All I'm seeing now is reduced fat; get that weak shit outta here. If my breath is going to smell stank from processed cheese, I may as well be getting fat while I'm at it!whenwin wrote:all i see:
Michigan c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle) Forum
- PopTorts13
- Posts: 378
- Joined: Sat Dec 03, 2011 6:27 pm
Re: Michigan c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
- Green Glass Windows
- Posts: 743
- Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2011 3:37 pm
Re: Michigan c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Ah, but I find the taste of reduced fat better than the regular ones. Maybe it's just the texture.PopTorts13 wrote:
All I'm seeing now is reduced fat; get that weak shit outta here. If my breath is going to smell stank from processed cheese, I may as well be getting fat while I'm at it!
- MachineLemon
- Posts: 375
- Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2011 9:47 am
Re: Michigan c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Bump. Radio silence here and I'm a long shot for a Darrow, but still interested.EdgarWinter wrote:If I received merit aid in the week or two post-admission but did not receive a Darrow invite. Does that mean that I am most definitely not going to receive one in the future? Anyone who got a Darrow invite get it post other merit scholly offer? Michigan made me a nice offer and the school seems awesome but the "we do not increase merit awards once they are made" part of the letter is crushing some (perhaps unrealistic) dreams of mine.
Edit: CHEEZ-IT are credited.
- JoeMo
- Posts: 1517
- Joined: Tue Oct 11, 2011 10:29 am
Re: Michigan c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
The general consensus is if you received initial merit aid then you will not get a Darrow invite. I think the few TLS'ers that have received Darrow invites mentioned that none of them were given initial merit offers and the same is true for past cycles.MachineLemon wrote:Bump. Radio silence here and I'm a long shot for a Darrow, but still interested.EdgarWinter wrote:If I received merit aid in the week or two post-admission but did not receive a Darrow invite. Does that mean that I am most definitely not going to receive one in the future? Anyone who got a Darrow invite get it post other merit scholly offer? Michigan made me a nice offer and the school seems awesome but the "we do not increase merit awards once they are made" part of the letter is crushing some (perhaps unrealistic) dreams of mine.
Edit: CHEEZ-IT are credited.
- WhiteGuy5
- Posts: 918
- Joined: Thu Oct 06, 2011 3:47 pm
Re: Michigan c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
We have the same table.blowhard wrote: This was one semester 1L:
--ImageRemoved--
No photos and we read every page (except the restatement...70%...and maybe 50% of the Farnsworth and Chirlsetin)
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- JustE
- Posts: 1330
- Joined: Tue Sep 28, 2010 8:49 pm
Re: Michigan c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
JoeMo wrote:The general consensus is if you received initial merit aid then you will not get a Darrow invite. I think the few TLS'ers that have received Darrow invites mentioned that none of them were given initial merit offers and the same is true for past cycles.MachineLemon wrote:Bump. Radio silence here and I'm a long shot for a Darrow, but still interested.EdgarWinter wrote:If I received merit aid in the week or two post-admission but did not receive a Darrow invite. Does that mean that I am most definitely not going to receive one in the future? Anyone who got a Darrow invite get it post other merit scholly offer? Michigan made me a nice offer and the school seems awesome but the "we do not increase merit awards once they are made" part of the letter is crushing some (perhaps unrealistic) dreams of mine.
Edit: CHEEZ-IT are credited.



This just gave me lots of false hope that I'll be getting a Darrow invite.



-Not a chance in hell.
-
- Posts: 2992
- Joined: Fri Jul 17, 2009 2:07 am
Re: Michigan c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
None of this matters. My original assertion...which started all of this...was most people wouldn't have time to work 2L if they were on a journal. Scrabble Champ then decided his friends knew better and that my analysis was inapplicable as the OP didn't mention a journal...despite the fact my response was qualified.JoeMo wrote:hyakku wrote:What? This doesn't really sense. Literally, almost all law schools have nearly identical curriculum with slight variation, hence why so many try to stress their clinics and other offerings. Law school is the definition of a cookie cutter experience, there's only so many anecdotes that can come up about Contracts law. And it's not like being a lawyer allots you some mystical options outside of law so again, there are only so many career paths for lawyers.JoeMo wrote:I don't think because someone knows of a different anecdote than your own it makes them a "douche" or a "cocky 0L" I think LS is a very anecdotal undertaking. Everyone has a different experience just as we don't all set out to accomplish the same thing (although admittedly 95% of TLS shares the same mentality be it Group Think or just that they're afraid to say what they really feel for fear of being mocked by the more sage minds of TLS). I know that ultimately we'll all take different paths and so in a few years when I'm telling some 0L "I was able to do this and this and this and this..." they will likely come on TLS and say "My friend did this" and someone will undoubtedly find themselves incredulous and call them out. And the cycle repeats.blowhard wrote: Cheez-its make the world go-round. My dog loves them too. She eats as many as I do.
Also, FWIW I'm not upset. This happens every year...cocky 0L's who think they know better because they have "friends" who did it. They learn eventually.
Let's move on and chalk this up to January jitters.
As for the other argument going on, I don't really understand what the issue is. The one guy already admitted that his friend took 30-40 hours less class a week; I could see how working would be pretty feasible with almost half the amount of required time for school throughout LS, although I still think it ultimately wouldn't be worth it.
Uh no. Not everyone chooses to do Law Review or is chosen. People participate in different clinics. Also after 1L it's not that cookie cutter. Some choose joint degrees others don't. Some choose to specialize others don't. Etc... Thus LS can be as cookie cutter as you want it to be but it can also be quite individualized.
- Elliott_Smith
- Posts: 379
- Joined: Tue Jan 03, 2012 4:34 am
Re: Michigan c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Let's lay that argument to rest, eh guys?
- thelong
- Posts: 992
- Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2011 10:55 am
Re: Michigan c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Elliott_Smith wrote:Let's lay that argument to rest, eh guys?
- JamMasterJ
- Posts: 6649
- Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2011 7:17 pm
Re: Michigan c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
so....................... who else is nervous about Michigan decisions..................................?
-
- Posts: 255
- Joined: Tue Aug 16, 2011 6:46 pm
Re: Michigan c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
not reading through 169 pages... r michigan decisions ONLY mail, or do they also email you a couple days later?
- JamMasterJ
- Posts: 6649
- Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2011 7:17 pm
Re: Michigan c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
status checkerbroncos_fan_26 wrote:not reading through 169 pages... r michigan decisions ONLY mail, or do they also email you a couple days later?
- UnamSanctam
- Posts: 7342
- Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2011 3:17 am
Re: Michigan c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
In for my LSAT score.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 255
- Joined: Tue Aug 16, 2011 6:46 pm
Re: Michigan c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
that only tells u when they make a decision, but how/when do you know if that decision is accepted/rejeceted/ waitlist etc ?JamMasterJ wrote:status checkerbroncos_fan_26 wrote:not reading through 169 pages... r michigan decisions ONLY mail, or do they also email you a couple days later?
- JamMasterJ
- Posts: 6649
- Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2011 7:17 pm
Re: Michigan c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
I think it says congratulations. It should also allow you into ASWbroncos_fan_26 wrote:that only tells u when they make a decision, but how/when do you know if that decision is accepted/rejeceted/ waitlist etc ?JamMasterJ wrote:status checkerbroncos_fan_26 wrote:not reading through 169 pages... r michigan decisions ONLY mail, or do they also email you a couple days later?
- FryBreadPower
- Posts: 908
- Joined: Tue Oct 25, 2011 9:46 pm
Re: Michigan c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Why aren't you giving me info Michigan?
- Pleasye
- Posts: 8738
- Joined: Sun Mar 14, 2010 4:22 pm
Re: Michigan c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Michigan's status checker says the decision on it.broncos_fan_26 wrote: that only tells u when they make a decision, but how/when do you know if that decision is accepted/rejeceted/ waitlist etc ?
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- JoeMo
- Posts: 1517
- Joined: Tue Oct 11, 2011 10:29 am
Re: Michigan c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
The status checker for Michigan has been changed recently. It now tells you if you've been accepted or rejected. Don't know if it will say anything for WL'ed people since those decisions haven't started going out yet.broncos_fan_26 wrote:that only tells u when they make a decision, but how/when do you know if that decision is accepted/rejeceted/ waitlist etc ?JamMasterJ wrote:status checkerbroncos_fan_26 wrote:not reading through 169 pages... r michigan decisions ONLY mail, or do they also email you a couple days later?
- JoeMo
- Posts: 1517
- Joined: Tue Oct 11, 2011 10:29 am
Re: Michigan c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
You are correct. None of it matters because it was a pretty pointless argument to begin with.blowhard wrote: None of this matters. My original assertion...which started all of this...was most people wouldn't have time to work 2L if they were on a journal. Scrabble Champ then decided his friends knew better and that my analysis was inapplicable as the OP didn't mention a journal...despite the fact my response was qualified.
-
- Posts: 21
- Joined: Mon Oct 24, 2011 10:20 pm
Re: Michigan c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Just got in. Don't know if I'll accept or delay a year and reapply. I must say that I do love the Michigan's vibe.
- Moriarty
- Posts: 304
- Joined: Wed Jan 18, 2012 5:29 pm
Re: Michigan c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
...but we can't let it rest, because NO ONE has presented good evidence on Reduced Fat v. Regular Cheez-its. I say Reduced Fat is fine--it gives off the image of "Mmmm, sexy is delicious!" even if you have "stank breath." (I lol'd when I read that, btw.) However, one may also argue that if you are going to eat junk-ish food, you might as well go all the way.thelong wrote:Elliott_Smith wrote:Let's lay that argument to rest, eh guys?
There. I reasoned for both sides of the argument. Top 5%, here I come.
(Blathering on about nothing is my way of preventing myself from obsessing over LSN, URM statistics, and my personal statement.)
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Moriarty
- Posts: 304
- Joined: Wed Jan 18, 2012 5:29 pm
Re: Michigan c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Congrats!chicagohopeful wrote:Just got in. Don't know if I'll accept or delay a year and reapply. I must say that I do love the Michigan's vibe.
- ScrabbleChamp
- Posts: 963
- Joined: Wed Jun 23, 2010 8:09 am
Re: Michigan c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Reduced fat cheese tastes like ass. Cheez-Its are made from real cheese. Therefore, Cheez-Its > Reduced Fat Cheez-Its.Moriarty wrote:...but we can't let it rest, because NO ONE has presented good evidence on Reduced Fat v. Regular Cheez-its. I say Reduced Fat is fine--it gives off the image of "Mmmm, sexy is delicious!" even if you have "stank breath." (I lol'd when I read that, btw.) However, one may also argue that if you are going to eat junk-ish food, you might as well go all the way.thelong wrote:Elliott_Smith wrote:Let's lay that argument to rest, eh guys?
There. I reasoned for both sides of the argument. Top 5%, here I come.
(Blathering on about nothing is my way of preventing myself from obsessing over LSN, URM statistics, and my personal statement.)
- JamMasterJ
- Posts: 6649
- Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2011 7:17 pm
Re: Michigan c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
today? or did you just not post until now?chicagohopeful wrote:Just got in. Don't know if I'll accept or delay a year and reapply. I must say that I do love the Michigan's vibe.
- thelong
- Posts: 992
- Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2011 10:55 am
Re: Michigan c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Doesn't matter. Checked status checker anyway.JamMasterJ wrote:today? or did you just not post until now?chicagohopeful wrote:Just got in. Don't know if I'll accept or delay a year and reapply. I must say that I do love the Michigan's vibe.
Le sigh.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login