Sorry 0L. Lame.0L Hoping for 1 wrote:Yep, but I am in DC so it could have been delayed by the stormscribelaw wrote:Via snail mail?0L Hoping for 1 wrote:Held at Columbia Today
Columbia 2010 Forum
-
- Posts: 1437
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2009 5:11 pm
Re: Columbia 2010
- poprox
- Posts: 247
- Joined: Sat Aug 22, 2009 9:58 pm
Re: Columbia 2010
It would be great if we knew exactly how many applicants Columbia has held this cycle. Maybe it's an extremely small number, and they'll take us before digging into the waitlist? Here's hoping 

- Jacinda
- Posts: 69
- Joined: Fri Dec 18, 2009 10:21 pm
Re: Columbia 2010
Actually someone else told me I should contact the ACLU, but I didn't know what they could do. I mean they could probably help with housing, but not the Medicaid part. The American health system is just screwed up. It does not allow for people like me to go to law school away from my parents' home. See CA and NY are rare. They're virtually one of the few states to allow you to choose your own caregivers. I don't know if anyone is familiar with healthcare, but there are a shortage of nurses. Plus they get paid better in hospitals, and most think home care is boring. Anyways, that being said I could not even find licenced nurses when I lived at home near Berkeley. My mom had to quit her job to take care of me, which now she obviously can't move across country with me. So I would like to have actual caregivers move with me, but here's the catch. Medicaid only pays them $10/hour. Medicaid cannot pay they're moving expenses because no one like me has ever done this. Most people, who require 24/7 care, pay their own caregivers, but I obviously can't do that if I'm receiving Medicaid. So I am completely stuck and only pray for a miracle, which this would literally have to be. I thought the funniest part with American University was when they said they had never had anyone as disabled as me lol!agentdedalus wrote:I guess I'm somewhat astounded that both American and Santa Clara would admit you, and, provided your disability was the only matter keeping you from attending, not do everything in their power to ensure that you could do so. Granted, I don't know specifics other than what you've posted here, and issues like Medicaid are perhaps beyond a school's control, but, at the risk of over stating the matter, this seems almost in the territory of the ACLU. That may be a bit hyperbolic, but does anyone else have a similar opinion or take on this?Jacinda wrote:The problem is I can only live in certain states--CA and NY being the easiest. Last year I got into AU's JD/MA in International Affairs, but I couldn't go because 1. They had housing issues like Santa Clara; 2. I couldn't find enough caregivers to move with me; and 3. The Medicaid in DC, MD, and VA doesn't allow me to choose my own caregivers. It was heartbreaking because I worked so hard to get in, and when I finally got in, I couldn't go because my disability stopped me. So if I don't get in, I might try retaking the LSAT, but someone told me it wouldn't matter I got 180 because they will give me a blanket score of 165 since I take an accommodated test ie double time with a scribe. Does anyone know anything about this?
As to retaking the LSAT and having potential scores "lessened" because of accommodated testing, I'd be careful about letting the "someone" who gave you this advice deter you. While this may hold true for some schools, others will view it in the context in which you frame it, either in an addendum or elsewhere in your app. Schools touting holistic approaches to apps should be especially understanding, as would a place like Berkeley (good luck this cycle btw) where your undergrad affiliation with people who can speak to your circumstances might be particularly helpful.
-
- Posts: 35
- Joined: Mon Nov 16, 2009 8:18 pm
Re: Columbia 2010
My point exactly. I'm just also concerned about timeliness. I'll probably just pay for express mail, or something.jsarna1 wrote:I sent mine via snail mail. I just think it looks more professional. Plus, I signed it, which I also think adds a touch.ljmrc3344 wrote:So even though Columbia told me that I can send a LOCI via e-mail, does anyone else feel more comfortable sending it in the mail? It just seems like it is less likely to get lost amongst everything else that is coming in their office if it is a physical copy. Or maybe I'm just old-fashioned...
-
- Posts: 85
- Joined: Sun Jun 21, 2009 11:14 pm
Re: Columbia 2010
That's a good idea, although I'm not sure there is that much of a hurry right now. I just hate the informality of e-mails. Glad I'm not the only old-fashioned person here...ljmrc3344 wrote:My point exactly. I'm just also concerned about timeliness. I'll probably just pay for express mail, or something.jsarna1 wrote:I sent mine via snail mail. I just think it looks more professional. Plus, I signed it, which I also think adds a touch.ljmrc3344 wrote:So even though Columbia told me that I can send a LOCI via e-mail, does anyone else feel more comfortable sending it in the mail? It just seems like it is less likely to get lost amongst everything else that is coming in their office if it is a physical copy. Or maybe I'm just old-fashioned...
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- keiko
- Posts: 88
- Joined: Tue Feb 10, 2009 12:37 pm
Re: Columbia 2010
snail mail? mind me asking when it was postmarked?kingabraham3 wrote:held. boo-hoo.
-
- Posts: 429
- Joined: Wed Sep 23, 2009 1:04 pm
Re: Columbia 2010
Damn, that's discouraging, especially since we are basically numbers twins. I am in DC too, so I may have gotten the same letter today, or will get it soon.0L Hoping for 1 wrote:Held at Columbia Today
Is held the same thing as waitlisted? I know that's probably been asked already, but it seems to vary at every school.
-
- Posts: 1322
- Joined: Sun Jan 25, 2009 9:36 pm
Re: Columbia 2010
It is not the same as Waitlist. It basically means they havent made a decision yetdemocrattotheend wrote:Damn, that's discouraging, especially since we are basically numbers twins. I am in DC too, so I may have gotten the same letter today, or will get it soon.0L Hoping for 1 wrote:Held at Columbia Today
Is held the same thing as waitlisted? I know that's probably been asked already, but it seems to vary at every school.
- $1.99
- Posts: 684
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2010 1:49 am
Re: Columbia 2010
yeah held people are second string behind accepted people, we are way better than you third and fourth string waitlisted/reserved kids, i am kevin kobb and you are mike vick, the difference is huge
-
- Posts: 100
- Joined: Thu Jan 07, 2010 4:25 pm
Re: Columbia 2010
For those of you also on hold - does anyone plan on writing a LOCI? I understand doing one if placed on reserve/waitlist, but not sure the protocol for those of us who were 'held' since this essentially means they haven't fully considered the existing application yet.
I don't have new grades/job/life updates really since my application was submitted, so it would really just be a 'I would really like to go to Columbia' letter - is this appropriate now or closer to the April decision date?
I don't have new grades/job/life updates really since my application was submitted, so it would really just be a 'I would really like to go to Columbia' letter - is this appropriate now or closer to the April decision date?
- amputatedbrain
- Posts: 337
- Joined: Tue Aug 04, 2009 5:21 pm
Re: Columbia 2010
Can only speak for sure about myself, but I think the general consensus is that you can write an LOCI once you've been placed on hold. By holding you they're seeing what you look like in comparison to the entire applicant pool, so if you have something to say that might improve you in their estimation, I would do it (even if its just reassuring them how much you want to go, although probably irrelevant in this particular case). I'm going to send one in as soon as I can find the time to write it.runnerman wrote:For those of you also on hold - does anyone plan on writing a LOCI? I understand doing one if placed on reserve/waitlist, but not sure the protocol for those of us who were 'held' since this essentially means they haven't fully considered the existing application yet.
I don't have new grades/job/life updates really since my application was submitted, so it would really just be a 'I would really like to go to Columbia' letter - is this appropriate now or closer to the April decision date?
- mb88
- Posts: 167
- Joined: Mon Oct 19, 2009 6:15 pm
Re: Columbia 2010
I never thought I'd be posting in here, but I just got put on reserve via snailmail postmarked Feb 10. I'm a 171/3.56 (non-URM). One of the addcomms must have really liked something in my application to save me from the auto-ding pile.
Also: is there really no difference between the Columbia waitlist and reserve group? The letter actually came with two parts, the first telling me that I was put on reserve, and the second was an entire separate page about how reserve was not a waitlist.
Also: is there really no difference between the Columbia waitlist and reserve group? The letter actually came with two parts, the first telling me that I was put on reserve, and the second was an entire separate page about how reserve was not a waitlist.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- puppleberry finn
- Posts: 1035
- Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2009 7:03 pm
Re: Columbia 2010
credited analogy.$1.99 wrote:yeah held people are second string behind accepted people, we are way better than you third and fourth string waitlisted/reserved kids, i am kevin kobb and you are mike vick, the difference is huge
- BlueCivic
- Posts: 168
- Joined: Wed Dec 09, 2009 5:59 pm
Re: Columbia 2010
Waitlisted today.
I guess i can add being waitlisted by a top 3 new york city law school to my resume.
I guess i can add being waitlisted by a top 3 new york city law school to my resume.
- puppleberry finn
- Posts: 1035
- Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2009 7:03 pm
Re: Columbia 2010
blatant anti-stanford trolling, or EGREGIOUS pro-NYU/Fordham trolling?BlueCivic wrote:Waitlisted today.
I guess i can add being waitlisted by a top 3 new york city law school to my resume.
- BlueCivic
- Posts: 168
- Joined: Wed Dec 09, 2009 5:59 pm
Re: Columbia 2010
puppleberry finn wrote:blatant anti-stanford trolling, or EGREGIOUS pro-NYU/Fordham trolling?BlueCivic wrote:Waitlisted today.
I guess i can add being waitlisted by a top 3 new york city law school to my resume.
Sorry, top 3 in nyc. I think everyone agrees that its one of the top three there.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- AngryAvocado
- Posts: 774
- Joined: Sun Jul 19, 2009 11:22 pm
Re: Columbia 2010
*whoosh*BlueCivic wrote:puppleberry finn wrote:blatant anti-stanford trolling, or EGREGIOUS pro-NYU/Fordham trolling?BlueCivic wrote:Waitlisted today.
I guess i can add being waitlisted by a top 3 new york city law school to my resume.
Sorry, top 3 in nyc. I think everyone agrees that its one of the top three there.
- tomhobbes
- Posts: 455
- Joined: Sat Feb 07, 2009 9:20 pm
Re: Columbia 2010
Well, I'd certainly say Columbia is one of the top five NYC law schools...BlueCivic wrote:puppleberry finn wrote:blatant anti-stanford trolling, or EGREGIOUS pro-NYU/Fordham trolling?BlueCivic wrote:Waitlisted today.
I guess i can add being waitlisted by a top 3 new york city law school to my resume.
Sorry, top 3 in nyc. I think everyone agrees that its one of the top three there.
- puppleberry finn
- Posts: 1035
- Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2009 7:03 pm
Re: Columbia 2010
at a minimum, I would say it's in the top 100 in the nation.tomhobbes wrote:Well, I'd certainly say Columbia is one of the top five NYC law schools...BlueCivic wrote:puppleberry finn wrote:blatant anti-stanford trolling, or EGREGIOUS pro-NYU/Fordham trolling?BlueCivic wrote:Waitlisted today.
I guess i can add being waitlisted by a top 3 new york city law school to my resume.
Sorry, top 3 in nyc. I think everyone agrees that its one of the top three there.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 32987
- Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2008 9:18 pm
Re: Columbia 2010
I think Columbia might actually be tentatively accredited by the ABA. I'll get back to you on it.
- TheWire
- Posts: 479
- Joined: Tue Oct 20, 2009 9:24 pm
Re: Columbia 2010
In the least hijacking manner...Held today in CA
- DoubleChecks
- Posts: 2328
- Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2009 4:35 pm
Re: Columbia 2010
? you find out the answer yet? i want to know whether i should withdraw or notKronk wrote:I think Columbia might actually be tentatively accredited by the ABA. I'll get back to you on it.
- puppleberry finn
- Posts: 1035
- Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2009 7:03 pm
Re: Columbia 2010
+1 am also curious about thisDoubleChecks wrote:? you find out the answer yet? i want to know whether i should withdraw or notKronk wrote:I think Columbia might actually be tentatively accredited by the ABA. I'll get back to you on it.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login