aw, faye, are you feeling a bit hurt?rrpati88 wrote:As someone who just found this forum, I appreciate the informative nature of it. However, as someone who worked in undergraduate admissions, I can tell you it is harder than you think. Y'all should cut Dean Deal and the Committee at Stanford a break and be a bit more appreciative. Also, if y'all would check this board a little less frequently, I assure you it will drive down your stress levels. Everything happens for a reason and the process is out of your hands at this point. Best of luck to everyone.
Respectfully Yours
Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants) Forum
- barrelofmonkeys
- Posts: 1942
- Joined: Wed Jun 12, 2013 6:41 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
- herrowww
- Posts: 69
- Joined: Mon Mar 10, 2014 3:08 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
rrpati88 wrote:As someone who just found this forum, I appreciate the informative nature of it. However, as someone who worked in undergraduate admissions, I can tell you it is harder than you think. Y'all should cut Dean Deal and the Committee at Stanford a break and be a bit more appreciative. Also, if y'all would check this board a little less frequently, I assure you it will drive down your stress levels. Everything happens for a reason and the process is out of your hands at this point. Best of luck to everyone.
Respectfully Yours
Dean Deal, is that you!? We were just JKing... Call me maybe?
- teampeeta
- Posts: 422
- Joined: Sat Jul 13, 2013 7:36 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
I appreciate this sentiment, but I'm calling bs on admissions being harder than we think as an acceptable reason for SLS's ratchetry. I think it's pretty cold blooded and unnecessary to make people wait 6 or 7 months just to get dinged. The WLs I can understand- it's tough to make decisions about people on the bubble, especially if you're waiting to see which of the admitted students matriculates. But dinging people at the very end of April who've been UR since Sept/October? Really?rrpati88 wrote:As someone who just found this forum, I appreciate the informative nature of it. However, as someone who worked in undergraduate admissions, I can tell you it is harder than you think. Y'all should cut Dean Deal and the Committee at Stanford a break and be a bit more appreciative. Also, if y'all would check this board a little less frequently, I assure you it will drive down your stress levels. Everything happens for a reason and the process is out of your hands at this point. Best of luck to everyone.
Respectfully Yours
Dean Deal is better than that.
Last edited by teampeeta on Wed Apr 30, 2014 11:57 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 52
- Joined: Thu Jan 16, 2014 10:28 am
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
All,
Check out new poll and vote for Stanford c/0 2017 status on 4/30/2014
http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/v ... 85&start=0
Check out new poll and vote for Stanford c/0 2017 status on 4/30/2014
http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/v ... 85&start=0
-
- Posts: 551
- Joined: Tue Jul 02, 2013 5:07 am
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
rrpati88 wrote:As someone who just found this forum, I appreciate the informative nature of it. However, as someone who worked in undergraduate admissions, I can tell you it is harder than you think. Y'all should cut Dean Deal and the Committee at Stanford a break and be a bit more appreciative. Also, if y'all would check this board a little less frequently, I assure you it will drive down your stress levels. Everything happens for a reason and the process is out of your hands at this point. Best of luck to everyone.
Respectfully Yours
This sounds like an adcomm

but we appreciate you for coming to calm us down a bit.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- koalacity
- Posts: 1162
- Joined: Wed Aug 07, 2013 9:56 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
Not to mention that every other school in the T14 (except maybe Columbia-I think there a few people still pending there) finished making decisions long before now. You can't possibly argue that Stanford's process is somehow even more holistic than Yale's, yet Yale finished releasing decisions 2 weeks ago-and that's with them receiving a large portion of their competitive applications right around the deadline (which Stanford doesn't have to deal with since they're rolling).teampeeta wrote:I appreciate this sentiment, but I'm calling bs on admissions being harder than we think as an acceptable reason for SLS's ratchetry. I think it's pretty cold blooded and unnecessary to make people wait 6 or 7 months just to get dinged. The WLs I can understand- it's tough to make decisions about people on the bubble, especially if you're waiting to see which of the admitted students matriculates. But dinging people at the very end of April who've been UR since Sept/October? Really?rrpati88 wrote:As someone who just found this forum, I appreciate the informative nature of it. However, as someone who worked in undergraduate admissions, I can tell you it is harder than you think. Y'all should cut Dean Deal and the Committee at Stanford a break and be a bit more appreciative. Also, if y'all would check this board a little less frequently, I assure you it will drive down your stress levels. Everything happens for a reason and the process is out of your hands at this point. Best of luck to everyone.
Respectfully Yours
Dean Deal is better than that.
- malleus discentium
- Posts: 906
- Joined: Sun May 26, 2013 2:30 am
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
FTFYkoalacity wrote:Not to mention that every other school in the T14 (except maybe Columbia-I think there a few people still pending there) finished making decisions long before now. You can't possibly argue that Stanford's process is somehow even more holistic than Yale's, yet Yale finished releasing decisions 2 weeks ago-and that's with them receiving a large portion of their competitive applications right around the deadline (which Stanford doesn't have to deal with since they're trolling).teampeeta wrote:I appreciate this sentiment, but I'm calling bs on admissions being harder than we think as an acceptable reason for SLS's ratchetry. I think it's pretty cold blooded and unnecessary to make people wait 6 or 7 months just to get dinged. The WLs I can understand- it's tough to make decisions about people on the bubble, especially if you're waiting to see which of the admitted students matriculates. But dinging people at the very end of April who've been UR since Sept/October? Really?rrpati88 wrote:As someone who just found this forum, I appreciate the informative nature of it. However, as someone who worked in undergraduate admissions, I can tell you it is harder than you think. Y'all should cut Dean Deal and the Committee at Stanford a break and be a bit more appreciative. Also, if y'all would check this board a little less frequently, I assure you it will drive down your stress levels. Everything happens for a reason and the process is out of your hands at this point. Best of luck to everyone.
Respectfully Yours
Dean Deal is better than that.
- andapieceoftoast
- Posts: 439
- Joined: Wed Aug 14, 2013 11:18 am
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
This is the part that I get a little annoyed by...I've tried to stay very positive on this board/TLS in general, but I have a hard time feeling "appreciative" that my app has been hanging in the balance for over 6 months. It's a crappy situation for all parties involved; I'm sure that making these decisions is not easy, but I'm going to go out on a limb here and say that it sucks more for the applicant.chizzy wrote:This sounds like an adcommrrpati88 wrote:As someone who just found this forum, I appreciate the informative nature of it. However, as someone who worked in undergraduate admissions, I can tell you it is harder than you think. Y'all should cut Dean Deal and the Committee at Stanford a break and be a bit more appreciative. Also, if y'all would check this board a little less frequently, I assure you it will drive down your stress levels. Everything happens for a reason and the process is out of your hands at this point. Best of luck to everyone.
Respectfully Yours
but we appreciate you for coming to calm us down a bit.
- t-14orbust
- Posts: 2130
- Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2012 4:43 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
Let it be known that I have not criticized SLS admissions and am very appreciative of them taking the 6 months to look over my application. I wouldn't mind waiting until mid-may if it's a straight acceptance 

-
- Posts: 551
- Joined: Tue Jul 02, 2013 5:07 am
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
i definitely agreeandapieceoftoast wrote:This is the part that I get a little annoyed by...I've tried to stay very positive on this board/TLS in general, but I have a hard time feeling "appreciative" that my app has been hanging in the balance for over 6 months. It's a crappy situation for all parties involved; I'm sure that making these decisions is not easy, but I'm going to go out on a limb here and say that it sucks more for the applicant.chizzy wrote:This sounds like an adcommrrpati88 wrote:As someone who just found this forum, I appreciate the informative nature of it. However, as someone who worked in undergraduate admissions, I can tell you it is harder than you think. Y'all should cut Dean Deal and the Committee at Stanford a break and be a bit more appreciative. Also, if y'all would check this board a little less frequently, I assure you it will drive down your stress levels. Everything happens for a reason and the process is out of your hands at this point. Best of luck to everyone.
Respectfully Yours
but we appreciate you for coming to calm us down a bit.
-
- Posts: 551
- Joined: Tue Jul 02, 2013 5:07 am
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
i wish the ABA changes the admissions process and set a specific date when everyone should receive a decision. I feel like that would make life a whole lot easier, even for adcomms.
- tparks
- Posts: 76
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2012 2:01 am
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
You are all weak and will not survive the winter. I call for an additional six months of waiting, if only to show my unwavering commitment to the integrity of this process.
- andapieceoftoast
- Posts: 439
- Joined: Wed Aug 14, 2013 11:18 am
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
Winter is coming.tparks wrote:You are all weak and will not survive the winter. I call for an additional six months of waiting, if only to show my unwavering commitment to the integrity of this process.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- malleus discentium
- Posts: 906
- Joined: Sun May 26, 2013 2:30 am
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
Exactly the point of why some people want to get into Stparks wrote:You are all weak and will not survive the winter. I call for an additional six months of waiting, if only to show my unwavering commitment to the integrity of this process.

- t-14orbust
- Posts: 2130
- Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2012 4:43 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
Valar Morghulistparks wrote:You are all weak and will not survive the winter. I call for an additional six months of waiting, if only to show my unwavering commitment to the integrity of this process.
- Brettanomyces
- Posts: 410
- Joined: Sat Jul 13, 2013 6:08 am
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
This would be pretty much impossible, considering that WL's aren't technically a decision.chizzy wrote:i wish the ABA changes the admissions process and set a specific date when everyone should receive a decision. I feel like that would make life a whole lot easier, even for adcomms.
-
- Posts: 551
- Joined: Tue Jul 02, 2013 5:07 am
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
technically they are. they could inform people that they are on WL the same time, just incase they dont cover their class size.Brettanomyces wrote:This would be pretty much impossible, considering that WL's aren't technically a decision.chizzy wrote:i wish the ABA changes the admissions process and set a specific date when everyone should receive a decision. I feel like that would make life a whole lot easier, even for adcomms.
i feel like the process would work in everyones favor.After the specific date, students would then have the time to decide where to withdraw and commit. then schools could resort to their waitlists.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- koalacity
- Posts: 1162
- Joined: Wed Aug 07, 2013 9:56 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
I have absolutely no idea to whom you are referring here.malleus discentium wrote:Exactly the point of why some people want to get into Stparks wrote:You are all weak and will not survive the winter. I call for an additional six months of waiting, if only to show my unwavering commitment to the integrity of this process.
- fleurdelis2
- Posts: 120
- Joined: Sat Feb 01, 2014 1:22 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
I got a call from a telemarketer with the same area code. SO CRUEL SO EVIL AT THIS POINT IN THE PROCESS
-
- Posts: 551
- Joined: Tue Jul 02, 2013 5:07 am
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
i hope faye doesn't track everyone on TLS and flat out ding people that are complaining.
-
- Posts: 4475
- Joined: Wed Jan 29, 2014 6:19 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
I think most people here are just being cranky about Stanford's admissions timeline in a playful sort of way.rrpati88 wrote:As someone who just found this forum, I appreciate the informative nature of it. However, as someone who worked in undergraduate admissions, I can tell you it is harder than you think. Y'all should cut Dean Deal and the Committee at Stanford a break and be a bit more appreciative. Also, if y'all would check this board a little less frequently, I assure you it will drive down your stress levels. Everything happens for a reason and the process is out of your hands at this point. Best of luck to everyone.
Respectfully Yours
I really can't help but take some genuine offense at this homely little sermon though...of course it's the job of adcomms to be judgmental...
ETA: after looking over it, I'm convinced this is the work of a mild troll...but then again, given the recent case of the UVA wait list, you never can tell...maybe not troll, but it sounds like a parody.
Last edited by EquallyWrong on Wed Apr 30, 2014 12:51 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 52
- Joined: Thu Jan 16, 2014 10:28 am
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
One vote got DLS as bean Wait-listed today
http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/v ... 7&t=228785
http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/v ... 7&t=228785
- whippersnappery
- Posts: 174
- Joined: Sat May 05, 2012 10:19 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
Not to incite a riot, but thought you guys might want to know that someone was added to the admitted students facebook group yesterday. Take that as you will.
Good luck all--I'm rooting for all of you.
Good luck all--I'm rooting for all of you.
-
- Posts: 52
- Joined: Thu Jan 16, 2014 10:28 am
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
Two voted as received calls today? Really?
http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/v ... 7&t=228785
http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/v ... 7&t=228785
- Brettanomyces
- Posts: 410
- Joined: Sat Jul 13, 2013 6:08 am
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
Nahhh.actexas wrote:Two voted as received calls today? Really?
http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/v ... 7&t=228785
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login