Texas 2011 Applicants Forum
- iwanta170
- Posts: 445
- Joined: Sat Apr 24, 2010 2:27 pm
Re: Texas 2011 Applicants
If I applied ED and then registered for a retake later, will they hold my file until January? The Status Checker says I'm complete and being considered for ED
- JazzOne
- Posts: 2979
- Joined: Tue Sep 09, 2008 11:04 am
Re: Texas 2011 Applicants
Does it account for OOS? I think that affects UT more than any other law school.whymeohgodno wrote:Just noticed lawschoolpredictor gave me a weaker index number for UT than Cornell. Doesn't UT have lower medians for both LSAT/GPA? Weird.
-
- Posts: 2508
- Joined: Mon Jul 19, 2010 8:15 pm
Re: Texas 2011 Applicants
Maybe. Is OOS that big of a disadvantage? I have numbers above both medians so I thought UT was a strong target.JazzOne wrote:Does it account for OOS? I think that affects UT more than any other law school.whymeohgodno wrote:Just noticed lawschoolpredictor gave me a weaker index number for UT than Cornell. Doesn't UT have lower medians for both LSAT/GPA? Weird.
Or maybe UT has higher 75th percentile for both LSAT/GPA than Cornell?
- JazzOne
- Posts: 2979
- Joined: Tue Sep 09, 2008 11:04 am
Re: Texas 2011 Applicants
I've heard conflicting reports about this. It was always my assumption that our OOS medians would be higher since the school is limited to 35% OOS matriculants. Because there are fewer spots for OOS, I figured the school could be more selective. However, someone recently suggested that Dean Ingram stated the exact reverse; that is, the OOS medians are ostensibly lower than IS because UT gets a large majority of its applications from IS applicants. Thus, they have a far larger pool of IS applicants, and perhaps they can grab a lot of high numbers from that large pool.whymeohgodno wrote:Maybe. Is OOS that big of a disadvantage? I have numbers above both medians so I thought UT was a strong target.JazzOne wrote:Does it account for OOS? I think that affects UT more than any other law school.whymeohgodno wrote:Just noticed lawschoolpredictor gave me a weaker index number for UT than Cornell. Doesn't UT have lower medians for both LSAT/GPA? Weird.
Or maybe UT has higher 75th percentile for both LSAT/GPA than Cornell?
I still feel like it's easier to get in if you're from Texas, but obviously, I don't have any inside information.
Edit: Now that I think about it, UT might be able to keep IS applicants with high numbers by giving them scholarships, which are tremendous when combined with UT's low COA with IS tuition.
-
- Posts: 154
- Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2010 12:57 pm
Re: Texas 2011 Applicants
adcomms would accept additional documents? i may start working on a Why Texas statement then. if i do write one, where would i send it to?JazzOne wrote:Yes to all questions. Next.txlaw wrote:Just got an email that I'm being held for regular decision. Is there anything I can do at this point to help my chances? UT is the only school I want to attend. Should I write a "why UT" letter or would that just annoy the admissions comittee? Also, If I get a legal job before they make a decision should I update them about it? Thanks in advance for any advice, I'm totally stressing out about this.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 2508
- Joined: Mon Jul 19, 2010 8:15 pm
Re: Texas 2011 Applicants
Did Dean Ingram actually state that? Or is that just rumor and speculation?JazzOne wrote:I've heard conflicting reports about this. It was always my assumption that our OOS medians would be higher since the school is limited to 35% OOS matriculants. Because there are fewer spots for OOS, I figured the school could be more selective. However, someone recently suggested that Dean Ingram stated the exact reverse; that is, the OOS medians are ostensibly lower than IS because UT gets a large majority of its applications from IS applicants. Thus, they have a far larger pool of IS applicants, and perhaps they can grab a lot of high numbers from that large pool.whymeohgodno wrote:Maybe. Is OOS that big of a disadvantage? I have numbers above both medians so I thought UT was a strong target.JazzOne wrote:Does it account for OOS? I think that affects UT more than any other law school.whymeohgodno wrote:Just noticed lawschoolpredictor gave me a weaker index number for UT than Cornell. Doesn't UT have lower medians for both LSAT/GPA? Weird.
Or maybe UT has higher 75th percentile for both LSAT/GPA than Cornell?
I still feel like it's easier to get in if you're from Texas, but obviously, I don't have any inside information.
Edit: Now that I think about it, UT might be able to keep IS applicants with high numbers by giving them scholarships, which are tremendous when combined with UT's low COA with IS tuition.
- JazzOne
- Posts: 2979
- Joined: Tue Sep 09, 2008 11:04 am
Re: Texas 2011 Applicants
I haven't read it myself, but the interview is here on TLS somewhere. I'm too lazy to look it up because I already sneaked in before the numbers started climbing. It's getting pretty damn tough to get into UT these days.whymeohgodno wrote:Did Dean Ingram actually state that? Or is that just rumor and speculation?
-
- Posts: 2508
- Joined: Mon Jul 19, 2010 8:15 pm
Re: Texas 2011 Applicants
Sigh...More signs pointing to a retake and waiting a cycle...JazzOne wrote:I haven't read it myself, but the interview is here on TLS somewhere. I'm too lazy to look it up because I already sneaked in before the numbers started climbing. It's getting pretty damn tough to get into UT these days.whymeohgodno wrote:Did Dean Ingram actually state that? Or is that just rumor and speculation?
- iwanta170
- Posts: 445
- Joined: Sat Apr 24, 2010 2:27 pm
Re: Texas 2011 Applicants
Anyone know?iwanta170 wrote:If I applied ED and then registered for a retake later, will they hold my file until January? The Status Checker says I'm complete and being considered for ED
- JazzOne
- Posts: 2979
- Joined: Tue Sep 09, 2008 11:04 am
Re: Texas 2011 Applicants
What? I though you had T14 numbers? Why are you so bent on UT? Go to Vandy!whymeohgodno wrote:Sigh...More signs pointing to a retake and waiting a cycle...JazzOne wrote:I haven't read it myself, but the interview is here on TLS somewhere. I'm too lazy to look it up because I already sneaked in before the numbers started climbing. It's getting pretty damn tough to get into UT these days.whymeohgodno wrote:Did Dean Ingram actually state that? Or is that just rumor and speculation?
- JazzOne
- Posts: 2979
- Joined: Tue Sep 09, 2008 11:04 am
Re: Texas 2011 Applicants
I think they will hold you over for RD if you register for a retake.iwanta170 wrote:Anyone know?iwanta170 wrote:If I applied ED and then registered for a retake later, will they hold my file until January? The Status Checker says I'm complete and being considered for ED
Unless you're clearly admit/reject. If you're borderline, they'll probably hold off for the December score.
-
- Posts: 843
- Joined: Sun Oct 04, 2009 11:10 am
Re: Texas 2011 Applicants
Is that based on anecdotal evidence? Compared to last year, the LSN graph definitely looks a bit different at this point in the cycle. I'm just curious if they announced that they are making a big push to raise medians (or however you came to that conclusion).JazzOne wrote:I haven't read it myself, but the interview is here on TLS somewhere. I'm too lazy to look it up because I already sneaked in before the numbers started climbing. It's getting pretty damn tough to get into UT these days.whymeohgodno wrote:Did Dean Ingram actually state that? Or is that just rumor and speculation?
-
- Posts: 2508
- Joined: Mon Jul 19, 2010 8:15 pm
Re: Texas 2011 Applicants
Tennesse scares me. Also my LSAT is below Vandy's new median. Also I hear Austin is nice.JazzOne wrote:What? I though you had T14 numbers? Why are you so bent on UT? Go to Vandy!whymeohgodno wrote:Sigh...More signs pointing to a retake and waiting a cycle...JazzOne wrote:I haven't read it myself, but the interview is here on TLS somewhere. I'm too lazy to look it up because I already sneaked in before the numbers started climbing. It's getting pretty damn tough to get into UT these days.whymeohgodno wrote:Did Dean Ingram actually state that? Or is that just rumor and speculation?
And my numbers are not t14 - only at medians for Cornell lols.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 416
- Joined: Thu May 13, 2010 12:16 am
Re: Texas 2011 Applicants
For RD pool, if you are complete, they don't hold - even at your request. Not sure how this plays with ED pool.iwanta170 wrote:Anyone know?iwanta170 wrote:If I applied ED and then registered for a retake later, will they hold my file until January? The Status Checker says I'm complete and being considered for ED
- iwanta170
- Posts: 445
- Joined: Sat Apr 24, 2010 2:27 pm
Re: Texas 2011 Applicants
Oh really..in that case I guess I may get a decision soonforward21 wrote:For RD pool, if you are complete, they don't hold - even at your request. Not sure how this plays with ED pool.iwanta170 wrote:Anyone know?iwanta170 wrote:If I applied ED and then registered for a retake later, will they hold my file until January? The Status Checker says I'm complete and being considered for ED
- AdamAndSteve
- Posts: 112
- Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2010 12:43 pm
Re: Texas 2011 Applicants
Is it too early in the admissions season to send a LOCI? I was held.
- JazzOne
- Posts: 2979
- Joined: Tue Sep 09, 2008 11:04 am
Re: Texas 2011 Applicants
I went to ASW a couple years ago, and Dean Sager openly admitted that his plans for the school were partially motivated by a desire to move up the rankings.nonprofit-prophet wrote:Is that based on anecdotal evidence? Compared to last year, the LSN graph definitely looks a bit different at this point in the cycle. I'm just curious if they announced that they are making a big push to raise medians (or however you came to that conclusion).JazzOne wrote:I haven't read it myself, but the interview is here on TLS somewhere. I'm too lazy to look it up because I already sneaked in before the numbers started climbing. It's getting pretty damn tough to get into UT these days.whymeohgodno wrote:Did Dean Ingram actually state that? Or is that just rumor and speculation?
At that time, UT had just jumped up to #15, so there was some excitement regarding the rankings and speculation about whether UT could climb into the T14. Plus, UT threw around a lot of scholarship money that year, and they've been hiring faculty members from higher-ranked schools. I also know of a professor who failed to tenure, and he/she left UT, so I think the administration is serious about improving UT from year to year. In addition, the class size has been slowly shrinking. There were 385 in my class, and the following class was slightly smaller. The rumor is that they want to get that down to 350 to improve the student to faculty ratio. The entire writing curriculum has been revamped.
My impression is that UT is on the rise. The only real drawback is that the facilities are a bit old. I personally don't mind that because the in-state tuition is so reasonable, but the law school and library are too old and in desperate need of a renovation. To be fair, the library renovation is underway, but I won't be around to reap the benefit of it, so I'm a little disgruntled that I've had to endure the construction.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 843
- Joined: Sun Oct 04, 2009 11:10 am
Re: Texas 2011 Applicants
Thanks for the info!JazzOne wrote:I went to ASW a couple years ago, and Dean Sager openly admitted that his plans for the school were partially motivated by a desire to move up the rankings.nonprofit-prophet wrote:Is that based on anecdotal evidence? Compared to last year, the LSN graph definitely looks a bit different at this point in the cycle. I'm just curious if they announced that they are making a big push to raise medians (or however you came to that conclusion).JazzOne wrote:I haven't read it myself, but the interview is here on TLS somewhere. I'm too lazy to look it up because I already sneaked in before the numbers started climbing. It's getting pretty damn tough to get into UT these days.whymeohgodno wrote:Did Dean Ingram actually state that? Or is that just rumor and speculation?
At that time, UT had just jumped up to #15, so there was some excitement regarding the rankings and speculation about whether UT could climb into the T14. Plus, UT threw around a lot of scholarship money that year, and they've been hiring faculty members from higher-ranked schools. I also know of a professor who failed to tenure, and he/she left UT, so I think the administration is serious about improving UT from year to year. In addition, the class size has been slowly shrinking. There were 385 in my class, and the following class was slightly smaller. The rumor is that they want to get that down to 350 to improve the student to faculty ratio. The entire writing curriculum has been revamped.
My impression is that UT is on the rise. The only real drawback is that the facilities are a bit old. I personally don't mind that because the in-state tuition is so reasonable, but the law school and library are too old and in desperate need of a renovation. To be fair, the library renovation is underway, but I won't be around to reap the benefit of it, so I'm a little disgruntled that I've had to endure the construction.
I just took a tour this weekend and I was surprised at how out of date the facilities looked (compared to other schools I visited). However, in-state tuition (as an out of stater) would certainly take my mind off the 1970s wood paneling!
- JazzOne
- Posts: 2979
- Joined: Tue Sep 09, 2008 11:04 am
Re: Texas 2011 Applicants
Did you see the new part of the library? The renovation is actually pretty impressive, but like I mentioned above, I'm bitter.nonprofit-prophet wrote:Thanks for the info!
I just took a tour this weekend and I was surprised at how out of date the facilities looked (compared to other schools I visited). However, in-state tuition (as an out of stater) would certainly take my mind off the 1970s wood paneling!
-
- Posts: 279
- Joined: Wed Aug 18, 2010 3:55 pm
Re: Texas 2011 Applicants
The rest of the campus is beautiful though (except for things like the main library, endearingly constructed in the shape of Texas). It is really the law school facilities that are quite dated.
- JazzOne
- Posts: 2979
- Joined: Tue Sep 09, 2008 11:04 am
Re: Texas 2011 Applicants
Meh, there are some cool things on campus, but I wouldn't say it is really beautiful. SMU is far more picturesque. I hate how the major roads run right through campus. Constant traffic is not really pretty either.The Real Jack McCoy wrote:The rest of the campus is beautiful though (except for things like the main library, endearingly constructed in the shape of Texas). It is really the law school facilities that are quite dated.
Edit: I'm not dogging the school. I love UT. Just calling it like I see it.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 843
- Joined: Sun Oct 04, 2009 11:10 am
Re: Texas 2011 Applicants
JazzOne wrote:Did you see the new part of the library? The renovation is actually pretty impressive, but like I mentioned above, I'm bitter.nonprofit-prophet wrote:Thanks for the info!
I just took a tour this weekend and I was surprised at how out of date the facilities looked (compared to other schools I visited). However, in-state tuition (as an out of stater) would certainly take my mind off the 1970s wood paneling!
Unfortunately, my tour guide only showed me the first floor of the library. However, the admissions office gave me a recent copy of UT Law Magazine that had mock ups of what the library will look like once it is completed. Very nice indeed.
-
- Posts: 1853
- Joined: Wed Dec 03, 2008 1:46 am
Re: Texas 2011 Applicants
LOL what?? Tennessee is fine and Nashville is a really progressive city. Plus, huge portion of the Vandy student body isnt from TN.whymeohgodno wrote:
Tennesse scares me. Also my LSAT is below Vandy's new median. Also I hear Austin is nice.
And my numbers are not t14 - only at medians for Cornell lols.
-
- Posts: 279
- Joined: Wed Aug 18, 2010 3:55 pm
Re: Texas 2011 Applicants
"Rest of" campus is definitely an overstatement. Some areas are great, others are hideous. I probably like the general style more than most, but I'll concede there are large swaths of campus that are less than ideal.JazzOne wrote:Meh, there are some cool things on campus, but I wouldn't say it is really beautiful. SMU is far more picturesque. I hate how the major roads run right through campus. Constant traffic is not really pretty either.The Real Jack McCoy wrote:The rest of the campus is beautiful though (except for things like the main library, endearingly constructed in the shape of Texas). It is really the law school facilities that are quite dated.
Edit: I'm not dogging the school. I love UT. Just calling it like I see it.
(Only drove by SMU)
- achilles
- Posts: 160
- Joined: Mon Sep 20, 2010 2:08 am
Re: Texas 2011 Applicants
Got the call today
so excited!! i was definitely not expecting it this soon. no scholly though, will have to try the matching program
Submitted 10/30, in state, PM for stats
also, i visited a few weeks ago and agree that the facilities could be prettier, but i think that the people at the school and austin make up for that

Submitted 10/30, in state, PM for stats
also, i visited a few weeks ago and agree that the facilities could be prettier, but i think that the people at the school and austin make up for that
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login