
Michigan c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle) Forum
- DonnaDraper
- Posts: 280
- Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2011 12:30 am
Re: Michigan c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
It seems the moral of the story is to just suck it up and write the supplementary essays. With numbers in Michigan's range, I feel like extra essays would get one from reject to WL (this is me speculating). Condolences to the rejected 

- WhiteGuy5
- Posts: 918
- Joined: Thu Oct 06, 2011 3:47 pm
Re: Michigan c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Sorry for all the dings guy =(.
Is there a In at Michigan thread? Can't find it...
Is there a In at Michigan thread? Can't find it...
-
- Posts: 147
- Joined: Fri Sep 30, 2011 4:45 pm
Re: Michigan c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
+1, I've also been wondering/looking for this thread.WhiteGuy5 wrote:Sorry for all the dings guy =(.
Is there a In at Michigan thread? Can't find it...
- Campagnolo
- Posts: 906
- Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2009 5:49 pm
Re: Michigan c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
What a time to ask, guys...thestillpoint wrote:+1, I've also been wondering/looking for this thread.WhiteGuy5 wrote:Sorry for all the dings guy =(.
Is there a In at Michigan thread? Can't find it...

I'm getting so fast with imgur.
- WhiteGuy5
- Posts: 918
- Joined: Thu Oct 06, 2011 3:47 pm
Re: Michigan c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
^ I know. It was a dick move, sorry =(.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Moriarty
- Posts: 304
- Joined: Wed Jan 18, 2012 5:29 pm
Re: Michigan c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
I'm sorry to all that heard bad news today; I hope that things turn out for the best for all of you, though! I'd like to think that rejections mean that there are better things in store.
<--- Forever Optimistic
(I still don't even have a status checker, so I can't even rightly panic with those still hanging on...that is NOT a complaint, though.)
Also keep the images coming, Campagnolo.
<--- Forever Optimistic
(I still don't even have a status checker, so I can't even rightly panic with those still hanging on...that is NOT a complaint, though.)
Also keep the images coming, Campagnolo.

-
- Posts: 497
- Joined: Mon Jan 02, 2012 12:02 pm
Re: Michigan c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
I'm hoping that's true. I'm up to 2 essays for Michigan and if I get WL'd, I'll write a few more. I really want to get in.DonnaDraper wrote:It seems the moral of the story is to just suck it up and write the supplementary essays. With numbers in Michigan's range, I feel like extra essays would get one from reject to WL (this is me speculating). Condolences to the rejected
- itsmelissaaa
- Posts: 29
- Joined: Thu Nov 17, 2011 8:05 pm
Re: Michigan c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Dinged this morning as well. First rejection of the cycle.
- RopeisaJoke
- Posts: 44
- Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2012 9:13 pm
Re: Michigan c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Did the people who got dinged today get the seemingly meaningless 'hold' email a few week ago?
- fingerscrossedxx
- Posts: 733
- Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2011 11:56 am
Re: Michigan c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
I am interested in this.RopeisaJoke wrote:Did the people who got dinged today get the seemingly meaningless 'hold' email a few week ago?
- itsmelissaaa
- Posts: 29
- Joined: Thu Nov 17, 2011 8:05 pm
Re: Michigan c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
No, I never received an email.
- Mr. Somebody
- Posts: 865
- Joined: Sat Dec 03, 2011 11:42 pm
Re: Michigan c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Lol guys we're way past the point where the e-mail matters.... never got the e-mail and I still don't have a decision.
- citygirl000
- Posts: 169
- Joined: Sun Sep 12, 2010 6:26 pm
Re: Michigan c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
thestillpoint wrote:+1, I've also been wondering/looking for this thread.WhiteGuy5 wrote:Sorry for all the dings guy =(.
Is there a In at Michigan thread? Can't find it...
Do you mean this? http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/v ... &start=550
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- ScoutFinch
- Posts: 109
- Joined: Sun Nov 20, 2011 6:34 am
Re: Michigan c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
No hold email for me. For the record, I wrote two of the supplemental essays, including Why Michigan.
- UnamSanctam
- Posts: 7342
- Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2011 3:17 am
Re: Michigan c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Nah, that's for people who are set on going to Michigan. WhiteGuy is referring to threads in this subforum for people that have been admitted but are not set on attending (e.g. In at Harvard, In at Chicago, etc.). The idea is that once people start getting dinged/WL'd, there's a difference in behavior between those people and the admitted, who have no stress. The rift can translate into fights, and this is avoided by creating an "In at..." thread. I actually don't like the practice since it clogs up this subforum, but I'm also admitted, so I'm admittedly (...) biased.citygirl000 wrote:thestillpoint wrote:+1, I've also been wondering/looking for this thread.WhiteGuy5 wrote:Sorry for all the dings guy =(.
Is there a In at Michigan thread? Can't find it...
Do you mean this? http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/v ... &start=550
- Dr. Filth
- Posts: 1158
- Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2011 7:22 pm
Re: Michigan c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
It would be beyond silly for dings/WL to get upset at admits. It's pretty simple to just not post when you're pissed off.
I was a ding today with no email, but I got my status checker around the time of the email. So I don't think I would have gotten an email even if they <3'd me.
I was a ding today with no email, but I got my status checker around the time of the email. So I don't think I would have gotten an email even if they <3'd me.
- moneybagsphd
- Posts: 888
- Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2011 11:07 pm
Re: Michigan c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Glad I checked my status before reading about the bloodbath. Still complete.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- captainwasabi09
- Posts: 161
- Joined: Thu Dec 22, 2011 12:18 am
Re: Michigan c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Campagnuolo, you can't faze me! I go here for undergrad! I see the beauty that is Michigan Law School every day!
- PopTorts13
- Posts: 378
- Joined: Sat Dec 03, 2011 6:27 pm
Re: Michigan c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
This is a BIG TEN commonality. The vast majority of our campuses are significantly more beautiful than others. Graduated from Indiana University- Bloomington for my undergraduate degree and then went down to Florida State University in Tallahassee. For any one that has ever been to IU, you know how ridiculously beautiful it is as well. Mid-West=Beautifulcaptainwasabi09 wrote:Campagnuolo, you can't faze me! I go here for undergrad! I see the beauty that is Michigan Law School every day!
- Campagnolo
- Posts: 906
- Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2009 5:49 pm
Re: Michigan c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
I've never been. I did just schedule a trip to go from Duke to Cornell (stopping at GULC on the way). I'd like to have a reason to come visit Michigan, too, but they seem intent on waiting until after spent a grand I don't have to visit other schools I'm not as interested in, pick one out, put down a deposit, and rent an apartment before making a decision on my file.captainwasabi09 wrote:Campagnuolo, you can't faze me! I go here for undergrad! I see the beauty that is Michigan Law School every day!
In the mean time, I post.

Post your own! Take a few snaps we haven't seen before. Otherwise, I'll just have to keep doing what I'm doing. Until I get in or dinged. Which could be awhile.
I actually wrote a draft Why Mich about the architecture of the quad from a phenomenological perspective. It was totally classy, obviously, but I didn't have the guts to send it in. PM if you want to read this gem. The trouble with the architecture in America is that it's all fake, and can therefore point only to what we lack.
- Nelson
- Posts: 2058
- Joined: Thu Feb 03, 2011 12:43 am
Re: Michigan c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
It's also because the "In at ____" threads tend to devolve into "Should I go to ____?" and "how much money would it take to make this worth it" discussions, both of which are understandably annoying to people just waiting to see if they'll get into the school.UnamSanctam wrote:Nah, that's for people who are set on going to Michigan. WhiteGuy is referring to threads in this subforum for people that have been admitted but are not set on attending (e.g. In at Harvard, In at Chicago, etc.). The idea is that once people start getting dinged/WL'd, there's a difference in behavior between those people and the admitted, who have no stress. The rift can translate into fights, and this is avoided by creating an "In at..." thread. I actually don't like the practice since it clogs up this subforum, but I'm also admitted, so I'm admittedly (...) biased.
In Michigan related news, I'm still complete. I suppose they'll get around to sending the WLs soon?
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- luxxe
- Posts: 830
- Joined: Sat Jul 11, 2009 11:12 am
Re: Michigan c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Looking at LSN, a lot of people who submitted before December last year got WL'd in late February, around the 25/26.Nelson wrote: In Michigan related news, I'm still complete. I suppose they'll get around to sending the WLs soon?
DNW to wait that long to get waitlisted

- UnamSanctam
- Posts: 7342
- Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2011 3:17 am
Re: Michigan c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
You would know better than I would. I was literally taking a shot in the dark and presenting it as fact.Nelson wrote:It's also because the "In at ____" threads tend to devolve into "Should I go to ____?" and "how much money would it take to make this worth it" discussions, both of which are understandably annoying to people just waiting to see if they'll get into the school.UnamSanctam wrote:Nah, that's for people who are set on going to Michigan. WhiteGuy is referring to threads in this subforum for people that have been admitted but are not set on attending (e.g. In at Harvard, In at Chicago, etc.). The idea is that once people start getting dinged/WL'd, there's a difference in behavior between those people and the admitted, who have no stress. The rift can translate into fights, and this is avoided by creating an "In at..." thread. I actually don't like the practice since it clogs up this subforum, but I'm also admitted, so I'm admittedly (...) biased.
- Nelson
- Posts: 2058
- Joined: Thu Feb 03, 2011 12:43 am
Re: Michigan c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Yeah, I wasn't disputing what you said. There's no doubt that it would clog up the forum if every school had 5+ threads a la Harvard.UnamSanctam wrote:You would know better than I would. I was literally taking a shot in the dark and presenting it as fact.Nelson wrote:It's also because the "In at ____" threads tend to devolve into "Should I go to ____?" and "how much money would it take to make this worth it" discussions, both of which are understandably annoying to people just waiting to see if they'll get into the school.UnamSanctam wrote:Nah, that's for people who are set on going to Michigan. WhiteGuy is referring to threads in this subforum for people that have been admitted but are not set on attending (e.g. In at Harvard, In at Chicago, etc.). The idea is that once people start getting dinged/WL'd, there's a difference in behavior between those people and the admitted, who have no stress. The rift can translate into fights, and this is avoided by creating an "In at..." thread. I actually don't like the practice since it clogs up this subforum, but I'm also admitted, so I'm admittedly (...) biased.
-
- Posts: 461
- Joined: Fri Jun 10, 2011 9:46 am
Re: Michigan c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Looks like I've lived to fight another day.
(please love me, mich!!)
(please love me, mich!!)
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login