# this year / (1 + % change this year)Keilz wrote:I can't do basic math anymorewhat's the formula to solve how many applicants had each specific score last year based on this years applicants and the percentage change?
TLS c/o 2020 - In #Squad We Trust Forum
-
Pozzo

- Posts: 1918
- Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2015 3:36 pm
Re: TLS c/o 2020 Applicants (hotdog pole)
-
Monday

- Posts: 784
- Joined: Mon Nov 07, 2016 9:36 am
Re: TLS c/o 2020 Applicants (hotdog pole)
.
Last edited by Monday on Thu May 11, 2017 12:14 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
Monday

- Posts: 784
- Joined: Mon Nov 07, 2016 9:36 am
Re: TLS c/o 2020 Applicants (hotdog pole)
.
Last edited by Monday on Thu May 11, 2017 12:15 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
Keilz

- Posts: 2322
- Joined: Mon Dec 24, 2012 2:35 am
Re: TLS c/o 2020 Applicants (hotdog pole)
Thanks all Lolol I was multiplying instead of dividingMonday wrote:Last Year # = Current Year # / (1 + XX/100), where XX is the percentage change.Pozzo wrote:Formula
- hellohalo

- Posts: 516
- Joined: Fri Jun 17, 2016 3:53 pm
Re: TLS c/o 2020 Applicants (hotdog pole)
(#17-#16)/#16=%Keilz wrote:I can't do basic math anymorewhat's the formula to solve how many applicants had each specific score last year based on this years applicants and the percentage change?
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
dclaw93

- Posts: 182
- Joined: Fri May 27, 2016 9:44 am
Re: TLS c/o 2020 Applicants (hotdog pole)
Based on latest data, 170+ group is down -3.3%, but if you take out the high number of 170 scorers, 171+ group is down -17.3%.
- Thelaw23

- Posts: 794
- Joined: Mon Oct 19, 2015 8:23 pm
Re: TLS c/o 2020 Applicants (hotdog pole)
Based on the latest data, the number of law schools who told me to go screw myself with my 174+ LSAT score has risen by 50%
- Mr_Chukes

- Posts: 1162
- Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2016 5:01 pm
Re: TLS c/o 2020 Applicants (hotdog pole)
This just doesn't seem right. They should all welcome you with open arms lol.Thelaw23 wrote:Based on the latest data, the number of law schools who told me to go screw myself with my 174+ LSAT score has risen by 50%
- shotgunheist

- Posts: 263
- Joined: Wed Sep 28, 2016 5:38 pm
Re: TLS c/o 2020 Applicants (hotdog pole)
Looking at schools I applied to on the lawschoolnumbers graph it really hurts me seeing that a lot of schools auto admits are some lsat line and then 3.7 and up gpas... when i have a low 160's lsat and a 3.68 it hurts. Look at BU, WUSTL, Emory for examples.
- Litt1tUp

- Posts: 249
- Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2017 8:07 pm
Re: TLS c/o 2020 Applicants (hotdog pole)
Yeah a year ago I was set on applying with my 162 as I thought it was an auto admit to BU and BC... I wonder how they are gonna maintain their numbers when they are not accepting their previous target populationsshotgunheist wrote:Looking at schools I applied to on the lawschoolnumbers graph it really hurts me seeing that a lot of schools auto admits are some lsat line and then 3.7 and up gpas... when i have a low 160's lsat and a 3.68 it hurts. Look at BU, WUSTL, Emory for examples.
- RParadela

- Posts: 858
- Joined: Tue Dec 13, 2016 1:04 am
Re: TLS c/o 2020 Applicants (hotdog pole)
Is it me or does this cycle seem pretty unfavorable to people in general? I see a lot more people with good numbers being rejected than people with poor numbers getting in against the odds
- brinicolec

- Posts: 4479
- Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2016 7:09 pm
Re: TLS c/o 2020 Applicants (hotdog pole)
It's been pretty unfavorable TOWARDS ME!!!!! lol. Just kidding. It's really just the T14 being hard to break into for me. T15-T25 has been very receptive lol.RParadela wrote:Is it me or does this cycle seem pretty unfavorable to people in general? I see a lot more people with good numbers being rejected than people with poor numbers getting in against the odds
- amberb94

- Posts: 331
- Joined: Fri Sep 30, 2016 3:37 pm
Re: TLS c/o 2020 Applicants (hotdog pole)
Cornell is being pretty rudeRParadela wrote:Is it me or does this cycle seem pretty unfavorable to people in general? I see a lot more people with good numbers being rejected than people with poor numbers getting in against the odds
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
haley12

- Posts: 537
- Joined: Thu Sep 22, 2016 11:37 am
Re: TLS c/o 2020 Applicants (hotdog pole)
Yes and YES! What happened to this cycle being a splitter's game??brinicolec wrote:It's been pretty unfavorable TOWARDS ME!!!!! lol. Just kidding. It's really just the T14 being hard to break into for me. T15-T25 has been very receptive lol.RParadela wrote:Is it me or does this cycle seem pretty unfavorable to people in general? I see a lot more people with good numbers being rejected than people with poor numbers getting in against the odds
- brinicolec

- Posts: 4479
- Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2016 7:09 pm
Re: TLS c/o 2020 Applicants (hotdog pole)
I think it might've ended up being a better cycle for reverse splitters than traditional splitters, but I'm not sure because I haven't been looking at reverse splitters' cycles lol.haley12 wrote:Yes and YES! What happened to this cycle being a splitter's game??brinicolec wrote:It's been pretty unfavorable TOWARDS ME!!!!! lol. Just kidding. It's really just the T14 being hard to break into for me. T15-T25 has been very receptive lol.RParadela wrote:Is it me or does this cycle seem pretty unfavorable to people in general? I see a lot more people with good numbers being rejected than people with poor numbers getting in against the odds
- Nightwing

- Posts: 281
- Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2017 4:44 am
Re: TLS c/o 2020 Applicants (hotdog pole)
For Cornell at least, absolutely, this has been more of a reverse splitters' cycle.brinicolec wrote:I think it might've ended up being a better cycle for reverse splitters than traditional splitters, but I'm not sure because I haven't been looking at reverse splitters' cycles lol.haley12 wrote:Yes and YES! What happened to this cycle being a splitter's game??brinicolec wrote:It's been pretty unfavorable TOWARDS ME!!!!! lol. Just kidding. It's really just the T14 being hard to break into for me. T15-T25 has been very receptive lol.RParadela wrote:Is it me or does this cycle seem pretty unfavorable to people in general? I see a lot more people with good numbers being rejected than people with poor numbers getting in against the odds
- brinicolec

- Posts: 4479
- Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2016 7:09 pm
Re: TLS c/o 2020 Applicants (hotdog pole)
Part of the reason I'm not liking the idea of sitting out a cycle is if top schools are starting to lean more towards GPA than LSAT and it's only gonna get worse, the longer I wait, the more screwed I'll be lolNightwing wrote:For Cornell at least, absolutely, this has been more of a reverse splitters' cycle.brinicolec wrote:I think it might've ended up being a better cycle for reverse splitters than traditional splitters, but I'm not sure because I haven't been looking at reverse splitters' cycles lol.haley12 wrote:Yes and YES! What happened to this cycle being a splitter's game??brinicolec wrote:It's been pretty unfavorable TOWARDS ME!!!!! lol. Just kidding. It's really just the T14 being hard to break into for me. T15-T25 has been very receptive lol.RParadela wrote:Is it me or does this cycle seem pretty unfavorable to people in general? I see a lot more people with good numbers being rejected than people with poor numbers getting in against the odds
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- RParadela

- Posts: 858
- Joined: Tue Dec 13, 2016 1:04 am
Re: TLS c/o 2020 Applicants (hotdog pole)
URM cycles are so weird sometimes. I see URMs with very pedestrian numbers that absolutely crush it and then there are ones that don't seem like they got much of a boost.brinicolec wrote:It's been pretty unfavorable TOWARDS ME!!!!! lol. Just kidding. It's really just the T14 being hard to break into for me. T15-T25 has been very receptive lol.RParadela wrote:Is it me or does this cycle seem pretty unfavorable to people in general? I see a lot more people with good numbers being rejected than people with poor numbers getting in against the odds
-
theboringest

- Posts: 314
- Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2016 6:19 am
Re: TLS c/o 2020 Applicants (hotdog pole)
Honestly I think I'm outperforming my numbers...I've been loving this cycle. Seems pretty feast or famine from what I'm seeing. People doing well are crushing it, or people are getting nothing. Not a lot of middle ground.RParadela wrote:Is it me or does this cycle seem pretty unfavorable to people in general? I see a lot more people with good numbers being rejected than people with poor numbers getting in against the odds
- brinicolec

- Posts: 4479
- Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2016 7:09 pm
Re: TLS c/o 2020 Applicants (hotdog pole)
yeah, I agree. Like I said, T15-25 are showing me love and it's nice but T14s are more like "Meh" or "No" or "Yeah, okay, if you're willing to foot this bill yourself [I'm not]"RParadela wrote:URM cycles are so weird sometimes. I see URMs with very pedestrian numbers that absolutely crush it and then there are ones that don't seem like they got much of a boost.brinicolec wrote:It's been pretty unfavorable TOWARDS ME!!!!! lol. Just kidding. It's really just the T14 being hard to break into for me. T15-T25 has been very receptive lol.RParadela wrote:Is it me or does this cycle seem pretty unfavorable to people in general? I see a lot more people with good numbers being rejected than people with poor numbers getting in against the odds
- Dodocogon

- Posts: 631
- Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2016 11:45 pm
Re: TLS c/o 2020 Applicants (hotdog pole)
I'd like to apologize here to redbulls2595 for jokingly asking if the MSU thread he made was to be updated on their webinars and his subsequent addition of them to the OP of his post... didn't think it'd be taken seriously. Whoops!
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- S.Picquery

- Posts: 598
- Joined: Sat Dec 31, 2016 9:39 pm
Re: TLS c/o 2020 Applicants (hotdog pole)
I want to agree with what y'all are saying but I have some great acceptances but only one school that I haven't already decided against has given me final FinAid and it is not a good amount. 288k upon repayment is a cruel consideration IMO.brinicolec wrote:yeah, I agree. Like I said, T15-25 are showing me love and it's nice but T14s are more like "Meh" or "No" or "Yeah, okay, if you're willing to foot this bill yourself [I'm not]"RParadela wrote:URM cycles are so weird sometimes. I see URMs with very pedestrian numbers that absolutely crush it and then there are ones that don't seem like they got much of a boost.brinicolec wrote:It's been pretty unfavorable TOWARDS ME!!!!! lol. Just kidding. It's really just the T14 being hard to break into for me. T15-T25 has been very receptive lol.RParadela wrote:Is it me or does this cycle seem pretty unfavorable to people in general? I see a lot more people with good numbers being rejected than people with poor numbers getting in against the odds
MAYBE IF I COULD GET SOME $$$ I'd be less PISSED/Anxious/perpetually nauseated.
-
theboringest

- Posts: 314
- Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2016 6:19 am
Re: TLS c/o 2020 Applicants (hotdog pole)
Combine that with 169's being down 40% (which is insane) and you're looking at some serious median hits for T14.dclaw93 wrote:Based on latest data, 170+ group is down -3.3%, but if you take out the high number of 170 scorers, 171+ group is down -17.3%.
- Kopetz

- Posts: 338
- Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2016 11:06 am
Re: TLS c/o 2020 Applicants (hotdog pole)
Maybe not as seriously as we're all hoping. The increase in 170s partially offsets the drop in 169s -- it's a difference of about 89 fewer applicants with 169/170 scores. That averages to about ten fewer median-level applicants for each T14 with a median of 169 or higher.theboringest wrote:Combine that with 169's being down 40% (which is insane) and you're looking at some serious median hits for T14.dclaw93 wrote:Based on latest data, 170+ group is down -3.3%, but if you take out the high number of 170 scorers, 171+ group is down -17.3%.
Of course, the drop in >170 scores probably amplifies the pressure on school medians, especially in the 171-174 range where we see some pretty big dropoffs. I have to think that's more of a headache for HYSCCN than for the rest of the T14, though.
-
theboringest

- Posts: 314
- Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2016 6:19 am
Re: TLS c/o 2020 Applicants (hotdog pole)
I think that will just push the pressure down- HYSCCN will compete more fiercely for, and get more of, the 170+ pie, leaving less for the lower T14, who are going to have to each get a higher yield of the 169/170 scorers than usual to keep their 75ths...pressure on their 75ths puts pressure on the medians...it just trickles down. Especially since it seems a lot of the current medians are maintained by pretty razor margins.Kopetz wrote:Maybe not as seriously as we're all hoping. The increase in 170s partially offsets the drop in 169s -- it's a difference of about 89 fewer applicants with 169/170 scores. That averages to about ten fewer median-level applicants for each T14 with a median of 169 or higher.theboringest wrote:Combine that with 169's being down 40% (which is insane) and you're looking at some serious median hits for T14.dclaw93 wrote:Based on latest data, 170+ group is down -3.3%, but if you take out the high number of 170 scorers, 171+ group is down -17.3%.
Of course, the drop in >170 scores probably amplifies the pressure on school medians, especially in the 171-174 range where we see some pretty big dropoffs. I have to think that's more of a headache for HYSCCN than for the rest of the T14, though.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login