Harvard 2010! Forum
-
brennanlives

- Posts: 47
- Joined: Sun Oct 25, 2009 10:48 pm
Re: Harvard 2010!
JR1!!!!! freaking out...so much adrenaline i did a headstand!
applied - oct/nov
complete - 11/20
held - 2/16
there's hope you guys!
applied - oct/nov
complete - 11/20
held - 2/16
there's hope you guys!
-
mh7777

- Posts: 63
- Joined: Fri Oct 23, 2009 12:20 pm
Re: Harvard 2010!
It also doesn't do much for those of us who have been UR for a while without hearing anything. No JR1, no hold, nothing.georgina wrote:really? his blog post actually made me a little sad.$1.99 wrote:JR made it seem like hold was actually a positive place to be in his blog. He put such a good spin on it that I now have some false hope.
the tls representation so far: 1 hold was admitted, and 1 hold got a jr1. JR's definition of "some" and "others" seem disheartening to me.JR wrote:In the last couple of weeks, I’ve started to go back through the holds. Some of you, we’ve already admitted; others have been asked to interview. Don’t freak out if that’s not you. This is a fairly long process, and it will take 6-8 weeks to go through all the applications, at which point some of the remaining holds be shifted to a wait-list.
also, his portrayal of the jr1 didn't clear up any of the confusion surrounding the large group of jr1 holds.
- Unitas

- Posts: 1379
- Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 7:03 pm
Re: Harvard 2010!
Congrats. Look like HLS is starting up again.brennanlives wrote:JR1!!!!! freaking out...so much adrenaline i did a headstand!
applied - oct/nov
complete - 11/20
held - 2/16
there's hope you guys!
- $1.99

- Posts: 684
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2010 1:49 am
Re: Harvard 2010!
lol arent you that 177/3.9 monster? congrats although i never doubted you would get onebrennanlives wrote:JR1!!!!! freaking out...so much adrenaline i did a headstand!
applied - oct/nov
complete - 11/20
held - 2/16
there's hope you guys!
-
dream

- Posts: 36
- Joined: Sun Aug 23, 2009 11:35 pm
Re: Harvard 2010!
wow congrats! Good luck!brennanlives wrote:JR1!!!!! freaking out...so much adrenaline i did a headstand!
applied - oct/nov
complete - 11/20
held - 2/16
there's hope you guys!
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Hattori Hanzo

- Posts: 659
- Joined: Wed Oct 07, 2009 12:17 am
Re: Harvard 2010!
Congrats! Did you send in any additional material after being held?brennanlives wrote:JR1!!!!! freaking out...so much adrenaline i did a headstand!
applied - oct/nov
complete - 11/20
held - 2/16
there's hope you guys!
-
brennanlives

- Posts: 47
- Joined: Sun Oct 25, 2009 10:48 pm
Re: Harvard 2010!
NO--that's the weirdest thing. i was planning on sending out my LOCI today, in fact!
- Consigliere

- Posts: 29
- Joined: Fri May 15, 2009 4:39 pm
Re: Harvard 2010!
i saw that too numbers twin...democrattotheend wrote:With almost identical numbers to me. That's discouraging.PoorOrpheus wrote:There has been a rejection:
http://harvard.lawschoolnumbers.com/app ... order=desc
good to see you on TLS by the way
-
hlshopes

- Posts: 9
- Joined: Mon Feb 15, 2010 7:22 pm
Re: Harvard 2010!
Nice!!!!! Big time congrats!!!! Hopefully JR1s today means JR2s on Mondayc0rpusdelicti wrote:Soooo....
I got my J.R.1 this morning! It's scheduled for next Tuesday. Submitted 11/04, Complete 11/12, Held on 1/27, LOCI sent last Wednesday/Thursday.
- los blancos

- Posts: 8397
- Joined: Mon Apr 21, 2008 4:18 pm
Re: Harvard 2010!
Hahahaha JR wins.crackberry wrote:Another TLS shoutout from an HYS admissions dean! Now, where's Faye Deal?
Josh Rubenstein wrote:It seems like there are quite a few of you agonizing over being on hold, and many of you seem to have a lot of time to spend on TLS. Relax – there are still places open in the class, and these will be filled by people on hold or whose applications have not been reviewed yet.
-
notanumber

- Posts: 484
- Joined: Wed Feb 03, 2010 4:28 pm
Re: Harvard 2010!
JR always wins. It's why he's the dean.los blancos wrote:Hahahaha JR wins.crackberry wrote:Another TLS shoutout from an HYS admissions dean! Now, where's Faye Deal?
Josh Rubenstein wrote:It seems like there are quite a few of you agonizing over being on hold, and many of you seem to have a lot of time to spend on TLS. Relax – there are still places open in the class, and these will be filled by people on hold or whose applications have not been reviewed yet.
- Hattori Hanzo

- Posts: 659
- Joined: Wed Oct 07, 2009 12:17 am
Re: Harvard 2010!
All is quiet on the eastern front. Looks like we live to fight another day.
- $1.99

- Posts: 684
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2010 1:49 am
Re: Harvard 2010!
yes we are fortunate indeed, i hope it is not quiet for me next Monday- Thursday though, come on JR, letting one person like me in isn't going to mess up your numbers too badly
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- tomhobbes

- Posts: 455
- Joined: Sat Feb 07, 2009 9:20 pm
Re: Harvard 2010!
I'm kind of disappointed by this question and answer thing on the HLS blog. It was great that JR answered people's questions about being on hold, because that's very relevant, and nobody really knew what was going on with it. But the other two questions he answered were softballs. The information about the phone interview is already out there, and that last question about LSAT/GPA cutoffs was obviously just selected so he could make Harvard look good. But of course no school is going to say "yeah, we're all about the numbers."
And Harvard kept all the questions hidden so we don't know what people asked. It seems that this wasn't actually a chance to grill JR and get answers to hard questions. Besides the information about holds, this was more like a politician's publicity stunt. Hopefully he takes up more interesting questions next time.
And Harvard kept all the questions hidden so we don't know what people asked. It seems that this wasn't actually a chance to grill JR and get answers to hard questions. Besides the information about holds, this was more like a politician's publicity stunt. Hopefully he takes up more interesting questions next time.
- DoubleChecks

- Posts: 2328
- Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2009 4:35 pm
Re: Harvard 2010!
hm, tbh, i sort of felt the same thingtomhobbes wrote:I'm kind of disappointed by this question and answer thing on the HLS blog. It was great that JR answered people's questions about being on hold, because that's very relevant, and nobody really knew what was going on with it. But the other two questions he answered were softballs. The information about the phone interview is already out there, and that last question about LSAT/GPA cutoffs was obviously just selected so he could make Harvard look good. But of course no school is going to say "yeah, we're all about the numbers."
And Harvard kept all the questions hidden so we don't know what people asked. It seems that this wasn't actually a chance to grill JR and get answers to hard questions. Besides the information about holds, this was more like a politician's publicity stunt. Hopefully he takes up more interesting questions next time.
but as long as we're being honest, i never really thought he'd answer some of the harder questions
i would have loved it if he told everyone the % of the class already accepted, but would he really?
- Sogui

- Posts: 621
- Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2009 12:32 am
Re: Harvard 2010!
Wow that's just freaky. They decided to hold you after 3 months and then a week later they change their mind and send you a JR1 without any changes to your record?brennanlives wrote:JR1!!!!! freaking out...so much adrenaline i did a headstand!
applied - oct/nov
complete - 11/20
held - 2/16
there's hope you guys!
Well congrats nonetheless, very exciting.
I'm just getting even more discouraged that held applicants are hearing back now before us purgatory victims.
JR's Minion: "Sir we've filled 99% of the class, what should we do with the last 1%?"
JR: "Well we've got a bunch of people who've been complete for over a month and haven't heard anything, let's take a look at them"
...
JR: "eww, nevermind, let's just admit a few holds and call it a cycle shall we?"
I saw on the Q&A that he said that HLS still has "some" empty seats.
"some" isn't very encouraging at all, he could have said "quite a few" or "plenty" or "many", some is just a way of saying "not zero".
- Hattori Hanzo

- Posts: 659
- Joined: Wed Oct 07, 2009 12:17 am
Re: Harvard 2010!
That's how I read it too. Sounds like they're almost done at this point.Sogui wrote:
I saw on the Q&A that he said that HLS still has "some" empty seats.
"some" isn't very encouraging at all, he could have said "quite a few" or "plenty" or "many", some is just a way of saying "not zero".
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- superberry

- Posts: 26
- Joined: Tue Sep 29, 2009 5:16 pm
Re: Harvard 2010!
Actually, he said "There are still places open in the class..", which sounds better than the above. HTH!!Hattori Hanzo wrote:That's how I read it too. Sounds like they're almost done at this point.Sogui wrote:
I saw on the Q&A that he said that HLS still has "some" empty seats.
"some" isn't very encouraging at all, he could have said "quite a few" or "plenty" or "many", some is just a way of saying "not zero".
- Sogui

- Posts: 621
- Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2009 12:32 am
Re: Harvard 2010!
Ah, that was the actual quote... I read it as "some" in my head, doesn't sound particularly encouraging either way.superberry wrote:Actually, he said "There are still places open in the class..", which sounds better than the above. HTH!!Hattori Hanzo wrote:That's how I read it too. Sounds like they're almost done at this point.Sogui wrote:
I saw on the Q&A that he said that HLS still has "some" empty seats.
"some" isn't very encouraging at all, he could have said "quite a few" or "plenty" or "many", some is just a way of saying "not zero".
-
lz06

- Posts: 390
- Joined: Fri Sep 26, 2008 9:41 am
Re: Harvard 2010!
I was pretty disappointed by the fact that he only answered 3 questions. seriously?
- dudester

- Posts: 326
- Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2009 7:23 pm
Re: Harvard 2010!
It seems JR might have actually answered that question because he was feeling a little sassy today: "So each year we admit many people who fall below our 25th percentile for GPA or LSAT (about 25% of the class actually)."tomhobbes wrote:I'm kind of disappointed by this question and answer thing on the HLS blog. It was great that JR answered people's questions about being on hold, because that's very relevant, and nobody really knew what was going on with it. But the other two questions he answered were softballs. The information about the phone interview is already out there, and that last question about LSAT/GPA cutoffs was obviously just selected so he could make Harvard look good. But of course no school is going to say "yeah, we're all about the numbers."
And Harvard kept all the questions hidden so we don't know what people asked. It seems that this wasn't actually a chance to grill JR and get answers to hard questions. Besides the information about holds, this was more like a politician's publicity stunt. Hopefully he takes up more interesting questions next time.
On second thought, TLS usually reeks of epic math fail...
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- englawyer

- Posts: 1271
- Joined: Wed Feb 14, 2007 10:57 pm
Re: Harvard 2010!
that doesn't account for splitters, which form a major chunk of the <25th category ( > 75 LSAT, <25 GPA for example).dudester wrote:It seems JR might have actually answered that question because he was feeling a little sassy today: "So each year we admit many people who fall below our 25th percentile for GPA or LSAT (about 25% of the class actually)."tomhobbes wrote:I'm kind of disappointed by this question and answer thing on the HLS blog. It was great that JR answered people's questions about being on hold, because that's very relevant, and nobody really knew what was going on with it. But the other two questions he answered were softballs. The information about the phone interview is already out there, and that last question about LSAT/GPA cutoffs was obviously just selected so he could make Harvard look good. But of course no school is going to say "yeah, we're all about the numbers."
And Harvard kept all the questions hidden so we don't know what people asked. It seems that this wasn't actually a chance to grill JR and get answers to hard questions. Besides the information about holds, this was more like a politician's publicity stunt. Hopefully he takes up more interesting questions next time.
On second thought, TLS usually reeks of epic math fail...
- Unitas

- Posts: 1379
- Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 7:03 pm
Re: Harvard 2010!
Strategic use of the word "or". It would be interesting to see how many applicants they accept with both GPA and LSAT below 25th. Bet that number is 0-5 people.englawyer wrote:that doesn't account for splitters, which form a major chunk of the <25th category ( > 75 LSAT, <25 GPA for example).dudester wrote:It seems JR might have actually answered that question because he was feeling a little sassy today: "So each year we admit many people who fall below our 25th percentile for GPA or LSAT (about 25% of the class actually)."tomhobbes wrote:I'm kind of disappointed by this question and answer thing on the HLS blog. It was great that JR answered people's questions about being on hold, because that's very relevant, and nobody really knew what was going on with it. But the other two questions he answered were softballs. The information about the phone interview is already out there, and that last question about LSAT/GPA cutoffs was obviously just selected so he could make Harvard look good. But of course no school is going to say "yeah, we're all about the numbers."
And Harvard kept all the questions hidden so we don't know what people asked. It seems that this wasn't actually a chance to grill JR and get answers to hard questions. Besides the information about holds, this was more like a politician's publicity stunt. Hopefully he takes up more interesting questions next time.
On second thought, TLS usually reeks of epic math fail...
- Nom Sawyer

- Posts: 913
- Joined: Sun Jun 14, 2009 1:28 am
Re: Harvard 2010!
Another TLS math fail example??englawyer wrote:that doesn't account for splitters, which form a major chunk of the <25th category ( > 75 LSAT, <25 GPA for example).dudester wrote:It seems JR might have actually answered that question because he was feeling a little sassy today: "So each year we admit many people who fall below our 25th percentile for GPA or LSAT (about 25% of the class actually)."tomhobbes wrote:I'm kind of disappointed by this question and answer thing on the HLS blog. It was great that JR answered people's questions about being on hold, because that's very relevant, and nobody really knew what was going on with it. But the other two questions he answered were softballs. The information about the phone interview is already out there, and that last question about LSAT/GPA cutoffs was obviously just selected so he could make Harvard look good. But of course no school is going to say "yeah, we're all about the numbers."
And Harvard kept all the questions hidden so we don't know what people asked. It seems that this wasn't actually a chance to grill JR and get answers to hard questions. Besides the information about holds, this was more like a politician's publicity stunt. Hopefully he takes up more interesting questions next time.
On second thought, TLS usually reeks of epic math fail...
haha just ribbing on you Englawyer (english lawyer?)... couldn't resist.
But yeah i'm very surprised JR actually straight out said that... lol he must not have a very high estimation of HLS admits math abilities
- hiromoto45

- Posts: 690
- Joined: Sun Sep 27, 2009 2:05 pm
Re: Harvard 2010!
Have any JR1s gone out recently? Should I give up hope if I've been complete for over a month?
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login