Props, dude. You did great, glad to have you as part of the class of 2016!Anonymous1963 wrote:What's a urm? Either way, I'm white, not a fulbright/rhodes/etc. scholar. Does that help?
Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013) Forum
-
- Posts: 108
- Joined: Wed Nov 07, 2012 2:57 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
- Rahviveh
- Posts: 2333
- Joined: Mon Aug 06, 2012 12:02 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
I did a search on LSN using the range 3.6-3.7 and 168-169, for the past three cycles. Not a single person has gotten in outright. That said, only one of them was an ED and that's counting WL's as denials as well. Either way, that's fantastic news and hopefully a good sign for this cycle.
- soccer88
- Posts: 105
- Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2012 7:25 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
.
Last edited by soccer88 on Sun Feb 09, 2014 9:57 am, edited 1 time in total.
- FranielMcbrodude
- Posts: 37
- Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2012 5:20 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Coming out of the woodwork to join this anxiety-ridden party and contribute my own neuroses. Columbia's a super long shot for me, but I got a fee waiver and their Gender and Sexuality law program would be a dream come true for me.
-
- Posts: 482
- Joined: Wed Sep 08, 2010 11:07 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
+1FranielMcbrodude wrote:Coming out of the woodwork to join this anxiety-ridden party and contribute my own neuroses. Columbia's a super long shot for me, but I got a fee waiver and their Gender and Sexuality law program would be a dream come true for me.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- moonman157
- Posts: 1040
- Joined: Mon Nov 14, 2011 10:26 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
me toosoccer88 wrote:Makes me regret not EDing big time
-
- Posts: 2
- Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2012 6:17 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
So no ED applicants received a decision today?
-
- Posts: 482
- Joined: Wed Sep 08, 2010 11:07 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
I wrote something relevant that was published by a big time magazine... Should I update the admissions committee? I'm worried that I might be coming off as desperate... Last week I sent in an updated resume because I was recently invited to speak at a national conference on LGBT equality. Thoughts?
-
- Posts: 108
- Joined: Wed Nov 07, 2012 2:57 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Do it.
I called the Admissions Office 3-4 times after the ED deadline, I'm pretty sure the girl there recognized me by voice eventually, but I got in. You won't regret it afterward, it's adding something compelling to your application, and honestly, it shouldn't have any real drawbacks.
You might think it makes you look desperate, but in all likelihood, they'll just see it as an added fact on your application, and if they did notice you asking repetitively (which you aren't necessarily) I'm not sure if it'd be frowned upon at all.
I called the Admissions Office 3-4 times after the ED deadline, I'm pretty sure the girl there recognized me by voice eventually, but I got in. You won't regret it afterward, it's adding something compelling to your application, and honestly, it shouldn't have any real drawbacks.
You might think it makes you look desperate, but in all likelihood, they'll just see it as an added fact on your application, and if they did notice you asking repetitively (which you aren't necessarily) I'm not sure if it'd be frowned upon at all.
-
- Posts: 482
- Joined: Wed Sep 08, 2010 11:07 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
haha ok - i'm gonna sleep on it.joedf wrote:Do it.
I called the Admissions Office 3-4 times after the ED deadline, I'm pretty sure the girl there recognized me by voice eventually, but I got in. You won't regret it afterward, it's adding something compelling to your application, and honestly, it shouldn't have any real drawbacks.
You might think it makes you look desperate, but in all likelihood, they'll just see it as an added fact on your application, and if they did notice you asking repetitively (which you aren't necessarily) I'm not sure if it'd be frowned upon at all.
-
- Posts: 108
- Joined: Wed Nov 07, 2012 2:57 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Haha forsure man. I understand the hesitance but there's nothing worse than a what-if thought after it's done.ht2988 wrote:haha ok - i'm gonna sleep on it.joedf wrote:Do it.
I called the Admissions Office 3-4 times after the ED deadline, I'm pretty sure the girl there recognized me by voice eventually, but I got in. You won't regret it afterward, it's adding something compelling to your application, and honestly, it shouldn't have any real drawbacks.
You might think it makes you look desperate, but in all likelihood, they'll just see it as an added fact on your application, and if they did notice you asking repetitively (which you aren't necessarily) I'm not sure if it'd be frowned upon at all.
- soccer88
- Posts: 105
- Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2012 7:25 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
.
Last edited by soccer88 on Sun Feb 09, 2014 9:57 am, edited 2 times in total.
- Elahrairah
- Posts: 99
- Joined: Wed Nov 23, 2011 3:07 am
Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Is Joedf's admission really that surprising? He was basically at both medians, right? LSN gives him about a 60% chance for RD...soccer88 wrote:I'm curious what other folks here thing regarding Joedf's admission/numbers. I realize we're drawing from an absurdly small sample size, but judging from some of the early acceptances to Michigan, Duke, and apparently now Columbia, is it possible we're still underestimating how unpredictable this cycle will be? Or is it more likely that this is just a drastic outlier and us at both 25% are barking up the wrong tree(s)...
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 571
- Joined: Sun Dec 11, 2011 2:36 pm
Post removed...
Post removed...
Last edited by VasaVasori on Tue Jan 05, 2016 6:23 pm, edited 13 times in total.
-
- Posts: 108
- Joined: Wed Nov 07, 2012 2:57 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Thanks, guys, means a lot.
Medians for last year's class were 172 and 3.71.
I tied the median and was just barely under for GPA, so I gave myself a coin flip chance at getting in - I don't think I'm a "drastic outlier." Since this was far and away my first choice school, I did ED, since I'd hear back early and didn't want anything else quite as much. As far as work experience/other non-hard numbers go, I'm in the middle of my gap year (am working) and I think I got decent-good LOR's and some slightly unconventional internships/work throughout undergrad.
I think I was right around the middle, and in this case I took what was perhaps a 50/50 gamble and it paid off.
Not a lock but not necessarily surprising, either.
Medians for last year's class were 172 and 3.71.
I tied the median and was just barely under for GPA, so I gave myself a coin flip chance at getting in - I don't think I'm a "drastic outlier." Since this was far and away my first choice school, I did ED, since I'd hear back early and didn't want anything else quite as much. As far as work experience/other non-hard numbers go, I'm in the middle of my gap year (am working) and I think I got decent-good LOR's and some slightly unconventional internships/work throughout undergrad.
I think I was right around the middle, and in this case I took what was perhaps a 50/50 gamble and it paid off.
Not a lock but not necessarily surprising, either.
Last edited by joedf on Wed Dec 05, 2012 2:01 am, edited 1 time in total.
- CO2016YEAH
- Posts: 578
- Joined: Sat Nov 03, 2012 11:42 am
Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Anything that substantially adds to the attractiveness of your application and indicates you are a benefit to CLS is worth reporting.ht2988 wrote:haha ok - i'm gonna sleep on it.joedf wrote:Do it.
I called the Admissions Office 3-4 times after the ED deadline, I'm pretty sure the girl there recognized me by voice eventually, but I got in. You won't regret it afterward, it's adding something compelling to your application, and honestly, it shouldn't have any real drawbacks.
You might think it makes you look desperate, but in all likelihood, they'll just see it as an added fact on your application, and if they did notice you asking repetitively (which you aren't necessarily) I'm not sure if it'd be frowned upon at all.
And you are desperate.

-
- Posts: 163
- Joined: Tue Sep 13, 2011 7:49 am
Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
.
Last edited by sokomofo on Tue Jun 24, 2014 10:13 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- soccer88
- Posts: 105
- Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2012 7:25 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Sorry my mistake, I meant Anonymous1963's admission, who had a 168 and a 3.6, hard to keep all these handles straight in my head. That was the one though that really broke the mold.
-
- Posts: 1
- Joined: Wed Dec 05, 2012 10:31 am
Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
I was accepted yesterday at 3:38 pm. Stats: 174 and 3.67 (ivy)
-
- Posts: 482
- Joined: Wed Sep 08, 2010 11:07 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
pm'ed yousokomofo wrote:wow nice! what conference as that?ht2988 wrote:I wrote something relevant that was published by a big time magazine... Should I update the admissions committee? I'm worried that I might be coming off as desperate... Last week I sent in an updated resume because I was recently invited to speak at a national conference on LGBT equality. Thoughts?

- Rahviveh
- Posts: 2333
- Joined: Mon Aug 06, 2012 12:02 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Joedfs admission wasnt surprising, but there was a guy who got in a couple pages ago who claimed to have a 3.6/168 and no major softs. If so that would be a big deal.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- soccer88
- Posts: 105
- Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2012 7:25 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
.
Last edited by soccer88 on Sun Feb 09, 2014 9:57 am, edited 1 time in total.
- Elahrairah
- Posts: 99
- Joined: Wed Nov 23, 2011 3:07 am
Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Wow! Very nicely done, Anonymous1963. You must have had a great application!soccer88 wrote:That's what I was trying to reference...was too tired to remember the right handle. Wondering what the implications are of the 168 3.6ChampagnePapi wrote:Joedfs admission wasnt surprising, but there was a guy who got in a couple pages ago who claimed to have a 3.6/168 and no major softs. If so that would be a big deal.
Now hopefully Columbia has a few more seats on the lifeboat for the rest of us steerage passengers...
-
- Posts: 39
- Joined: Wed Aug 12, 2009 12:24 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Hi everyone! New poster here, though I've been following this thread. I got my acceptance letter at 2:30 EST today. Numbers are 169/3.8 from an ivy. 2.5 year work experience. Really surprised I got in, especially since I retook the LSAT this October and actually did worse (168...don't ask.) I keep thinking they're going to e-mail me and be like oops, that was a mistake!
Good luck to everyone else who's still waiting!
Good luck to everyone else who's still waiting!
- djwjddl
- Posts: 478
- Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2011 1:50 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
now i'm really kicking myself for not applying ED to CLSSampaguita21 wrote:Hi everyone! New poster here, though I've been following this thread. I got my acceptance letter at 2:30 EST today. Numbers are 169/3.8 from an ivy. 2.5 year work experience. Really surprised I got in, especially since I retook the LSAT this October and actually did worse (168...don't ask.) I keep thinking they're going to e-mail me and be like oops, that was a mistake!
Good luck to everyone else who's still waiting!
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login