Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread Forum

[Skunky Bumps]

Still hanging around, no DLS quite yet.

[djwjddl]

Hate to say this, but still here

[jselson]

Got a WL in the mail, really a nice letter, but will be withdrawing.

[hamsamitchguy03]

ed ited

[Spritzpiggy]

DLS today

[Anonymous4444]

Still nothing...

[Vincent]

It's quiet.









TOO quiet.

[bob loblaw11]

DLS finally. I don't know what time but I assume it was over the weekend. Regardless of waitlist or ding, cycle is over and I'm a happy girl!

[porch]

And let the Sweet 16 of bracket challenge begin. Sweet 16 and Elite 8 today.
Final four and finals tomorrow. The winner gets accepted.

[switchis32]

Dls Friday at 5 pm. Just called and it was waitlist. And my cycle is now over, well kinda. Kinda surprised actually

[digifly]

DLS today too. 12/13 submit

Oh Stanford, how I loved you so.

digifly, I think you will be the last TLSer standing.

Boy, won't that be fun!

[switchis32]

Does anyone know if Stanford's wait list sees movement, or is it a lost cause?

[wert3813]

Does anyone know if Stanford's wait list sees movement, or is it a lost cause?

I don't know, but I do know that that list must be 600 deep based of how many TLSer have gotten an offer on it.

[switchis32]

Damn things aren't looking very good for us

[cwid1391]

Does anyone know if Stanford's wait list sees movement, or is it a lost cause?

I don't know, but I do know that that list must be 600 deep based of how many TLSer have gotten an offer on it.

I often wonder if there is a bit more of a sampling bias on TLS than we think. It seems to make sense that higher scorers would tend to be more active and thus would seek out forums.

Someone who is good at crunching LSN numbers could probably prove this definitively one way or the other, but that person is not me.

[TripTrip]

Does anyone know if Stanford's wait list sees movement, or is it a lost cause?

I don't know, but I do know that that list must be 600 deep based of how many TLSer have gotten an offer on it.

I often wonder if there is a bit more of a sampling bias on TLS than we think. It seems to make sense that higher scorers would tend to be more active and thus would seek out forums.

Someone who is good at crunching LSN numbers could probably prove this definitively one way or the other, but that person is not me.

LSN applicants usually account for ~11% of the total applicant pool and ~16% of the total admit pool, so yes, there is bias.

Based on that information, and accounting for the definite sample bias, the current size of the waitlist would be between 268 and 390 people.

[LSATSCORES2012]

Does anyone know if Stanford's wait list sees movement, or is it a lost cause?

I don't know, but I do know that that list must be 600 deep based of how many TLSer have gotten an offer on it.

I often wonder if there is a bit more of a sampling bias on TLS than we think. It seems to make sense that higher scorers would tend to be more active and thus would seek out forums.

Someone who is good at crunching LSN numbers could probably prove this definitively one way or the other, but that person is not me.

Folks on LSN definitely don't represent the entire applicant pool. The graph below shows how many times more applicants there are on LSN with a given LSAT score relative to what one would expect if LSN were representative.

--ImageRemoved--

[wert3813]

Does anyone know if Stanford's wait list sees movement, or is it a lost cause?

I don't know, but I do know that that list must be 600 deep based of how many TLSer have gotten an offer on it.

I often wonder if there is a bit more of a sampling bias on TLS than we think. It seems to make sense that higher scorers would tend to be more active and thus would seek out forums.

Someone who is good at crunching LSN numbers could probably prove this definitively one way or the other, but that person is not me.

Right but no reason TLS/LSN should have a higher sampling of WL than admits.

[TripTrip]

Does anyone know if Stanford's wait list sees movement, or is it a lost cause?

I don't know, but I do know that that list must be 600 deep based of how many TLSer have gotten an offer on it.

I often wonder if there is a bit more of a sampling bias on TLS than we think. It seems to make sense that higher scorers would tend to be more active and thus would seek out forums.

Someone who is good at crunching LSN numbers could probably prove this definitively one way or the other, but that person is not me.

Right but no reason TLS/LSN should have a higher sampling of WL than admits.

Or a lower sample of WL than applicants.

[porch]

Way too quiet today.

Tomorrow is gonna be a MASSACRE

[whereskyle]

Way too quiet today.

Tomorrow is gonna be a MASSACRE

damn

[Anonymous4444]

I just checked my status and the current status date part is gone....!?!

[cwid1391]

I just checked my status and the current status date part is gone....!?!

Mine is still hanging strong. What a trooper.

[Anonymous4444]

Dls....

edit: called its a WL

ill wait it out why not

[twenty]

Still hanging on. Ya'll think tomorrow will be a wave?