Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017) Forum

Share Your Experiences, Read About Other Experiences. Please keep posts organized by school and expected year of graduation.
Post Reply

Next JS2 wave(s) will be...

Monday 3/27
2
2%
Tuesday 3/28
18
17%
Wednesday 3/29
35
32%
Thursday 3/30
13
12%
Friday 3/31
30
28%
Saturday 4/1
10
9%
 
Total votes: 108

User avatar
Smc1994

Silver
Posts: 681
Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2016 5:58 pm

Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)

Post by Smc1994 » Tue Mar 14, 2017 1:12 pm

CPA-->JD wrote:
myrik wrote:
Smc1994 wrote:
pragmaticpoet wrote:
dyebri wrote:Today is not the day. I have been telling you guys. I'm calling it. They would have given one by now.



Let's not let the troll off that easy
I now think you are right and am sad that you are right.

But at least you're right! Lol
Pyrrhic victory :/ Or, maybe, we are about to burn an innocent man. Perhaps an additional test should be required. I propose we dunk the poster in the river. If his chair floats, he's a witch. If not, then it's a real wave.
It's possible they're not a troll and just didn't want adcoms being able to identify them (would be pretty obvious posting right after a JS2)
If it was a brand new account created after a js2 then what is the "hopeful" part of the username? Smells fishy to me...

That fish smell is almost certainly emanating from the river. Where we should dunk him. I already got the rope, rocks, chair, and pulley, guys...

User avatar
dddddd90

Bronze
Posts: 142
Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2016 3:55 pm

Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)

Post by dddddd90 » Tue Mar 14, 2017 1:12 pm

Smc1994 wrote:
dddddd90 wrote:
Kinch08 wrote:
dddddd90 wrote:
Kinch08 wrote:
dddddd90 wrote:Prediction based on LSN: Almost all rejections have occurred. If you're still standing, you are probably WL or A. If you haven't gotten a JS1, it'll either come by 3/31 -- or it won't. Almost everyone will know something (JS1/JS2/WL) by 3/31.

Recommendation for your and my and our communal sanity: Moving forward, post results instead of speculation.
But speculation is so much fun! And we've got to get to 180 somehow...

Also, haven't there been a fair number of late-March dings in past cycles? IDK where I read that, I could be wrong.
Not that I noticed, but I only looked at last year's wave. The vast majority of rejections occurred by mid march, with a few speckled in after. I don't see why the response bias for earlier rejections would be higher than for later ones, so I think it might be a real trend.

I encourage everyone to look for themselves and draw their own conclusions. My statement was an "almost all," so I am aware that it's not a universal rule...
I guess we're just disagreeing over "most" vs. "almost all," so it's not a big deal. I'm pretty sure that there'll be at least a few splitters rejected (for example), but how many "a few" is remains to be seen.
Yeah, I would say that's true. I'd say maybe like 10% of rejections haven't happened yet.

The trends from prior years have not necessarily held this year. I think we're extrapolating from incomplete data. I encourage optimism in this process, but let's not speculate without basis. I think our resident data analyst, Pozzo, is on a flight today, and, without him, I think we MUST forsake trend analysis in favor of childlike hope.
LOLd +1

User avatar
forum_user

Silver
Posts: 844
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2015 9:40 am

Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)

Post by forum_user » Tue Mar 14, 2017 1:13 pm

CPA-->JD wrote:
myrik wrote:
Smc1994 wrote:
pragmaticpoet wrote:
dyebri wrote:Today is not the day. I have been telling you guys. I'm calling it. They would have given one by now.



Let's not let the troll off that easy
I now think you are right and am sad that you are right.

But at least you're right! Lol
Pyrrhic victory :/ Or, maybe, we are about to burn an innocent man. Perhaps an additional test should be required. I propose we dunk the poster in the river. If his chair floats, he's a witch. If not, then it's a real wave.
It's possible they're not a troll and just didn't want adcoms being able to identify them (would be pretty obvious posting right after a JS2)
If it was a brand new account created after a js2 then what is the "hopeful" part of the username? Smells fishy to me...
tbh whose first priority immediately upon getting into Harvard is to post about it on the internet--and creating an account just to do so no less? Like surely you at least want to tell your mom first, right?

User avatar
appind

Gold
Posts: 2266
Joined: Mon Nov 12, 2012 3:07 am

Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)

Post by appind » Tue Mar 14, 2017 1:49 pm

Smc1994 wrote:
dddddd90 wrote:
Kinch08 wrote:
dddddd90 wrote:
Kinch08 wrote:
dddddd90 wrote:Prediction based on LSN: Almost all rejections have occurred. If you're still standing, you are probably WL or A. If you haven't gotten a JS1, it'll either come by 3/31 -- or it won't. Almost everyone will know something (JS1/JS2/WL) by 3/31.

Recommendation for your and my and our communal sanity: Moving forward, post results instead of speculation.
But speculation is so much fun! And we've got to get to 180 somehow...

Also, haven't there been a fair number of late-March dings in past cycles? IDK where I read that, I could be wrong.
Not that I noticed, but I only looked at last year's wave. The vast majority of rejections occurred by mid march, with a few speckled in after. I don't see why the response bias for earlier rejections would be higher than for later ones, so I think it might be a real trend.

I encourage everyone to look for themselves and draw their own conclusions. My statement was an "almost all," so I am aware that it's not a universal rule...
I guess we're just disagreeing over "most" vs. "almost all," so it's not a big deal. I'm pretty sure that there'll be at least a few splitters rejected (for example), but how many "a few" is remains to be seen.
Yeah, I would say that's true. I'd say maybe like 10% of rejections haven't happened yet.

The trends from prior years have not necessarily held this year. I think we're extrapolating from incomplete data. I encourage optimism in this process, but let's not speculate without basis. I think our resident data analyst, Pozzo, is on a flight today, and, without him, I think we MUST forsake trend analysis in favor of childlike hope.
Someone had posted that fb group has 350 people. Comparing that with 600 people on FB at last year cycle's end, it means that around 350 × 3/2 = 475 js2 have been given. That makes around 425 js2 remaining.

Last week someone reported 20 open intvw slots. So
week of 3/6 JS1: 20

Any data based on previous opened interview slots as to how many js1 been given so far?

Pozzo

Gold
Posts: 1918
Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2015 3:36 pm

Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)

Post by Pozzo » Tue Mar 14, 2017 1:53 pm

dddddd90 wrote:
Smc1994 wrote:
dddddd90 wrote:
Kinch08 wrote:
dddddd90 wrote:
Kinch08 wrote:
dddddd90 wrote:Prediction based on LSN: Almost all rejections have occurred. If you're still standing, you are probably WL or A. If you haven't gotten a JS1, it'll either come by 3/31 -- or it won't. Almost everyone will know something (JS1/JS2/WL) by 3/31.

Recommendation for your and my and our communal sanity: Moving forward, post results instead of speculation.
But speculation is so much fun! And we've got to get to 180 somehow...

Also, haven't there been a fair number of late-March dings in past cycles? IDK where I read that, I could be wrong.
Not that I noticed, but I only looked at last year's wave. The vast majority of rejections occurred by mid march, with a few speckled in after. I don't see why the response bias for earlier rejections would be higher than for later ones, so I think it might be a real trend.

I encourage everyone to look for themselves and draw their own conclusions. My statement was an "almost all," so I am aware that it's not a universal rule...
I guess we're just disagreeing over "most" vs. "almost all," so it's not a big deal. I'm pretty sure that there'll be at least a few splitters rejected (for example), but how many "a few" is remains to be seen.
Yeah, I would say that's true. I'd say maybe like 10% of rejections haven't happened yet.

The trends from prior years have not necessarily held this year. I think we're extrapolating from incomplete data. I encourage optimism in this process, but let's not speculate without basis. I think our resident data analyst, Pozzo, is on a flight today, and, without him, I think we MUST forsake trend analysis in favor of childlike hope.
LOLd +1
Gah, I wish I was on a plane today. It doesn't matter, though.

Data is dead. All that remain are hope and despair. The choice is yours.

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


User avatar
Kinch08

Bronze
Posts: 309
Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)

Post by Kinch08 » Tue Mar 14, 2017 1:57 pm

appind wrote:
Someone had posted that fb group has 350 people. Comparing that with 600 people on FB at last year cycle's end, it means that around 350 × 3/2 = 475 js2 have been given. That makes around 425 js2 remaining.

Last week someone reported 20 open intvw slots. So
week of 3/6 JS1: 20

Any data based on previous opened interview slots as to how many js1 been given so far?
The assumption based on C/O 2019 data (which might not hold) is that there are at most one or two JS1 waves remaining. Possibly none. But who knows? There've been a lot of very small JS1 waves this year. Wouldn't be at all surprised if they kept trickling in. Regardless, I'd say that it's almost certain that more than 800 of the ~1000 (or is it like ~1200? I forget) JS1's have been given out

but I'm also the guy who was gonna give 4:1 on a JS2 wave today, so don't listen to me.

User avatar
nimbus cloud

Silver
Posts: 536
Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2015 2:19 am

Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)

Post by nimbus cloud » Tue Mar 14, 2017 1:59 pm

Kinch08 wrote: The assumption based on C/O 2019 data (which might not hold) is that there are at most one or two JS1 waves remaining. Possibly none. But who knows? There've been a lot of very small JS1 waves this year. Wouldn't be at all surprised if they kept trickling in. Regardless, I'd say that it's almost certain that more than 800 of the ~1000 (or is it like ~1200? I forget) JS1's have been given out

but I'm also the guy who was gonna give 4:1 on a JS2 wave today, so don't listen to me.
Class of 2019:
Number of Admission Offers: 908

User avatar
Smc1994

Silver
Posts: 681
Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2016 5:58 pm

Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)

Post by Smc1994 » Tue Mar 14, 2017 2:02 pm

Pozzo wrote:
dddddd90 wrote:
Smc1994 wrote:
dddddd90 wrote:
Kinch08 wrote:
dddddd90 wrote:
Kinch08 wrote:
Also, haven't there been a fair number of late-March dings in past cycles? IDK where I read that, I could be wrong.
Not that I noticed, but I only looked at last year's wave. The vast majority of rejections occurred by mid march, with a few speckled in after. I don't see why the response bias for earlier rejections would be higher than for later ones, so I think it might be a real trend.

I encourage everyone to look for themselves and draw their own conclusions. My statement was an "almost all," so I am aware that it's not a universal rule...
I guess we're just disagreeing over "most" vs. "almost all," so it's not a big deal. I'm pretty sure that there'll be at least a few splitters rejected (for example), but how many "a few" is remains to be seen.
Yeah, I would say that's true. I'd say maybe like 10% of rejections haven't happened yet.

The trends from prior years have not necessarily held this year. I think we're extrapolating from incomplete data. I encourage optimism in this process, but let's not speculate without basis. I think our resident data analyst, Pozzo, is on a flight today, and, without him, I think we MUST forsake trend analysis in favor of childlike hope.
LOLd +1
Gah, I wish I was on a plane today. It doesn't matter, though.

Data is dead. All that remain are hope and despair. The choice is yours.
Okay, I choose cake.

User avatar
Kinch08

Bronze
Posts: 309
Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)

Post by Kinch08 » Tue Mar 14, 2017 2:03 pm

nimbus cloud wrote:
Kinch08 wrote: The assumption based on C/O 2019 data (which might not hold) is that there are at most one or two JS1 waves remaining. Possibly none. But who knows? There've been a lot of very small JS1 waves this year. Wouldn't be at all surprised if they kept trickling in. Regardless, I'd say that it's almost certain that more than 800 of the ~1000 (or is it like ~1200? I forget) JS1's have been given out

but I'm also the guy who was gonna give 4:1 on a JS2 wave today, so don't listen to me.
Class of 2019:
Number of Admission Offers: 908
So ~900 JS2's means ~1200 JS1's, so yeah, I guess we go with my second number.

Want to continue reading?

Register for access!

Did I mention it was FREE ?


VapidP

Bronze
Posts: 244
Joined: Wed Nov 23, 2016 10:11 am

Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)

Post by VapidP » Tue Mar 14, 2017 2:04 pm

Kinch08 wrote:
nimbus cloud wrote:
Kinch08 wrote: The assumption based on C/O 2019 data (which might not hold) is that there are at most one or two JS1 waves remaining. Possibly none. But who knows? There've been a lot of very small JS1 waves this year. Wouldn't be at all surprised if they kept trickling in. Regardless, I'd say that it's almost certain that more than 800 of the ~1000 (or is it like ~1200? I forget) JS1's have been given out

but I'm also the guy who was gonna give 4:1 on a JS2 wave today, so don't listen to me.
Class of 2019:
Number of Admission Offers: 908
So ~900 JS2's means ~1200 JS1's, so yeah, I guess we go with my second number.
I've also heard that they don't necessarily give out 1200 JS1's. My friend from Harvard said that they stop giving out JS1s once they have 800ish JS2s or something.

User avatar
Kinch08

Bronze
Posts: 309
Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)

Post by Kinch08 » Tue Mar 14, 2017 2:16 pm

VapidP wrote:
Kinch08 wrote:
nimbus cloud wrote:
Kinch08 wrote: The assumption based on C/O 2019 data (which might not hold) is that there are at most one or two JS1 waves remaining. Possibly none. But who knows? There've been a lot of very small JS1 waves this year. Wouldn't be at all surprised if they kept trickling in. Regardless, I'd say that it's almost certain that more than 800 of the ~1000 (or is it like ~1200? I forget) JS1's have been given out

but I'm also the guy who was gonna give 4:1 on a JS2 wave today, so don't listen to me.
Class of 2019:
Number of Admission Offers: 908
So ~900 JS2's means ~1200 JS1's, so yeah, I guess we go with my second number.
I've also heard that they don't necessarily give out 1200 JS1's. My friend from Harvard said that they stop giving out JS1s once they have 800ish JS2s or something.
I think the numbers are big enough and the changes in incentives from year to year are small enough that the ratio of JS1's to JS2's is not going to change dramatically year to year. So if that ratio is roughly 1:.75 one year (as it has been in the past, I believe), it's likely to be roughly the same this year.

Which isn't to say that your friend is wrong. I'd believe that they cap based on JS2's, not JS1's.

User avatar
appind

Gold
Posts: 2266
Joined: Mon Nov 12, 2012 3:07 am

Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)

Post by appind » Tue Mar 14, 2017 2:32 pm

Kinch08 wrote:
VapidP wrote:
Kinch08 wrote:
nimbus cloud wrote:
Kinch08 wrote: The assumption based on C/O 2019 data (which might not hold) is that there are at most one or two JS1 waves remaining. Possibly none. But who knows? There've been a lot of very small JS1 waves this year. Wouldn't be at all surprised if they kept trickling in. Regardless, I'd say that it's almost certain that more than 800 of the ~1000 (or is it like ~1200? I forget) JS1's have been given out

but I'm also the guy who was gonna give 4:1 on a JS2 wave today, so don't listen to me.
Class of 2019:
Number of Admission Offers: 908
So ~900 JS2's means ~1200 JS1's, so yeah, I guess we go with my second number.
I've also heard that they don't necessarily give out 1200 JS1's. My friend from Harvard said that they stop giving out JS1s once they have 800ish JS2s or something.
I think the numbers are big enough and the changes in incentives from year to year are small enough that the ratio of JS1's to JS2's is not going to change dramatically year to year. So if that ratio is roughly 1:.75 one year (as it has been in the past, I believe), it's likely to be roughly the same this year.

Which isn't to say that your friend is wrong. I'd believe that they cap based on JS2's, not JS1's.
These are all reconcilable statements. Around 30% of the class gets in from WL. So around 200 js2 will be from WL.
That means they do around 1000 JS1s.

Looking at data from class of 2018 thread, 750 JS1 were handed out by this time 2 years ago. Combined with 20 slots from last week, we have had 770 JS1s.

So my projection is that there are 230 JS1s still pending.

User avatar
Kinch08

Bronze
Posts: 309
Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)

Post by Kinch08 » Tue Mar 14, 2017 2:52 pm

appind wrote:
Kinch08 wrote:
VapidP wrote:
Kinch08 wrote:
nimbus cloud wrote:
Kinch08 wrote: The assumption based on C/O 2019 data (which might not hold) is that there are at most one or two JS1 waves remaining. Possibly none. But who knows? There've been a lot of very small JS1 waves this year. Wouldn't be at all surprised if they kept trickling in. Regardless, I'd say that it's almost certain that more than 800 of the ~1000 (or is it like ~1200? I forget) JS1's have been given out

but I'm also the guy who was gonna give 4:1 on a JS2 wave today, so don't listen to me.
Class of 2019:
Number of Admission Offers: 908
So ~900 JS2's means ~1200 JS1's, so yeah, I guess we go with my second number.
I've also heard that they don't necessarily give out 1200 JS1's. My friend from Harvard said that they stop giving out JS1s once they have 800ish JS2s or something.
I think the numbers are big enough and the changes in incentives from year to year are small enough that the ratio of JS1's to JS2's is not going to change dramatically year to year. So if that ratio is roughly 1:.75 one year (as it has been in the past, I believe), it's likely to be roughly the same this year.

Which isn't to say that your friend is wrong. I'd believe that they cap based on JS2's, not JS1's.
These are all reconcilable statements. Around 30% of the class gets in from WL. So around 200 js2 will be from WL.
That means they do around 1000 JS1s.

Looking at data from class of 2018 thread, 750 JS1 were handed out by this time 2 years ago. Combined with 20 slots from last week, we have had 770 JS1s.

So my projection is that there are 230 JS1s still pending.
Technically, those 200 JS2's from the WL will all go through JS1's before being admitted, so the total number of JS1's will still be around 1200. I don't think we know how many JS1's from WL end up not receiving JS2's (I hope not many; it would suck to have your hopes raised and dashed like that), so the numbers you give will change based on that. But your point is taken.
Last edited by Kinch08 on Tue Mar 14, 2017 2:53 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Register now!

Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.

It's still FREE!


User avatar
hellohalo

Silver
Posts: 516
Joined: Fri Jun 17, 2016 3:53 pm

Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)

Post by hellohalo » Tue Mar 14, 2017 2:53 pm

appind wrote:
These are all reconcilable statements. Around 30% of the class gets in from WL. So around 200 js2 will be from WL.
That means they do around 1000 JS1s.

Looking at data from class of 2018 thread, 750 JS1 were handed out by this time 2 years ago. Combined with 20 slots from last week, we have had 770 JS1s.

So my projection is that there are 230 JS1s still pending.
So many?! Is 30% normal to all law schools? Curious.

User avatar
appind

Gold
Posts: 2266
Joined: Mon Nov 12, 2012 3:07 am

Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)

Post by appind » Tue Mar 14, 2017 2:56 pm

Revised Estimates:

475 JS2 given so far
770 JS1 given so far

325 JS2 (converts from js1 w/o WL) remaining
100 JS2 (converts from WL w/o initial js1) remaining
425 JS2 total remaining

330 JS1 remaining
100 WL->interview remaining

based on above I think a big wave of about 125 JS2s should be there soon.
Last edited by appind on Tue Mar 14, 2017 3:49 pm, edited 2 times in total.

dyebri

Bronze
Posts: 267
Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2017 1:42 am

Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)

Post by dyebri » Tue Mar 14, 2017 2:58 pm

appind wrote:Revised Estimates:

475 JS2 given so far
770 JS1 given so far

375 JS2 (converts from js1 w/o WL) remaining
100 JS2 (converts from WL w/o initial js1) remaining
475 JS2 total remaining

330 JS1 remaining
100 WL->interview remaining

based on above I think a big wave of about 125 JS2s shold be soon.



I have no idea why you guys bother trying to speculate when you have not one piece of information. Just relax. The day is over for JS2 and JS1s. We won't know till tommorow

User avatar
dietcoke1

Silver
Posts: 1326
Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2016 8:18 pm

Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)

Post by dietcoke1 » Tue Mar 14, 2017 3:00 pm

this thread rn
Image
Last edited by dietcoke1 on Tue Mar 14, 2017 3:17 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Get unlimited access to all forums and topics

Register now!

I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...


User avatar
Kinch08

Bronze
Posts: 309
Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)

Post by Kinch08 » Tue Mar 14, 2017 3:02 pm

hellohalo wrote:
appind wrote:
These are all reconcilable statements. Around 30% of the class gets in from WL. So around 200 js2 will be from WL.
That means they do around 1000 JS1s.

Looking at data from class of 2018 thread, 750 JS1 were handed out by this time 2 years ago. Combined with 20 slots from last week, we have had 770 JS1s.

So my projection is that there are 230 JS1s still pending.
So many?! Is 30% normal to all law schools? Curious.
The other day I saw a thread which claimed that between 20 and 25% of the people who were waitlisted in the C/0 2019 eventually made it in off of the waitlist. If 30% of the class was made up of waitlisted students like Appind says, that would mean that 800-1000 applicants were waitlisted. I can't find that thread now, although I've looked for it a little bit; does anyone who knows what I'm talking about want to link us so we can clear this up?

RE people who want us to stop talking about angels and pinheads: Your dastardly efforts to prevent us from reaching the sacred 180 before the fast-approaching deadline will not succeed.

User avatar
appind

Gold
Posts: 2266
Joined: Mon Nov 12, 2012 3:07 am

Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)

Post by appind » Tue Mar 14, 2017 3:12 pm

Kinch08 wrote: Technically, those 200 JS2's from the WL will all go through JS1's before being admitted, so the total number of JS1's will still be around 1200. I don't think we know how many JS1's from WL end up not receiving JS2's (I hope not many; it would suck to have your hopes raised and dashed like that), so the numbers you give will change based on that. But your point is taken.
I think the nomenclature has been to call those who interview off WL something other than js1. I think they are called JSb.
The 30% figure is from a past year's thread.

User avatar
Kinch08

Bronze
Posts: 309
Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)

Post by Kinch08 » Tue Mar 14, 2017 3:22 pm

http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/v ... 5#p7508095

That's the post I was talking about, if anyone's interested. 23% of waitlisted HLS students (roughly, going off of LSN reported numbers) who remain on the waitlist make it in. And apparently 30% of the class is drawn from that 23%. So yeah, if that's all kosher, roughly 800 of us are going to get WL'd, with or without a JS1.

User avatar
unrelated

Bronze
Posts: 113
Joined: Wed Nov 16, 2016 1:05 pm

Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)

Post by unrelated » Tue Mar 14, 2017 3:34 pm

Kinch08 wrote:http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/v ... 5#p7508095

That's the post I was talking about, if anyone's interested. 23% of waitlisted HLS students (roughly, going off of LSN reported numbers) who remain on the waitlist make it in. And apparently 30% of the class is drawn from that 23%. So yeah, if that's all kosher, roughly 800 of us are going to get WL'd, with or without a JS1.
I don't think LSN is a very good source to make total applicant pool projections, but I like the distraction.

Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.

Register now, it's still FREE!


tartan2016

New
Posts: 91
Joined: Sat Mar 04, 2017 7:51 pm

Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)

Post by tartan2016 » Tue Mar 14, 2017 3:43 pm

appind wrote:
Kinch08 wrote: Technically, those 200 JS2's from the WL will all go through JS1's before being admitted, so the total number of JS1's will still be around 1200. I don't think we know how many JS1's from WL end up not receiving JS2's (I hope not many; it would suck to have your hopes raised and dashed like that), so the numbers you give will change based on that. But your point is taken.
I think the nomenclature has been to call those who interview off WL something other than js1. I think they are called JSb.
The 30% figure is from a past year's thread.
So does the ~900 admits include those pulled off the waitlist?

bettyboopydoop

New
Posts: 23
Joined: Fri Dec 09, 2016 3:53 pm

Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)

Post by bettyboopydoop » Tue Mar 14, 2017 4:53 pm

so if I haven't gone JS1 but also haven't been rejected, I'll probably be waitlisted? Thoughts on writing a LOCI now?

Dr.Degrees_Cr.Cash

Silver
Posts: 1296
Joined: Sat Feb 20, 2016 1:27 pm

Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)

Post by Dr.Degrees_Cr.Cash » Tue Mar 14, 2017 5:00 pm

forum_user wrote:
CPA-->JD wrote:
myrik wrote:
Smc1994 wrote:
pragmaticpoet wrote:
dyebri wrote:Today is not the day. I have been telling you guys. I'm calling it. They would have given one by now.



Let's not let the troll off that easy
I now think you are right and am sad that you are right.

But at least you're right! Lol
Pyrrhic victory :/ Or, maybe, we are about to burn an innocent man. Perhaps an additional test should be required. I propose we dunk the poster in the river. If his chair floats, he's a witch. If not, then it's a real wave.
It's possible they're not a troll and just didn't want adcoms being able to identify them (would be pretty obvious posting right after a JS2)
If it was a brand new account created after a js2 then what is the "hopeful" part of the username? Smells fishy to me...
tbh whose first priority immediately upon getting into Harvard is to post about it on the internet--and creating an account just to do so no less? Like surely you at least want to tell your mom first, right?
I mean, I'd tell y'all first, but not if I had to make an account to do it

User avatar
calpolisci2016

Bronze
Posts: 391
Joined: Mon Apr 04, 2016 1:42 am

Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)

Post by calpolisci2016 » Tue Mar 14, 2017 5:05 pm

Is tomorrow a snow/WFH day too?

Seriously? What are you waiting for?

Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!


Post Reply

Return to “Law School Acceptances, Denials, and Waitlists”