JDBound2015 wrote:I am currently still pending at SMU, however out of where I am still pending it is the one other place I might consider if I can get in. I am currently admitted to and would likely otherwise attend a compatible ranked school. One thing that really makes SMU stand out amongst its US News ranked peers is its employment stats. If you look on LST and its ABA and NALP reports you will see that employment, Big Law placement, and salary are great for its rank. At the same time it is also clear that about 80% stay in Texas and over half of the class stay in the DFW metro area, making SMU much more regional than similarly ranked private schools in the USN 40s. My question is, how much of SMU's employment stats are driven by the school itself. Dallas is widely known as one of the best and fastest growing markets (and many law students across the country are encouraged to check out). That being said SMU Dedman is obviously widely known in the city and maintains an excellent reputation and many connections.
My question really boils down to: Is SMU's employment outcomes really that much better than other 40s USN schools, or is a graduate of a similarly ranked school willing to seek employment in Texas likely to have similar outcomes?
SMU's employment outcomes in Texas, especially N. Texas, will be better than similar schools, and would be worse in a similar regional school's region. For example, SMU and UNC have nearly identical numbers, but if you want to practice in Texas you'll have much better outcomes from SMU than from UNC and vice versa. Similarly, Alabama has very strong employment numbers, but is also very much a regional school. If you want to practice in Alabama or a surrounding area, U of A will serve you well, but not if you're trying to go elsewhere to practice.