UCLA? Forum

CardinalRules · Post by **CardinalRules** » Fri Nov 20, 2009 6:30 pm

crackberry wrote:
rondemarino wrote:Hey, I hear you. Wasn't trying to rain on your parade. Tis a little amusing, no?
Listen, you're probably right, but if I don't get in anywhere in HYSCCN, it could be awfully tough to turn down $90K.

Same here; if no marquee acceptance, it's not easy to turn down full ride + Southern California location + some cool special programs that are closely related to my interests.

emptybee · Post by **emptybee** » Fri Nov 20, 2009 6:41 pm

In and 90K

rondemarino · Post by **rondemarino** » Fri Nov 20, 2009 6:44 pm

Couple of people on LSN last year were certainly swayed with the $90+ offers (link).

When do yo guys have to notify UCLA that you're accepting the scholarship? Is it the same date as the first deposit deadline?

crackberry · Post by **crackberry** » Fri Nov 20, 2009 6:50 pm

rondemarino wrote:Couple of people on LSN last year were certainly swayed with the $90+ offers (link).

When do yo guys have to notify UCLA that you're accepting the scholarship? Is it the same date as the first deposit deadline?

Yeah

Jacques · Post by **Jacques** » Fri Nov 20, 2009 7:14 pm

By the way, has anyone who's been accepted been ED?

jay115 · Post by **jay115** » Sat Nov 21, 2009 5:36 pm

Jacques wrote:By the way, has anyone who's been accepted been ED?

id like to know as well.

tintin · Post by **tintin** » Sun Nov 22, 2009 1:49 am

i take it they dont call on the weekends?

southxii · Post by **southxii** » Sun Nov 22, 2009 2:09 am

I hope not. Nothing like a denial to ruin a weekend. Other than at a bar, of course.

clarence35 · Post by **clarence35** » Mon Nov 23, 2009 3:47 pm

jay115 wrote:
Jacques wrote:By the way, has anyone who's been accepted been ED?
id like to know as well.

I received a call from Dean Schwartz earlier this morning, in via Early Decision.

rondemarino · Post by **rondemarino** » Mon Nov 23, 2009 3:49 pm

EDers - wanna post your numbers too?

j2d3 · Post by **j2d3** » Mon Nov 23, 2009 3:52 pm

I love that this thread's topic ends in a question mark.

It's like, totally like California upspeak, right?

jgulia45 · Post by **jgulia45** » Mon Nov 23, 2009 3:56 pm

clarence35 wrote:
jay115 wrote:
Jacques wrote:By the way, has anyone who's been accepted been ED?
id like to know as well.
I received a call from Dean Schwartz earlier this morning, in via Early Decision.

what are your stats??

finalaspects · Post by **finalaspects** » Mon Nov 23, 2009 3:57 pm

clarence35 wrote:
jay115 wrote:
Jacques wrote:By the way, has anyone who's been accepted been ED?
id like to know as well.
I received a call from Dean Schwartz earlier this morning, in via Early Decision.

Hey Clarence, do you mind sharing your stats with us please? or at the very least whether your gpa/lsat is above their medians? which is 3.77 and 168.

clarence35 · Post by **clarence35** » Mon Nov 23, 2009 4:01 pm

finalaspects wrote:
clarence35 wrote:
jay115 wrote:
Jacques wrote:By the way, has anyone who's been accepted been ED?
id like to know as well.
I received a call from Dean Schwartz earlier this morning, in via Early Decision.
Hey Clarence, do you mind sharing your stats with us please? or at the very least whether your gpa/lsat is above their medians? which is 3.77 and 168.

I don't know how helpful my stats will be since I'm a fairly non-traditional candidate (engineering/cs major at Berkeley UG, 4 years work experience), but I had a 3.54 GPA and 168 LSAT. Good luck with your application cycle!

jgulia45 · Post by **jgulia45** » Mon Nov 23, 2009 4:03 pm

Clarence, when did you go complete if you don't mind sharing?

rondemarino · Post by **rondemarino** » Mon Nov 23, 2009 4:05 pm

Not bad. Good news for 168s.

clarence35 · Post by **clarence35** » Mon Nov 23, 2009 4:07 pm

jgulia45 wrote:Clarence, when did you go complete if you don't mind sharing?

I went complete on 10/30.

Jacques · Post by **Jacques** » Mon Nov 23, 2009 4:27 pm

Glad to hear UCLA is continuing to look at applications during the holiday weekend!

finalaspects · Post by **finalaspects** » Mon Nov 23, 2009 4:32 pm

rondemarino wrote:Not bad. Good news for 168s.

Can you please go work for their admissions and just let everyone in with a 168?

THANKS! =)

Hopefullawstudent · Post by **Hopefullawstudent** » Mon Nov 23, 2009 4:37 pm

finalaspects wrote:
rondemarino wrote:Not bad. Good news for 168s.
Can you please go work for their admissions and just let everyone in with a 168?

THANKS! =)

+1,000,000,000,000,000,000.

rondemarino · Post by **rondemarino** » Mon Nov 23, 2009 4:43 pm

finalaspects wrote:
rondemarino wrote:Not bad. Good news for 168s.
Can you please go work for their admissions and just let everyone in with a 168?

THANKS! =)

Well, don't pop open the champagne just yet. 168 being rejected would have been horrific news for 168s. However, for all we know, Clarence cured cancer and his/her numbers played no role.

finalaspects · Post by **finalaspects** » Mon Nov 23, 2009 5:30 pm

rondemarino wrote:
finalaspects wrote:
rondemarino wrote:Not bad. Good news for 168s.
Can you please go work for their admissions and just let everyone in with a 168?

THANKS! =)
Well, don't pop open the champagne just yet. 168 being rejected would have been horrific news for 168s. However, for all we know, Clarence cured cancer and his/her numbers played no role.

Yea, don't worry I'm actually expecting to get rejected. =I

Mosca · Post by **Mosca** » Mon Nov 23, 2009 7:14 pm

clarence35 wrote: I received a call from Dean Schwartz earlier this morning, in via Early Decision.

Congratulations! It's got to feel good to know where you are going before Thanksgiving. I hope I get the call soon too.

jgulia45 · Post by **jgulia45** » Mon Nov 23, 2009 7:18 pm

it appears angelato on LSN was also accepted ED today. his/her stats are 3.93 and 166 went complete 10/14

finalaspects · Post by **finalaspects** » Mon Nov 23, 2009 7:25 pm

jgulia45 wrote:it appears angelato on LSN was also accepted ED today. his/her stats are 3.93 and 166 went complete 10/14

Over 75% in GPA and over the 25% in LSAT

not looking too great for splitters

UCLA? Forum

Re: UCLA?

Re: UCLA?

Re: UCLA?

Re: UCLA?

Re: UCLA?

Re: UCLA?

Re: UCLA?

Re: UCLA?

Re: UCLA?

Re: UCLA?

Re: UCLA?

Re: UCLA?

Re: UCLA?

Re: UCLA?

Re: UCLA?

Re: UCLA?

Re: UCLA?

Re: UCLA?

Re: UCLA?

Re: UCLA?

Re: UCLA?

Re: UCLA?

Re: UCLA?

Re: UCLA?

Re: UCLA?