I committed a terrible sin here, using the word "literally" incorrectly (like Joe Biden). I apologize for this hyperbole. What I meant to say was, "they will allow you to contest them, but I can assure you that you will never win."ndnlawdc wrote:Hmm. If they're truly acting as a municipal government, this would seem like a government denial of a right to due process.crackberry wrote:I hate that the Stanford "police" (they can't reasonably be called real police) refuse to budge on parking tickets. First, my freshman year, tickets were $20; now they're $45-$60 (outrageous). Second, they literally won't allow you to contest tickets. It is such bullshit. I hate those damn cops. They have nothing better to do than troll for parking tickets and it bothers me to no end.im_blue wrote:Off topic rant: I once got a "no permit displayed" ticket for parking in an ES lot, with my ES permit displayed on the passenger side. I contacted Parking, which claimed that they don't have time to check both sides of every windshield. If that's the case, then why didn't I get a ticket for the 1 year and 8 months before that? I conclude that either it was a recently hired meter maid, or the Parking department is increasing its efforts to give out tickets. /rant
In at Stanford! Forum
- crackberry
- Posts: 3252
- Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 3:23 pm
Re: In at Stanford!
- crackberry
- Posts: 3252
- Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 3:23 pm
Re: In at Stanford!
Yo, never saw your answer. PM it.Kronk wrote:No quotsiescrackberry wrote:While you're right, I am very curious how you guessed/inferred that.Kronk wrote:I don't think he's religious.
gone
- ndnlawdc
- Posts: 181
- Joined: Thu Jun 19, 2008 9:09 pm
Re: In at Stanford!
Ah. Darn. I had all sorts of hypos spinning in my head. It was like a CivPro exam all over again, and I got excited.crackberry wrote: I committed a terrible sin here, using the word "literally" incorrectly (like Joe Biden). I apologize for this hyperbole. What I meant to say was, "they will allow you to contest them, but I can assure you that you will never win."
Well, the Supreme Court approves of due process hearings you can never win -- e.g. Hamdi and Hamdan.
- crackberry
- Posts: 3252
- Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 3:23 pm
Re: In at Stanford!
Goddamnit. Not sure if this has been posted yet, but I can't remember it, so here:
Trustees also approved tuition hikes for graduate students, ranging from 3.5 percent – for general graduate students, engineers, entering MBAs and continuing medical students – to 5.8 percent for Law School students.
http://news.stanford.edu/news/2010/febr ... 20910.html
Trustees also approved tuition hikes for graduate students, ranging from 3.5 percent – for general graduate students, engineers, entering MBAs and continuing medical students – to 5.8 percent for Law School students.
http://news.stanford.edu/news/2010/febr ... 20910.html
- CardinalRules
- Posts: 2332
- Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2009 5:20 pm
Re: In at Stanford!
Because we're going to be that much richer than everyone else and better able to repay it?crackberry wrote:Goddamnit. Not sure if this has been posted yet, but I can't remember it, so here:
Trustees also approved tuition hikes for graduate students, ranging from 3.5 percent – for general graduate students, engineers, entering MBAs and continuing medical students – to 5.8 percent for Law School students.
http://news.stanford.edu/news/2010/febr ... 20910.html

Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- adameus
- Posts: 719
- Joined: Fri Aug 14, 2009 2:07 am
Re: In at Stanford!
Peaks in to see if there are any recent acceptances.
- crackberry
- Posts: 3252
- Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 3:23 pm
Re: In at Stanford!
There have been two TLS acceptances at SLS in the last month (BioE and anmo). Three on LSN (two URMs).adameus wrote:Peaks in to see if there are any recent acceptances.
- adameus
- Posts: 719
- Joined: Fri Aug 14, 2009 2:07 am
Re: In at Stanford!
Yeah I've seen those. None this week though it seems.crackberry wrote:There have been two TLS acceptances at SLS in the last month (BioE and anmo). Three on LSN (two URMs).adameus wrote:Peaks in to see if there are any recent acceptances.
- WhiskeyGuy
- Posts: 361
- Joined: Wed Jul 15, 2009 4:34 pm
Re: In at Stanford!
Nah. Just find a qualifying public interest job that pays you less than $50.000.01 (or whatever the threshold income level is for our class) and work it for 10 years.CardinalRules wrote:Because we're going to be that much richer than everyone else and better able to repay it?crackberry wrote:Goddamnit. Not sure if this has been posted yet, but I can't remember it, so here:
Trustees also approved tuition hikes for graduate students, ranging from 3.5 percent – for general graduate students, engineers, entering MBAs and continuing medical students – to 5.8 percent for Law School students.
http://news.stanford.edu/news/2010/febr ... 20910.html
- tomhobbes
- Posts: 455
- Joined: Sat Feb 07, 2009 9:20 pm
Re: In at Stanford!
Stanford is an excellent school with a discerning eye for character and zing. Michigan, on the other hand, is a TTT in decline.
- CardinalRules
- Posts: 2332
- Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2009 5:20 pm
Re: In at Stanford!
Is Stanford your top choice of those from which you've heard so far?tomhobbes wrote:Stanford is an excellent school with a discerning eye for character and zing. Michigan, on the other hand, is a TTT in decline.
- tomhobbes
- Posts: 455
- Joined: Sat Feb 07, 2009 9:20 pm
Re: In at Stanford!
Harvard is probably my top choice at the moment, but I'll certainly visit Stanford, and I'm still holding out for Yale.CardinalRules wrote:Is Stanford your top choice of those from which you've heard so far?tomhobbes wrote:Stanford is an excellent school with a discerning eye for character and zing. Michigan, on the other hand, is a TTT in decline.
- crackberry
- Posts: 3252
- Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 3:23 pm
Re: In at Stanford!
tomhobbes - is the line in your profile about UM stolen from my reference to Gladiator in the Yale thread?
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- tomhobbes
- Posts: 455
- Joined: Sat Feb 07, 2009 9:20 pm
Re: In at Stanford!
No, it's actually stolen from Gladiator.crackberry wrote:tomhobbes - is the line in your profile about UM stolen from my reference to Gladiator in the Yale thread?
- crackberry
- Posts: 3252
- Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 3:23 pm
Re: In at Stanford!
I know a liar when I see one, hobbes.tomhobbes wrote:No, it's actually stolen from Gladiator.crackberry wrote:tomhobbes - is the line in your profile about UM stolen from my reference to Gladiator in the Yale thread?
- CardinalRules
- Posts: 2332
- Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2009 5:20 pm
Re: In at Stanford!
Or when you see someone with a Tiger Woods avatar.crackberry wrote:I know a liar when I see one, hobbes.tomhobbes wrote:No, it's actually stolen from Gladiator.crackberry wrote:tomhobbes - is the line in your profile about UM stolen from my reference to Gladiator in the Yale thread?

- crackberry
- Posts: 3252
- Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 3:23 pm
Re: In at Stanford!
No offense intended CR, but I much prefer looking at Maria than your self-tar.CardinalRules wrote:Or when you see someone with a Tiger Woods avatar.crackberry wrote:I know a liar when I see one, hobbes.tomhobbes wrote:No, it's actually stolen from Gladiator.crackberry wrote:tomhobbes - is the line in your profile about UM stolen from my reference to Gladiator in the Yale thread?
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- CardinalRules
- Posts: 2332
- Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2009 5:20 pm
Re: In at Stanford!
In other news, water is wet.crackberry wrote:
No offense intended CR, but I much prefer looking at Maria than your self-tar.

- tomhobbes
- Posts: 455
- Joined: Sat Feb 07, 2009 9:20 pm
Re: In at Stanford!
Same, but offense intended.crackberry wrote:No offense intended CR, but I much prefer looking at Maria than your self-tar.CardinalRules wrote:
Or when you see someone with a Tiger Woods avatar.
- CardinalRules
- Posts: 2332
- Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2009 5:20 pm
Re: In at Stanford!
Get any calls of interest today, hobbesy?tomhobbes wrote:Same, but offense intended.crackberry wrote:No offense intended CR, but I much prefer looking at Maria than your self-tar.CardinalRules wrote:
Or when you see someone with a Tiger Woods avatar.

- crackberry
- Posts: 3252
- Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 3:23 pm
Re: In at Stanford!
I'll answer for him: no.CardinalRules wrote:Get any calls of interest today, hobbesy?
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- BioEBear2010
- Posts: 745
- Joined: Wed Nov 19, 2008 7:05 pm
Re: In at Stanford!
Your mother gave him a ring, but he was busy doing Harvard-y things.CardinalRules wrote: Get any calls of interest today, hobbesy?
- CardinalRules
- Posts: 2332
- Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2009 5:20 pm
Re: In at Stanford!
Hey, you never know. He might have had an exciting chat with his mother.crackberry wrote:I'll answer for him: no.CardinalRules wrote:Get any calls of interest today, hobbesy?
- tomhobbes
- Posts: 455
- Joined: Sat Feb 07, 2009 9:20 pm
Re: In at Stanford!
No, I had time for her.BioEBear2010 wrote:Your mother gave him a ring, but he was busy doing Harvard-y things.CardinalRules wrote: Get any calls of interest today, hobbesy?
- CardinalRules
- Posts: 2332
- Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2009 5:20 pm
Re: In at Stanford!
Are you actually at the HLS ASW, hobbes?tomhobbes wrote:No, I had time for her.BioEBear2010 wrote:Your mother gave him a ring, but he was busy doing Harvard-y things.CardinalRules wrote: Get any calls of interest today, hobbesy?
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login