+1. Stats in profile. Applied 10/1.IronSkadden wrote:Accepted via email today. Stats are 167, 3.6.
GW c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle) Forum
- AmandaPB

- Posts: 430
- Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2011 1:37 pm
Re: GW c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
-
charliep

- Posts: 225
- Joined: Sat Oct 29, 2011 9:36 pm
Re: GW c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
did your e-mail say you should've already received an acceptance letter?AmandaPB wrote:+1. Stats in profile. Applied 10/1.IronSkadden wrote:Accepted via email today. Stats are 167, 3.6.
- AmandaPB

- Posts: 430
- Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2011 1:37 pm
Re: GW c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Yes, but I definitely haven’t.charliep wrote:did your e-mail say you should've already received an acceptance letter?AmandaPB wrote:+1. Stats in profile. Applied 10/1.IronSkadden wrote:Accepted via email today. Stats are 167, 3.6.
-
charliep

- Posts: 225
- Joined: Sat Oct 29, 2011 9:36 pm
Re: GW c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
yeah, same hereAmandaPB wrote:Yes, but I definitely haven’t.charliep wrote:did your e-mail say you should've already received an acceptance letter?AmandaPB wrote:+1. Stats in profile. Applied 10/1.IronSkadden wrote:Accepted via email today. Stats are 167, 3.6.
-
nametaken

- Posts: 385
- Joined: Fri Dec 16, 2011 2:23 pm
Re: GW c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
+2. applied 12/3. mine said I should have received an acceptance letter too.. i'm not sure if i have though because I am in CA for vacationAmandaPB wrote:+1. Stats in profile. Applied 10/1.IronSkadden wrote:Accepted via email today. Stats are 167, 3.6.
EDIT: Numbers are 175, 3.9
Last edited by nametaken on Thu Dec 22, 2011 3:55 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
hobojarpen

- Posts: 204
- Joined: Wed Apr 06, 2011 12:31 am
Re: GW c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
In via email. Never got the acceptance letter yet and status checker isn't updated either. GPA is around the median and LSAT is above 75th.
-
rwill

- Posts: 5
- Joined: Wed Oct 26, 2011 12:02 am
Re: GW c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
I also got an acceptance email today. 168/3.8
- gavinstevens

- Posts: 289
- Joined: Thu May 13, 2010 6:17 pm
Re: GW c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
In via email today. More info on my LSN.
No status update and no snail mail that the email says I should've received.
No status update and no snail mail that the email says I should've received.
-
AbLSAT

- Posts: 46
- Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2011 5:40 pm
Re: GW c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
In via email today 170 3.8
- stingray

- Posts: 89
- Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2011 6:37 pm
Re: GW c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Congrats everyone!!! I bet it was a surprise getting the email acceptance.
Are any of the acceptances from ED? Still waiting.
Are any of the acceptances from ED? Still waiting.
-
AbLSAT

- Posts: 46
- Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2011 5:40 pm
Re: GW c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Whats everyone's thoughts on gw? If its between gw and Fordham where are the better big law chances?
- law4vus

- Posts: 743
- Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2011 11:35 am
Re: GW c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Comes down to region. GW is going to be better in DC, especially for IP. Fordham is going to be better in NYC. I'd say that Fordham puts a proportionately higher number of their students into Big Law, but that's more a function of smaller class size and larger market rather than a difference in school quality.AbLSAT wrote:Whats everyone's thoughts on gw? If its between gw and Fordham where are the better big law chances?
- ColtsFan88

- Posts: 1431
- Joined: Thu Oct 13, 2011 5:05 pm
Re: GW c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Has anyone received scholarship info yet? I got the email today with the link to the ASW but I couldn't find anything about scholarships.
-
gatorapplicant

- Posts: 137
- Joined: Tue Mar 22, 2011 6:49 pm
Re: GW c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
in today via email. no letter in the mail, no scholarship info
-
georgeconstanza

- Posts: 65
- Joined: Wed Oct 26, 2011 11:26 pm
Re: GW c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
In via e-mail (3.3/173), but I haven't gotten a letter.
-
EMZE

- Posts: 710
- Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2011 10:53 am
Re: GW c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
In. Email. Today.
- AmandaPB

- Posts: 430
- Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2011 1:37 pm
Re: GW c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Letter today. Disappointed by the lack of information and personalization. Will withdraw soon.
- law4vus

- Posts: 743
- Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2011 11:35 am
Re: GW c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Were you even seriously considering GW with those numbers and the Stanford acceptance anyway?AmandaPB wrote:Letter today. Disappointed by the lack of information and personalization. Will withdraw soon.
- AmandaPB

- Posts: 430
- Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2011 1:37 pm
Re: GW c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Haha, no, not at this point in the cycle. In the beginning I definitely was.law4vus wrote:Were you even seriously considering GW with those numbers and the Stanford acceptance anyway?AmandaPB wrote:Letter today. Disappointed by the lack of information and personalization. Will withdraw soon.
- DonnaDraper

- Posts: 280
- Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2011 12:30 am
Re: GW c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
AmandaPB wrote:Letter today. Disappointed by the lack of information and personalization. Will withdraw soon.
- AmandaPB

- Posts: 430
- Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2011 1:37 pm
Re: GW c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Alright.
Last edited by AmandaPB on Fri Dec 23, 2011 9:46 pm, edited 3 times in total.
-
djkrish

- Posts: 53
- Joined: Mon Oct 24, 2011 7:47 am
Re: GW c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
dude my letter had a handwritten note at the bottom with a reference to my essay. crossing my fingers that means i got some scholarship money headed my way. when are you supposed to hear about that stuff anyways?AmandaPB wrote:Letter today. Disappointed by the lack of information and personalization. Will withdraw soon.
- AmandaPB

- Posts: 430
- Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2011 1:37 pm
Re: GW c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Nice! Yeah, mine was just like, “congrats!” Boo. But that’s awesome for you. I have no idea about scholarships and whatnot, but you sound like a candidate for one!djkrish wrote:dude my letter had a handwritten note at the bottom with a reference to my essay. crossing my fingers that means i got some scholarship money headed my way. when are you supposed to hear about that stuff anyways?AmandaPB wrote:Letter today. Disappointed by the lack of information and personalization. Will withdraw soon.
-
djkrish

- Posts: 53
- Joined: Mon Oct 24, 2011 7:47 am
Re: GW c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
haha i hope. law school is too much cash money. congrats on stanford by the wayAmandaPB wrote:Nice! Yeah, mine was just like, “congrats!” Boo. But that’s awesome for you. I have no idea about scholarships and whatnot, but you sound like a candidate for one!djkrish wrote:dude my letter had a handwritten note at the bottom with a reference to my essay. crossing my fingers that means i got some scholarship money headed my way. when are you supposed to hear about that stuff anyways?AmandaPB wrote:Letter today. Disappointed by the lack of information and personalization. Will withdraw soon.
- DonnaDraper

- Posts: 280
- Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2011 12:30 am
Re: GW c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Sorry about the bitchy eye roll. I just thought it was a little unfair of you to criticize a school that some people in this thread really want to go to/already attend after prolonging a withdrawal. "Congrats" is pretty lame, but they did offer you a spot, so....congrats!AmandaPB wrote:Alright.