WUSTL c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle) Forum
- franklyscarlet
- Posts: 2918
- Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2011 10:16 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
any decisions today for those who moved yesterday? Mine is still no news at 12/6.
- Killingly
- Posts: 1179
- Joined: Sat Jun 04, 2011 11:17 am
Re: WUSTL c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
If it helps, my email came at 5:12 PM EST. Definite possibility they could send more out today.franklyscarlet wrote:any decisions today for those who moved yesterday? Mine is still no news at 12/6.
- msblaw89
- Posts: 2662
- Joined: Wed Sep 07, 2011 6:10 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Still therefranklyscarlet wrote:any decisions today for those who moved yesterday? Mine is still no news at 12/6.
- franklyscarlet
- Posts: 2918
- Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2011 10:16 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
That would totally make my Wednesday. I feel like this one acceptance is super personal for me.Killingly wrote:If it helps, my email came at 5:12 PM EST. Definite possibility they could send more out today.franklyscarlet wrote:any decisions today for those who moved yesterday? Mine is still no news at 12/6.
- Killingly
- Posts: 1179
- Joined: Sat Jun 04, 2011 11:17 am
Re: WUSTL c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
I'm pulling for you, Scarlet!franklyscarlet wrote:That would totally make my Wednesday. I feel like this one acceptance is super personal for me.Killingly wrote:If it helps, my email came at 5:12 PM EST. Definite possibility they could send more out today.franklyscarlet wrote:any decisions today for those who moved yesterday? Mine is still no news at 12/6.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 385
- Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2011 12:45 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
I love the overlap of people posting in both this thread and the NU thread. Hope to see you all at one of them next fall!
- 80eight
- Posts: 170
- Joined: Sat Aug 27, 2011 10:18 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
For what it's worth, guys: St. Louis Doesn't Suck
Last edited by 80eight on Wed Dec 07, 2011 8:34 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- franklyscarlet
- Posts: 2918
- Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2011 10:16 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
I've never uderstood st Louis hate. I adored it there.80eight wrote:For what its worth, guys: St. Louis Doesn't Suck
- Samara
- Posts: 3238
- Joined: Wed May 11, 2011 4:26 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
haha, splitters in the house! Same to you!STLMizzou wrote:I love the overlap of people posting in both this thread and the NU thread. Hope to see you all at one of them next fall!
-
- Posts: 385
- Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2011 12:45 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Yeah... too bad my dad neglected to tell me that my G-ma on his side was full blooded Native American (never knew her, kind of taboo in the family to bring her up).
Would have been nice to be able to put URM on those apps, even if I am blond hair blue eyed...
Would have been nice to be able to put URM on those apps, even if I am blond hair blue eyed...
- msblaw89
- Posts: 2662
- Joined: Wed Sep 07, 2011 6:10 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
I think for most schools you have to have tribal documentation.... I have Native American in me too.... but I can't legally validate it so I put whiteSTLMizzou wrote:Yeah... too bad my dad neglected to tell me that my G-ma on his side was full blooded Native American (never knew her, kind of taboo in the family to bring her up).
Would have been nice to be able to put URM on those apps, even if I am blond hair blue eyed...
-
- Posts: 385
- Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2011 12:45 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Yeah, but my dad got a DNA test to prove he was genetically linked when he was doing government work. I would assume DNA tracing to linage would suffice. Damn him and his lack of full disclosure.
Anyways, too late now, apps are in. Hopefully they like me for the wonderful splitter white boy I am...
Anyways, too late now, apps are in. Hopefully they like me for the wonderful splitter white boy I am...
- msblaw89
- Posts: 2662
- Joined: Wed Sep 07, 2011 6:10 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
True...maybe you can get in contact with them?STLMizzou wrote:Yeah, but my dad got a DNA test to prove he was genetically linked when he was doing government work. I would assume DNA tracing to linage would suffice. Damn him and his lack of full disclosure.
Anyways, too late now, apps are in. Hopefully they like me for the wonderful splitter white boy I am...
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 385
- Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2011 12:45 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Eh, I would feel like I am taking advantage of a system that has a good purpose of getting a diverse student body, and giving people who have not had many chances in life a leg up for once.
At least if I get rejected I know they wouldn't have wanted me for who I really am anyways.
At least if I get rejected I know they wouldn't have wanted me for who I really am anyways.
- msblaw89
- Posts: 2662
- Joined: Wed Sep 07, 2011 6:10 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
True, I think an acceptance would be more gratifying . Good Luck!! I don't think you will need the URM boost anywaySTLMizzou wrote:Eh, I would feel like I am taking advantage of a system that has a good purpose of getting a diverse student body, and giving people who have not had many chances in life a leg up for once.
At least if I get rejected I know they wouldn't have wanted me for who I really am anyways.
-
- Posts: 385
- Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2011 12:45 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
msblaw89 wrote:True, I think an acceptance would be more gratifying . Good Luck!! I don't think you will need the URM boost anyway
Well, I may have been bored at work the other day, and I may have emailed back the KU fee waiver telling them I would rather rip out my eyeballs than have them witness me attending KU. And I may have gotten an angry email back threatening to make a misconduct claim against me... So there's that.
Whatever, I was just trying to fully disclose everything. I regret nothing.
- crumpetsandtea
- Posts: 7147
- Joined: Thu Jun 17, 2010 7:57 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
STLMizzou, you're a damn good person. 

Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 265
- Joined: Sun Aug 08, 2010 4:14 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
STLMizzou wrote:msblaw89 wrote:True, I think an acceptance would be more gratifying . Good Luck!! I don't think you will need the URM boost anyway
Well, I may have been bored at work the other day, and I may have emailed back the KU fee waiver telling them I would rather rip out my eyeballs than have them witness me attending KU. And I may have gotten an angry email back threatening to make a misconduct claim against me... So there's that.
Whatever, I was just trying to fully disclose everything. I regret nothing.

- Magnifique1908
- Posts: 574
- Joined: Mon Feb 18, 2008 11:46 am
Re: WUSTL c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
STLMizzou wrote:msblaw89 wrote:True, I think an acceptance would be more gratifying . Good Luck!! I don't think you will need the URM boost anyway
Well, I may have been bored at work the other day, and I may have emailed back the KU fee waiver telling them I would rather rip out my eyeballs than have them witness me attending KU. And I may have gotten an angry email back threatening to make a misconduct claim against me... So there's that.
Whatever, I was just trying to fully disclose everything. I regret nothing.

-
- Posts: 385
- Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2011 12:45 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
crumpetsandtea wrote:STLMizzou, you're a damn good person.
Thanks, let's just hope the people who look over my app at WashU don't have any KU ties. It's unlikely, seeing as most KU grads move back in with their parents and don't get jobs on admissions boards at prestigious universities, but I will keep my fingers crossed just in case.
-
- Posts: 479
- Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2011 11:01 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Haha did you really do that? I was thinking of doing that to ND and Liberty for different reasons, but I decided against for that very reason.STLMizzou wrote:msblaw89 wrote:True, I think an acceptance would be more gratifying . Good Luck!! I don't think you will need the URM boost anyway
Well, I may have been bored at work the other day, and I may have emailed back the KU fee waiver telling them I would rather rip out my eyeballs than have them witness me attending KU. And I may have gotten an angry email back threatening to make a misconduct claim against me... So there's that.
Whatever, I was just trying to fully disclose everything. I regret nothing.
I still may write a (polite but firm) email to ND telling them that they are missing out on qualified candidates because of certain policies, and I am evidence of this.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- soccerfreak
- Posts: 407
- Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2010 1:57 am
Re: WUSTL c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
I fully endorse these actions.STLMizzou wrote:msblaw89 wrote:True, I think an acceptance would be more gratifying . Good Luck!! I don't think you will need the URM boost anyway
Well, I may have been bored at work the other day, and I may have emailed back the KU fee waiver telling them I would rather rip out my eyeballs than have them witness me attending KU. And I may have gotten an angry email back threatening to make a misconduct claim against me... So there's that.
Whatever, I was just trying to fully disclose everything. I regret nothing.
-
- Posts: 385
- Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2011 12:45 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Yes, yes I did.addy11 wrote:Haha did you really do that? I was thinking of doing that to ND and Liberty for different reasons, but I decided against for that very reason.
I then had to write a follow-up email explaining when I said "My denial of your invitation to apply should be considered good news to you, as the day I come to Laurence KS will be the day the town burns to the ground, again." I simply saying if a natural disaster such as fire where to devastate their town I would help in the relief effort similar to Auburn supporters assisting the town of Tuscaloosa when it was in need.
Although referring to their incoming class as the perfect group to continue their currently meteoric rise to the top of the law school rankings may be viewed as a tad overzealous.
-
- Posts: 47
- Joined: Thu Jun 30, 2011 12:05 am
Re: WUSTL c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
As a current Mizzou undergrad, I approve this message.STLMizzou wrote:I may have emailed back the KU fee waiver telling them I would rather rip out my eyeballs than have them witness me attending KU.
- thelawschoolproject
- Posts: 1364
- Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2011 12:58 am
Re: WUSTL c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
STLMizzou wrote:Yes, yes I did.addy11 wrote:Haha did you really do that? I was thinking of doing that to ND and Liberty for different reasons, but I decided against for that very reason.
I then had to write a follow-up email explaining when I said "My denial of your invitation to apply should be considered good news to you, as the day I come to Laurence KS will be the day the town burns to the ground, again." I simply saying if a natural disaster such as fire where to devastate their town I would help in the relief effort similar to Auburn supporters assisting the town of Tuscaloosa when it was in need.
Although referring to their incoming class as the perfect group to continue their currently meteoric rise to the top of the law school rankings may be viewed as a tad overzealous.
You, I like you. Fuck KU.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login