Chicago c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014) Forum
-
- Posts: 142
- Joined: Wed Jun 24, 2009 12:29 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
Interview request here as well! Complete 10/20ish. RD.
-
- Posts: 148
- Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2012 1:06 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
NIce! This is definitely good newsRegulus wrote:If it is anything like last year, I would consider it to be just about as good of an indication of your candidacy as a JS1. It is definitely a good sign, but it doesn't mean that you're automatically "in." Just don't screw it up and you should be okay.thestatusguo wrote:Is there any consensus on what it means to get an interview? Is it like getting a JS1 at HLS in terms of who they give it to? Or is it just for most applicants?

- Crowing
- Posts: 2631
- Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2012 4:20 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
Considering a couple of last year's WLs though, there is probably a gauging YP element as well.Regulus wrote:If it is anything like last year, I would consider it to be just about as good of an indication of your candidacy as a JS1. It is definitely a good sign, but it doesn't mean that you're automatically "in." Just don't screw it up and you should be okay.thestatusguo wrote:Is there any consensus on what it means to get an interview? Is it like getting a JS1 at HLS in terms of who they give it to? Or is it just for most applicants?
- TheMostDangerousLG
- Posts: 1545
- Joined: Thu Nov 22, 2012 4:25 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
Interview request! Woo! 

- The-Specs
- Posts: 1039
- Joined: Tue Oct 30, 2012 12:55 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
Very nice MDLG, did you get one last year or just get straight WLed?TheMostDangerousLG wrote:Interview request! Woo!
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- elterrible78
- Posts: 1120
- Joined: Mon Mar 12, 2012 3:09 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
So what, you're saying I screwed up my JS1 interview? The nerve...Regulus wrote:If it is anything like last year, I would consider it to be just about as good of an indication of your candidacy as a JS1. It is definitely a good sign, but it doesn't mean that you're automatically "in." Just don't screw it up and you should be okay.thestatusguo wrote:Is there any consensus on what it means to get an interview? Is it like getting a JS1 at HLS in terms of who they give it to? Or is it just for most applicants?
- Let It Roll
- Posts: 85
- Joined: Wed May 04, 2011 12:52 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
Interview Request today.
SO EXCITED!! Submitted late September.

SO EXCITED!! Submitted late September.
- Mojosodope
- Posts: 941
- Joined: Tue Jun 18, 2013 10:33 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
UR date?TheMostDangerousLG wrote:Interview request! Woo!
-
- Posts: 3070
- Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2012 12:17 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
.
Last edited by 20141023 on Sun Feb 15, 2015 9:54 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 296
- Joined: Fri Jan 20, 2012 1:11 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
Regulus wrote:Guys, you can learn a lot from elterrible in regards of what NOT to do on your applications / during your interviews. He claimed that he was a 3-time Olympic gold medalist in gymnastics on his résumé to Harvard to sound impressive; he also told them that he wanted to go to law school so that he could legalize marijuana in every state after graduation in an attempt to make it sound like he has "big goals." Perhaps his biggest mistake was the fact that he wrote a diversity statement about being half black, which fell apart when he tried using face paint to make himself look "darker" during his Skype interview.elterrible78 wrote:So what, you're saying I screwed up my JS1 interview? The nerve...Regulus wrote:If it is anything like last year, I would consider it to be just about as good of an indication of your candidacy as a JS1. It is definitely a good sign, but it doesn't mean that you're automatically "in." Just don't screw it up and you should be okay.thestatusguo wrote:Is there any consensus on what it means to get an interview? Is it like getting a JS1 at HLS in terms of who they give it to? Or is it just for most applicants?
Obviously, it didn't work out to well for him in the long run.


-
- Posts: 538
- Joined: Thu Dec 06, 2012 4:06 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
I told myself when I applied last year in January that I would get a professional haircut if I got an interview from U of C. It never came and I was WLd in March.
Needless to say, my hair has gotten very long...until this week.
Besides the standard interview questions that they'll be asking, what's the procedure on Skype? I'm assuming they call you, you answer, and talk for 20 minutes and then it's over. Is this the kind of interview where I should try and sell myself or is the kind of interview where I just shouldn't screw up for about 20 minutes? How long do you spend answering each question?
(Sorry if these questions have been asked already but I am someone who struggles with rambling in interviews and I'd like to know how this works with such a brief interview.)
Needless to say, my hair has gotten very long...until this week.
Besides the standard interview questions that they'll be asking, what's the procedure on Skype? I'm assuming they call you, you answer, and talk for 20 minutes and then it's over. Is this the kind of interview where I should try and sell myself or is the kind of interview where I just shouldn't screw up for about 20 minutes? How long do you spend answering each question?
(Sorry if these questions have been asked already but I am someone who struggles with rambling in interviews and I'd like to know how this works with such a brief interview.)
- Crowing
- Posts: 2631
- Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2012 4:20 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
My general experience with LS interviews is that "selling yourself" isn't really what schools are looking for. They have your resume, PS, LoRs, and transcript that are all basically doing that already. Their objectives are probably more along the lines of (1) clarify specific interesting/unusual points on your resume; (2) gauge interest in the school; and (3) make sure you're not a creep.fivestarfolds wrote:I told myself when I applied last year in January that I would get a professional haircut if I got an interview from U of C. It never came and I was WLd in March.
Needless to say, my hair has gotten very long...until this week.
Besides the standard interview questions that they'll be asking, what's the procedure on Skype? I'm assuming they call you, you answer, and talk for 20 minutes and then it's over. Is this the kind of interview where I should try and sell myself or is the kind of interview where I just shouldn't screw up for about 20 minutes? How long do you spend answering each question?
(Sorry if these questions have been asked already but I am someone who struggles with rambling in interviews and I'd like to know how this works with such a brief interview.)
YMMV, but IMO it's a lot more important to be conversational, topical, and a good listener. Make sure you are actually directly addressing what you are asked and be responsive and pleasant. Obviously you want to give favorable answers but don't like get on a soapbox and demonstrate your ass burgers; we already have Regulus to do that

- WhiteyCakes
- Posts: 1390
- Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2012 2:38 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
I hear he even brought up his "summer tiger pit", whatever that is...Regulus wrote:Guys, you can learn a lot from elterrible in regards of what NOT to do on your applications / during your interviews. He claimed that he was a 3-time Olympic gold medalist in gymnastics on his résumé to Harvard to sound impressive; he also told them that he wanted to go to law school so that he could legalize marijuana in every state after graduation in an attempt to make it sound like he has "big goals." Perhaps his biggest mistake was the fact that he wrote a diversity statement about being half black, which fell apart when he tried using face paint to make himself look "darker" during his Skype interview.elterrible78 wrote:So what, you're saying I screwed up my JS1 interview? The nerve...Regulus wrote:If it is anything like last year, I would consider it to be just about as good of an indication of your candidacy as a JS1. It is definitely a good sign, but it doesn't mean that you're automatically "in." Just don't screw it up and you should be okay.thestatusguo wrote:Is there any consensus on what it means to get an interview? Is it like getting a JS1 at HLS in terms of who they give it to? Or is it just for most applicants?
Obviously, it didn't work out to well for him in the long run.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- mylifeis24
- Posts: 323
- Joined: Tue Oct 29, 2013 3:23 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
For the skype interview, what's the appropriate attire? I'd really like to roll out of bed and log on, but I have a feeling they're expecting shirt and tie? jacket?
- TheMostDangerousLG
- Posts: 1545
- Joined: Thu Nov 22, 2012 4:25 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
Straight waitlisted, but I applied in late March (and with different stats).The-Specs wrote:Very nice MDLG, did you get one last year or just get straight WLed?TheMostDangerousLG wrote:Interview request! Woo!
-
- Posts: 217
- Joined: Sun Jul 08, 2012 8:29 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
I had shirt+tie+jacket.mylifeis24 wrote:For the skype interview, what's the appropriate attire? I'd really like to roll out of bed and log on, but I have a feeling they're expecting shirt and tie? jacket?
There is no risk of overdressing...
-
- Posts: 3070
- Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2012 12:17 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
.
Last edited by 20141023 on Sun Feb 15, 2015 9:53 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 3971
- Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2012 7:01 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
well, damn, gotta make some returns now.Regulus wrote:Or is there...NapoleonXV wrote:I had shirt+tie+jacket.mylifeis24 wrote:For the skype interview, what's the appropriate attire? I'd really like to roll out of bed and log on, but I have a feeling they're expecting shirt and tie? jacket?
There is no risk of overdressing...
-
- Posts: 125
- Joined: Fri Jul 05, 2013 3:38 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
Interview request here as well. Submitted 10/5, wen't complete 10/15, and under review sometime in early November. Stats in profile
-
- Posts: 217
- Joined: Sun Jul 08, 2012 8:29 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
I wore an Oxford academic gown (we call it sub fusc), and btw it is the scholars gown just to tell the interviewer that I am first class honours student.Regulus wrote:NapoleonXV wrote:I had shirt+tie+jacket.mylifeis24 wrote:For the skype interview, what's the appropriate attire? I'd really like to roll out of bed and log on, but I have a feeling they're expecting shirt and tie? jacket?
There is no risk of overdressing...
Or is there...
Hahahah just kidding. Seriously though shirt and tie and jacket should not be either underdress or overdress.
- drawstring
- Posts: 1933
- Joined: Tue Apr 09, 2013 4:52 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
I've just worn a dress shirt for my interviews.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 3971
- Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2012 7:01 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
no pants?drawstring wrote:I've just worn a dress shirt for my interviews.
- drawstring
- Posts: 1933
- Joined: Tue Apr 09, 2013 4:52 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
Of course not scoobersscoobers wrote:no pants?drawstring wrote:I've just worn a dress shirt for my interviews.
-
- Posts: 3070
- Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2012 12:17 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
.
Last edited by 20141023 on Sun Feb 15, 2015 9:53 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- drawstring
- Posts: 1933
- Joined: Tue Apr 09, 2013 4:52 pm
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login