Haha I have. Twice. "End of April at the latest."tenniscourt wrote:I dare one of you to call and ask when decisions could be expected
Columbia c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle) Forum
- waferthinmint
- Posts: 337
- Joined: Mon Jan 13, 2014 6:57 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)
- tenniscourt
- Posts: 279
- Joined: Mon Jan 13, 2014 8:00 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)
waferthinmint wrote:Haha I have. Twice. "End of April at the latest."tenniscourt wrote:I dare one of you to call and ask when decisions could be expected
Maybe you should word it "If you were a gambler, and you had to place a bet on when the next wave of decisions would come, would you put the timetable anytime this week/today?"
- Mack.Hambleton
- Posts: 5414
- Joined: Mon Jan 13, 2014 2:09 am
Re: Columbia c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)
does end of april apply to held people as well?
- tenniscourt
- Posts: 279
- Joined: Mon Jan 13, 2014 8:00 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)
How do you know if you've been held? Email or snail mail?
- Mack.Hambleton
- Posts: 5414
- Joined: Mon Jan 13, 2014 2:09 am
Re: Columbia c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)
email. there were large wavestenniscourt wrote:How do you know if you've been held? Email or snail mail?
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- checkers
- Posts: 376
- Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2013 11:35 am
Re: Columbia c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)
I would say that's a safe assumption. Were some people held without a letter indicating April 25th as the latest date for a decision?james.bungles wrote:does end of april apply to held people as well?
- luuma
- Posts: 246
- Joined: Sat Dec 10, 2011 2:04 am
Re: Columbia c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)
Three months, 4 completes, no answer. I feel like how the doc feels right before he turns into the hulk.
- luuma
- Posts: 246
- Joined: Sat Dec 10, 2011 2:04 am
Re: Columbia c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)
Delete wrong thread. On my phone, my bad.
-
- Posts: 91
- Joined: Sun Oct 06, 2013 4:44 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)
We live to fight another day...
- gbelle
- Posts: 476
- Joined: Thu Apr 04, 2013 2:50 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)
Stillllll waiting....Elleonleo wrote:We live to fight another day...
- checkers
- Posts: 376
- Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2013 11:35 am
Re: Columbia c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)
'Fight' is such an active verb. I would have gone with 'languish' instead.Elleonleo wrote:We live to fight another day...
I wish we had the option to fight though. I DEMAND TRIAL BY COMBAT!
- gbelle
- Posts: 476
- Joined: Thu Apr 04, 2013 2:50 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)
I like this. What does your crystal ball say for tomorrow?checkers wrote:'Fight' is such an active verb. I would have gone with 'languish' instead.Elleonleo wrote:We live to fight another day...
I wish we had the option to fight though. I DEMAND TRIAL BY COMBAT!
- checkers
- Posts: 376
- Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2013 11:35 am
Re: Columbia c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)
Tomorrow is confirmed to be the big day. Source: http://top-law-schools.com/forums/viewt ... &start=346gbelle wrote:I like this. What does your crystal ball say for tomorrow?checkers wrote:'Fight' is such an active verb. I would have gone with 'languish' instead.Elleonleo wrote:We live to fight another day...
I wish we had the option to fight though. I DEMAND TRIAL BY COMBAT!
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- waferthinmint
- Posts: 337
- Joined: Mon Jan 13, 2014 6:57 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)
That is some water-tight research right there...checkers wrote:Tomorrow is confirmed to be the big day. Source: http://top-law-schools.com/forums/viewt ... &start=346gbelle wrote:I like this. What does your crystal ball say for tomorrow?checkers wrote:'Fight' is such an active verb. I would have gone with 'languish' instead.Elleonleo wrote:We live to fight another day...
I wish we had the option to fight though. I DEMAND TRIAL BY COMBAT!
- MagicEightBall
- Posts: 7
- Joined: Sun Mar 02, 2014 7:58 pm
-
- Posts: 91
- Joined: Sun Oct 06, 2013 4:44 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)
To confirm, this is just based on the date of a wave of decisions from last year? Or is there something else?
- tenniscourt
- Posts: 279
- Joined: Mon Jan 13, 2014 8:00 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)
^thats it haha. We're grasping at anything.
Also, it might be safe to say if nothing comes today then we probably won't hear anything until next week at the earliest
Also, it might be safe to say if nothing comes today then we probably won't hear anything until next week at the earliest
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- tenniscourt
- Posts: 279
- Joined: Mon Jan 13, 2014 8:00 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)
MagicEightBall wrote:Tomorrow.

-
- Posts: 538
- Joined: Thu Dec 06, 2012 4:06 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)
It's just based on last year's cycle. Today is the first day that movement happened from those with holds.
As far as permissible evidence is concerned for law school acceptances, this is about as good as it gets. Let the tiny wAves of acceptances, wait lists, and rejections begin!
Happy April on the CLS thread
Its gonna be gruesome.
As far as permissible evidence is concerned for law school acceptances, this is about as good as it gets. Let the tiny wAves of acceptances, wait lists, and rejections begin!
Happy April on the CLS thread

-
- Posts: 91
- Joined: Sun Oct 06, 2013 4:44 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)
weeeee! I hope this applies to peeps who haven't heard back at all yet as well!
GL erryone.
GL erryone.
- checkers
- Posts: 376
- Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2013 11:35 am
Re: Columbia c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)
No, but MagicEightBall is our second source now. Two source confirmation! Alert the media!tenniscourt wrote:MagicEightBall wrote:Tomorrow.Checkers, is this you?
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 538
- Joined: Thu Dec 06, 2012 4:06 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)
CLS emailed me about an update this morning so we can also confirm that people are IN the office as opposed to OUT of it.checkers wrote:No, but MagicEightBall is our second source now. Two source confirmation! Alert the media!tenniscourt wrote:MagicEightBall wrote:Tomorrow.Checkers, is this you?
The evidence is mounting.
edit: diction.
- tenniscourt
- Posts: 279
- Joined: Mon Jan 13, 2014 8:00 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)
fivestarfolds wrote:CLS emailed me about an update this morning so we can also confirm that people are IN the office as opposed to OUT of it.checkers wrote:No, but MagicEightBall is our second source now. Two source confirmation! Alert the media!tenniscourt wrote:MagicEightBall wrote:Tomorrow.Checkers, is this you?
The evidence is mounting.
edit: diction.
It's the calm before the storm, guys!
-
- Posts: 91
- Joined: Sun Oct 06, 2013 4:44 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)
I can never tell if people are more delusional here than me!
- tenniscourt
- Posts: 279
- Joined: Mon Jan 13, 2014 8:00 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)
Elleonleo wrote:I can never tell if people are more delusional here than me!
Do you neurotically check your email too!?
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login