Not sure how their process of decisions go, but I got my ding yesterday. So hopefully you weren't in my batch if there was a batch. I was complete a day later than you. Good Luck!LieutKaffee wrote:Complete 12/2 and still waiting. Anyone else?
Columbia 2010 Forum
- unknownscholar

- Posts: 258
- Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2008 11:22 pm
Re: Columbia 2010
-
mospina

- Posts: 8
- Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 5:40 pm
Re: Columbia 2010
unknownscholar wrote:Not sure how their process of decisions go, but I got my ding yesterday. So hopefully you weren't in my batch if there was a batch. I was complete a day later than you. Good Luck!LieutKaffee wrote:Complete 12/2 and still waiting. Anyone else?
I'm sorry to hear that, did you hear through e-mail or regular mail?
- unknownscholar

- Posts: 258
- Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2008 11:22 pm
Re: Columbia 2010
regular mail.mospina wrote:unknownscholar wrote:Not sure how their process of decisions go, but I got my ding yesterday. So hopefully you weren't in my batch if there was a batch. I was complete a day later than you. Good Luck!LieutKaffee wrote:Complete 12/2 and still waiting. Anyone else?
I'm sorry to hear that, did you hear through e-mail or regular mail?
- Lieut Kaffee

- Posts: 773
- Joined: Wed Nov 11, 2009 2:01 am
Re: Columbia 2010
Thanks for the info. I shall look forward to my very own rejection letter in tomorrow's mail. A waitlist would be nice....unknownscholar wrote:Not sure how their process of decisions go, but I got my ding yesterday. So hopefully you weren't in my batch if there was a batch. I was complete a day later than you. Good Luck!LieutKaffee wrote:Complete 12/2 and still waiting. Anyone else?
- fidesverita

- Posts: 274
- Joined: Mon Aug 10, 2009 9:04 pm
Re: Columbia 2010
Complete back in Nov and still nothing!
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
legalnoeagle

- Posts: 254
- Joined: Thu Oct 08, 2009 3:23 pm
Re: Columbia 2010
Ugh. Complete 1/11, hoping for some CLS love this week. Even though some Jan completes have already heard back, the backlog of Oct/Nov/Dec folks has me feeling not-so-confident.
- cavortingbeastie

- Posts: 17
- Joined: Sun Dec 27, 2009 5:52 pm
Re: Columbia 2010
I hope we hear something next week...
-
03121202698008

- Posts: 2992
- Joined: Fri Jul 17, 2009 2:07 am
Re: Columbia 2010
Have any of you gotten in after being held for further review? Did you write a LOCI?
-
cflames7

- Posts: 61
- Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 2:30 am
Re: Columbia 2010
In at Columbia! (via email)
Date of the attached PDF letter is March 1st.
With a 75K scholly offer from Chicago, this is really going to make decisions hard. Any thoughts on Chicago with $ vs Columbia?
Date of the attached PDF letter is March 1st.
With a 75K scholly offer from Chicago, this is really going to make decisions hard. Any thoughts on Chicago with $ vs Columbia?
-
Kronk

- Posts: 32987
- Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2008 9:18 pm
Re: Columbia 2010
They are essentially peer schools. Columbia places slightly better into BigLaw (but not significantly). Chicago places better into clerkships (significantly). About the same in academia, at this point, though Chicago has historically been better. Columbia has a better LRAP for PI.cflames7 wrote:In at Columbia! (via email)
Date of the attached PDF letter is March 1st.
With a 75K scholly offer from Chicago, this is really going to make decisions hard. Any thoughts on Chicago with $ vs Columbia?
Definitely Chicago unless you have an attachment to CLS for some reason.
- crackberry

- Posts: 3252
- Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 3:23 pm
Re: Columbia 2010
Your goalie didn't look so hot against the U.S. on Friday huh?cflames7 wrote:In at Columbia! (via email)
Date of the attached PDF letter is March 1st.
With a 75K scholly offer from Chicago, this is really going to make decisions hard. Any thoughts on Chicago with $ vs Columbia?
-
BenJ

- Posts: 1341
- Joined: Mon Dec 28, 2009 12:58 pm
Re: Columbia 2010
However, if you submit the Columbia financial aid application, CLS may well be willing to match the Chicago offer. Worth a try if you prefer Columbia without money in consideration.Kronk wrote:They are essentially peer schools. Columbia places slightly better into BigLaw (but not significantly). Chicago places better into clerkships (significantly). About the same in academia, at this point, though Chicago has historically been better. Columbia has a better LRAP for PI.cflames7 wrote:In at Columbia! (via email)
Date of the attached PDF letter is March 1st.
With a 75K scholly offer from Chicago, this is really going to make decisions hard. Any thoughts on Chicago with $ vs Columbia?
Definitely Chicago unless you have an attachment to CLS for some reason.
-
cflames7

- Posts: 61
- Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 2:30 am
Re: Columbia 2010
We won gold, YEAH BABY!crackberry wrote:Your goalie didn't look so hot against the U.S. on Friday huh?cflames7 wrote:In at Columbia! (via email)
Date of the attached PDF letter is March 1st.
With a 75K scholly offer from Chicago, this is really going to make decisions hard. Any thoughts on Chicago with $ vs Columbia?
I found out about it by hitting refresh every 2 mins in OT from the olympic website while waiting for a flight in Bangkok. The game wasn't on TV there if you can believe it!
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- crackberry

- Posts: 3252
- Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 3:23 pm
Re: Columbia 2010
Well yes, Canada won gold (incredible game), but I was referring to the Flames' goalie, Miikka Kiprusoff, who put on an epic display in the USA-Finland semifinal game.cflames7 wrote:We won gold, YEAH BABY!crackberry wrote:Your goalie didn't look so hot against the U.S. on Friday huh?
I found out about it by hitting refresh every 2 mins in OT from the olympic website while waiting for a flight in Bangkok. The game wasn't on TV there if you can believe it!
-
cflames7

- Posts: 61
- Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 2:30 am
Re: Columbia 2010
As a proud, patriotic Canadian I was completely detached from Kiprusoff during the olympics. I was hoping he got lit up in the relegation round and could rest for the rest of the olympics... make him hungrier when he gets back to playing for the Flames.crackberry wrote:Well yes, Canada won gold (incredible game), but I was referring to the Flames' goalie, Miikka Kiprusoff, who put on an epic display in the USA-Finland semifinal game.cflames7 wrote:We won gold, YEAH BABY!crackberry wrote:Your goalie didn't look so hot against the U.S. on Friday huh?
I found out about it by hitting refresh every 2 mins in OT from the olympic website while waiting for a flight in Bangkok. The game wasn't on TV there if you can believe it!
- crackberry

- Posts: 3252
- Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 3:23 pm
Re: Columbia 2010
Well, he whined before the Olympics, saying he wouldn't play for Finland unless he was named the starter. The Finns gave in to his demands and Kiprusoff proceeded to give up 4 goals in the first 7 shots of the semifinal game against the Americans. He then pulled himself. Finland did win the bronze, however.cflames7 wrote:As a proud, patriotic Canadian I was completely detached from Kiprusoff during the olympics. I was hoping he got lit up in the relegation round and could rest for the rest of the olympics... make him hungrier when he gets back to playing for the Flames.
Also, Sidney Crosby definitely got laid last night.
-
cflames7

- Posts: 61
- Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 2:30 am
Re: Columbia 2010
I submitted my NeedAccess application a few weeks ago (before my admissions offer). When will I be offered merit aid from Columbia, if at all?BenJ wrote:However, if you submit the Columbia financial aid application, CLS may well be willing to match the Chicago offer. Worth a try if you prefer Columbia without money in consideration.Kronk wrote:They are essentially peer schools. Columbia places slightly better into BigLaw (but not significantly). Chicago places better into clerkships (significantly). About the same in academia, at this point, though Chicago has historically been better. Columbia has a better LRAP for PI.cflames7 wrote:In at Columbia! (via email)
Date of the attached PDF letter is March 1st.
With a 75K scholly offer from Chicago, this is really going to make decisions hard. Any thoughts on Chicago with $ vs Columbia?
Definitely Chicago unless you have an attachment to CLS for some reason.
I submitted my application to Columbia in October, so to only recieve an admission offer now makes it seem like I was a border-line candidate, rather than an auto-admit. Does CLS give merit aid to borderline admits?
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- swc65

- Posts: 1003
- Joined: Wed Jul 22, 2009 11:27 am
Re: Columbia 2010
I was under the impression that need-access was for, well, need-based aid.cflames7 wrote:I submitted my NeedAccess application a few weeks ago (before my admissions offer). When will I be offered merit aid from Columbia, if at all?BenJ wrote:However, if you submit the Columbia financial aid application, CLS may well be willing to match the Chicago offer. Worth a try if you prefer Columbia without money in consideration.Kronk wrote:They are essentially peer schools. Columbia places slightly better into BigLaw (but not significantly). Chicago places better into clerkships (significantly). About the same in academia, at this point, though Chicago has historically been better. Columbia has a better LRAP for PI.cflames7 wrote:In at Columbia! (via email)
Date of the attached PDF letter is March 1st.
With a 75K scholly offer from Chicago, this is really going to make decisions hard. Any thoughts on Chicago with $ vs Columbia?
Definitely Chicago unless you have an attachment to CLS for some reason.
I submitted my application to Columbia in October, so to only recieve an admission offer now makes it seem like I was a border-line candidate, rather than an auto-admit. Does CLS give merit aid to borderline admits?
- starr126

- Posts: 12
- Joined: Sat Feb 27, 2010 3:05 pm
Re: Columbia 2010
after two months, i finally FINALLY got the complete email.
it's these small victories that keep me semi-sane.
it's these small victories that keep me semi-sane.
- Dignan

- Posts: 1110
- Joined: Sun Feb 08, 2009 5:52 pm
Re: Columbia 2010
I'm not sure about this, but I recall reading that CLS's "need-based aid" is not purely need based. IIRC, Columbia appears to take merit-based attributes (like LSAT scores) into account when doling out aid in March and April. That's what a few people claimed last cycle. If anyone can confirm this, please weigh in.swc65 wrote: I was under the impression that need-access was for, well, need-based aid.
-
tar2009

- Posts: 38
- Joined: Thu Aug 27, 2009 2:19 pm
Re: Columbia 2010
so is it generally accepted that if youre accepted you get an email and if your rejected its snail mail? What about wait list?
My decision was mailed to me, but it was sent back because they had the wrong address. They resent it today, but they wouldn't tell me what it said. Any ideas? Thanks
My decision was mailed to me, but it was sent back because they had the wrong address. They resent it today, but they wouldn't tell me what it said. Any ideas? Thanks
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
cflames7

- Posts: 61
- Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 2:30 am
Re: Columbia 2010
I remember reading that people were getting decisions via snail mail (admit and reject). Maybe I got my decision via email because I am an international student?tar2009 wrote:so is it generally accepted that if youre accepted you get an email and if your rejected its snail mail? What about wait list?
My decision was mailed to me, but it was sent back because they had the wrong address. They resent it today, but they wouldn't tell me what it said. Any ideas? Thanks
I don't really know, just pontificating
- swc65

- Posts: 1003
- Joined: Wed Jul 22, 2009 11:27 am
Re: Columbia 2010
I have read the same thing on this TLS from time to time.Dignan wrote:I'm not sure about this, but I recall reading that CLS's "need-based aid" is not purely need based. IIRC, Columbia appears to take merit-based attributes (like LSAT scores) into account when doling out aid in March and April. That's what a few people claimed last cycle. If anyone can confirm this, please weigh in.swc65 wrote: I was under the impression that need-access was for, well, need-based aid.
From CLS site "Columbia Law School awards grant assistance primarily on the basis of demonstrated financial need. However, there are a number of fellowships not based on financial need that are awarded by the Admissions Office at the time an applicant is admitted to the Law School. There is no separate application for these fellowships."
They wrote "primarily" on need-based aid so they seem to have left themselves a little wiggle room for considering merit.
- groundkontrol

- Posts: 183
- Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2009 12:25 am
Re: Columbia 2010
I was accepted via snail mail.tar2009 wrote:so is it generally accepted that if youre accepted you get an email and if your rejected its snail mail? What about wait list?
My decision was mailed to me, but it was sent back because they had the wrong address. They resent it today, but they wouldn't tell me what it said. Any ideas? Thanks
- foxyeconomist

- Posts: 143
- Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2010 6:53 pm
Re: Columbia 2010
The status checker page says all decisions are mailed. I assume that means snail mail, because it'd be silly to pay for all the paper and postage to reject people, and not spend any money on the ones they want.cflames7 wrote:I remember reading that people were getting decisions via snail mail (admit and reject). Maybe I got my decision via email because I am an international student?tar2009 wrote:so is it generally accepted that if youre accepted you get an email and if your rejected its snail mail? What about wait list?
My decision was mailed to me, but it was sent back because they had the wrong address. They resent it today, but they wouldn't tell me what it said. Any ideas? Thanks
I don't really know, just pontificating
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login