Bummer. Being an ED'er might help you get off the waitlist faster, though. Are those numbers actual for this year or from that interview with Dean Schwartz?JesusChrist wrote:Waitlisted today with a 166/3.3 ED. UCLA was my dream school but I can't say I'm surprised. My number were going to be a stretch. And actually, the mere fact that I was Waitlisted and not outright rejected with those numbers hopefully reflects the quality of my soft and my PS.
280 ED applications, 30 accepted through ED and 30 get WL. That's not too bad.
UCLA c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013) Forum
-
- Posts: 67
- Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2011 8:14 pm
Re: UCLA c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
-
- Posts: 384
- Joined: Wed Aug 25, 2010 12:44 am
Re: UCLA c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
From the interview.hattrick87 wrote:Bummer. Being an ED'er might help you get off the waitlist faster, though. Are those numbers actual for this year or from that interview with Dean Schwartz?JesusChrist wrote:Waitlisted today with a 166/3.3 ED. UCLA was my dream school but I can't say I'm surprised. My number were going to be a stretch. And actually, the mere fact that I was Waitlisted and not outright rejected with those numbers hopefully reflects the quality of my soft and my PS.
280 ED applications, 30 accepted through ED and 30 get WL. That's not too bad.
-
- Posts: 149
- Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2011 2:52 pm
Re: UCLA c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
rejected ed today, around 25th gpa / lsat right above 25th, not surprised 

- sanjola
- Posts: 482
- Joined: Sun Dec 19, 2010 12:56 pm
Re: UCLA c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Dinged today.
Oh well, it was a long shot. Good luck everyone!

Oh well, it was a long shot. Good luck everyone!
- dproduct
- Posts: 4078
- Joined: Tue Dec 27, 2011 8:58 pm
Re: UCLA c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
I'm so sorrysanjola wrote:Dinged today.![]()
Oh well, it was a long shot. Good luck everyone!

Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- 06102016
- Posts: 13460
- Joined: Tue Oct 25, 2011 1:29 pm
- sanjola
- Posts: 482
- Joined: Sun Dec 19, 2010 12:56 pm
Re: UCLA c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Thank you. This is the last cycle I'm applying in, so I won't be retaking.dproduct wrote:I'm so sorrysanjola wrote:Dinged today.![]()
Oh well, it was a long shot. Good luck everyone!Good luck on the rest of your cycle. Are considering a retake?
-
- Posts: 157
- Joined: Mon Mar 28, 2011 9:41 pm
Re: UCLA c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
CO2016YEAH wrote:I agree with the others in that you should pretty much be an auto-admit! I'm surprised you haven't heard anything, but I think it will come.kfischm1 wrote:Applied RD and went complete 9/18. Haven't heard anything. 169/4.14. Starting to worry. :-/
Are there any glaring factors that would go against you (major c&f issues, etc)?
I did submit a c&f addendum. Maybe that is the reason for not hearing. :-/
Does UCLA yield protect like some lower T-14s? I've been accepted to some T-14s already and one with significant money. Maybe because I didn't write a Why UCLA or program specific letter they are thinking I won't attend if accepted? My PS and resume is very public interest oriented, which UCLA seems to be focused on.
Guess I'll just have to sit back and wait.
-
- Posts: 222
- Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2012 12:52 pm
Re: UCLA c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
My guess is they wouldn't yield project you. If anything they'll accept you, but not offer any money (this seems to be happening to people with really phenomenal numbers applying to UCLA). Of course you would be able to negotiate if you're truly interested in UCLA and you have money already at other T14's. I wouldn't be too concerned. I have slightly worse numbers (high 3.9X, 168) and they were kind enough to offer me $90,000. Best of luck!!kfischm1 wrote:CO2016YEAH wrote:I agree with the others in that you should pretty much be an auto-admit! I'm surprised you haven't heard anything, but I think it will come.kfischm1 wrote:Applied RD and went complete 9/18. Haven't heard anything. 169/4.14. Starting to worry. :-/
Are there any glaring factors that would go against you (major c&f issues, etc)?
I did submit a c&f addendum. Maybe that is the reason for not hearing. :-/
Does UCLA yield protect like some lower T-14s? I've been accepted to some T-14s already and one with significant money. Maybe because I didn't write a Why UCLA or program specific letter they are thinking I won't attend if accepted? My PS and resume is very public interest oriented, which UCLA seems to be focused on.
Guess I'll just have to sit back and wait.
-
- Posts: 11730
- Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2012 9:53 am
Re: UCLA c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
What's the consensus on when we should start negotiating if we already have a scholarship offer from UCLA? I have an offer from a peer and would like to bring the COA down at UCLA. Too soon to start the process?
- dsn32
- Posts: 436
- Joined: Sun May 01, 2011 3:40 pm
Re: UCLA c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Wondering about this as well. I don't want to pester them with offers from other schools multiple times, but in the same vein Dean Schwartz has said to me multiple times that UCLA wants to be aware of other offers. Anyone have experience with negotiating with them?BigZuck wrote:What's the consensus on when we should start negotiating if we already have a scholarship offer from UCLA? I have an offer from a peer and would like to bring the COA down at UCLA. Too soon to start the process?
-
- Posts: 222
- Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2012 12:52 pm
Re: UCLA c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
I talked to someone that is currently a 2L about this. He said to wait until you have more offers/the best offers you can get from other schools. So, basically around March. This will also give you time to visit and/or go to the admitted students weekend, which shows that you're legitimately interested and not trying to get an offer to use as leverage against another school.dsn32 wrote:Wondering about this as well. I don't want to pester them with offers from other schools multiple times, but in the same vein Dean Schwartz has said to me multiple times that UCLA wants to be aware of other offers. Anyone have experience with negotiating with them?BigZuck wrote:What's the consensus on when we should start negotiating if we already have a scholarship offer from UCLA? I have an offer from a peer and would like to bring the COA down at UCLA. Too soon to start the process?
EDIT: to clarify, the 2L is at UCLA law with 105k
- RetakeFrenzy
- Posts: 597
- Joined: Fri Dec 14, 2012 11:41 am
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 500
- Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2012 9:31 am
Re: UCLA c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
That's interesting, how will they verify how much you are getting from the other school?BigZuck wrote:What's the consensus on when we should start negotiating if we already have a scholarship offer from UCLA? I have an offer from a peer and would like to bring the COA down at UCLA. Too soon to start the process?
- joiedevivre18
- Posts: 98
- Joined: Mon May 03, 2010 7:33 pm
Re: UCLA c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Got in yesterday via a generic "Info for Admitted Students" email that said a formal letter of acceptance is in the mail. 169/3.93
Since it was a generic letter there was no mention of scholarship - can anyone shed light on how they were notified? Thanks!
Since it was a generic letter there was no mention of scholarship - can anyone shed light on how they were notified? Thanks!
-
- Posts: 370
- Joined: Mon Nov 26, 2012 7:28 pm
Re: UCLA c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Just got the phone call, in with 20k a year!!
- jubee
- Posts: 159
- Joined: Thu Nov 01, 2012 6:28 pm
Re: UCLA c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
I just missed a call, and Dean Schwartz left a message asking me to call back whenever. Is this definitely an acceptance call? If so or if not, what does he say/does he ask anything? wish I had answered because I would have had to deal with it but now I'm having anxiety about calling back haha.
ETA: being paranoid cuz i've read in another threads about unexpected dean phone calls where its like a mini interview
ETA: being paranoid cuz i've read in another threads about unexpected dean phone calls where its like a mini interview
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 169
- Joined: Fri Feb 03, 2012 1:21 am
Re: UCLA c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
You're in! Congrats!jubee wrote:I just missed a call, and Dean Schwartz left a message asking me to call back whenever. Is this definitely an acceptance call? If so or if not, what does he say/does he ask anything? wish I had answered because I would have had to deal with it but now I'm having anxiety about calling back haha.
ETA: being paranoid cuz i've read in another threads about unexpected dean phone calls where its like a mini interview
- 06102016
- Posts: 13460
- Joined: Tue Oct 25, 2011 1:29 pm
-
- Posts: 67
- Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2011 8:14 pm
Re: UCLA c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Yup.slack_academic wrote:Congrats to new admits. I want some of that Bruin love for myself, though.
- dproduct
- Posts: 4078
- Joined: Tue Dec 27, 2011 8:58 pm
Re: UCLA c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
hattrick87 wrote:Yup.slack_academic wrote:Congrats to new admits. I want some of that Bruin love for myself, though.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 135
- Joined: Thu Nov 08, 2012 10:42 pm
Re: UCLA c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
In today! Got phone call from the dean. Complete 10/7. $90,000 too, so that was exciting!
Undergrad: University of Chicago
GPA: 3.57
LSAT: 172
Teach For America, strong leadership in college.
Undergrad: University of Chicago
GPA: 3.57
LSAT: 172
Teach For America, strong leadership in college.
- jubee
- Posts: 159
- Joined: Thu Nov 01, 2012 6:28 pm
Re: UCLA c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
for people that $ wasn't mentioned in call does that mean no $? also, i got a vmail and called back an hour later, and had to be patched through to the Dean, could possibly have interfered with notification of scholarship...? haha wishful thinking
-
- Posts: 102
- Joined: Thu Jun 28, 2012 1:39 pm
Re: UCLA c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
I got the call from Dean Schwartz today! In with full scholarship. Pretty stoked. Did not expect that much money.
-
- Posts: 15
- Joined: Sat Nov 24, 2012 4:35 am
Re: UCLA c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
In via phoneccall!submitted 11/23. Wasn't expecting such a fast turn around time...congrats to a admits!
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login