Share Your Experiences, Read About Other Experiences. Please keep posts organized by school and expected year of graduation.
-
Glasseyes

- Posts: 539
- Joined: Sun Nov 10, 2013 7:19 pm
Post
by Glasseyes » Thu May 15, 2014 12:01 pm
leigh912198972 wrote:Just got dumped.
Really need some good news today.
Sorry to hear that.

-
britrf

- Posts: 73
- Joined: Wed Feb 26, 2014 3:28 pm
Post
by britrf » Thu May 15, 2014 12:13 pm
leigh912198972 wrote:Just got dumped.
Really need some good news today.
I'm rooting for you!
-
BaberhamLincoln

- Posts: 2992
- Joined: Thu Jan 02, 2014 1:50 pm
Post
by BaberhamLincoln » Thu May 15, 2014 12:24 pm
LOLZ @ Johann's latest tweet.
But, like, I thought they were done reviewing videos/hold people!
-
britrf

- Posts: 73
- Joined: Wed Feb 26, 2014 3:28 pm
Post
by britrf » Thu May 15, 2014 12:24 pm
TweetsByJohann:
"eight wardrobe changes during a 3 min hold video is a bit excessive"
WHO DID THIS.
-
jk148706

- Posts: 2502
- Joined: Fri May 10, 2013 11:14 am
Post
by jk148706 » Thu May 15, 2014 12:25 pm
britrf wrote:TweetsByJohann:
"eight wardrobe changes during a 3 min hold video is a bit excessive"
WHO DID THIS.
Whoever did it at least got noticed
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
ManoftheHour

- Posts: 3486
- Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2013 6:03 pm
Post
by ManoftheHour » Thu May 15, 2014 12:31 pm
jk148706 wrote:britrf wrote:TweetsByJohann:
"eight wardrobe changes during a 3 min hold video is a bit excessive"
WHO DID THIS.
Whoever did it at least got noticed
Now I feel like I didn't try hard enough...
-
rion91

- Posts: 969
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2011 12:58 pm
Post
by rion91 » Thu May 15, 2014 12:32 pm
At least they'll remember you!
-
Letzgo1Gen

- Posts: 69
- Joined: Wed May 08, 2013 10:15 am
Post
by Letzgo1Gen » Thu May 15, 2014 12:35 pm
britrf wrote:TweetsByJohann:
"eight wardrobe changes during a 3 min hold video is a bit excessive"
WHO DID THIS.
Honestly, at this point it seems so remedial of them. You're going to judge a bunch of wanna-be-lawyers on our wardrobe or video editing skills? How about looking at the content of the video instead of our fashion choices, or at our life accomplishments, or scores? The fact that our appearances are being judged - and possibly influencing our file, even if subconsciously, really pisses me off.
-
luuma

- Posts: 246
- Joined: Sat Dec 10, 2011 2:04 am
Post
by luuma » Thu May 15, 2014 12:37 pm
Wow forget it, we're never hearing back. They're clearly not "done". That one tweet staying that they were done was either misinterpreted or misstated. Regardless I can't tell if I'm feeling angry or totally defeated at this point but they're playing us real good.
Want to continue reading?
Register for access!
Did I mention it was FREE ?
Already a member? Login
-
ManoftheHour

- Posts: 3486
- Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2013 6:03 pm
Post
by ManoftheHour » Thu May 15, 2014 12:38 pm
ManoftheHour wrote:bigfeature wrote:SO TODAY.
I'm not holding my breath. I know how these bros are.
-
ManoftheHour

- Posts: 3486
- Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2013 6:03 pm
Post
by ManoftheHour » Thu May 15, 2014 12:38 pm
I bet they're just laughing at us. Every tweet they make, they come back here to watch our reactions.
-
rahulg91

- Posts: 427
- Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2013 1:30 pm
Post
by rahulg91 » Thu May 15, 2014 12:43 pm
ManoftheHour wrote:jk148706 wrote:britrf wrote:TweetsByJohann:
"eight wardrobe changes during a 3 min hold video is a bit excessive"
WHO DID THIS.
Whoever did it at least got noticed
Now I feel like I didn't try hard enough...
Yeah man anything less than 5 wardrobe changes in 3 min is TTT.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
luuma

- Posts: 246
- Joined: Sat Dec 10, 2011 2:04 am
Post
by luuma » Thu May 15, 2014 1:18 pm
I called. They said they're having server issues with LSAC. They're going to try to send out decisions (did not indicate some or all) by the end of this week (there is only tomorrow left this week?) or next week. But he emphasized that he cannot guarantee either one. So.. There's that...
-
ManoftheHour

- Posts: 3486
- Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2013 6:03 pm
Post
by ManoftheHour » Thu May 15, 2014 1:20 pm
luuma wrote:I called. They said they're having server issues with LSAC. They're going to try to send out decisions (did not indicate some or all) by the end of this week (there is only tomorrow left this week?) or next week. But he emphasized that he cannot guarantee either one. So.. There's that...

-
jk148706

- Posts: 2502
- Joined: Fri May 10, 2013 11:14 am
Post
by jk148706 » Thu May 15, 2014 1:21 pm
luuma wrote:I called. They said they're having server issues with LSAC. They're going to try to send out decisions (did not indicate some or all) by the end of this week (there is only tomorrow left this week?) or next week. But he emphasized that he cannot guarantee either one. So.. There's that...

-
britrf

- Posts: 73
- Joined: Wed Feb 26, 2014 3:28 pm
Post
by britrf » Thu May 15, 2014 1:28 pm
luuma wrote:I called. They said they're having server issues with LSAC. They're going to try to send out decisions (did not indicate some or all) by the end of this week (there is only tomorrow left this week?) or next week. But he emphasized that he cannot guarantee either one. So.. There's that...
Wow. Just wow.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
BaberhamLincoln

- Posts: 2992
- Joined: Thu Jan 02, 2014 1:50 pm
Post
by BaberhamLincoln » Thu May 15, 2014 1:31 pm
Can someone explain to me what LSAC has to do with them sending us an email decision?
-
magjag

- Posts: 90
- Joined: Tue Feb 11, 2014 2:04 pm
Post
by magjag » Thu May 15, 2014 1:31 pm
britrf wrote:luuma wrote:I called. They said they're having server issues with LSAC. They're going to try to send out decisions (did not indicate some or all) by the end of this week (there is only tomorrow left this week?) or next week. But he emphasized that he cannot guarantee either one. So.. There's that...
Wow. Just wow.
The lack of urgency on their part tells us that we have been waitlisted.
We know it, they know it, we know that they know and so forth.
-
magjag

- Posts: 90
- Joined: Tue Feb 11, 2014 2:04 pm
Post
by magjag » Thu May 15, 2014 1:32 pm
leigh912198972 wrote:Can someone explain to me what LSAC has to do with them sending us an email decision?
incompetence.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
-
BaberhamLincoln

- Posts: 2992
- Joined: Thu Jan 02, 2014 1:50 pm
Post
by BaberhamLincoln » Thu May 15, 2014 1:35 pm
This is so jacked up.
I hope Johann updates via twitter because there are probably people who don't use TLS that would be anxiously awaiting an email.
-
ManoftheHour

- Posts: 3486
- Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2013 6:03 pm
Post
by ManoftheHour » Thu May 15, 2014 1:38 pm
leigh912198972 wrote:This is so jacked up.
I hope Johann updates via twitter because there are probably people who don't use TLS that would be anxiously awaiting an email.
I don't think non-TLSers know he has a twitter account to begin with.
-
rion91

- Posts: 969
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2011 12:58 pm
Post
by rion91 » Thu May 15, 2014 1:47 pm
NU has made me a masochist.
-
britrf

- Posts: 73
- Joined: Wed Feb 26, 2014 3:28 pm
Post
by britrf » Thu May 15, 2014 1:48 pm
There's still over 4 hours until 5 CST. Maybe they'll get it together by then. Maybe some of us will get an email today.
My guess as to why they need LSAC to admit us is that they might have to indicate decisions to LSAC before they notify the actual person, so they can't fudge their yield stats.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login