WUSTL c/o 2018 Applicants Forum

Share Your Experiences, Read About Other Experiences. Please keep posts organized by school and expected year of graduation.
Post Reply

Likelihood of Attending

Still waiting
26
18%
WL
23
16%
Accept and withdrawal
30
21%
Accept undecided
11
8%
Accept deposit extension
18
13%
Accept deposit but...
14
10%
Accept deposit and looking for housing
21
15%
 
Total votes: 143

User avatar
PeanutsNJam

Gold
Posts: 4670
Joined: Tue Jul 10, 2012 1:57 pm

Re: WUSTL c/o 2018 Applicants

Post by PeanutsNJam » Wed Jul 01, 2015 10:38 am

Having already done a budget backpacking trip through EU, I have a cruise to Japan planned (ticket purchased), and tentative plans for a Thailand trip. Lots of good eats, gym, playing in the sun.

That said, I'm nibbling on some E&E's at a snail's pace, just to familiarize myself with the jargon (really, most my time is spent on Wiki looking up werdz and things) and general writing style of law books, so when I have to read them for real I can do it quickly and efficiently without having to context-clue any words.

It's 30 min/day casual reading, I really don't think it can hurt.

User avatar
chuckbass

Platinum
Posts: 9956
Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2011 9:29 pm

Re: WUSTL c/o 2018 Applicants

Post by chuckbass » Wed Jul 01, 2015 10:49 am

It won't hurt but you're wasting 30 minutes/day.

User avatar
Jmart082

Bronze
Posts: 354
Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2014 5:52 pm

Re: WUSTL c/o 2018 Applicants

Post by Jmart082 » Wed Jul 01, 2015 5:30 pm

scottidsntknow wrote:It won't hurt but you're wasting 30 minutes/day.
#GUNNERGONNAGUN

PourMeTea

Platinum
Posts: 6874
Joined: Sun Jun 17, 2012 8:32 am

Re: WUSTL c/o 2018 Applicants

Post by PourMeTea » Wed Jul 01, 2015 5:50 pm

e&es are p much unilaterally the crappiest and least in depth supplements

chingwoo

Bronze
Posts: 345
Joined: Wed Sep 18, 2013 11:28 pm

Re: WUSTL c/o 2018 Applicants

Post by chingwoo » Wed Jul 01, 2015 5:57 pm

PourMeTea wrote:e&es are p much unilaterally the crappiest and least in depth supplements
Shh I need to sell mine.

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


User avatar
Jmart082

Bronze
Posts: 354
Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2014 5:52 pm

Re: WUSTL c/o 2018 Applicants

Post by Jmart082 » Wed Jul 01, 2015 7:04 pm

PourMeTea wrote:e&es are p much unilaterally the crappiest and least in depth supplements
THIS

User avatar
chuckbass

Platinum
Posts: 9956
Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2011 9:29 pm

Re: WUSTL c/o 2018 Applicants

Post by chuckbass » Thu Jul 02, 2015 12:37 am

Jmart082 wrote:
PourMeTea wrote:e&es are p much unilaterally the crappiest and least in depth supplements
THIS
Meh it was good for civ pro.

User avatar
Jmart082

Bronze
Posts: 354
Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2014 5:52 pm

Re: WUSTL c/o 2018 Applicants

Post by Jmart082 » Thu Jul 02, 2015 12:05 pm

scottidsntknow wrote:
Jmart082 wrote:
PourMeTea wrote:e&es are p much unilaterally the crappiest and least in depth supplements
THIS
Meh it was good for civ pro.
I'm something of a cynic when it comes to the topic of the efficacy of commercially prepared supplements. But then again, I'm also a cynic in the general sense. They could prove helpful should your professor decide to base his exam off of questions presented in said materials, doe.

User avatar
chuckbass

Platinum
Posts: 9956
Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2011 9:29 pm

Re: WUSTL c/o 2018 Applicants

Post by chuckbass » Thu Jul 02, 2015 12:26 pm

Jmart082 wrote:
scottidsntknow wrote:
Jmart082 wrote:
PourMeTea wrote:e&es are p much unilaterally the crappiest and least in depth supplements
THIS
Meh it was good for civ pro.
I'm something of a cynic when it comes to the topic of the efficacy of commercially prepared supplements. But then again, I'm also a cynic in the general sense. They could prove helpful should your professor decide to base his exam off of questions presented in said materials, doe.
I mean I think civ pro is a class that's the least dependent on your prof since it's just straight up rules. The E&E examples were really helpful and useful and all stuff that anyone would be tested on.

Want to continue reading?

Register for access!

Did I mention it was FREE ?


User avatar
landshoes

Silver
Posts: 1291
Joined: Mon Jan 09, 2012 2:17 pm

Re: WUSTL c/o 2018 Applicants

Post by landshoes » Thu Jul 02, 2015 12:28 pm

the thing is that relatively high-quality pedagogical research indicates that familiarity with a topic helps people learn. Even if they don't get it right the first time or don't get all the detail. Having seen words before, having seen the topics discussed before--all of these things facilitate learning. That's why we have science class in 3rd grade even though they can't understand RNA.

In other words, I don't think it's necessarily a waste of time just because it's not perfect or the best supplement or whatever. Just becoming more familiar with what the material is and more comfortable with the vocab will facilitate learning. In that sense, reading casually and looking up new words is probably the best strategy to use--not hardcore memorization, just familiarity, low-stress--that's what you want when you're previewing a course.

(0L but have destroyed a number of difficult and memorization-heavy courses, and I always always always pre-read)

User avatar
chuckbass

Platinum
Posts: 9956
Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2011 9:29 pm

Re: WUSTL c/o 2018 Applicants

Post by chuckbass » Thu Jul 02, 2015 12:34 pm

landshoes wrote:the thing is that relatively high-quality pedagogical research indicates that familiarity with a topic helps people learn. Even if they don't get it right the first time or don't get all the detail. Having seen words before, having seen the topics discussed before--all of these things facilitate learning. That's why we have science class in 3rd grade even though they can't understand RNA.

In other words, I don't think it's necessarily a waste of time just because it's not perfect or the best supplement or whatever. Just becoming more familiar with what the material is and more comfortable with the vocab will facilitate learning. In that sense, reading casually and looking up new words is probably the best strategy to use--not hardcore memorization, just familiarity, low-stress--that's what you want when you're previewing a course.

(0L but have destroyed a number of difficult and memorization-heavy courses, and I always always always pre-read)
This is lovely but we also all have experience being law students and I can tell you it won't do shit. HTH.

User avatar
legit

Bronze
Posts: 105
Joined: Sun Jun 07, 2015 4:17 pm

Re: WUSTL c/o 2018 Applicants

Post by legit » Thu Jul 02, 2015 12:38 pm

For the students who read Getting to Maybe, did you refer to it during the term as Paul suggests?

User avatar
LET'S GET IT

Silver
Posts: 1343
Joined: Mon Apr 22, 2013 12:19 pm

Re: WUSTL c/o 2018 Applicants

Post by LET'S GET IT » Thu Jul 02, 2015 1:13 pm

scottidsntknow wrote:
landshoes wrote:the thing is that relatively high-quality pedagogical research indicates that familiarity with a topic helps people learn. Even if they don't get it right the first time or don't get all the detail. Having seen words before, having seen the topics discussed before--all of these things facilitate learning. That's why we have science class in 3rd grade even though they can't understand RNA.

In other words, I don't think it's necessarily a waste of time just because it's not perfect or the best supplement or whatever. Just becoming more familiar with what the material is and more comfortable with the vocab will facilitate learning. In that sense, reading casually and looking up new words is probably the best strategy to use--not hardcore memorization, just familiarity, low-stress--that's what you want when you're previewing a course.

(0L but have destroyed a number of difficult and memorization-heavy courses, and I always always always pre-read)
This is lovely but we also all have experience being law students and I can tell you it won't do shit. HTH.
This is credited. It may give you an edge the first month, knowing the lingo and what not, but 1L is all about exams and by the time exams role around, everyone will know the lingo. I'm honestly not trying to be rude here, but you haven't been through 1L and we have. You are wasting your time. At best it will make you feel smart if you get cold called early, which is completely inconsequential.

Register now!

Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.

It's still FREE!


User avatar
landshoes

Silver
Posts: 1291
Joined: Mon Jan 09, 2012 2:17 pm

Re: WUSTL c/o 2018 Applicants

Post by landshoes » Thu Jul 02, 2015 1:25 pm

idk that it's actually possible to know whether it would have made a difference based on anecdotal experience. but this is sort of a played out discussion on TLS so I'll move on

PourMeTea

Platinum
Posts: 6874
Joined: Sun Jun 17, 2012 8:32 am

Re: WUSTL c/o 2018 Applicants

Post by PourMeTea » Thu Jul 02, 2015 1:32 pm

legit wrote:For the students who read Getting to Maybe, did you refer to it during the term as Paul suggests?
Yeah. Side note, someone who has 2 CALIs under their belt brought GTM and literally nothing else to open note finals so you know it's good

User avatar
LET'S GET IT

Silver
Posts: 1343
Joined: Mon Apr 22, 2013 12:19 pm

Re: WUSTL c/o 2018 Applicants

Post by LET'S GET IT » Thu Jul 02, 2015 1:53 pm

landshoes wrote:idk that it's actually possible to know whether it would have made a difference based on anecdotal experience. but this is sort of a played out discussion on TLS so I'll move on
You should have been in our class. You would have fit right in.

User avatar
valen

Bronze
Posts: 385
Joined: Tue Jul 15, 2014 3:31 pm

Re: WUSTL c/o 2018 Applicants

Post by valen » Thu Jul 02, 2015 3:23 pm

I'm not sure why people want to pre-read so badly. I literally did an," awww yisssssss!" at all the comments saying pre-reading was useless. I don't want to read. At this point I am avoiding all school things until school actually starts (other than reading GTM sometime this month).

Get unlimited access to all forums and topics

Register now!

I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...


User avatar
chuckbass

Platinum
Posts: 9956
Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2011 9:29 pm

Re: WUSTL c/o 2018 Applicants

Post by chuckbass » Thu Jul 02, 2015 3:54 pm

valen wrote:I'm not sure why people want to pre-read so badly. I literally did an," awww yisssssss!" at all the comments saying pre-reading was useless. I don't want to read. At this point I am avoiding all school things until school actually starts (other than reading GTM sometime this month).
See this is what you should be doing. This is the last free summer of your life so you should enjoy it. And honestly if you've spent enough time on TLS you don't even need to read GTM. I never read it since I had read through enough of the advice on TLS and if you do that it's unnecessary.

User avatar
chuckbass

Platinum
Posts: 9956
Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2011 9:29 pm

Re: WUSTL c/o 2018 Applicants

Post by chuckbass » Thu Jul 02, 2015 3:55 pm

landshoes wrote:idk that it's actually possible to know whether it would have made a difference based on anecdotal experience. but this is sort of a played out discussion on TLS so I'll move on
In December post your grades and let's compare.

User avatar
ek5dn

Bronze
Posts: 419
Joined: Sat Jan 03, 2015 12:14 am

Re: WUSTL c/o 2018 Applicants

Post by ek5dn » Thu Jul 02, 2015 5:20 pm

Anyone get this email? Subject: An Exclusive Invitation from Howard Cayne, Partner, Arnold & Porter LLP

Anyone going?

User avatar
Fiero85

Gold
Posts: 1983
Joined: Sun Jun 30, 2013 3:38 am

Re: WUSTL c/o 2018 Applicants

Post by Fiero85 » Thu Jul 02, 2015 6:01 pm

scottidsntknow wrote:
landshoes wrote:idk that it's actually possible to know whether it would have made a difference based on anecdotal experience. but this is sort of a played out discussion on TLS so I'll move on
In December post your grades and let's compare.
(Claws are out)

Bottom line, people: A man's gotta do what he thinks is right. If, after consulting with various successful law students who approached this issue differently and recommend different things, just do what you think is best for you. I agree with Scott in thinking that 0L prep might be useless, but if it makes you feel better, knock yourself out. Short of burn out risk and wasted time, there's not a lot on the line.

Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.

Register now, it's still FREE!


User avatar
Jmart082

Bronze
Posts: 354
Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2014 5:52 pm

Re: WUSTL c/o 2018 Applicants

Post by Jmart082 » Thu Jul 02, 2015 6:15 pm

scottidsntknow wrote:
landshoes wrote:idk that it's actually possible to know whether it would have made a difference based on anecdotal experience. but this is sort of a played out discussion on TLS so I'll move on
In December post your grades and let's compare.
AND THE REF TAKES A POINT AWAY

User avatar
Jmart082

Bronze
Posts: 354
Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2014 5:52 pm

Re: WUSTL c/o 2018 Applicants

Post by Jmart082 » Thu Jul 02, 2015 6:33 pm

LET'S GET IT wrote:
landshoes wrote:idk that it's actually possible to know whether it would have made a difference based on anecdotal experience. but this is sort of a played out discussion on TLS so I'll move on
You should have been in our class. You would have fit right in.
+1...bless their gentle souls.

User avatar
LET'S GET IT

Silver
Posts: 1343
Joined: Mon Apr 22, 2013 12:19 pm

Re: WUSTL c/o 2018 Applicants

Post by LET'S GET IT » Thu Jul 02, 2015 7:07 pm

Fiero85 wrote:
scottidsntknow wrote:
landshoes wrote:idk that it's actually possible to know whether it would have made a difference based on anecdotal experience. but this is sort of a played out discussion on TLS so I'll move on
In December post your grades and let's compare.
(Claws are out)

Bottom line, people: A man's gotta do what he thinks is right. If, after consulting with various successful law students who approached this issue differently and recommend different things, just do what you think is best for you. I agree with Scott in thinking that 0L prep might be useless, but if it makes you feel better, knock yourself out. Short of burn out risk and wasted time, there's not a lot on the line.
Why it gotta be a man? That's sexist, bro.

this is a joke

Also burnout is a real thing. That's why I'm against 0L prep. But I have a friend who swears by it and did really well, so like Fiero said, to each their own.

User avatar
Birdnals

Gold
Posts: 4579
Joined: Wed Apr 04, 2012 10:26 am

Re: WUSTL c/o 2018 Applicants

Post by Birdnals » Thu Jul 02, 2015 7:16 pm

0L prep is stupid, will not help you, and runs the very real risk of fucking you over if by some chance in your finals fried brain you write something from the suppliment you read which the professor disagrees with or taught differently.


If you want to at best waste your time and very possibly fuck yourself before law school even starts, go ahead and ignore the advice of literally everyone who has been through a semester or more of law school, be my guest.

Seriously? What are you waiting for?

Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!


Post Reply

Return to “Law School Acceptances, Denials, and Waitlists”