Vanderbilt c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle) Forum
-
- Posts: 380
- Joined: Sat Sep 29, 2007 5:13 pm
Re: Vanderbilt c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Taking the high road; it doesn't satisfy as it should.
-
- Posts: 307
- Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2011 4:19 pm
Re: Vanderbilt c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Why are you trolling acceptance threads just to be a dick to random people? You and helmholtz don't have anything better to do?Grizz wrote:Can't help it if the stuff you post is dumb.anewaphorist wrote:^Lol at resurrecting a dead topic.
-
- Posts: 564
- Joined: Thu Jul 07, 2011 9:10 pm
Re: Vanderbilt c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
applied 11/29 167 3.7 maybe
- chem
- Posts: 871
- Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2011 8:14 pm
Re: Vanderbilt c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Reasoning? They seem about on par in employment statistics (via LST). That would be the only metric I would use to determine "peer" rankingsGrizz wrote:Also lol @ GULC being peer.
- Grizz
- Posts: 10564
- Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2010 6:31 pm
Re: Vanderbilt c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
I go here?American_in_China wrote:Why are you trolling acceptance threads just to be a dick to random people? You and helmholtz don't have anything better to do?Grizz wrote:Can't help it if the stuff you post is dumb.anewaphorist wrote:^Lol at resurrecting a dead topic.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 307
- Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2011 4:19 pm
Re: Vanderbilt c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
So why are you scaring off prospective students?Grizz wrote:I go here?American_in_China wrote:Why are you trolling acceptance threads just to be a dick to random people? You and helmholtz don't have anything better to do?Grizz wrote:Can't help it if the stuff you post is dumb.anewaphorist wrote:^Lol at resurrecting a dead topic.
- Cornelius
- Posts: 505
- Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 3:16 pm
Re: Vanderbilt c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Doesn't seem that way to me, just correcting another misinformed poster.American_in_China wrote: So why are you scaring off prospective students?
- Hannibal
- Posts: 2211
- Joined: Mon Jul 12, 2010 12:00 pm
Re: Vanderbilt c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Yeah, and he did so to say it would be ridiculous to pay $70k more for GTown than Vandy.Cornelius wrote:Doesn't seem that way to me, just correcting another misinformed poster.American_in_China wrote: So why are you scaring off prospective students?
- hotspur
- Posts: 103
- Joined: Mon Sep 05, 2011 1:05 pm
Re: Vanderbilt c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Ridiculous seems a little harsh. How about, 'based on one's personal opinions and preferences, spending the extra money to go to G'town could be a bad move'Hannibal wrote:Yeah, and he did so to say it would be ridiculous to pay $70k more for GTown than Vandy.Cornelius wrote:Doesn't seem that way to me, just correcting another misinformed poster.American_in_China wrote: So why are you scaring off prospective students?
- Grizz
- Posts: 10564
- Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2010 6:31 pm
Re: Vanderbilt c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
hotspur wrote: Ridiculous seems a little harsh. How about, 'based on one's personal opinions and preferences, spending the extra money to go to G'town could be a bad move'
Grizz wrote:I would never take GULC over Vandy at $70k.
-
- Posts: 58
- Joined: Mon May 30, 2011 5:00 pm
Re: Vanderbilt c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
WHoa.... Decision mailed date of 12/6. That was def. not there last night. Pretty surprised, just went complete 11/14
Here's hoping for good news! If it's good news the Fedex package comes within about 2 days right?
Hoping this is not the first round of rejects!
Here's hoping for good news! If it's good news the Fedex package comes within about 2 days right?
Hoping this is not the first round of rejects!
-
- Posts: 380
- Joined: Sat Sep 29, 2007 5:13 pm
Re: Vanderbilt c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Misinformed? The topic under discussion was entirely one of preference/individual judgment. 'Misinformed'? Because I'd be willing to forego the cost of a Land Rover for a shot at the best school in the DC area (and, by extension, a government/PI job there)? The personalities ITT are so grating. Why can't you just let someone respond to a hypothetical that was being bounced around a few pages ago? If you think that prestigious employment in D.C. ain't worth a dime extra, then that's fine. I think it is. I thought I took the mickey out of this bullshit by not engaging in Grizz's self-aggrandizement. Apparently, there's one other poster fueling the idiotic fire, thinking it's "misinformed" to hold employment prospects that in any way differ from his own.Doesn't seem that way to me, just correcting another misinformed poster.
I've already been accepted to this school, so I'm more interested in finding out the potential classmates I'd have should I choose to matriculate. The small sample size of 1Ls and prospective 0Ls has not been represented well. With students that offer profound critiques--like calling my post,
--how could I not be sold on Vandy, on the caliber of students I'd be working with? Way to go, Grizz; you're driving away a student with #s above both medians in an already moribund application season. I'm sure Vandy's admissions office appreciates your handiwork.dumb stuff
FWIW, it would be great to return to the purpose of this thread. Somehow, I doubt this will happen. Good luck to all those accepted, and it sure would be great to have some meaningful discussion here, just in case some redeeming quality of the school/its students/its career prospects would surface.
Last edited by anewaphorist on Wed Dec 07, 2011 3:56 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- chem
- Posts: 871
- Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2011 8:14 pm
Re: Vanderbilt c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
dumb stuffanewaphorist wrote:Misinformed? The topic under discussion was entirely one of preference/individual judgment. 'Misinformed'? Because I'd be willing to forego the cost of a Land Rover for a shot at the best school in the DC area (and, by extension, a government/PI job there)? The personalities ITT are so grating. Why can't you just let someone respond to a hypothetical that was being bounced around a few pages ago? If you think that prestigious employment in D.C. ain't worth a dime extra, then that's fine. I think it is. I thought I took the mickey out of this bullshit by not engaging in Grizz's self-aggrandizement. Apparently, there's one other poster fueling the idiotic fire, thinking it's "misinformed" to hold employment prospects that in any way differ from his own.Doesn't seem that way to me, just correcting another misinformed poster.
I've already been accepted to this school, so I'm more interested in finding out the potential classmates I'd have should I choose to matriculate. The small sample size of 1Ls and prospective 0Ls has not been represented well. With students that offer profound critiques--like calling my post,--how could I not be sold on Vandy, on the caliber of students I'd be working with? Way to go, Grizz; you're driving away a student with #s above both medians in an already moribund application season. I'm sure Vandy's admissions office appreciates your handiwork.dumb stuff
FWIW, it would be great to return to the purpose of this thread. Somehow, I doubt this will happen. Good luck to all those accepted, and it sure would be great to have some meaningful discussion here.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Cornelius
- Posts: 505
- Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 3:16 pm
Re: Vanderbilt c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
In this post, poster responds to "off topic" subjects and then complains how the thread is going "off topic".anewaphorist wrote:Misinformed? The topic under discussion was entirely one of preference/individual judgment. 'Misinformed'? Because I'd be willing to forego the cost of a Land Rover for a shot at the best school in the DC area (and, by extension, a government/PI job there)? The personalities ITT are so grating. Why can't you just let someone respond to a hypothetical that was being bounced around a few pages ago? If you think that prestigious employment in D.C. ain't worth a dime extra, then that's fine. I think it is. I thought I took the mickey out of this bullshit by not engaging in Grizz's self-aggrandizement. Apparently, there's one other poster fueling the idiotic fire, thinking it's "misinformed" to hold employment prospects that in any way differ from his own.Doesn't seem that way to me, just correcting another misinformed poster.
I've already been accepted to this school, so I'm more interested in finding out the potential classmates I'd have should I choose to matriculate. The small sample size of 1Ls and prospective 0Ls has not been represented well. With students that offer profound critiques--like calling my post,--how could I not be sold on Vandy, on the caliber of students I'd be working with? Way to go, Grizz; you're driving away a student with #s above both medians in an already moribund application season. I'm sure Vandy's admissions office appreciates your handiwork.dumb stuff
FWIW, it would be great to return to the purpose of this thread. Somehow, I doubt this will happen. Good luck to all those accepted, and it sure would be great to have some meaningful discussion here.
-
- Posts: 380
- Joined: Sat Sep 29, 2007 5:13 pm
Re: Vanderbilt c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
^Because it clearly is helping no LS applicant, which is the fucking purpose of this website. I like to think of myself as the Dutch boy trying to put his finger in the dike, for it clearly has been leaking for at least a page of posts. (Insert sexual innuendo tangent now).
Last edited by anewaphorist on Wed Dec 07, 2011 3:59 pm, edited 2 times in total.
- Cornelius
- Posts: 505
- Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 3:16 pm
Re: Vanderbilt c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
The hypocrisy and irony of the situation appears to be lost on you. Time to stop raging broski.anewaphorist wrote:^Because it clearly is helping no LS applicant, which is the fucking purpose of this website.
70K is a lot of money to forego to choose a school that has very similar employment prospects to the one offering money, especially given the absurd class size of said school. Again, LOL at "non-peer". School ranked 14 vs school ranked 30? Sure, non-peer. 14 vs 16? C'mon now.
Last edited by Cornelius on Wed Dec 07, 2011 4:02 pm, edited 3 times in total.
- crumpetsandtea
- Posts: 7147
- Joined: Thu Jun 17, 2010 7:57 pm
Re: Vanderbilt c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
LOL bro, y u mad tho?anewaphorist wrote:Misinformed? The topic under discussion was entirely one of preference/individual judgment. 'Misinformed'? Because I'd be willing to forego the cost of a Land Rover for a shot at the best school in the DC area (and, by extension, a government/PI job there)? The personalities ITT are so grating. Why can't you just let someone respond to a hypothetical that was being bounced around a few pages ago? If you think that prestigious employment in D.C. ain't worth a dime extra, then that's fine. I think it is. I thought I took the mickey out of this bullshit by not engaging in Grizz's self-aggrandizement. Apparently, there's one other poster fueling the idiotic fire, thinking it's "misinformed" to hold employment prospects that in any way differ from his own.
I've already been accepted to this school, so I'm more interested in finding out the potential classmates I'd have should I choose to matriculate. The small sample size of 1Ls and prospective 0Ls has not been represented well. With students that offer profound critiques--like calling my post,--how could I not be sold on Vandy, on the caliber of students I'd be working with? Way to go, Grizz; you're driving away a student with #s above both medians in an already moribund application season. I'm sure Vandy's admissions office appreciates your handiwork.dumb stuff
FWIW, it would be great to return to the purpose of this thread. Somehow, I doubt this will happen. Good luck to all those accepted, and it sure would be great to have some meaningful discussion here.



Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 265
- Joined: Sun Aug 08, 2010 4:14 pm
Re: Vanderbilt c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
calm down bro. quit being so butthurtanewaphorist wrote:^Because it clearly is helping no LS applicant, which is the fucking purpose of this website. I like to think of myself as the Dutch boy trying to put his finger in the dike, for it clearly has been leaking for at least a page of posts. (Insert sexual innuendo tangent now).
- crumpetsandtea
- Posts: 7147
- Joined: Thu Jun 17, 2010 7:57 pm
Re: Vanderbilt c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Also:
That's impressive self awareness, man.anewaphorist wrote:The personalities ITT are so grating.
- Grizz
- Posts: 10564
- Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2010 6:31 pm
Re: Vanderbilt c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
There are plenty of reasons to choose GULC over Vandy, but the specific reasons I quoted a page ago aren't good ones.
Furthermore, your assertion that DC is essentially closed to Vandy grads is just plain wrong. It's the most selective and competitive market in the country, and it's hard to break from here, but it's not "essentially closed."
And that's it.
Just incidentally, bigfed hiring is virtually nil (from everywhere) and that is unlikely to change.
Furthermore, your assertion that DC is essentially closed to Vandy grads is just plain wrong. It's the most selective and competitive market in the country, and it's hard to break from here, but it's not "essentially closed."
And that's it.
Just incidentally, bigfed hiring is virtually nil (from everywhere) and that is unlikely to change.
-
- Posts: 670
- Joined: Fri Apr 08, 2011 6:49 pm
Re: Vanderbilt c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
ITP: the most darling trollette of the aspie contingent, once again, makes an unsolicited entrance into an argument to post the most tired and unfunny response of the last decadecrumpetsandtea wrote:LOL bro, y u mad tho?anewaphorist wrote:Misinformed? The topic under discussion was entirely one of preference/individual judgment. 'Misinformed'? Because I'd be willing to forego the cost of a Land Rover for a shot at the best school in the DC area (and, by extension, a government/PI job there)? The personalities ITT are so grating. Why can't you just let someone respond to a hypothetical that was being bounced around a few pages ago? If you think that prestigious employment in D.C. ain't worth a dime extra, then that's fine. I think it is. I thought I took the mickey out of this bullshit by not engaging in Grizz's self-aggrandizement. Apparently, there's one other poster fueling the idiotic fire, thinking it's "misinformed" to hold employment prospects that in any way differ from his own.
I've already been accepted to this school, so I'm more interested in finding out the potential classmates I'd have should I choose to matriculate. The small sample size of 1Ls and prospective 0Ls has not been represented well. With students that offer profound critiques--like calling my post,--how could I not be sold on Vandy, on the caliber of students I'd be working with? Way to go, Grizz; you're driving away a student with #s above both medians in an already moribund application season. I'm sure Vandy's admissions office appreciates your handiwork.dumb stuff
FWIW, it would be great to return to the purpose of this thread. Somehow, I doubt this will happen. Good luck to all those accepted, and it sure would be great to have some meaningful discussion here.![]()
![]()
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- crumpetsandtea
- Posts: 7147
- Joined: Thu Jun 17, 2010 7:57 pm
Re: Vanderbilt c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
horrorbusiness wrote:ITP: the most darling trollette of the aspie contingent, once again, makes an unsolicited entrance into an argument to post the most tired and unfunny response of the last decade

crumpetsandtea wrote:I heard back, we set something up, he cancelled 10 minutes before the meeting, said we'd meet up that weekend but never specified when or where, and then hasn't responded since then.JDndMSW wrote:Doesn't it say to call the school if you don't hear back within a certain window?crumpetsandtea wrote:ffffffffffffuuuuuuuuuuuuu. ugh, this person needs to get back to me soon thenthelawschoolproject wrote: When I called the admissions office about my interview, they said they would hold off on a decision until they heard back from my interviewer.
crumpetsandtea wrote:CONGRATULATIONS!!!!!!!!!!! If you don't mind me asking, what were your softs?
crumpetsandtea wrote:How long does it usually take after your interview to hear back about a decision? Just had mine tonight, been complete since 11/11/11 (such a cool date)
I'd hardly say this was an 'unsolicited entrance'. I've been posting in this thread for at least a month now. As for your butthurtness: you were being a dumbass, I called you out. Get over it, horrorbusiness. How long can you hold a meaningless internet grudge for?
-
- Posts: 380
- Joined: Sat Sep 29, 2007 5:13 pm
Re: Vanderbilt c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
I love TLS. You can't win, because the troll, the funny agitator, always sways the audience, whose attention span is so short they cannot read the actual post history. Apparently, no one can read the page-topping post, in which I attempted to take the high road and be done with whatever bullshit "raging" was instigated. Apparently Grizz, as a Vandy 1L during exam season, has nothing better to do than troll the old posts of admitted students. Why is this not the crime? The crime is being 'mad, bro'?
I think it's more fruitful to discuss employment prospects, so I'll thank Grizz for at least mentioning them in a tertiary way in his post. Look at the numbers. The point is simply that the risk of $70,000 (Vandy's most-given scholarship) is smoothed somewhat (although, of course, not entirely) at GULC. Good LRAP programs make 5-figure debt increments matter even less. And please, let's notice the bias here. Grizz goes to Vandy. I go nowhere yet and have no reason to favor one school over the other.
Seems like other internet grudges are coming to the surface ITT. I absolve myself of that particular unintended consequence of people calling me 'misinformed'.
I think it's more fruitful to discuss employment prospects, so I'll thank Grizz for at least mentioning them in a tertiary way in his post. Look at the numbers. The point is simply that the risk of $70,000 (Vandy's most-given scholarship) is smoothed somewhat (although, of course, not entirely) at GULC. Good LRAP programs make 5-figure debt increments matter even less. And please, let's notice the bias here. Grizz goes to Vandy. I go nowhere yet and have no reason to favor one school over the other.
Seems like other internet grudges are coming to the surface ITT. I absolve myself of that particular unintended consequence of people calling me 'misinformed'.
Last edited by anewaphorist on Wed Dec 07, 2011 4:10 pm, edited 2 times in total.
- Grizz
- Posts: 10564
- Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2010 6:31 pm
Re: Vanderbilt c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
She is darling, alright
-
- Posts: 670
- Joined: Fri Apr 08, 2011 6:49 pm
Re: Vanderbilt c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
operative word in my previous post was "argument" (not thread). contrary to your belief and your many insistings (might not be a word), i ain't mad/grudgin'. i was lightheartedly trolling just like you werecrumpetsandtea wrote:
I'd hardly say this was an 'unsolicited entrance'. I've been posting in this thread for at least a month now. As for your butthurtness: you were being a dumbass, I called you out. Get over it, horrorbusiness. How long can you hold a meaningless internet grudge for?

Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login