flame or ritard (think the hangover)Hattori Hanzo wrote:Flamelawgod wrote:but i talked on the phone to some guy Josh Rosenstein or something.
Harvard 2010! Forum
-
swimbrad

- Posts: 184
- Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2009 12:02 am
Re: Harvard 2010!
- Sogui

- Posts: 621
- Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2009 12:32 am
Re: Harvard 2010!
I think you're thinking of "rah-tard"swimbrad wrote:flame or ritard (think the hangover)Hattori Hanzo wrote:Flamelawgod wrote:but i talked on the phone to some guy Josh Rosenstein or something.
- $1.99

- Posts: 684
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2010 1:49 am
Re: Harvard 2010!
alright congrats to all those who dodged JR's rejection machine gun today. no "dodge this" for me.
-
Kronk

- Posts: 32987
- Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2008 9:18 pm
Re: Harvard 2010!
There were only 2. hth$1.99 wrote:alright congrats to all those who dodged JR's rejection machine gun today. no "dodge this" for me.
- Sogui

- Posts: 621
- Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2009 12:32 am
Re: Harvard 2010!
Wait does that mean you failed to dodge it? Or there was no need because the rejection gun was pointed another direction?$1.99 wrote:alright congrats to all those who dodged JR's rejection machine gun today. no "dodge this" for me.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Consigliere

- Posts: 29
- Joined: Fri May 15, 2009 4:39 pm
Re: Harvard 2010!
I attribute it to the 5 D's of Dodgeball I learned back in grammar school.$1.99 wrote:alright congrats to all those who dodged JR's rejection machine gun today. no "dodge this" for me.
Or, like my prelaw advisor always says "If you can dodge a wrench, you can dodge a rejection."
- los blancos

- Posts: 8397
- Joined: Mon Apr 21, 2008 4:18 pm
Re: Harvard 2010!
If I went complete over a week ago, how soon can I expect a ding?
- $1.99

- Posts: 684
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2010 1:49 am
Re: Harvard 2010!
lol it means the gun wasn't pointed at my head like that agentSogui wrote:Wait does that mean you failed to dodge it? Or there was no need because the rejection gun was pointed another direction?$1.99 wrote:alright congrats to all those who dodged JR's rejection machine gun today. no "dodge this" for me.
- Genki

- Posts: 246
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 9:04 am
Re: Harvard 2010!
Haven't you been following this thread at ALL Sogui?Sogui wrote:So no JR1s today?
Everyone knows that Monday is the day to watch out for JR1 emails...
(sorry, couldn't help myself)
-
buffalo

- Posts: 8
- Joined: Tue Feb 16, 2010 7:30 pm
Re: Harvard 2010!
Hey all, I posted in another forum but have read a few pages of this mammoth thread and wondered if any Harvard hopefuls had some insight. I want Harvard/Yale next cycle and my numbers are 175/3.85. I thought I was almost a lock for Harvard, but I just read some of the recent dings and am pretty apprehensive about my numbers now! My softs should be strong even for Harvard/Yale, but should I be considering a retake if I really have my heart set on one of the two schools?
Good luck to all on their cycle this round! And congrats to all have already made it in!
Good luck to all on their cycle this round! And congrats to all have already made it in!
- Na_Swatch

- Posts: 467
- Joined: Sun Sep 20, 2009 4:40 pm
Re: Harvard 2010!
What is your UG and is that a single LSAT score? Can't get a good read on your chances w/o that info.buffalo wrote:Hey all, I posted in another forum but have read a few pages of this mammoth thread and wondered if any Harvard hopefuls had some insight. I want Harvard/Yale next cycle and my numbers are 175/3.85. I thought I was almost a lock for Harvard, but I just read some of the recent dings and am pretty apprehensive about my numbers now! My softs should be strong even for Harvard/Yale, but should I be considering a retake if I really have my heart set on one of the two schools?
Good luck to all on their cycle this round! And congrats to all have already made it in!
- $1.99

- Posts: 684
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2010 1:49 am
Re: Harvard 2010!
i think you are ok, the person who got rejected with those numbers is an irregularity if you look at their lsn profile, they got waitlisted at many auto admit school.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
buffalo

- Posts: 8
- Joined: Tue Feb 16, 2010 7:30 pm
Re: Harvard 2010!
Single LSAT score + University of Colorado Boulder. My GPA was great my last three years, suffered the first year, and course load was full of challenging courses. I've been out of school for a few years but have been doing meaningful work that I am certain will be looked upon favorably.Na_Swatch wrote:What is your UG and is that a single LSAT score? Can't get a good read on your chances w/o that info.buffalo wrote:Hey all, I posted in another forum but have read a few pages of this mammoth thread and wondered if any Harvard hopefuls had some insight. I want Harvard/Yale next cycle and my numbers are 175/3.85. I thought I was almost a lock for Harvard, but I just read some of the recent dings and am pretty apprehensive about my numbers now! My softs should be strong even for Harvard/Yale, but should I be considering a retake if I really have my heart set on one of the two schools?
Good luck to all on their cycle this round! And congrats to all have already made it in!
-
buffalo

- Posts: 8
- Joined: Tue Feb 16, 2010 7:30 pm
Re: Harvard 2010!
Thanks, I'll look up the profile.$1.99 wrote:i think you are ok, the person who got rejected with those numbers is an irregularity if you look at their lsn profile, they got waitlisted at many auto admit school.
-
chopsticks3092

- Posts: 30
- Joined: Tue Oct 20, 2009 6:04 am
Re: Harvard 2010!
Actually JR was not admitted off the waitlist. If you got that impression from this blog post you'll notice that it was written by someone named Anit, as JR clarifies during this interview with AdmissionsDean (LinkRemoved).Peter North wrote:JR himself was a "waitlist" late summer admit to HLS. Now that he's on the other side of the fence... I wonder how he's going to treat borderline (or those with compelling softs)...Machine-gun style dings... or more than a few sympathy admits... this is his 1st year as Dean of Admissions... so we'll just have to wait and see how he plays the cards...
But it is an open question how he will treat borderline candidates as a first-year admissions dean.
-
Kronk

- Posts: 32987
- Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2008 9:18 pm
Re: Harvard 2010!
I'm glad you're not in my cycle. They can't accept TWO people from CU.buffalo wrote:Single LSAT score + University of Colorado Boulder. My GPA was great my last three years, suffered the first year, and course load was full of challenging courses. I've been out of school for a few years but have been doing meaningful work that I am certain will be looked upon favorably.Na_Swatch wrote:What is your UG and is that a single LSAT score? Can't get a good read on your chances w/o that info.buffalo wrote:Hey all, I posted in another forum but have read a few pages of this mammoth thread and wondered if any Harvard hopefuls had some insight. I want Harvard/Yale next cycle and my numbers are 175/3.85. I thought I was almost a lock for Harvard, but I just read some of the recent dings and am pretty apprehensive about my numbers now! My softs should be strong even for Harvard/Yale, but should I be considering a retake if I really have my heart set on one of the two schools?
Good luck to all on their cycle this round! And congrats to all have already made it in!
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- Na_Swatch

- Posts: 467
- Joined: Sun Sep 20, 2009 4:40 pm
Re: Harvard 2010!
Hmm with one take, and CU Boulder as a decent Tier One you probably have an 85+% chance at Harvard next semester as long as you apply early. Just get your app well prepared and get it in before October and you def won't need to retake.Kronk wrote:I'm glad you're not in my cycle. They can't accept TWO people from CU.buffalo wrote:Single LSAT score + University of Colorado Boulder. My GPA was great my last three years, suffered the first year, and course load was full of challenging courses. I've been out of school for a few years but have been doing meaningful work that I am certain will be looked upon favorably.Na_Swatch wrote:What is your UG and is that a single LSAT score? Can't get a good read on your chances w/o that info.buffalo wrote:Hey all, I posted in another forum but have read a few pages of this mammoth thread and wondered if any Harvard hopefuls had some insight. I want Harvard/Yale next cycle and my numbers are 175/3.85. I thought I was almost a lock for Harvard, but I just read some of the recent dings and am pretty apprehensive about my numbers now! My softs should be strong even for Harvard/Yale, but should I be considering a retake if I really have my heart set on one of the two schools?
Good luck to all on their cycle this round! And congrats to all have already made it in!173 / 3.91 from CU Boulder.
-
Kronk

- Posts: 32987
- Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2008 9:18 pm
Re: Harvard 2010!
Already applied this cycle. I think HE is applying next cycle.Na_Swatch wrote:Hmm with one take, and CU Boulder as a decent Tier One you probably have an 85+% chance at Harvard next semester as long as you apply early. Just get your app well prepared and get it in before October and you def won't need to retake.Kronk wrote: I'm glad you're not in my cycle. They can't accept TWO people from CU.173 / 3.91 from CU Boulder.
- Na_Swatch

- Posts: 467
- Joined: Sun Sep 20, 2009 4:40 pm
Re: Harvard 2010!
Yeah that was aimed at him.. a 173, 3.9 is probably only 70% chance of admittanceKronk wrote:Already applied this cycle. I think HE is applying next cycle.Na_Swatch wrote:Hmm with one take, and CU Boulder as a decent Tier One you probably have an 85+% chance at Harvard next semester as long as you apply early. Just get your app well prepared and get it in before October and you def won't need to retake.Kronk wrote: I'm glad you're not in my cycle. They can't accept TWO people from CU.173 / 3.91 from CU Boulder.
- DoubleChecks

- Posts: 2328
- Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2009 4:35 pm
Re: Harvard 2010!
you have a good shot. i wouldnt retake the LSAT (unless you were avging 178+ and just messed up on game day) since it's really the GPA that would keep you out, not the LSAT (tho i know, its 1 point below the 75%)buffalo wrote:Single LSAT score + University of Colorado Boulder. My GPA was great my last three years, suffered the first year, and course load was full of challenging courses. I've been out of school for a few years but have been doing meaningful work that I am certain will be looked upon favorably.Na_Swatch wrote:What is your UG and is that a single LSAT score? Can't get a good read on your chances w/o that info.buffalo wrote:Hey all, I posted in another forum but have read a few pages of this mammoth thread and wondered if any Harvard hopefuls had some insight. I want Harvard/Yale next cycle and my numbers are 175/3.85. I thought I was almost a lock for Harvard, but I just read some of the recent dings and am pretty apprehensive about my numbers now! My softs should be strong even for Harvard/Yale, but should I be considering a retake if I really have my heart set on one of the two schools?
Good luck to all on their cycle this round! And congrats to all have already made it in!
if your softs are as strong as you think they are (you'd be surprised after lurking around on TLS how weak your softs may be haha, not saying yours are...but i had a rude awakening), then id say you have like 70% at HLS right off the bat. 85% seems a bit too high, unless these softs are REALLY badass or you're including chances off the waitlist or something (stress that'd kill me haha)
Last edited by DoubleChecks on Sat Feb 20, 2010 1:58 am, edited 1 time in total.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
Kronk

- Posts: 32987
- Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2008 9:18 pm
Re: Harvard 2010!
I think you're overestimating both chances tbh.Na_Swatch wrote:Yeah that was aimed at him.. a 173, 3.9 is probably only 70% chance of admittanceKronk wrote:Already applied this cycle. I think HE is applying next cycle.Na_Swatch wrote:Hmm with one take, and CU Boulder as a decent Tier One you probably have an 85+% chance at Harvard next semester as long as you apply early. Just get your app well prepared and get it in before October and you def won't need to retake.Kronk wrote: I'm glad you're not in my cycle. They can't accept TWO people from CU.173 / 3.91 from CU Boulder.
- DoubleChecks

- Posts: 2328
- Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2009 4:35 pm
Re: Harvard 2010!
I agree. I put the first guy at ~65-70% and you at ~60%Kronk wrote:I think you're overestimating both chances tbh.Na_Swatch wrote: Yeah that was aimed at him.. a 173, 3.9 is probably only 70% chance of admittance
you arent that much worse off than the 3.85/175 tho
- Na_Swatch

- Posts: 467
- Joined: Sun Sep 20, 2009 4:40 pm
Re: Harvard 2010!
Well just from last cycle 4 out of 5 people with a 173, 3.9 got into Harvard. Adding in the fact that CU Boulder is not a premier UG (though still decent) and the fact that this cycle is more competitive I would say 70% is reasonable (slightly higher than 2 admits out of three apps).Kronk wrote:I think you're overestimating both chances tbh.Na_Swatch wrote:Yeah that was aimed at him.. a 173, 3.9 is probably only 70% chance of admittanceKronk wrote:
Already applied this cycle. I think HE is applying next cycle.
If the 173 is the highest LSAT or there is a lack of softs than the chances would probably be lower.
However, at the 3.88, 175 level with work experience and early app I think chances are quite high. You might be right tho, it seems this year anybody who is < 3.9 has lower chances..
-
Kronk

- Posts: 32987
- Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2008 9:18 pm
Re: Harvard 2010!
No, if only because I have the luxury of both numbers above the medians.DoubleChecks wrote:I agree. I put the first guy at ~65-70% and you at ~60%Kronk wrote:I think you're overestimating both chances tbh.Na_Swatch wrote: Yeah that was aimed at him.. a 173, 3.9 is probably only 70% chance of admittance
you arent that much worse off than the 3.85/175 tho
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login