Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017) Forum
-
ChambanaMan

- Posts: 30
- Joined: Mon Feb 20, 2017 6:32 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
Well... I survived another ding wave. Applied kinda late so we will see how much longer I last.
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 432831
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
Same. I have also been "Complete" since early November. No JS1. So...*shrug*
- OnlyHumean

- Posts: 68
- Joined: Fri Nov 11, 2016 10:06 am
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
I don't mean to put this on you, but would you mind dreaming that I get in tonight? A JS2 tomorrow would be lovely.LegallyBlackJD wrote:Dinged via email today @ 11:16AM.
No JS1. Complete 2/21/17.
Oddly enough, had a dream last night that I was dinged. LOL. Best of luck to everyone else!
- jjcorvino

- Posts: 1459
- Joined: Fri Oct 14, 2016 9:49 am
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
Well, I didn't get dinged again and still haven't gotten a JS1, seems like I might be in the Waitlist pile? They have definitely reviewed my file, so if I was going to get dinged or interviewed I think that would happen aleady?
-
Rigo

- Posts: 16639
- Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2014 3:19 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
How does waitlist work in actuality?
Is it JS1 people who never got a JS2 at the top of the pile and non-JS1 non-rejects at the bottom?
Is it JS1 people who never got a JS2 at the top of the pile and non-JS1 non-rejects at the bottom?
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- jjcorvino

- Posts: 1459
- Joined: Fri Oct 14, 2016 9:49 am
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
I would assume so, but I am just making things up.Rigo wrote:How does waitlist work in actuality?
Is it JS1 people who never got a JS2 at the top of the pile and non-JS1 non-rejects at the bottom?
- nimbus cloud

- Posts: 536
- Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2015 2:19 am
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
Nope, once you're waitlisted, there is not a substantial difference between those who'd had a JS1 prior to the waitlist and those who didn't.Rigo wrote:How does waitlist work in actuality?
Is it JS1 people who never got a JS2 at the top of the pile and non-JS1 non-rejects at the bottom?
- SilverSurfer2020

- Posts: 152
- Joined: Wed Sep 07, 2016 4:50 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
Sorry if this info is elsewhere, but what % of people typically get off the WL?nimbus cloud wrote:Nope, once you're waitlisted, there is not a substantial difference between those who'd had a JS1 prior to the waitlist and those who didn't.Rigo wrote:How does waitlist work in actuality?
Is it JS1 people who never got a JS2 at the top of the pile and non-JS1 non-rejects at the bottom?
-
Rigo

- Posts: 16639
- Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2014 3:19 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
Okay thanks.nimbus cloud wrote:Nope, once you're waitlisted, there is not a substantial difference between those who'd had a JS1 prior to the waitlist and those who didn't.Rigo wrote:How does waitlist work in actuality?
Is it JS1 people who never got a JS2 at the top of the pile and non-JS1 non-rejects at the bottom?
I guess that probably involves some quick June JS1's and immediate JS2's sometimes. Assuming everyone HAS to be interviewed in order to get accepted.
Last edited by Rigo on Mon Mar 13, 2017 6:59 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- nimbus cloud

- Posts: 536
- Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2015 2:19 am
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
I am sure there is more recent data, but all I have right now is link 1 and link 2SilverSurfer2020 wrote:Sorry if this info is elsewhere, but what % of people typically get off the WL?nimbus cloud wrote:Nope, once you're waitlisted, there is not a substantial difference between those who'd had a JS1 prior to the waitlist and those who didn't.Rigo wrote:How does waitlist work in actuality?
Is it JS1 people who never got a JS2 at the top of the pile and non-JS1 non-rejects at the bottom?
- nimbus cloud

- Posts: 536
- Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2015 2:19 am
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
Yes. Based on last year's waitlist, in order to get in people must go through JS1 if they hadn't prior to the waitlist and then there is another call shortly before JS2 confirming continued interest and basically asking if you will commit if accepted.Rigo wrote: Okay thanks.
I guess that probably involves some quick June JS1's and immediate JS2's sometimes. Assuming everyone HAS to be interviewed in order to get accepted.
- ashrice13

- Posts: 1793
- Joined: Sun Jul 24, 2016 10:30 am
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
This seems odd to me. Like...there's gotta be a reason person A received a JS1 and person B didn't. Wouldn't that play out in who gets pulled from the WL?nimbus cloud wrote:Nope, once you're waitlisted, there is not a substantial difference between those who'd had a JS1 prior to the waitlist and those who didn't.Rigo wrote:How does waitlist work in actuality?
Is it JS1 people who never got a JS2 at the top of the pile and non-JS1 non-rejects at the bottom?
- dddddd90

- Posts: 142
- Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2016 3:55 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
Not necessarily. Some people who got JS1s could have fucked them up, but not enough to send them straight to ding. People who didn't get JS1s could have really compelling softs but H may be waiting to see how many low number folks/splitters they can let in once they have a better idea of their class make up.ashrice13 wrote:This seems odd to me. Like...there's gotta be a reason person A received a JS1 and person B didn't. Wouldn't that play out in who gets pulled from the WL?nimbus cloud wrote:Nope, once you're waitlisted, there is not a substantial difference between those who'd had a JS1 prior to the waitlist and those who didn't.Rigo wrote:How does waitlist work in actuality?
Is it JS1 people who never got a JS2 at the top of the pile and non-JS1 non-rejects at the bottom?
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
anonperson2017

- Posts: 77
- Joined: Mon Jan 23, 2017 9:05 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
.
Last edited by anonperson2017 on Fri Mar 17, 2017 3:12 pm, edited 2 times in total.
- bartlettadmin

- Posts: 104
- Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2017 10:16 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
Same. I honestly don't know what I would prefer between a ding and a waitlist. At least with the former you know. Instead of just waiting around for what I'm sure would be an eventual ding for me anyway.jjcorvino wrote:Well, I didn't get dinged again and still haven't gotten a JS1, seems like I might be in the Waitlist pile? They have definitely reviewed my file, so if I was going to get dinged or interviewed I think that would happen aleady?
- nimbus cloud

- Posts: 536
- Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2015 2:19 am
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
This or what the above poster said. Or another possible version: we know that the faculty gets involved after the JS1 interview. In your hypothetical, the faculty might prefer person B to person A even if the admissions office originally liked person A better.dddddd90 wrote:Not necessarily. Some people who got JS1s could have fucked them up, but not enough to send them straight to ding. People who didn't get JS1s could have really compelling softs but H may be waiting to see how many low number folks/splitters they can let in once they have a better idea of their class make up.ashrice13 wrote:This seems odd to me. Like...there's gotta be a reason person A received a JS1 and person B didn't. Wouldn't that play out in who gets pulled from the WL?nimbus cloud wrote:Nope, once you're waitlisted, there is not a substantial difference between those who'd had a JS1 prior to the waitlist and those who didn't.Rigo wrote:How does waitlist work in actuality?
Is it JS1 people who never got a JS2 at the top of the pile and non-JS1 non-rejects at the bottom?
-
tartan2016

- Posts: 91
- Joined: Sat Mar 04, 2017 7:51 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
^yeah seems like the faculty had a lot of say. That may explain why so so interviews get in while some really great ones don'tnimbus cloud wrote:This or what the above poster said. Or another possible version: we know that the faculty gets involved after the JS1 interview. In your hypothetical, the faculty might prefer person B to person A even if the admissions office originally liked person A better.dddddd90 wrote:Not necessarily. Some people who got JS1s could have fucked them up, but not enough to send them straight to ding. People who didn't get JS1s could have really compelling softs but H may be waiting to see how many low number folks/splitters they can let in once they have a better idea of their class make up.ashrice13 wrote:This seems odd to me. Like...there's gotta be a reason person A received a JS1 and person B didn't. Wouldn't that play out in who gets pulled from the WL?nimbus cloud wrote:Nope, once you're waitlisted, there is not a substantial difference between those who'd had a JS1 prior to the waitlist and those who didn't.Rigo wrote:How does waitlist work in actuality?
Is it JS1 people who never got a JS2 at the top of the pile and non-JS1 non-rejects at the bottom?
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- ashrice13

- Posts: 1793
- Joined: Sun Jul 24, 2016 10:30 am
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
Honestly...I think I might prefer the ding for this reason. With my below 25th LSAT the odds aren't looking too good and I'd rather just be let down quick so I can move on with my life.bartlettadmin wrote:Same. I honestly don't know what I would prefer between a ding and a waitlist. At least with the former you know. Instead of just waiting around for what I'm sure would be an eventual ding for me anyway.jjcorvino wrote:Well, I didn't get dinged again and still haven't gotten a JS1, seems like I might be in the Waitlist pile? They have definitely reviewed my file, so if I was going to get dinged or interviewed I think that would happen aleady?
- ashrice13

- Posts: 1793
- Joined: Sun Jul 24, 2016 10:30 am
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
Yeah...this all makes sensetartan2016 wrote:^yeah seems like the faculty had a lot of say. That may explain why so so interviews get in while some really great ones don'tnimbus cloud wrote:This or what the above poster said. Or another possible version: we know that the faculty gets involved after the JS1 interview. In your hypothetical, the faculty might prefer person B to person A even if the admissions office originally liked person A better.dddddd90 wrote:Not necessarily. Some people who got JS1s could have fucked them up, but not enough to send them straight to ding. People who didn't get JS1s could have really compelling softs but H may be waiting to see how many low number folks/splitters they can let in once they have a better idea of their class make up.ashrice13 wrote:This seems odd to me. Like...there's gotta be a reason person A received a JS1 and person B didn't. Wouldn't that play out in who gets pulled from the WL?nimbus cloud wrote:Nope, once you're waitlisted, there is not a substantial difference between those who'd had a JS1 prior to the waitlist and those who didn't.Rigo wrote:How does waitlist work in actuality?
Is it JS1 people who never got a JS2 at the top of the pile and non-JS1 non-rejects at the bottom?
-
Mackgal

- Posts: 107
- Joined: Mon Nov 28, 2016 9:13 am
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
On HLS's website it indicates that anyone who gets into Harvard off of the wait list will have interviewed, no one gets accepted to the school without a JS1. So it could be that people who get put on the wait list without having a JS1 are people who they haven't had the time to give a JS1 to yet, but consider to be equally as competitive with those individuals who have already had a JS1 interview. Either way, according to Harvard, non-JS1 waitlisters will have to have a JS1 at some point to get acceptedashrice13 wrote:Yeah...this all makes sensetartan2016 wrote:^yeah seems like the faculty had a lot of say. That may explain why so so interviews get in while some really great ones don'tnimbus cloud wrote:This or what the above poster said. Or another possible version: we know that the faculty gets involved after the JS1 interview. In your hypothetical, the faculty might prefer person B to person A even if the admissions office originally liked person A better.dddddd90 wrote:Not necessarily. Some people who got JS1s could have fucked them up, but not enough to send them straight to ding. People who didn't get JS1s could have really compelling softs but H may be waiting to see how many low number folks/splitters they can let in once they have a better idea of their class make up.ashrice13 wrote:This seems odd to me. Like...there's gotta be a reason person A received a JS1 and person B didn't. Wouldn't that play out in who gets pulled from the WL?nimbus cloud wrote:Nope, once you're waitlisted, there is not a substantial difference between those who'd had a JS1 prior to the waitlist and those who didn't.Rigo wrote:How does waitlist work in actuality?
Is it JS1 people who never got a JS2 at the top of the pile and non-JS1 non-rejects at the bottom?
-
BabyDoc2JD

- Posts: 41
- Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2016 9:16 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
HLS closed on Tuesday, March 14
Harvard Law School will be closed on Tuesday, March 14 due to the forecasted winter weather event that is expected to bring significant snowfall and blizzard conditions to the Boston and Cambridge areas.
Do you think they will be working from home tomorrow?
Harvard Law School will be closed on Tuesday, March 14 due to the forecasted winter weather event that is expected to bring significant snowfall and blizzard conditions to the Boston and Cambridge areas.
Do you think they will be working from home tomorrow?
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
pandaaa

- Posts: 47
- Joined: Fri Nov 25, 2016 4:55 am
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
I got in in the last wave but never got an invite for the FB group. Am I supposed to join myself?chasima wrote:ah, ok, makes sense! thanks for the info!VapidP wrote:I doubt everyone admitted joins the FB group. Apparently last years capped out at 600ish. I would assume a generous estimate of over half the offers have gone outchasima wrote:only 350?? out of a total of 900 acceptances for the cycle? wowKinch08 wrote:rough estimate of # of people admitted so far, from the FB group.tomgirl wrote:
350 of us?
-
kiwi50

- Posts: 133
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2016 12:41 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
.
Last edited by kiwi50 on Wed Mar 22, 2017 5:07 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
Pozzo

- Posts: 1918
- Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2015 3:36 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
They've been scouting these boards for sure. Good luck tomorrow, everyone.kiwi50 wrote:This is what their twitter feed says, so if the hashtag really holds true, they'll be working from home.
"The @Harvard_Law J.D. Admissions Office will be closed on Tuesday, March 14, 2017. Stay warm! #snowday #blizzard2017 #workingfromhome"
-
JGuy

- Posts: 6
- Joined: Wed Feb 22, 2017 9:13 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
Snap, something gonna happen tomorrow, and I have a 6 hours flight >.<Pozzo wrote:They've been scouting these boards for sure. Good luck tomorrow, everyone.kiwi50 wrote:This is what their twitter feed says, so if the hashtag really holds true, they'll be working from home.
"The @Harvard_Law J.D. Admissions Office will be closed on Tuesday, March 14, 2017. Stay warm! #snowday #blizzard2017 #workingfromhome"
Also, I feel bad for that one guy with super identifying stats now. :/
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login