a kid can hope though....
Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013) Forum
-
Anonymous4444

- Posts: 631
- Joined: Sat Sep 29, 2012 11:41 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
a kid can hope though....
-
Anonymous4444

- Posts: 631
- Joined: Sat Sep 29, 2012 11:41 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
djwjddl wrote:No way. Adcoms need some holiday cheer too, Anonymous4444. Come on.Anonymous4444 wrote:any chance inthat we are getting responses for rd before jan? this new update got me wonderin.....
anybody else think this
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=81Nl7VYFEaI
or just me?
- justtrying

- Posts: 38
- Joined: Wed Nov 07, 2012 11:29 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Taking bets on ED decisions tomorrow...?
-
nodame

- Posts: 21
- Joined: Thu Nov 01, 2012 8:42 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
RD, has been complete since 11/13, no interview and no status update today...
bad sign?
bad sign?
- domino

- Posts: 324
- Joined: Sat Dec 08, 2012 8:51 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
yugh no update, stuck at 11/26
(rd)
-
vzapana

- Posts: 530
- Joined: Sat Oct 13, 2012 2:54 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
too early to tell. according to chicago's twitter, the school started reading early october apps less than two weeks ago. assuming that they are furiously trying to get ED decisions ready by dec. 31, they are likely still stuck on ED apps/ October RD apps. don't sweat it.nodame wrote:RD, has been complete since 11/13, no interview and no status update today...
bad sign?
-
Anonymous4444

- Posts: 631
- Joined: Sat Sep 29, 2012 11:41 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
agreedvzapana wrote:too early to tell. according to chicago's twitter, the school started reading early october apps less than two weeks ago. assuming that they are furiously trying to get ED decisions ready by dec. 31, they are likely still stuck on ED apps/ October RD apps. don't sweat it.nodame wrote:RD, has been complete since 11/13, no interview and no status update today...
bad sign?
- bdeebs

- Posts: 128
- Joined: Thu Mar 31, 2011 3:54 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Checking in. 172/3.94. Application received 12/7, complete 12/18. Now for the waiting game.
- airbud

- Posts: 61
- Joined: Mon Apr 30, 2012 3:01 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Complete 10/12. UR for a while since then. Updated 12/17...but still UR.
Anyone else in a similar boat?
3.85/167/USMC/non-URM
Anyone else in a similar boat?
3.85/167/USMC/non-URM
-
BigZuck

- Posts: 11730
- Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2012 9:53 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
This question has been answered today. Like 10 times.airbud wrote:Complete 10/12. UR for a while since then. Updated 12/17...but still UR.
Anyone else in a similar boat?
3.85/167/USMC/non-URM
- Rahviveh

- Posts: 2333
- Joined: Mon Aug 06, 2012 12:02 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
So I tried to call a few minutes ago and they said the admissions office is only open from 10-3. Is this normal?


- djwjddl

- Posts: 478
- Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2011 1:50 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
ChampagnePapi wrote:So I tried to call a few minutes ago and they said the admissions office is only open from 10-3. Is this normal?
EDIT: admissions office is open 8:30-5, but admissions committee only meets 10-3
Last edited by djwjddl on Wed Dec 19, 2012 11:10 am, edited 1 time in total.
- Nickg415

- Posts: 290
- Joined: Mon May 14, 2012 4:31 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Just got an invite from someone at UChicago to apply. The person who wrote it went to my undergrad and the school is trying to pull in more graduates from my undergrad. Is this just an elaborate plot to get more apps in?
- 2014

- Posts: 6028
- Joined: Sat Jun 05, 2010 3:53 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Yes. You should still apply though!Nickg415 wrote:Just got an invite from someone at UChicago to apply. The person who wrote it went to my undergrad and the school is trying to pull in more graduates from my undergrad. Is this just an elaborate plot to get more apps in?
- Mr. Elshal

- Posts: 611
- Joined: Thu Sep 20, 2012 11:30 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
If it makes you feel better, I've been stuck since 11/7. No movement at all. I'm RD but I really thought I would hear something by now. Interestingly, though, about 2/3 of the schools I applied to have told me nothing and I sent out applications in October.domino wrote:yugh no update, stuck at 11/26(rd)
-
20141023

- Posts: 3070
- Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2012 12:17 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
.
Last edited by 20141023 on Mon Feb 16, 2015 5:42 am, edited 1 time in total.
- venus

- Posts: 312
- Joined: Tue Oct 23, 2012 3:48 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
OMG dude... LOL...Regulus wrote:I want this to be me tomorrow.
--ImageRemoved--
Call me Chicago. I love you.
-
one_by_one

- Posts: 278
- Joined: Wed Jun 20, 2012 2:10 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
I'm impressed by the gif but also sort of creeped out by that cat... Good luck!venus wrote:OMG dude... LOL...Regulus wrote:I want this to be me tomorrow.
--ImageRemoved--
Call me Chicago. I love you.
- Rahviveh

- Posts: 2333
- Joined: Mon Aug 06, 2012 12:02 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
hmmm.... admissions office not answering the phone...


- djwjddl

- Posts: 478
- Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2011 1:50 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
in a staff meeting at the moment...ChampagnePapi wrote:hmmm.... admissions office not answering the phone...
- Yukos

- Posts: 1774
- Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2011 12:47 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Shorty was a cop.
- Rahviveh

- Posts: 2333
- Joined: Mon Aug 06, 2012 12:02 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Just burst out laughing in my office after reading the subject line of some TTT's marketing email.
"California to Ohio - Why the Move is Worth it"
LOL. good luck convincing anyone of that!
"California to Ohio - Why the Move is Worth it"
LOL. good luck convincing anyone of that!
- djwjddl

- Posts: 478
- Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2011 1:50 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Ok, Chicago. You win. i give up.


- levinelove

- Posts: 31
- Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2012 7:00 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
ChampagnePapi wrote:Just burst out laughing in my office after reading the subject line of some TTT's marketing email.
"California to Ohio - Why the Move is Worth it"
LOL. good luck convincing anyone of that!
Yes, ONU Law. Very convincing....
- domino

- Posts: 324
- Joined: Sat Dec 08, 2012 8:51 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
interesting. the fact that you haven't been hearing back from many places did make me feel better (sorry) given your strong numbers. guess it's still early!Mr. Elshal wrote:If it makes you feel better, I've been stuck since 11/7. No movement at all. I'm RD but I really thought I would hear something by now. Interestingly, though, about 2/3 of the schools I applied to have told me nothing and I sent out applications in October.domino wrote:yugh no update, stuck at 11/26(rd)