Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013) Forum

carboncopyx · Post by **carboncopyx** » Fri Feb 15, 2013 8:04 pm

Here's a cute picture as penance for my negativity. NO MORE NEGATIVITY.

spyke123 · Post by **spyke123** » Fri Feb 15, 2013 8:06 pm

someone on the URM thread reported getting JS2 today

i guess he/she was the only one

carboncopyx · Post by **carboncopyx** » Fri Feb 15, 2013 8:09 pm

spyke123 wrote:someone on the URM thread reported getting JS2 today i guess he/she was the only one

... and they only interviewed on Tuesday. Three days between JS1 and JS2, wow.

ManOfTheMinute · Post by **ManOfTheMinute** » Fri Feb 15, 2013 8:18 pm

carboncopyx wrote:
spyke123 wrote:someone on the URM thread reported getting JS2 today i guess he/she was the only one
... and they only interviewed on Tuesday. Three days between JS1 and JS2, wow.

Ok, so if we don't get a JS2 on Monday (3 days after our KB1s), then you are allowed to bring back the negativity.

Audeamus · Post by **Audeamus** » Fri Feb 15, 2013 8:29 pm

ManOfTheMinute wrote:
carboncopyx wrote:
spyke123 wrote:someone on the URM thread reported getting JS2 today i guess he/she was the only one
... and they only interviewed on Tuesday. Three days between JS1 and JS2, wow.
Ok, so if we don't get a JS2 on Monday (3 days after our KB1s), then you are allowed to bring back the negativity.

as a JS0 tottering on the precipice of dingdom, i move that any complaining from JS1ers should take place in a different thread.

ManOfTheMinute · Post by **ManOfTheMinute** » Fri Feb 15, 2013 8:34 pm

Audeamus wrote:
ManOfTheMinute wrote:
carboncopyx wrote:
spyke123 wrote:someone on the URM thread reported getting JS2 today i guess he/she was the only one
... and they only interviewed on Tuesday. Three days between JS1 and JS2, wow.
Ok, so if we don't get a JS2 on Monday (3 days after our KB1s), then you are allowed to bring back the negativity.
as a JS0 tottering on the precipice of dingdom, i move that any complaining from JS1ers should take place in a different thread.

Brosef, we're all still "applicants" ... we have a thread for the forgotten

5buildingsin1 · Post by **5buildingsin1** » Fri Feb 15, 2013 8:51 pm

spyke123 wrote:
same feeling.. I think as long as we keep dodging bullets... we will get our JS2 someday...

I sincerely hope so (1/30 KB1)....is this just wishful thinking?

d330 · Post by **d330** » Fri Feb 15, 2013 8:54 pm

Any JS1s from around 1/9 still here besides me?

Audeamus · Post by **Audeamus** » Fri Feb 15, 2013 8:58 pm

ManOfTheMinute wrote:
Audeamus wrote:
ManOfTheMinute wrote:
carboncopyx wrote: Ok, so if we don't get a JS2 on Monday (3 days after our KB1s), then you are allowed to bring back the negativity.
as a JS0 tottering on the precipice of dingdom, i move that any complaining from JS1ers should take place in a different thread.
Brosef, we're all still "applicants" ... we have a thread for the forgotten

I was being facetious. And I wouldn't consider myself forgotten since, as far as I know, they haven't dinged any of us Jan completes yet.

spyke123 · Post by **spyke123** » Fri Feb 15, 2013 9:01 pm

d330 wrote:Any JS1s from around 1/9 still here besides me?

you might be the last one standing.. good luck solider!

d330 · Post by **d330** » Fri Feb 15, 2013 9:12 pm

spyke123 wrote:
d330 wrote:Any JS1s from around 1/9 still here besides me?
you might be the last one standing.. good luck solider!

Thanks spyke123. I feel like I'm calling for a last charge and seeing only open air around me. And now that folks are getting call backs in less time than it takes to feel hungry during a fast, this is truly feeling like the last stand.

GoldenGriffin · Post by **GoldenGriffin** » Fri Feb 15, 2013 9:32 pm

Went complete 1/3, haven't heard anything since, preparing for the ding. 171/3.95

carbonara · Post by **carbonara** » Fri Feb 15, 2013 11:23 pm

d330 wrote:Any JS1s from around 1/9 still here besides me?

Still here -- mine was around that time. No hold, but no word. Nothing to do but wait I guess. Hope we get good news soon!

volp · Post by **volp** » Sat Feb 16, 2013 3:53 am

ManOfTheMinute wrote:
carboncopyx wrote:
volp wrote:question: did kb tell you that you had 15 minutes at the beginning of the interview?
Yeah, she said 10-15 minutes to talk, which I found short. But maybe the interviews are just getting shorter and shorter.
How long did yours last? Also, I think its always been described as a 10-15 minute interview...

okay i thought it had always been a 15-20 minute interview, so i was surprised. mine ran 13:40, three questions from me. *tries to not think about it*

Jpreece59 · Post by **Jpreece59** » Sat Feb 16, 2013 11:19 am

GoldenGriffin wrote:Went complete 1/3, haven't heard anything since, preparing for the ding. 171/3.95

+1

vzapana · Post by **vzapana** » Sat Feb 16, 2013 2:25 pm

Carboncopy, now that Rachel got rejected from Harvard, maybe you might wanna change you avatar....

ManOfTheMinute · Post by **ManOfTheMinute** » Sat Feb 16, 2013 2:27 pm

vzapana wrote:Carboncopy, now that Rachel got rejected from Harvard, maybe you might wanna change you avatar....

He has a good point... but then again, she is kinda hot so I don't mind looking at her everytime you post

d330 · Post by **d330** » Sat Feb 16, 2013 2:30 pm

ManOfTheMinute wrote:
vzapana wrote:Carboncopy, now that Rachel got rejected from Harvard, maybe you might wanna change you avatar....
He has a good point... but then again, she is kinda hot so I don't mind looking at her everytime you post

She was rejected to open up a slot for one of us.

vzapana · Post by **vzapana** » Sat Feb 16, 2013 2:37 pm

Also, if she were a real-life applicant, her PS would've had to be blatantly ungrammatical and nonsensical, or she would have had to kill someone, for her not to get in.

ManOfTheMinute · Post by **ManOfTheMinute** » Sat Feb 16, 2013 2:42 pm

vzapana wrote:Also, if she were a real-life applicant, her PS would've had to be blatantly ungrammatical and nonsensical, or she would have had to kill someone, for her not to get in.

Do we know what her UGPA was? I mean, it sounds like her whole life is being a paralegal, so I doubt she has many other softs beyond being a legacy...

vzapana · Post by **vzapana** » Sat Feb 16, 2013 2:48 pm

ManOfTheMinute wrote:
vzapana wrote:Also, if she were a real-life applicant, her PS would've had to be blatantly ungrammatical and nonsensical, or she would have had to kill someone, for her not to get in.
Do we know what her UGPA was? I mean, it sounds like her whole life is being a paralegal, so I doubt she has many other softs beyond being a legacy...

To get a paralegal job at a "top 3 firm", you would need a stellar ugpa and some solid law-oriented extracurriculars, I'd imagine. Also, she's a black applicant with a 99th-percentile LSAT score. There are fewer than 100 black applicants with a 3.5+ ugpa/ 165+ lsat score nationwide, according to the ABA's fisher amicus brief. She's basically a law school unicorn.

trojandave · Post by **trojandave** » Sat Feb 16, 2013 2:55 pm

ManOfTheMinute wrote:
vzapana wrote:Also, if she were a real-life applicant, her PS would've had to be blatantly ungrammatical and nonsensical, or she would have had to kill someone, for her not to get in.
Do we know what her UGPA was? I mean, it sounds like her whole life is being a paralegal, so I doubt she has many other softs beyond being a legacy...

Softs include a PHD in the art of seduction and a brief stint on a reality TV show. I'd say she got a raw deal. Or no deal...

--ImageRemoved--

carboncopyx · Post by **carboncopyx** » Sat Feb 16, 2013 4:50 pm

vzapana wrote:Carboncopy, now that Rachel got rejected from Harvard, maybe you might wanna change you avatar....

1) SUITS SPOILER. I HAVEN'T SEEN IT YET. D:
2) I'm gonna search for an Elle Woods tar now. She didn't get rejected from Harvard--AND she successfully found a husband there! Pretty much livin' the dreammm.

ETA: Changed avatar according to how my expression will be if/when HLS calls me!!! (Please? Pretty please? With a cherry on top?)

amsong · Post by **amsong** » Sat Feb 16, 2013 5:05 pm

carboncopyx wrote:She didn't get rejected from Harvard

What, like it's hard?

Legallybronzed180 · Post by **Legallybronzed180** » Sat Feb 16, 2013 9:24 pm

Hi
Can someone who had the interview please tell me what they are looking for and what they ask so. ICANN prepare .
Good luck to all who are waiting!

Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013) Forum

Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Register for access!

Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.

Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Register now!

Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Register now, it's still FREE!

Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Seriously? What are you waiting for?