:16 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)
I was glad to learn they encourage students to take classes in the business school. But, it did seem that some of the questions were rather basicSteelPenguin wrote:Yup. I learned a bit about the Columbia overall, but for applications it was mostly stuff already covered by TLS. I'm still glad I went though. Additionally, some of the questions asked towards the end, especially revolving around character and fitness had me holding back laughter.Humbert Humbert wrote:I was there. It was good, though not much new information, particularly if you are a regular to this website. It took place in one of their lecture halls - probably about 100 people or so showed up (mostly college students or recent grads, by the look of it). Additionally, they are undergoing some pretty significant renovation in the main lobby of the law school building. It looks nice, from what I could tell.lastsamurai wrote:Anybody make it to the information session today? Got stuck at work unfortunately. How was it?
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login