areyou serious> js1 in november and still no official hold??elterrible78 wrote:Neither are you, bud...I think that dubious honor just may be mine. JS1 on 11/8.Lavitz wrote:Congrats everyone!
JS1 on 11/13d330 wrote: Is there a TLS Harvard thread award for longest in post JS1 purgatory?
Held on 1/18
You're not in the lead for the purgatory award just yet
Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013) Forum
-
- Posts: 1403
- Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2012 4:57 pm
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
- d330
- Posts: 155
- Joined: Wed Dec 26, 2012 10:30 am
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
+1 Does seem flawed and seems to follow the general trend of interpreting partial data in the way that makes the odds shrink with each day, which may be true - but not because of these numbers.wert3813 wrote:Seems flawed. Doesn't allow for growth in market share for LSN.5buildingsin1 wrote:If you go off of last year's numbers, there were 134 admits recorded on LSN, which is 16% of the 830 admitted students.
Extrapolating to this year, there are 98 currently accepted students on LSN, implying that there have been around 607 JS2's.
- Lavitz
- Posts: 3402
- Joined: Mon May 31, 2010 1:39 am
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Oh I know. That's why I never said I was. Just wasn't sure if you wanted to be referenced in this regard, so I used myself as an example of someone who's waited longer.elterrible78 wrote:Neither are you, bud...I think that dubious honor just may be mine. JS1 on 11/8.Lavitz wrote:Congrats everyone!
JS1 on 11/13d330 wrote: Is there a TLS Harvard thread award for longest in post JS1 purgatory?
Held on 1/18
You're not in the lead for the purgatory award just yet

He was held the same day I was, along with some other first batch JS1s, but I'm not sure of their JS1 dates so I can't tell exactly who holds the record.az21833 wrote:
areyou serious> js1 in november and still no official hold??
-
- Posts: 530
- Joined: Sat Oct 13, 2012 2:54 pm
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Ouch. Well ... think about it this way ... you're going to hear back from JS in April no matter what, so you're more than halfway through your wait. X.XLavitz wrote:Oh I know. That's why I never said I was. Just wasn't sure if you wanted to be referenced in this regard, so I used myself as an example of someone who's waited longer.elterrible78 wrote:Neither are you, bud...I think that dubious honor just may be mine. JS1 on 11/8.Lavitz wrote:Congrats everyone!
JS1 on 11/13d330 wrote: Is there a TLS Harvard thread award for longest in post JS1 purgatory?
Held on 1/18
You're not in the lead for the purgatory award just yet![]()
He was held the same day I was, along with some other first batch JS1s, but I'm not sure of their JS1 dates so I can't tell exactly who holds the record.az21833 wrote:
areyou serious> js1 in november and still no official hold??
- broadstreet11
- Posts: 175
- Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2012 7:34 pm
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Sooooooooo...JS1's tomorrow?
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- ManOfTheMinute
- Posts: 1557
- Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2012 12:54 am
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Nah, some JS2s... it feels like its been a whilebroadstreet11 wrote:Sooooooooo...JS1's tomorrow?
-
- Posts: 1403
- Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2012 4:57 pm
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
lol next js2s are gona be in March i bet now after todays watershed moment
- ManOfTheMinute
- Posts: 1557
- Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2012 12:54 am
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
az21833 wrote:lol next js2s are gona be in March i bet now after todays watershed moment

-
- Posts: 1403
- Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2012 4:57 pm
- kingsfield69
- Posts: 344
- Joined: Mon Nov 05, 2012 2:52 pm
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
True, but possible that growth in awareness/use of LSN may be offset by the decline in applications. If, as many have theorized, much of the decline is at the higher end of the LSAT/GPA scale, LSN would be less representative of the applicant pool than before.wert3813 wrote:Seems flawed. Doesn't allow for growth in market share for LSN.5buildingsin1 wrote:If you go off of last year's numbers, there were 134 admits recorded on LSN, which is 16% of the 830 admitted students.
Extrapolating to this year, there are 98 currently accepted students on LSN, implying that there have been around 607 JS2's.
To think there are ~250 more JS2s to go out at this point in the cycle seems about right.
- twinkletoes16
- Posts: 1317
- Joined: Mon Nov 19, 2012 11:14 pm
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
kingsfield69 wrote:
To think there are ~250 more JS2s to go out at this point in the cycle seems about right.
ME!!!!!!
But really, just celebrated my 2-month anniversary with sitting at "Complete."

- kingsfield69
- Posts: 344
- Joined: Mon Nov 05, 2012 2:52 pm
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
I'm fascinated by your situation. The absence of a ding or hold is generally a good thing ... you've obviously cleared some internal hurdles. My guess is your app is getting passed around to different reviewers. How else to explain the delay? But no matter the reason, one begins to wonder what the Hell they are waiting for? This is an excruciating amount of time for you to wait just to see evidence the process is moving.twinkletoes16 wrote:kingsfield69 wrote:
To think there are ~250 more JS2s to go out at this point in the cycle seems about right.
ME!!!!!!
But really, just celebrated my 2-month anniversary with sitting at "Complete."
Pulling for you though ... hope your email chimes soon.
- jcan91
- Posts: 224
- Joined: Mon Dec 26, 2011 11:24 pm
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
If this helps give any hope, I was at "complete" for a solid 2.5 months at least before I got my JS1.kingsfield69 wrote:I'm fascinated by your situation. The absence of a ding or hold is generally a good thing ... you've obviously cleared some internal hurdles. My guess is your app is getting passed around to different reviewers. How else to explain the delay? But no matter the reason, one begins to wonder what the Hell they are waiting for? This is an excruciating amount of time for you to wait just to see evidence the process is moving.twinkletoes16 wrote:kingsfield69 wrote:
To think there are ~250 more JS2s to go out at this point in the cycle seems about right.
ME!!!!!!
But really, just celebrated my 2-month anniversary with sitting at "Complete."
Pulling for you though ... hope your email chimes soon.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- txdude45
- Posts: 913
- Joined: Mon May 21, 2012 6:25 pm
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Im in the same spot. Have you considered a LOCI? I know that one now pretty much means not doing one after a hold, but I'm fitting the urge almost every day to send one in.twinkletoes16 wrote:kingsfield69 wrote:
To think there are ~250 more JS2s to go out at this point in the cycle seems about right.
ME!!!!!!
But really, just celebrated my 2-month anniversary with sitting at "Complete."
Anyone got advice on the wisdom of this...?
- pedestrian
- Posts: 461
- Joined: Sat Jun 18, 2011 9:38 pm
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
JS1 may be the cruelest thing Harvard has ever done to me. It's like they knew that my application was an eyes-closed hail mary so now they are forcing me to go back and research all of the glorious things that I will be missing when they inevitably ding me.
- Cicero76
- Posts: 1284
- Joined: Mon Aug 13, 2012 9:41 pm
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
That just means it's nearing time for your JS1twinkletoes16 wrote:kingsfield69 wrote:
To think there are ~250 more JS2s to go out at this point in the cycle seems about right.
ME!!!!!!
But really, just celebrated my 2-month anniversary with sitting at "Complete."

Lol.ManOfTheMinute wrote:az21833 wrote:lol next js2s are gona be in March i bet now after todays watershed moment
- Audeamus
- Posts: 430
- Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2012 10:28 pm
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
they wouldn't have invited you for a JS1 if your ding was inevitable. stats?pedestrian wrote:JS1 may be the cruelest thing Harvard has ever done to me. It's like they knew that my application was an eyes-closed hail mary so now they are forcing me to go back and research all of the glorious things that I will be missing when they inevitably ding me.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- Audeamus
- Posts: 430
- Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2012 10:28 pm
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Personally, I think people have gotten overzealous with the LOCIs this cycle. Everything I have read and heard suggests that you should not send a LOCI unless you have been WL'd, have a significant update, or did not write a "Why X" for a school that clearly values those (i.e. UVA, Michigan, Duke). Harvard will know your still interested without a LOCI, and you run the risk of annoying them by sending one.txdude45 wrote:Im in the same spot. Have you considered a LOCI? I know that one now pretty much means not doing one after a hold, but I'm fitting the urge almost every day to send one in.twinkletoes16 wrote:kingsfield69 wrote:
To think there are ~250 more JS2s to go out at this point in the cycle seems about right.
ME!!!!!!
But really, just celebrated my 2-month anniversary with sitting at "Complete."
Anyone got advice on the wisdom of this...?
- pedestrian
- Posts: 461
- Joined: Sat Jun 18, 2011 9:38 pm
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Sent you a PM because they are a dead give-away and I don't want JS to see me whining on the internetAudeamus wrote:they wouldn't have invited you for a JS1 if your ding was inevitable. stats?pedestrian wrote:JS1 may be the cruelest thing Harvard has ever done to me. It's like they knew that my application was an eyes-closed hail mary so now they are forcing me to go back and research all of the glorious things that I will be missing when they inevitably ding me.

- pedestrian
- Posts: 461
- Joined: Sat Jun 18, 2011 9:38 pm
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
I agree, although I'm thinking of integrating LOCIs into my other activities, such as long coffee lines and slow service at restaurants.Audeamus wrote:Personally, I think people have gotten overzealous with the LOCIs this cycle. Everything I have read and heard suggests that you should not send a LOCI unless you have been WL'd, have a significant update, or did not write a "Why X" for a school that clearly values those (i.e. UVA, Michigan, Duke). Harvard will know your still interested without a LOCI, and you run the risk of annoying them by sending one.txdude45 wrote: Im in the same spot. Have you considered a LOCI? I know that one now pretty much means not doing one after a hold, but I'm fitting the urge almost every day to send one in.
Anyone got advice on the wisdom of this...?
- ph5354a
- Posts: 1600
- Joined: Thu Nov 01, 2012 7:40 pm
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
"I am writing to express my continued interest in a tall skim latte."pedestrian wrote: I agree, although I'm thinking of integrating LOCIs into my other activities, such as long coffee lines and slow service at restaurants.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Audeamus
- Posts: 430
- Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2012 10:28 pm
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Dear Starbucks,pedestrian wrote:I'm thinking of integrating LOCIs into my other activities, such as long coffee lines and slow service at restaurants.
I am still interested in receiving that cappuccino. Your baristas may be slow and your drinks overpriced, but your foam has unparalleled floof and your commitment to fair trade is impressive.
If provided with a cappuccino, I will enthusiastically commit to drinking it.
Sincerely,
Audeamus
-
- Posts: 530
- Joined: Sat Oct 13, 2012 2:54 pm
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
I want to post on pg 200!
Done.
#wishingforgoodluck
Done.
#wishingforgoodluck
- carboncopyx
- Posts: 565
- Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2012 10:30 am
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
If there are no more JS2s until March, that would be sad. This is the worst wait ever.vzapana wrote:#wishingforgoodluck
- twinkletoes16
- Posts: 1317
- Joined: Mon Nov 19, 2012 11:14 pm
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
kingsfield69 wrote:I'm fascinated by your situation. The absence of a ding or hold is generally a good thing ... you've obviously cleared some internal hurdles. My guess is your app is getting passed around to different reviewers. How else to explain the delay? But no matter the reason, one begins to wonder what the Hell they are waiting for? This is an excruciating amount of time for you to wait just to see evidence the process is moving.twinkletoes16 wrote:kingsfield69 wrote:
To think there are ~250 more JS2s to go out at this point in the cycle seems about right.
ME!!!!!!
But really, just celebrated my 2-month anniversary with sitting at "Complete."
Pulling for you though ... hope your email chimes soon.
Thanks! I don't think anyone from my complete date has been dinged or held though so I think they're just now getting to us. I fear checking my email now.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login