are you going to remain on their waitlist?saskia17 wrote:It's pretty vague and doesn't preclude further acceptances.
Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants) Forum
- hellomellow
- Posts: 227
- Joined: Mon Jan 06, 2014 2:35 am
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
- bbkk
- Posts: 728
- Joined: Wed Dec 26, 2012 4:28 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
I have withdrawn my application (still UR). Good luck to those of who are still in the game!
-
- Posts: 551
- Joined: Tue Jul 02, 2013 5:07 am
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
you have amazing options and i wish you the best!bbkk wrote:I have withdrawn my application (still UR). Good luck to those of who are still in the game!
*hurry up stanford, you're losing people
- Mack.Hambleton
- Posts: 5414
- Joined: Mon Jan 13, 2014 2:09 am
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
Hamilton > S anyway. Congrats on the cycle!bbkk wrote:I have withdrawn my application (still UR). Good luck to those of who are still in the game!
-
- Posts: 4
- Joined: Wed Mar 12, 2014 6:35 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
173 days later, turned down.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- vuthy
- Posts: 378
- Joined: Wed Jun 12, 2013 8:55 am
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
DLS. Submitted early Jan. Will wait for letter, ye olde style.
-
- Posts: 191
- Joined: Sun May 05, 2013 1:17 am
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
DLS. Under review 12/6. ill keep ya'll posted.
edit: rejected....what a ride.
edit: rejected....what a ride.
Last edited by W$RKliveWELL on Thu Apr 17, 2014 12:15 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- barrelofmonkeys
- Posts: 1942
- Joined: Wed Jun 12, 2013 6:41 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
This is a lot of you..when did you all last check? It's only 6AM in Palo Alto.
also sorry/congrats
also sorry/congrats
-
- Posts: 4475
- Joined: Wed Jan 29, 2014 6:19 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
I'm about ready for a DLS. Considered withdrawing, but really had no reason to aside from the gratification I would feel, as a control freak, of having the final say in the matter. I've noticed a lot of January DLSes for the people nice enough to give complete dates...earlier dates seem to still be awaiting the next phase of WL, dings, and "possible" acceptances. Would like to see them dig a little deeper into the fossil records today.
- SordidLSATHistory
- Posts: 45
- Joined: Wed Nov 06, 2013 8:37 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
Condolences to those who received bad news.
I'm somehow still alive, but at this point it kind of feels like we're playing Russian roulette with a loaded gun. I might go last, but my outcome will be the same as the five people who went before me (though a misfire is still "possible"
).
I'm somehow still alive, but at this point it kind of feels like we're playing Russian roulette with a loaded gun. I might go last, but my outcome will be the same as the five people who went before me (though a misfire is still "possible"


-
- Posts: 14
- Joined: Thu Mar 13, 2014 12:54 am
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
I'm wondering why anyone would take Stanford over Harvard. I've come up with some reasons. Harvard's class size is too big? You prefer Stanford to Cambridge? Other reasons? For me, it's Yale, Harvard, Stanford, in that order. But I'd like to hear your thoughts.
Stats are 169 / 3.9x. I applied to law schools really late. Went UR on 1/22 with Stanford. Still under review. I'm actually optimistic about getting admitted, but I may take Penn over Stanford. Stanford is sort of a black letter law school, and I'm interested in legal theory. Also Penn is very close to family. Waiting to hear from Stanford, Chicago, NYU. Admitted to Penn, Cornell. Wait-listed at Columbia, Duke, others.
Edit: I should say that I'm a non-trad with graduate degrees, all 3.9x GPAs. I hear that Stanford likes this sort of thing.
Stats are 169 / 3.9x. I applied to law schools really late. Went UR on 1/22 with Stanford. Still under review. I'm actually optimistic about getting admitted, but I may take Penn over Stanford. Stanford is sort of a black letter law school, and I'm interested in legal theory. Also Penn is very close to family. Waiting to hear from Stanford, Chicago, NYU. Admitted to Penn, Cornell. Wait-listed at Columbia, Duke, others.
Edit: I should say that I'm a non-trad with graduate degrees, all 3.9x GPAs. I hear that Stanford likes this sort of thing.
- barrelofmonkeys
- Posts: 1942
- Joined: Wed Jun 12, 2013 6:41 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
Can I ask why you're optimistic about getting admitted to Stanford?ianfaircloud wrote:I'm wondering why anyone would take Stanford over Harvard. I've come up with some reasons. Harvard's class size is too big? You prefer Stanford to Cambridge? Other reasons? For me, it's Yale, Harvard, Stanford, in that order. But I'd like to hear your thoughts.
Stats are 169 / 3.9x. I applied to law schools really late. Went UR on 1/22 with Stanford. Still under review. I'm actually optimistic about getting admitted, but I may take Penn over Stanford. Stanford is sort of a black letter law school, and I'm interested in legal theory. Also Penn is very close to family. Waiting to hear from Stanford, Chicago, NYU. Admitted to Penn, Cornell. Wait-listed at Columbia, Duke, others.
- wealtheow
- Posts: 1034
- Joined: Wed Dec 21, 2011 1:45 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
i want to post the willy wonka pic but i'm too sleepy still.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- andapieceoftoast
- Posts: 439
- Joined: Wed Aug 14, 2013 11:18 am
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
The joke would really be on us.wealtheow wrote:i want to post the willy wonka pic but i'm too sleepy still.
-
- Posts: 4475
- Joined: Wed Jan 29, 2014 6:19 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
I think a lot of people are leaning toward Harvard over Stanford simply because they haven't heard beans from Stanford while Harvard has been courting them for months. That being said...is this a discussion anybody really needs to have? People were talking about the merits of Yale v. Stanford...what can you do? Talk and visit and develop a feeling for each place you are considering. They're all big and fancy and dazzling enough to let you do what you want, within reason, so long as your eyes follow light. It doesn't seem like you have an offer in hand from either Harvard or Stanford though (our consensus is straight admits from Stanford at this point are unlikely), so why do the whole H vs S vs Y finer points of elitism routine when it has no relevance? I'd say your stats would be viewed more favorably by Stanford, taking things in their broadest sense, but April is half over so don't go missing any Penn deadlines over this. The bigger and more worthwhile general discussion is HSY vs. non top 3 schools for cheaper and how much cheaper, that's where people really get serious.ianfaircloud wrote:I'm wondering why anyone would take Stanford over Harvard. I've come up with some reasons. Harvard's class size is too big? You prefer Stanford to Cambridge? Other reasons? For me, it's Yale, Harvard, Stanford, in that order. But I'd like to hear your thoughts.
Stats are 169 / 3.9x. I applied to law schools really late. Went UR on 1/22 with Stanford. Still under review. I'm actually optimistic about getting admitted, but I may take Penn over Stanford. Stanford is sort of a black letter law school, and I'm interested in legal theory. Also Penn is very close to family. Waiting to hear from Stanford, Chicago, NYU. Admitted to Penn, Cornell. Wait-listed at Columbia, Duke, others.
Edit: I should say that I'm a non-trad with graduate degrees, all 3.9x GPAs. I hear that Stanford likes this sort of thing.
- andapieceoftoast
- Posts: 439
- Joined: Wed Aug 14, 2013 11:18 am
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
So well said Equally.EquallyWrong wrote:I think a lot of people are leaning toward Harvard over Stanford simply because they haven't heard beans from Stanford while Harvard has been courting them for months. That being said...is this a discussion anybody really needs to have? People were talking about the merits of Yale v. Stanford...what can you do? Talk and visit and develop a feeling for each place you are considering. They're all big and fancy and dazzling enough to let you do what you want, within reason, so long as your eyes follow light. It doesn't seem like you have an offer in hand from either Harvard or Stanford though (our consensus is straight admits from Stanford at this point are unlikely), so why do the whole H vs S vs Y finer points of elitism routine when it has no relevance? I'd say your stats would be viewed more favorably by Stanford, taking things in their broadest sense, but April is half over so don't go missing any Penn deadlines over this. The bigger and more worthwhile general discussion is HSY vs. non top 3 schools for cheaper and how much cheaper, that's where people really get serious.ianfaircloud wrote:I'm wondering why anyone would take Stanford over Harvard. I've come up with some reasons. Harvard's class size is too big? You prefer Stanford to Cambridge? Other reasons? For me, it's Yale, Harvard, Stanford, in that order. But I'd like to hear your thoughts.
Stats are 169 / 3.9x. I applied to law schools really late. Went UR on 1/22 with Stanford. Still under review. I'm actually optimistic about getting admitted, but I may take Penn over Stanford. Stanford is sort of a black letter law school, and I'm interested in legal theory. Also Penn is very close to family. Waiting to hear from Stanford, Chicago, NYU. Admitted to Penn, Cornell. Wait-listed at Columbia, Duke, others.
Edit: I should say that I'm a non-trad with graduate degrees, all 3.9x GPAs. I hear that Stanford likes this sort of thing.
-
- Posts: 17
- Joined: Wed Jan 29, 2014 1:58 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
Not only are they losing people to Yale and Harvard but they are losing candidates with GENEROUS OFFERS from rest of T6, for example, Chicago's Rubies, NYU's AnBryce, Columbia's Hamilton etc. Come on Stanford, work on your timing.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 141
- Joined: Tue Dec 17, 2013 11:51 am
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
Given that they are making us wait til 10 days before deposits are due almost everywhere, I doubt they consider us big losses. Otherwise they would have probably just accepted us earlier with the other 99.9% of the class. According to LSN, approximately the same # of people have been accepted this year already as have been accepted the previous two years.
- MrMileyCyrus
- Posts: 191
- Joined: Wed Dec 18, 2013 3:23 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
God, just give me my WL already, Faye.
- Chalupa-Batman
- Posts: 101
- Joined: Tue Feb 18, 2014 5:47 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
I think this now, but it will really only give us till mid-may when we start doing this exact same thing on this thread all over again.MrMileyCyrus wrote:God, just give me my WL already, Faye.
-
- Posts: 551
- Joined: Tue Jul 02, 2013 5:07 am
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
but why hold people till the bitter end?love4life29 wrote:Given that they are making us wait til 10 days before deposits are due almost everywhere, I doubt they consider us big losses. Otherwise they would have probably just accepted us earlier with the other 99.9% of the class. According to LSN, approximately the same # of people have been accepted this year already as have been accepted the previous two years.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 141
- Joined: Tue Dec 17, 2013 11:51 am
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
They're probably just deciding between waitlists and rejects, and don't have a lot of incentive to move quickly.chizzy wrote:but why hold people till the bitter end?love4life29 wrote:Given that they are making us wait til 10 days before deposits are due almost everywhere, I doubt they consider us big losses. Otherwise they would have probably just accepted us earlier with the other 99.9% of the class. According to LSN, approximately the same # of people have been accepted this year already as have been accepted the previous two years.
-
- Posts: 14
- Joined: Thu Mar 13, 2014 12:54 am
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
Thanks for the replies. I'm not confident that Stanford will admit me, but I'm optimistic. I haven't written it off, for sure. It just looks like Stanford likes the non-trads, people with degrees, "experience," etc. I can sense a lot of frustration in this thread on Stanford's taking its time.andapieceoftoast wrote:So well said Equally.EquallyWrong wrote:I think a lot of people are leaning toward Harvard over Stanford simply because they haven't heard beans from Stanford while Harvard has been courting them for months. That being said...is this a discussion anybody really needs to have? People were talking about the merits of Yale v. Stanford...what can you do? Talk and visit and develop a feeling for each place you are considering. They're all big and fancy and dazzling enough to let you do what you want, within reason, so long as your eyes follow light. It doesn't seem like you have an offer in hand from either Harvard or Stanford though (our consensus is straight admits from Stanford at this point are unlikely), so why do the whole H vs S vs Y finer points of elitism routine when it has no relevance? I'd say your stats would be viewed more favorably by Stanford, taking things in their broadest sense, but April is half over so don't go missing any Penn deadlines over this. The bigger and more worthwhile general discussion is HSY vs. non top 3 schools for cheaper and how much cheaper, that's where people really get serious.ianfaircloud wrote:I'm wondering why anyone would take Stanford over Harvard. I've come up with some reasons. Harvard's class size is too big? You prefer Stanford to Cambridge? Other reasons? For me, it's Yale, Harvard, Stanford, in that order. But I'd like to hear your thoughts.
Stats are 169 / 3.9x. I applied to law schools really late. Went UR on 1/22 with Stanford. Still under review. I'm actually optimistic about getting admitted, but I may take Penn over Stanford. Stanford is sort of a black letter law school, and I'm interested in legal theory. Also Penn is very close to family. Waiting to hear from Stanford, Chicago, NYU. Admitted to Penn, Cornell. Wait-listed at Columbia, Duke, others.
Edit: I should say that I'm a non-trad with graduate degrees, all 3.9x GPAs. I hear that Stanford likes this sort of thing.
Just to be clear: There's no H vs S vs Y thing here. I'm not suggesting that one is *objectively* better than the other. I'm suggesting that, for most people, H is going to be subjectively better than S. Hence my question. Get it? That's why I said, "For me, it's Yale, Harvard, Stanford, in that order." I assumed it's that for most people. But for people who are entertaining a Stanford over a Harvard offer, I would love to hear your thoughts on this.
- dnptan
- Posts: 355
- Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2013 5:33 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
Common Pros: Top 3 LS, Business School, Medical Schoolianfaircloud wrote:
Thanks for the replies. I'm not confident that Stanford will admit me, but I'm optimistic. I haven't written it off, for sure. It just looks like Stanford likes the non-trads, people with degrees, "experience," etc. I can sense a lot of frustration in this thread on Stanford's taking its time.
Just to be clear: There's no H vs S vs Y thing here. I'm not suggesting that one is *objectively* better than the other. I'm suggesting that, for most people, H is going to be subjectively better than S. Hence my question. Get it? That's why I said, "For me, it's Yale, Harvard, Stanford, in that order." I assumed it's that for most people. But for people who are entertaining a Stanford over a Harvard offer, I would love to hear your thoughts on this.
Stanford Pros: Smaller Class Size, California Weather, Intellectual Property, Silicon Valley, Hollywood, Engineering School, San Francisco
Harvard Pros: Larger Class Size, Reputation, MIT-proximity, Higher Ranking (for now?), Boston
- lastsamurai
- Posts: 978
- Joined: Tue Jun 25, 2013 11:17 am
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
Maybe work on your internet tone a bit (see bold text above).ianfaircloud wrote: Thanks for the replies. I'm not confident that Stanford will admit me, but I'm optimistic. I haven't written it off, for sure. It just looks like Stanford likes the non-trads, people with degrees, "experience," etc. I can sense a lot of frustration in this thread on Stanford's taking its time.
Just to be clear: There's no H vs S vs Y thing here. I'm not suggesting that one is *objectively* better than the other. I'm suggesting that, for most people, H is going to be subjectively better than S. Hence my question. Get it? That's why I said, "For me, it's Yale, Harvard, Stanford, in that order." I assumed it's that for most people. But for people who are entertaining a Stanford over a Harvard offer, I would love to hear your thoughts on this.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login