Cornell waiting room Forum

badwithpseudonyms · Post by **badwithpseudonyms** » Thu Dec 17, 2009 3:21 pm

bfinlayson wrote:because i'm still EAC 11/13 i feel like this means i've been rejected.

Why's that? I figure the closer it gets to xmas the more likely we should be in because no one is that cruel to save the straight up rejections for last, are they?!

badwithpseudonyms · Post by **badwithpseudonyms** » Thu Dec 17, 2009 3:22 pm

JayTal wrote:
bfinlayson wrote:because i'm still EAC 11/13 i feel like this means i've been rejected.
I'm right there with you. Here's to hoping!

You're hoping she's been rejected?!

kbo026 · Post by **kbo026** » Thu Dec 17, 2009 3:26 pm

bfinlayson · Post by **bfinlayson** » Thu Dec 17, 2009 3:26 pm

JayTal wrote:
bfinlayson wrote:because i'm still EAC 11/13 i feel like this means i've been rejected.
I'm right there with you. Here's to hoping!

EDIT: Look into James Earl Jones' eyes. They're calming

hahahaha i was just about to say that i simultaneously weirded out and soothed by looking at that picture. i imagine he is telling me to woman up and get a life, instead of debating whether or not to call.

JayTal · Post by **JayTal** » Thu Dec 17, 2009 3:28 pm

bfinlayson wrote:
JayTal wrote:
bfinlayson wrote:because i'm still EAC 11/13 i feel like this means i've been rejected.
I'm right there with you. Here's to hoping!

EDIT: Look into James Earl Jones' eyes. They're calming
hahahaha i was just about to say that i simultaneously weirded out and soothed by looking at that picture. i imagine he is telling me to woman up and get a life, instead of debating whether or not to call.

TITCR

beamsmehome · Post by **beamsmehome** » Thu Dec 17, 2009 3:34 pm

mcflooter06 · Post by **mcflooter06** » Thu Dec 17, 2009 3:35 pm

hopefulundergrad wrote:Any 11/5 still waiting? Besides me, of course.

Meeee!

bfinlayson · Post by **bfinlayson** » Thu Dec 17, 2009 3:38 pm

i wish i had checked my blackberry like an hour ago....i'm in!!!!!

ahhhhh soooo excited!!

edit: now i also feel like an idiot for the above posts, but what the heck they tricked me by not changing my status checker.

Aias · Post by **Aias** » Thu Dec 17, 2009 3:41 pm

krispykitten · Post by **krispykitten** » Thu Dec 17, 2009 3:42 pm

bfinlayson wrote:i wish i had checked my blackberry like an hour ago....i'm in!!!!!

ahhhhh soooo excited!!

Hahahaha, awesome congrats!!!

aetennis17 · Post by **aetennis17** » Thu Dec 17, 2009 3:47 pm

held over to RD @ both BC & Cornell in today. Well here's to drinking early today

hv1 · Post by **hv1** » Thu Dec 17, 2009 3:48 pm

aetennis17 wrote:held over to RD @ both BC & Cornell in today. Well here's to drinking early today

what's drinking going to do? why not re-prep for LSAT?

Kobe, D-Wade, and Lebron would be hittin the gym again if they lost a game

Wanpsack1 · Post by **Wanpsack1** » Thu Dec 17, 2009 3:52 pm

In Via Email

I'm almost as excited as my wife, who was checking my email for me and called me at work. All I heard was screaming on the other end, so I figured I got accepted to Cornell or there was a home invasion going on. Luckily it was the first one.

Good luck to all those waiting.

Status checker still says EAC 11/11

hv1 · Post by **hv1** » Thu Dec 17, 2009 3:54 pm

Wanpsack1 wrote:In Via Email I'm almost as excited as my wife, who was checking my email for me and called me at work. All I heard was screaming on the other end, so I figured I got accepted to Cornell or there was a home invasion going on. Luckily it was the first one.

Good luck to all those waiting.

Status checker still says EAC 11/11

are the emails rolling out? as in, we've seen people posting this after around 2 p.m., unless they are streaming out little by little

Wanpsack1 · Post by **Wanpsack1** » Thu Dec 17, 2009 3:57 pm

I didn't call and my status checker didn't change, but the email showed up today at 1150 (MST). Works for me. Another posted said she found out via Blackberry, so it looks like the emails are rolling (unless they called her). Now everyone can get paranoid about status checkers and inboxes, if you weren't already.

Good Luck!

aetennis17 · Post by **aetennis17** » Thu Dec 17, 2009 4:01 pm

hv1 wrote:
aetennis17 wrote:held over to RD @ both BC & Cornell in today. Well here's to drinking early today
what's drinking going to do? why not re-prep for LSAT?

Kobe, D-Wade, and Lebron would be hittin the gym again if they lost a game

Well I hate the Lakers- so that pretty much answers that question. No re-take for me...I took mine last Feb and there is no way I could go through with it again. I figure if BC/Cornell won't take me then it's not meant to be. I'm in @ Fordham, UT-Austin, & BU--- I think those are some pretty solid choices.

Emma. · Post by **Emma.** » Thu Dec 17, 2009 4:02 pm

In via email! Was still EAC 11/16 this morning.

NancyBotwin · Post by **NancyBotwin** » Thu Dec 17, 2009 4:04 pm

emrose wrote:In via email! Was still EAC 11/16 this morning.

NICE EM!!

tamlyric · Post by **tamlyric** » Thu Dec 17, 2009 4:10 pm

emrose wrote:In via email! Was still EAC 11/16 this morning.

That's my boy!

bfinlayson · Post by **bfinlayson** » Thu Dec 17, 2009 4:10 pm

my mail says it got pushed to my bb at 1:56 EST. status checker still says EAC complete at 11/13.

they really must be looking at applications holistically because i know i have a worse LSAT score than a lot of y'all who got deferred. everyone on team 11/13 with deferrals should not give up hope, because i want that dang t-shirt.

washingtonian · Post by **washingtonian** » Thu Dec 17, 2009 4:11 pm

would you mind PMing me your lsat?

NancyBotwin · Post by **NancyBotwin** » Thu Dec 17, 2009 4:14 pm

Anyone notice how on the LSN graph there's a big empty space around <3.4 and >170? Are they EVER going to get to the splitters? Or have all the splitters who've received "decisions" been deferred?

Scratch that, I think I just answered my own question:

http://cornell.lawschoolnumbers.com/app ... &sort=sent

09042014 · Post by **09042014** » Thu Dec 17, 2009 4:16 pm

NancyBotwin wrote:Anyone notice how on the LSN graph there's a big empty space around <3.4 and >170? Are they EVER going to get to the splitters? Or have all the splitters who've received "decisions" been deferred?

If I were a law school I'd let it splitters last too. Figure out how many you need to make your LSAT goal, then let them in one at a time.

NancyBotwin · Post by **NancyBotwin** » Thu Dec 17, 2009 4:17 pm

Desert Fox wrote:
NancyBotwin wrote:Anyone notice how on the LSN graph there's a big empty space around <3.4 and >170? Are they EVER going to get to the splitters? Or have all the splitters who've received "decisions" been deferred?
If I were a law school I'd let it splitters last too. Figure out how many you need to make your LSAT goal, then let them in one at a time.

Well yeah, but a lot of us are EA, so you'd think they'd have deferred us if that were the case. But look at the link above - nada.

Dignan · Post by **Dignan** » Thu Dec 17, 2009 4:18 pm

I'm accepted! And I am under consideration for the Dean's scholarship.

Cornell waiting room Forum

Re: Cornell waiting room

Re: Cornell waiting room

Re: Cornell waiting room

Re: Cornell waiting room

Re: Cornell waiting room

Re: Cornell waiting room

Re: Cornell waiting room

Re: Cornell waiting room

Re: Cornell waiting room

Re: Cornell waiting room

Re: Cornell waiting room

Re: Cornell waiting room

Re: Cornell waiting room

Re: Cornell waiting room

Re: Cornell waiting room

Re: Cornell waiting room

Re: Cornell waiting room

Re: Cornell waiting room

Re: Cornell waiting room

Re: Cornell waiting room

Re: Cornell waiting room

Re: Cornell waiting room

Re: Cornell waiting room

Re: Cornell waiting room

Re: Cornell waiting room