Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014) Forum
-
- Posts: 118
- Joined: Thu Sep 26, 2013 10:44 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
I know it doesn't matter much, and I'm sure I can search through the thread to find this this info but I figured it'd be quicker to just ask anyway -- does anyone know how many people get JS1's vs. how many accepted?
Thanks
Thanks
- t-14orbust
- Posts: 2130
- Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2012 4:43 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
Someone might have more precise info but last year it was around ~1200 JS1s and 850 or so acceptedTela1283 wrote:I know it doesn't matter much, and I'm sure I can search through the thread to find this this info but I figured it'd be quicker to just ask anyway -- does anyone know how many people get JS1's vs. how many accepted?
Thanks
edit: I think they're doing more interviews this year, but probably keeping the accepted # around the same. Stick around for some more in-depth analysis from LS22
- lawschool22
- Posts: 3875
- Joined: Thu Jul 25, 2013 5:47 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
Haha no additional analysis, you've got it rightt-14orbust wrote:Someone might have more precise info but last year it was around ~1200 JS1s and 850 or so acceptedTela1283 wrote:I know it doesn't matter much, and I'm sure I can search through the thread to find this this info but I figured it'd be quicker to just ask anyway -- does anyone know how many people get JS1's vs. how many accepted?
Thanks
edit: I think they're doing more interviews this year, but probably keeping the accepted # around the same. Stick around for some more in-depth analysis from LS22

ETA: Tela this link will give you a lot of info about this year's class: HLS Standard 509 Report
- t-14orbust
- Posts: 2130
- Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2012 4:43 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
I may have mixed it up with last year's mention that they were doing more, which bumped it to 1200. Please disregard that unless someone else has info to back it uplawschool22 wrote:Haha no additional analysis, you've got it rightt-14orbust wrote:Someone might have more precise info but last year it was around ~1200 JS1s and 850 or so acceptedTela1283 wrote:I know it doesn't matter much, and I'm sure I can search through the thread to find this this info but I figured it'd be quicker to just ask anyway -- does anyone know how many people get JS1's vs. how many accepted?
Thanks
edit: I think they're doing more interviews this year, but probably keeping the accepted # around the same. Stick around for some more in-depth analysis from LS22. Although I had not heard they were doing more interviews this year. Not doubting, but where did you see that?
ETA: Tela this link will give you a lot of info about this year's class: HLS Standard 509 Report
edit: looking at that link, how is it possible that people are receiving more than full tuition?
- kershka
- Posts: 630
- Joined: Sat Dec 21, 2013 2:45 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
They probably received some form of living stipendt-14orbust wrote:I may have mixed it up with last year's mention that they were doing more, which bumped it to 1200. Please disregard that unless someone else has info to back it uplawschool22 wrote:Haha no additional analysis, you've got it rightt-14orbust wrote:Someone might have more precise info but last year it was around ~1200 JS1s and 850 or so acceptedTela1283 wrote:I know it doesn't matter much, and I'm sure I can search through the thread to find this this info but I figured it'd be quicker to just ask anyway -- does anyone know how many people get JS1's vs. how many accepted?
Thanks
edit: I think they're doing more interviews this year, but probably keeping the accepted # around the same. Stick around for some more in-depth analysis from LS22. Although I had not heard they were doing more interviews this year. Not doubting, but where did you see that?
ETA: Tela this link will give you a lot of info about this year's class: HLS Standard 509 Report
edit: looking at that link, how is it possible that people are receiving more than full tuition?
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 189
- Joined: Tue Apr 02, 2013 7:51 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
According to the financial aid website, the only way to receive more than around $35,000/yr in grants is if you have dependents. See this link http://www.law.harvard.edu/current/sfs/ ... rried.html
- t-14orbust
- Posts: 2130
- Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2012 4:43 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
I see, thanks. Thank you too, Kershkha.sasquatchsam wrote:According to the financial aid website, the only way to receive more than around $35,000/yr in grants is if you have dependents. See this link http://www.law.harvard.edu/current/sfs/ ... rried.html
- Mort_the_Tort
- Posts: 92
- Joined: Fri Dec 13, 2013 12:23 am
- lawschool22
- Posts: 3875
- Joined: Thu Jul 25, 2013 5:47 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
I'm done predicting lolMort_the_Tort wrote:¿ monday ?
-
- Posts: 76
- Joined: Fri Jan 10, 2014 12:11 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
During the js1 interview, can you wear/use headphones with mic attached to it?
wouldn't it look weird if you put on headphones around your head during the interview...
?
wouldn't it look weird if you put on headphones around your head during the interview...
?
- lawschool22
- Posts: 3875
- Joined: Thu Jul 25, 2013 5:47 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
I wore small earbuds and used an external mic. The earbuds will definitely help with feedback. I think they're pretty common and would be fine.hwannabe1234 wrote:During the js1 interview, can you wear/use headphones with mic attached to it?
wouldn't it look weird if you put on headphones around your head during the interview...
?
- midwest17
- Posts: 1685
- Joined: Sat Aug 31, 2013 5:27 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
The instructions specifically say that it's fine if you use headphones.lawschool22 wrote:I wore small earbuds and used an external mic. The earbuds will definitely help with feedback. I think they're pretty common and would be fine.hwannabe1234 wrote:During the js1 interview, can you wear/use headphones with mic attached to it?
wouldn't it look weird if you put on headphones around your head during the interview...
?
- kershka
- Posts: 630
- Joined: Sat Dec 21, 2013 2:45 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
Headphones are completely fine. During my Chicago interview, my interviewer actually had on a headset like you described.hwannabe1234 wrote:During the js1 interview, can you wear/use headphones with mic attached to it?
wouldn't it look weird if you put on headphones around your head during the interview...
?
I think LS22 had the best combination for headset/mic. I used my computer mic which worked alright and a set of earbuds. I found that worked well, because I could keep one earbud in but leave the other out so that my voice didn't get too loud. If you have non-sound suppressing headphones, however, that's probably not as big of a concern.
Just test whatever method you decide on before the interview to make sure there are no kinks and you should be good to go!
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 331
- Joined: Tue Oct 08, 2013 12:39 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
Are we really doing this? lol. It's a skype interview, I'm pretty sure that as long as you are doing something reasonable for an online interview you have no need to worry. For the record, though, I used earbuds and the computer mic and haven't gotten in yet, so that's probably what killed my app.kershka wrote:Headphones are completely fine. During my Chicago interview, my interviewer actually had on a headset like you described.hwannabe1234 wrote:During the js1 interview, can you wear/use headphones with mic attached to it?
wouldn't it look weird if you put on headphones around your head during the interview...
?
I think LS22 had the best combination for headset/mic. I used my computer mic which worked alright and a set of earbuds. I found that worked well, because I could keep one earbud in but leave the other out so that my voice didn't get too loud. If you have non-sound suppressing headphones, however, that's probably not as big of a concern.
Just test whatever method you decide on before the interview to make sure there are no kinks and you should be good to go!


- lawschool22
- Posts: 3875
- Joined: Thu Jul 25, 2013 5:47 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
I'm not sure which part of the above comments you're taking issue with...IrishJew wrote:Are we really doing this? lol. It's a skype interview, I'm pretty sure that as long as you are doing something reasonable for an online interview you have no need to worry. For the record, though, I used earbuds and the computer mic and haven't gotten in yet, so that's probably what killed my app.kershka wrote:Headphones are completely fine. During my Chicago interview, my interviewer actually had on a headset like you described.hwannabe1234 wrote:During the js1 interview, can you wear/use headphones with mic attached to it?
wouldn't it look weird if you put on headphones around your head during the interview...
?
I think LS22 had the best combination for headset/mic. I used my computer mic which worked alright and a set of earbuds. I found that worked well, because I could keep one earbud in but leave the other out so that my voice didn't get too loud. If you have non-sound suppressing headphones, however, that's probably not as big of a concern.
Just test whatever method you decide on before the interview to make sure there are no kinks and you should be good to go!![]()
-
- Posts: 331
- Joined: Tue Oct 08, 2013 12:39 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
I know it's in all our natures to freak out and want to get it perfect, it just seems a little silly to be fretting about what kind of headphones to use. I mean, I'm pretty darn anal-retentive and even I wasn't worried about that! But maybe I'm just being a jackass, which is totally a possibility too!lawschool22 wrote: I'm not sure which part of the above comments you're taking issue with...
- kershka
- Posts: 630
- Joined: Sat Dec 21, 2013 2:45 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
Okay, I'm not interested in getting into a fight but I'm unsure if you're responding to my previous comment or that of hwannabe who first posted the question. If it's to me then I think you misunderstood what I was saying and kinda overreacted regardless. I have already been admitted and was just trying to reassure hwannabe, in response to their inquiry, that a headset wouldn't hurt them as I used one and was still admitted. My advice was to do a run through on Skype before the interview to make sure that there were no technical gaffs that could unsettle them during the interview. During my practice run, I discovered that taking one earbud out made me sound more natural. For a friend, doing a run-through showed her that her computer mic wasn't picking up her voice and she had to go out and buy an external mic. Either way, my comments were just designed to reassure them that they'd be fine and should go with whatever makes them the most comfortable. (FWIW, I didn't "fret over what kind of headphones to use." I used the only ones I owned and checked that my computer mic worked because I didn't really have the money to buy an external mic as was advised).IrishJew wrote:I know it's in all our natures to freak out and want to get it perfect, it just seems a little silly to be fretting about what kind of headphones to use. I mean, I'm pretty darn anal-retentive and even I wasn't worried about that! But maybe I'm just being a jackass, which is totally a possibility too!lawschool22 wrote: I'm not sure which part of the above comments you're taking issue with...
I hope that your comments were directed at me and not hwannabe because getting reassurances about stressful parts of the admissions process is a huge part of what this thread is for. Earlier people were worried about what color tie to wear; wondering if a headset would look awkward has not only been asked a million times but is pretty reasonable, considering. Given their concern, this is probably their first Skype interview and it's therefore not obvious to them that using a headset is perfectly normal.
But this whole thing is ridiculous and I'm not sure how it even got started. Hwannabe1234 and other recent JS1s, you all are going to do great! Pour yourselves a glass of wine, curl up in your most comfortable chair, and just relax. You've got this. Good luck!

Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- Mort_the_Tort
- Posts: 92
- Joined: Fri Dec 13, 2013 12:23 am
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
what we need is some poetry -- cue chneyo
-
- Posts: 331
- Joined: Tue Oct 08, 2013 12:39 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
Kershka, all good points. Clearly I came off badly and I apologize. I agree COMPLETELY that checking your system and rehearsing are good ideas. It sounded to me like the question was "will JS hold it against me if I'm wearing a headset as opposed to some other configuration." My reaction to that was meant to be less a harsh "you're stupid" and more of a lighthearted "come on, you'll do fine." Though obviously that didn't come through very well and I'm sorry for that.
I had never had a skype interview before my JS1, and there were plenty of details I worried about, but I guess just because I didn't think to fret about how my headphones would look doesn't mean it isn't a reasonable concern.
Folks who are heading into JS1: I certainly can't speak for everyone, but FWIW I had an interview and felt like the interviewer was pretty friendly, genuinely interested in learning about me as an applicant, and not looking for tiny things to "hold against me." Two friends IRL who had interviews felt the same way. Personally I found it a lot less scary than I expected, though I was definitely glad I prepared. (Though I haven't gotten my JS2 yet, so I'm by no means an expert). They wouldn't have invite you unless they thought you were Harvard material!
I had never had a skype interview before my JS1, and there were plenty of details I worried about, but I guess just because I didn't think to fret about how my headphones would look doesn't mean it isn't a reasonable concern.
Folks who are heading into JS1: I certainly can't speak for everyone, but FWIW I had an interview and felt like the interviewer was pretty friendly, genuinely interested in learning about me as an applicant, and not looking for tiny things to "hold against me." Two friends IRL who had interviews felt the same way. Personally I found it a lot less scary than I expected, though I was definitely glad I prepared. (Though I haven't gotten my JS2 yet, so I'm by no means an expert). They wouldn't have invite you unless they thought you were Harvard material!
- kershka
- Posts: 630
- Joined: Sat Dec 21, 2013 2:45 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
NP, Irish
Sometime tone is hard to convey online. Everyone freaks out about different things and it can be funny to see what each person is worried about. It's just good to get your concerns out here so that you're not worried about inconsequential things during that actual interview.
And I agree. The interviewers are definitely not looking to trick you. It may not be as relaxed as UVA, but my interviewer was still perfectly nice (though I had to keep fighting the urge to look at the screen instead of the camera to check her expression and see how my constant stammering was being perceived
)

And I agree. The interviewers are definitely not looking to trick you. It may not be as relaxed as UVA, but my interviewer was still perfectly nice (though I had to keep fighting the urge to look at the screen instead of the camera to check her expression and see how my constant stammering was being perceived

-
- Posts: 331
- Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2012 3:40 am
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
So i had put a hold on my application although it went complete early December because I was writing December LSAT. I have notified them that I would like to take off the hold on my application as I have received my score. But my status checker's "current status date" still reads December 3rd.... should I be concerned?
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 44
- Joined: Mon Aug 05, 2013 12:03 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
Does anybody know how many people or what percentage of the total have been accepted until now?
- HorseThief
- Posts: 713
- Joined: Mon Oct 21, 2013 1:45 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
Probably not, but if you are, just write to the hls staff to confirm that the hold has been lifted.esther0123 wrote:So i had put a hold on my application although it went complete early December because I was writing December LSAT. I have notified them that I would like to take off the hold on my application as I have received my score. But my status checker's "current status date" still reads December 3rd.... should I be concerned?
- HorseThief
- Posts: 713
- Joined: Mon Oct 21, 2013 1:45 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
We are extremely uninformed, but we've speculated that about 300 people have been accepted out of a total of 800 that will be accepted. That means about 38% of the class has been filled up.sandclock wrote:Does anybody know how many people or what percentage of the total have been accepted until now?
- lawschool22
- Posts: 3875
- Joined: Thu Jul 25, 2013 5:47 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
Closer to 860ish will be accepted. Not that it matters all that much, I just want to send out as much hope as possible lolHorseThief wrote:We are extremely uninformed, but we've speculated that about 300 people have been accepted out of a total of 800 that will be accepted. That means about 38% of the class has been filled up.sandclock wrote:Does anybody know how many people or what percentage of the total have been accepted until now?

Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login