Columbia 2010 Forum
-
- Posts: 84
- Joined: Wed Jun 24, 2009 4:35 pm
Re: Columbia 2010
Wow Columbia, are you for real? Nothing in the mail today. Complete since October. No word.
-
- Posts: 1341
- Joined: Mon Dec 28, 2009 12:58 pm
Re: Columbia 2010
Reserve = waitlist. Columbia has their own fancy term for it. Yes, send a LOCI.tm912 wrote:Hi everyone, I tried to do some TLS research on this but I think I am just getting more confused, so I am hoping someone on here knows what they are talking about...today I received a letter from CLS telling me I am being put "on reserve" until the end of May.
Is this the same thing as waitlisted? Is it worth it to stay on the list (they ask to respond whether you want to continue to be considered by 3/8)? Is there more than one reserve and any differences between them because I noticed the website says "first reserve"? Should I be sending a LOCI?
Sorry i know it is a lot of questions, but if anyone else happens to know more about this, I would really appreciate the input. Thanks!!
- Rand M.
- Posts: 757
- Joined: Fri Aug 07, 2009 8:24 am
Re: Columbia 2010
+1jimmyd11011 wrote:Wow Columbia, are you for real? Nothing in the mail today. Complete since October. No word.
- gahthelaw
- Posts: 727
- Joined: Sun May 17, 2009 11:30 pm
Re: Columbia 2010
+2Rand M. wrote:+1jimmyd11011 wrote:Wow Columbia, are you for real? Nothing in the mail today. Complete since October. No word.
glad i'm not alone.
- Rand M.
- Posts: 757
- Joined: Fri Aug 07, 2009 8:24 am
Re: Columbia 2010
I have got to think that this is just a mail delay thing. Surely anyone who submitted in Oct. is in this wave at least. It would seem strange to move into the 6th month without anything. Although, I guess it wouldn't be too strange since CLS is one of 5 schools where I am just hangin' around. I just want an answer. I am very satisfied with my current options and just want everything to be settled and get the deciding process underway.gahthelaw wrote:+2Rand M. wrote:+1jimmyd11011 wrote:Wow Columbia, are you for real? Nothing in the mail today. Complete since October. No word.
glad i'm not alone.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- gahthelaw
- Posts: 727
- Joined: Sun May 17, 2009 11:30 pm
Re: Columbia 2010
i'm pretty close to NYC -- i doubt it's a mail delay, though I have no idea why they're hanging onto us. I guess I can't complain though -- I'd rather be here than on reserve, I think.Rand M. wrote:I have got to think that this is just a mail delay thing. Surely anyone who submitted in Oct. is in this wave at least. It would seem strange to move into the 6th month without anything. Although, I guess it wouldn't be too strange since CLS is one of 5 schools where I am just hangin' around. I just want an answer. I am very satisfied with my current options and just want everything to be settled and get the deciding process underway.gahthelaw wrote:+2Rand M. wrote:+1jimmyd11011 wrote:Wow Columbia, are you for real? Nothing in the mail today. Complete since October. No word.
glad i'm not alone.
-
- Posts: 24
- Joined: Sat Oct 17, 2009 8:13 am
Re: Columbia 2010
I have got to think that this is just a mail delay thing. Surely anyone who submitted in Oct. is in this wave at least. It would seem strange to move into the 6th month without anything. Although, I guess it wouldn't be too strange since CLS is one of 5 schools where I am just hangin' around. I just want an answer. I am very satisfied with my current options and just want everything to be settled and get the deciding process underway.[/quote]
i'm pretty close to NYC -- i doubt it's a mail delay, though I have no idea why they're hanging onto us. I guess I can't complain though -- I'd rather be here than on reserve, I think.[/quote]
+1 except w/in walking distance
i'm pretty close to NYC -- i doubt it's a mail delay, though I have no idea why they're hanging onto us. I guess I can't complain though -- I'd rather be here than on reserve, I think.[/quote]
+1 except w/in walking distance
- chinny123
- Posts: 83
- Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 3:06 pm
Re: Columbia 2010
Wow that's ridiculous. I'm complete 1/12 and I'm already getting antsy!jimmyd11011 wrote:Wow Columbia, are you for real? Nothing in the mail today. Complete since October. No word.
-
- Posts: 6
- Joined: Sat Jun 27, 2009 4:57 pm
Re: Columbia 2010
+3Rand M. wrote:I have got to think that this is just a mail delay thing. Surely anyone who submitted in Oct. is in this wave at least. It would seem strange to move into the 6th month without anything. Although, I guess it wouldn't be too strange since CLS is one of 5 schools where I am just hangin' around. I just want an answer. I am very satisfied with my current options and just want everything to be settled and get the deciding process underway.gahthelaw wrote:+2Rand M. wrote:+1jimmyd11011 wrote:Wow Columbia, are you for real? Nothing in the mail today. Complete since October. No word.
glad i'm not alone.
I've been complete since October also. I was beginning to think I was the only one who hadn't heard yet.
- gahthelaw
- Posts: 727
- Joined: Sun May 17, 2009 11:30 pm
Re: Columbia 2010
so does anyone have any theories on why it is we haven't heard anything? are we splitters? do we have lower numbers but some awesome softs?
for me, i'm more or less exactly at both their GPA and LSAT median, so i don't pad their numbers in any kind of cool way. i do have some cool sounding WE though.
for me, i'm more or less exactly at both their GPA and LSAT median, so i don't pad their numbers in any kind of cool way. i do have some cool sounding WE though.
- PapantlaFlyer
- Posts: 86
- Joined: Thu Dec 03, 2009 6:03 pm
Re: Columbia 2010
I'm below 25th% LSAT and about median GPA, URM, and I believe pretty interesting softs, but nothing spectacular. Complete since Oct, no word.gahthelaw wrote:so does anyone have any theories on why it is we haven't heard anything? are we splitters? do we have lower numbers but some awesome softs?
for me, i'm more or less exactly at both their GPA and LSAT median, so i don't pad their numbers in any kind of cool way. i do have some cool sounding WE though.
-
- Posts: 59
- Joined: Tue Sep 29, 2009 2:51 pm
Re: Columbia 2010
Has anyone tried emailing to ask about the long wait? I did back when the first wave started at the end of January and I was told that I would probably receive a decision sometime in February...
- gahthelaw
- Posts: 727
- Joined: Sun May 17, 2009 11:30 pm
Re: Columbia 2010
i'd vote to hang on until a few days into march - stuff could be coming anytime, i suppose.c0rpusdelicti wrote:Has anyone tried emailing to ask about the long wait? I did back when the first wave started at the end of January and I was told that I would probably receive a decision sometime in February...
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 50
- Joined: Wed Feb 20, 2008 6:47 pm
Re: Columbia 2010
c0rpusdelicti - when did you apply/go complete?
-
- Posts: 59
- Joined: Tue Sep 29, 2009 2:51 pm
Re: Columbia 2010
11/04 and 11/20.LDC wrote:c0rpusdelicti - when did you apply/go complete?
- superberry
- Posts: 26
- Joined: Tue Sep 29, 2009 5:16 pm
Re: Columbia 2010
I'm above both 75%'s, which we have all realized doesn't count for much this year. Complete mid-Oct, heard nothing. Decent softs. This blows.PapantlaFlyer wrote:I'm below 25th% LSAT and about median GPA, URM, and I believe pretty interesting softs, but nothing spectacular. Complete since Oct, no word.gahthelaw wrote:so does anyone have any theories on why it is we haven't heard anything? are we splitters? do we have lower numbers but some awesome softs?
for me, i'm more or less exactly at both their GPA and LSAT median, so i don't pad their numbers in any kind of cool way. i do have some cool sounding WE though.
-
- Posts: 13
- Joined: Sun Feb 21, 2010 9:44 pm
Re: Columbia 2010
I went complete in early November and haven't heard anything either. I'm median LSAT and 25% GPA with (what I thought were) strong softs.
I'm hoping that the longer wait means that we are some sort of marginal candidate (between acceptance and waitlist) but that's pure speculation / dream.
Also, is it true that Columbia mails the acceptance / waitlist / rejection letters to the permanent address?
I'm hoping that the longer wait means that we are some sort of marginal candidate (between acceptance and waitlist) but that's pure speculation / dream.
Also, is it true that Columbia mails the acceptance / waitlist / rejection letters to the permanent address?
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- lsathalon
- Posts: 216
- Joined: Sun Feb 08, 2009 2:37 pm
Re: Columbia 2010
Mine came to current address, not permanent.emanon27 wrote:I went complete in early November and haven't heard anything either. I'm median LSAT and 25% GPA with (what I thought were) strong softs.
I'm hoping that the longer wait means that we are some sort of marginal candidate (between acceptance and waitlist) but that's pure speculation / dream.
Also, is it true that Columbia mails the acceptance / waitlist / rejection letters to the permanent address?
-
- Posts: 6
- Joined: Sat Jun 27, 2009 4:57 pm
Re: Columbia 2010
gahthelaw wrote:so does anyone have any theories on why it is we haven't heard anything? are we splitters? do we have lower numbers but some awesome softs?
for me, i'm more or less exactly at both their GPA and LSAT median, so i don't pad their numbers in any kind of cool way. i do have some cool sounding WE though.
I went complete mid-October and am below the median LSAT but above the median GPA, with good softs.
-
- Posts: 61
- Joined: Fri Jun 26, 2009 9:36 am
Re: Columbia 2010
Complete 10/21. I retook the LSAT in December, but I did not tell them or ask them to hold my application. I am going to NYU's admitted student event on 3/4-3/5 and it would be awesome to split the trip with Columbia if I am actually getting in. Honestly cannot believe so many of us have still not got answers.hapate4 wrote:gahthelaw wrote:so does anyone have any theories on why it is we haven't heard anything? are we splitters? do we have lower numbers but some awesome softs?
for me, i'm more or less exactly at both their GPA and LSAT median, so i don't pad their numbers in any kind of cool way. i do have some cool sounding WE though.
I went complete mid-October and am below the median LSAT but above the median GPA, with good softs.
-
- Posts: 8
- Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 3:52 pm
Re: Columbia 2010
...
Last edited by YESLawSchool2013 on Wed Feb 24, 2010 1:24 am, edited 1 time in total.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Kiersten1985
- Posts: 784
- Joined: Fri Jul 31, 2009 3:36 pm
Re: Columbia 2010
So obsessing over CLS tonight actually made me feel better and here's why:
CLS accepts roughly 14-15% of applicants, which total somewhere around 8500. This rounds out to roughly 1250 acceptances each year, roughly 30% of which matriculate for a class totaling around 400. (I know numbers are rough, bear with me.)
For 2009/10 cycle, there are under 300 acceptances reported on LSN. UNDER 300. So at least for CLS, I would say LSN is only somewhat representative of average acceptances. I would go further and purport that the reported numbers are higher on average than the entire accepted pool of applicants because people who post on TLS/LSN are more obsessed with the application process and (in my own world) therefore have higher numbers.
I know there are about a million holes in my theory, but for now this is letting me sleep tonight...kind of.
CLS accepts roughly 14-15% of applicants, which total somewhere around 8500. This rounds out to roughly 1250 acceptances each year, roughly 30% of which matriculate for a class totaling around 400. (I know numbers are rough, bear with me.)
For 2009/10 cycle, there are under 300 acceptances reported on LSN. UNDER 300. So at least for CLS, I would say LSN is only somewhat representative of average acceptances. I would go further and purport that the reported numbers are higher on average than the entire accepted pool of applicants because people who post on TLS/LSN are more obsessed with the application process and (in my own world) therefore have higher numbers.
I know there are about a million holes in my theory, but for now this is letting me sleep tonight...kind of.
- AngryAvocado
- Posts: 774
- Joined: Sun Jul 19, 2009 11:22 pm
Re: Columbia 2010
I'd caution against assuming the numbers of CLS admitted students on LSN are significantly higher than the average CLS admit elsewhere, but I think you're right to assume that Columbia still has a good number of acceptances to give out. Just looking at the number of acceptances on LSN last year vs. this year, Columbia has about another full page of green dots to hand out before matching last years total. Considering that there are almost certainly more LSN users this year than last, it's probably not too much of a stretch to assume that they're only a little over halfway done admitting people. That's good news for those waiting, I think.Kiersten1985 wrote:So obsessing over CLS tonight actually made me feel better and here's why:
CLS accepts roughly 14-15% of applicants, which total somewhere around 8500. This rounds out to roughly 1250 acceptances each year, roughly 30% of which matriculate for a class totaling around 400. (I know numbers are rough, bear with me.)
For 2009/10 cycle, there are under 300 acceptances reported on LSN. UNDER 300. So at least for CLS, I would say LSN is only somewhat representative of average acceptances. I would go further and purport that the reported numbers are higher on average than the entire accepted pool of applicants because people who post on TLS/LSN are more obsessed with the application process and (in my own world) therefore have higher numbers.
I know there are about a million holes in my theory, but for now this is letting me sleep tonight...kind of.
-
- Posts: 1341
- Joined: Mon Dec 28, 2009 12:58 pm
Re: Columbia 2010
Surprisingly, there actually appear to be fewer LSN users this cycle than last. 32 pages of users come up if you search 2009-2010 with no criteria, but 44 pages of users come up for 2008-2009. There may be a lot of people whose profiles are private until all decisions are made, but they would be excluded from the school graphs anyway.
- castellon
- Posts: 62
- Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2010 4:19 pm
Re: Columbia 2010
After my H rejection last week and my S rejection today, I need a CLS to cheer me up! I would have chosen it over those 2 anyway, so c'mon!
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login