
U Chicago 2010 Forum
- puppleberry finn
- Posts: 1035
- Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2009 7:03 pm
Re: U Chicago 2010
like an underaged crackwhore


- gahthelaw
- Posts: 727
- Joined: Sun May 17, 2009 11:30 pm
Re: U Chicago 2010
she's 15. just sayin'.rockchalk86 wrote:I'd do her
-
- Posts: 209
- Joined: Fri Nov 13, 2009 12:05 pm
Re: U Chicago 2010
By the way, has there even been a worse actress than Hilary Duff? I swear she belongs in B films or worse....
- gahthelaw
- Posts: 727
- Joined: Sun May 17, 2009 11:30 pm
Re: U Chicago 2010
i just couldn't get over the threesome thing. like...it's hilary duff! hilary duff doesn't do threesomes, she does disney! though i guess it was the most tepid threesome ever.dms87 wrote:By the way, has there even been a worse actress than Hilary Duff? I swear she belongs in B films or worse....
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- rockchalk86
- Posts: 528
- Joined: Thu Oct 15, 2009 10:16 am
Re: U Chicago 2010
Never mind. I have no clue who this girl is and was just basing that statement off the pic. Considering she looks about as old as most girls you see at undergrad bars I don't feel too badgahthelaw wrote:she's 15. just sayin'.rockchalk86 wrote:I'd do her
-
- Posts: 209
- Joined: Fri Nov 13, 2009 12:05 pm
Re: U Chicago 2010
She's actually 16, you meanie!rockchalk86 wrote:Never mind. I have no clue who this girl is and was just basing that statement off the pic. Considering she looks about as old as most girls you see at undergrad bars I don't feel too badgahthelaw wrote:she's 15. just sayin'.rockchalk86 wrote:I'd do her
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taylor_Momsen
Almost 16 1/2, in fact.

- gahthelaw
- Posts: 727
- Joined: Sun May 17, 2009 11:30 pm
Re: U Chicago 2010
oof. my bad. however, there isn't really a 'less' illegal in this situation, just still illegal.dms87 wrote:She's actually 16, you meanie!rockchalk86 wrote:Never mind. I have no clue who this girl is and was just basing that statement off the pic. Considering she looks about as old as most girls you see at undergrad bars I don't feel too badgahthelaw wrote:she's 15. just sayin'.rockchalk86 wrote:I'd do her
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taylor_Momsen
Almost 16 1/2, in fact.
- ClemCarter
- Posts: 248
- Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 9:09 am
Re: U Chicago 2010
Pretty stoked on the drug-dealer little J storyline. Hope she gets some come-uppance.
-
- Posts: 209
- Joined: Fri Nov 13, 2009 12:05 pm
Re: U Chicago 2010
Oh Clem, oh Clem. Whatever shall we do with you.......ClemCarter wrote:Pretty stoked on the drug-dealer little J storyline. Hope she gets some come-uppance.
- ClemCarter
- Posts: 248
- Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 9:09 am
Re: U Chicago 2010
dms87 wrote:Oh Clem, oh Clem. Whatever shall we do with you.......ClemCarter wrote:Pretty stoked on the drug-dealer little J storyline. Hope she gets some come-uppance.
I'unno. Got any money?
- crackberry
- Posts: 3252
- Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 3:23 pm
Re: U Chicago 2010
So every admit gets a phone call from Chicago?
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- ClemCarter
- Posts: 248
- Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 9:09 am
Re: U Chicago 2010
You are seriously committed to staying on topic, and for that, I appluad you, sir.crackberry wrote:So every admit gets a phone call from Chicago?
- crackberry
- Posts: 3252
- Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 3:23 pm
Re: U Chicago 2010
I don't watch these teeny-bopper shows you guys rant about on these threads. I have nothing to contribute to those conversations.ClemCarter wrote:You are seriously committed to staying on topic, and for that, I appluad you, sir.crackberry wrote:So every admit gets a phone call from Chicago?
- gahthelaw
- Posts: 727
- Joined: Sun May 17, 2009 11:30 pm
Re: U Chicago 2010
we could just start posting pictures and then rate who is the most amazing. the clear frontrunner:crackberry wrote:I don't watch these teeny-bopper shows you guys rant about on these threads. I have nothing to contribute to those conversations.ClemCarter wrote:You are seriously committed to staying on topic, and for that, I appluad you, sir.crackberry wrote:So every admit gets a phone call from Chicago?
--ImageRemoved--
- ClemCarter
- Posts: 248
- Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 9:09 am
Re: U Chicago 2010
crackberry wrote:I don't watch these teeny-bopper shows you guys rant about on these threads. I have nothing to contribute to those conversations.ClemCarter wrote:You are seriously committed to staying on topic, and for that, I appluad you, sir.crackberry wrote:So every admit gets a phone call from Chicago?
Is rant really the appropriate word?
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- crackberry
- Posts: 3252
- Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 3:23 pm
Re: U Chicago 2010
Well no. I suppose "discuss to no end" is somewhat better. But I find myself having to scroll through countless pictures and posts about shows I've never even heard of, let alone watched. And that makes me want to rant.ClemCarter wrote:crackberry wrote:I don't watch these teeny-bopper shows you guys rant about on these threads. I have nothing to contribute to those conversations.ClemCarter wrote:You are seriously committed to staying on topic, and for that, I appluad you, sir.crackberry wrote:So every admit gets a phone call from Chicago?
Is rant really the appropriate word?
Where's hopefulundergrad? Every admit gets a phone call you say?
- ClemCarter
- Posts: 248
- Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 9:09 am
Re: U Chicago 2010
crackberry wrote: Well no. I suppose "discuss to no end" is somewhat better. But I find myself having to scroll through countless pictures and posts about shows I've never even heard of, let alone watched. And that makes me want to rant.
Gah, shall we take this to the bitter pessimism thread? I'm picking up on a "vibe."
- gahthelaw
- Posts: 727
- Joined: Sun May 17, 2009 11:30 pm
Re: U Chicago 2010
agreed. sorry crackberry!ClemCarter wrote:crackberry wrote: Well no. I suppose "discuss to no end" is somewhat better. But I find myself having to scroll through countless pictures and posts about shows I've never even heard of, let alone watched. And that makes me want to rant.
Gah, shall we take this to the bitter pessimism thread? I'm picking up on a "vibe."

- gotmilk?
- Posts: 204
- Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2009 2:25 am
Re: U Chicago 2010
RANT RANT RANT RANT RANT RANT. dumb pop culture. you still manage to get at me even when i bury myself in a uchicago law thread.crackberry wrote:Well no. I suppose "discuss to no end" is somewhat better. But I find myself having to scroll through countless pictures and posts about shows I've never even heard of, let alone watched. And that makes me want to rant.ClemCarter wrote:crackberry wrote:I don't watch these teeny-bopper shows you guys rant about on these threads. I have nothing to contribute to those conversations.ClemCarter wrote:
You are seriously committed to staying on topic, and for that, I appluad you, sir.
Is rant really the appropriate word?
Where's hopefulundergrad? Every admit gets a phone call you say?
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- crackberry
- Posts: 3252
- Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 3:23 pm
Re: U Chicago 2010
Right, I was wondering about RD though.boo_pragmatism wrote:That seems to be the consensus, at least for ED kids.crackberry wrote:Where's hopefulundergrad? Every admit gets a phone call you say?
http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/v ... 3&start=50
- crackberry
- Posts: 3252
- Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 3:23 pm
Re: U Chicago 2010
Awesome. Thank you. Please resume incessant teeny-bopper TV show discussion...boo_pragmatism wrote:It looks like calls were still going out until at least February, which indicates RD'ers get calls as well.crackberry wrote:Right, I was wondering about RD though.boo_pragmatism wrote:That seems to be the consensus, at least for ED kids.crackberry wrote:Where's hopefulundergrad? Every admit gets a phone call you say?
http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/v ... 3&start=50
- crackberry
- Posts: 3252
- Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 3:23 pm
Re: U Chicago 2010
You and me both, my friend. You and me both.boo_pragmatism wrote:I have no clue what the fuck show they are talking about. On topic seems better.crackberry wrote:Awesome. Thank you. Please resume incessant teeny-bopper TV show discussion...
-
- Posts: 942
- Joined: Wed Nov 12, 2008 2:03 am
Re: U Chicago 2010
.
Last edited by Anastasia Dee Dualla on Sat May 02, 2015 10:25 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login