Huh. I seemed to remember some astronomical LSAT score. Much luck, either way!NancyBotwin wrote:Eh, not with my numbers. It's a huge reach.Vegas_Rebel wrote:You look concerned Nancy.
Short of a Cornell style adcom meltdown, I'm sure you're fine
U Penn 2010 Forum
- Vegas_Rebel

- Posts: 327
- Joined: Tue Sep 29, 2009 11:18 am
Re: U Penn 2010
- NancyBotwin

- Posts: 1084
- Joined: Wed Jun 10, 2009 5:43 pm
Re: U Penn 2010
Lol. That would not be me.Vegas_Rebel wrote:Huh. I seemed to remember some astronomical LSAT score. Much luck, either way!NancyBotwin wrote:Eh, not with my numbers. It's a huge reach.Vegas_Rebel wrote:You look concerned Nancy.
Short of a Cornell style adcom meltdown, I'm sure you're fine
- puppleberry finn

- Posts: 1035
- Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2009 7:03 pm
Re: U Penn 2010
Even with their insane YPing, which btw is terrible, according to http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/v ... =2&t=96231, Penn still admits 73% of people at both 75%--and they also admit 73% of people at both medians. So it seems less likely that any given applicant would be YPed than not.shadowfrost000 wrote:You ask that as if I am God. I can't really tell you, but you can tell Penn YPs like a mofo. It is just hard to believe that someone with HYS numbers would choose not to go to HYS...Hattori Hanzo wrote: So other than ED there is pretty much no hope for someone outside Penn's normal range to get accepted??
If you by chance get WL and write a really good Why Penn and really don't jump on a different bandwagon at your first opportunity, I don't see why they wouldn't accept you.
-
bowie8285

- Posts: 241
- Joined: Sun Mar 22, 2009 7:38 pm
Re: U Penn 2010
am i the only one getting impatient with this lack of movement? i've been checking my status checker for a month now and nothing's changed.....what's going oooooon
- puppleberry finn

- Posts: 1035
- Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2009 7:03 pm
Re: U Penn 2010
bowie8285 wrote:am i the only one getting impatient with this lack of movement? i've been checking my status checker for a month now and nothing's changed.....what's going oooooon
yesssssss I am super impatient. Outside of YH, Penn is my top choice, and they are being so silent...
-
The Kim Jong illest

- Posts: 192
- Joined: Sat Nov 21, 2009 1:01 am
Re: U Penn 2010
.
Last edited by The Kim Jong illest on Sat Dec 05, 2009 4:37 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
The Kim Jong illest

- Posts: 192
- Joined: Sat Nov 21, 2009 1:01 am
Re: U Penn 2010
I ambowie8285 wrote:are any of ya'll ED?
- Burberry by Burberry

- Posts: 271
- Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2009 1:43 am
Re: U Penn 2010
FYI, it's "y'all."bowie8285 wrote:are any of ya'll ED?
I applied ED.
- danidancer

- Posts: 841
- Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2007 9:46 pm
Re: U Penn 2010
I'm ED as well. I doubt my numbers are much of a threat to anyone here though. 
-
alm2127

- Posts: 40
- Joined: Fri Jun 12, 2009 3:04 pm
Re: U Penn 2010
ED also. guess no calls are coming today:/
- Hattori Hanzo

- Posts: 659
- Joined: Wed Oct 07, 2009 12:17 am
Re: U Penn 2010
If you look @ 175/3.5+, only 13% got acceptedpuppins wrote:Even with their insane YPing, which btw is terrible, according to http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/v ... =2&t=96231, Penn still admits 73% of people at both 75%--and they also admit 73% of people at both medians. So it seems less likely that any given applicant would be YPed than not.shadowfrost000 wrote:You ask that as if I am God. I can't really tell you, but you can tell Penn YPs like a mofo. It is just hard to believe that someone with HYS numbers would choose not to go to HYS...Hattori Hanzo wrote: So other than ED there is pretty much no hope for someone outside Penn's normal range to get accepted??
If you by chance get WL and write a really good Why Penn and really don't jump on a different bandwagon at your first opportunity, I don't see why they wouldn't accept you.
-
nonprofit-prophet

- Posts: 843
- Joined: Sun Oct 04, 2009 11:10 am
Re: U Penn 2010
wow I didn't realize how many TLS users were ED applicants... makes me even more nervous.
-
bowie8285

- Posts: 241
- Joined: Sun Mar 22, 2009 7:38 pm
Re: U Penn 2010
nonprofit-prophet wrote:wow I didn't realize how many TLS users were ED applicants... makes me even more nervous.
are you ED?
- beebs

- Posts: 219
- Joined: Mon Jul 27, 2009 9:37 pm
Re: U Penn 2010
My under review date changed from 11/20 to 11/30. Big day. 
-
bowie8285

- Posts: 241
- Joined: Sun Mar 22, 2009 7:38 pm
Re: U Penn 2010
my under review never changed! they must have tossed me out
- puppleberry finn

- Posts: 1035
- Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2009 7:03 pm
Re: U Penn 2010
Hey, 13% is nothing to scoff at! That's gotta be better than my chances at YH, right?Hattori Hanzo wrote: If you look @ 175/3.5+, only 13% got accepted
-
nonprofit-prophet

- Posts: 843
- Joined: Sun Oct 04, 2009 11:10 am
Re: U Penn 2010
or accepted you instantly!bowie8285 wrote:my under review never changed! they must have tossed me out
Also, I am ED
-
The Kim Jong illest

- Posts: 192
- Joined: Sat Nov 21, 2009 1:01 am
Re: U Penn 2010
Same boat for me - insta-accept I hope! Much more likely, though, would be that it has no meaning.bowie8285 wrote:my under review never changed! they must have tossed me out
-
duodora

- Posts: 103
- Joined: Thu Jun 11, 2009 12:28 pm
Re: U Penn 2010
Does this mean anything for Penn? I know it does for Duke...beebs wrote:My under review date changed from 11/20 to 11/30. Big day.
-
ankit

- Posts: 226
- Joined: Tue Dec 16, 2008 7:48 am
Re: U Penn 2010
+2, no change since "Under Committee Review" on 10/29....The Kim Jong illest wrote:Same boat for me - insta-accept I hope! Much more likely, though, would be that it has no meaning.bowie8285 wrote:my under review never changed! they must have tossed me out
-
oneforship

- Posts: 1004
- Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2008 5:17 pm
Re: U Penn 2010
tcrBurberry by Burberry wrote: FYI, it's "y'all."![]()
-
The Kim Jong illest

- Posts: 192
- Joined: Sat Nov 21, 2009 1:01 am
Re: U Penn 2010
You look like you have near autoadmit numbers. If bowie has high numbers too I will get slightly excited.ankit wrote:+2, no change since "Under Committee Review" on 10/29....The Kim Jong illest wrote:Same boat for me - insta-accept I hope! Much more likely, though, would be that it has no meaning.bowie8285 wrote:my under review never changed! they must have tossed me out