koalacity wrote:It's the STTTanford Way.drawstring wrote:That's great.......make us all wait till the end just for bad news!
Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants) Forum
- t-14orbust
- Posts: 2130
- Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2012 4:43 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
-
- Posts: 70
- Joined: Fri Aug 02, 2013 8:22 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
I'm just hoping for a wait-list at this point.
- Arrow4Christ
- Posts: 418
- Joined: Tue Jan 14, 2014 12:07 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
I'm honestly fine with any outcome from SLS at this point. I'm just ready to close out the cycle and move on to making a decision.
- vuthy
- Posts: 378
- Joined: Wed Jun 12, 2013 8:55 am
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
Couldn't agree more. Also, the fact that there is no 'best practices' rule that says all schools have to decide by, say, April 15 is just absurd to me.Arrow4Christ wrote:I'm honestly fine with any outcome from SLS at this point. I'm just ready to close out the cycle and move on to making a decision.
-
- Posts: 52
- Joined: Thu Jan 16, 2014 10:28 am
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
You all have worked so hard to make your case so far as you are still waiting here.
Now patient is your best friend, and you will always need him in your lawyer career.
Only 168/3.9+ here, good luck to Y'All.
Now patient is your best friend, and you will always need him in your lawyer career.
Only 168/3.9+ here, good luck to Y'All.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Chalupa-Batman
- Posts: 101
- Joined: Tue Feb 18, 2014 5:47 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
I thought only doctors needed patience?actexas wrote:You all have worked so hard to make your case so far as you are still waiting here.
Now patient is your best friend, and you will always need him in your lawyer career.
Only 168/3.9+ here, good luck to Y'All.
Buh dum tsssh.
-
- Posts: 500
- Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2012 9:31 am
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
Does Stanford have a FB page?
- hellomellow
- Posts: 227
- Joined: Mon Jan 06, 2014 2:35 am
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)

- HankBashir
- Posts: 536
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2013 3:01 am
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
I'm not sure how different this cycle is compared to last year's, but last year SLS did all of their first-round admits before ASW. After that it was all just waitlists/dings.
We had ASW a week earlier this year, so I'm not quite sure how that affects things. I will tell you that we had ~190 admits at ASW, but I don't know how many people did not show up. (I didn't do ASW last year).
We had ASW a week earlier this year, so I'm not quite sure how that affects things. I will tell you that we had ~190 admits at ASW, but I don't know how many people did not show up. (I didn't do ASW last year).
- Chalupa-Batman
- Posts: 101
- Joined: Tue Feb 18, 2014 5:47 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
Thanks, Hank. Sadly information of this nature has already been shared, refuted, re-stated and defended, quoted, transcribed into poetic verse, interpreted by scholars and then re- stated again itt.HankBashir wrote:I'm not sure how different this cycle is compared to last year's, but last year SLS did all of their first-round admits before ASW. After that it was all just waitlists/dings.
We had ASW a week earlier this year, so I'm not quite sure how that affects things. I will tell you that we had ~190 admits at ASW, but I don't know how many people did not show up. (I didn't do ASW last year).
There seems to be far less activity itt today. I think most people, like me, are feeling defeated enough to give up speculation and resign ourselves to negative expectations.
- andapieceoftoast
- Posts: 439
- Joined: Wed Aug 14, 2013 11:18 am
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
Is anyone even bothering to check their status checkers anymore?
- drawstring
- Posts: 1933
- Joined: Tue Apr 09, 2013 4:52 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
Meandapieceoftoast wrote:Is anyone even bothering to check their status checkers anymore?
At this point my hope is totally gone though
- hellomellow
- Posts: 227
- Joined: Mon Jan 06, 2014 2:35 am
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
+1000drawstring wrote:Meandapieceoftoast wrote:Is anyone even bothering to check their status checkers anymore?
At this point my hope is totally gone though
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Ryan11212
- Posts: 56
- Joined: Sat Jan 04, 2014 3:06 am
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
I can't with the "lawadmissions.obnoxiouspromotion.bs.edu" emails. I have a heart attack just about every time. Although, this one really made me laugh.
http://postimg.org/image/5z6egdefn/
http://postimg.org/image/5z6egdefn/
- Jessasaurus
- Posts: 289
- Joined: Thu Nov 07, 2013 4:02 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
+1Ryan11212 wrote:I can't with the "lawadmissions.obnoxiouspromotion.bs.edu" emails. I have a heart attack just about every time. Although, this one really made me laugh.
http://postimg.org/image/5z6egdefn/
-
- Posts: 488
- Joined: Thu Nov 07, 2013 9:01 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
.
Last edited by muzzy on Mon Apr 14, 2014 4:58 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- goldenflash19
- Posts: 548
- Joined: Wed Sep 21, 2011 11:15 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
I'm thinking the number of people who haven't heard back is astronomically high. Almost every person I spoke with at the Boalt ASW hasn't heard back yet, although one person did tell me he was waitlisted by snail mail two weeks ago.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- Jessasaurus
- Posts: 289
- Joined: Thu Nov 07, 2013 4:02 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
What?? someone was waitlisted??goldenflash19 wrote:I'm thinking the number of people who haven't heard back is astronomically high. Almost every person I spoke with at the Boalt ASW hasn't heard back yet, although one person did tell me he was waitlisted by snail mail two weeks ago.
- goldenflash19
- Posts: 548
- Joined: Wed Sep 21, 2011 11:15 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
I questioned him like three times about it. He kept nodding yeah. I'm not sure if he was lying (no idea why he'd do this)or just trying to sound like he wasn't rejected. It doesn't make sense with the lack of WL's on LSN.Jessasaurus wrote:What?? someone was waitlisted??goldenflash19 wrote:I'm thinking the number of people who haven't heard back is astronomically high. Almost every person I spoke with at the Boalt ASW hasn't heard back yet, although one person did tell me he was waitlisted by snail mail two weeks ago.
- teampeeta
- Posts: 422
- Joined: Sat Jul 13, 2013 7:36 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
Ugh, you're probably right even if the person who claimed to be wait listed wasn't being truthful.goldenflash19 wrote:I'm thinking the number of people who haven't heard back is astronomically high. Almost every person I spoke with at the Boalt ASW hasn't heard back yet, although one person did tell me he was waitlisted by snail mail two weeks ago.
WTF is taking them so long? Seriously, their process can't be that holistic and even if it were, how does it take 2.5 months from the app deadline to know what to do with the candidates you have? If Yale already has released the vast majority of their decisions, what is Faye's excuse?
I'm not bitter at all. Still hoping for a call. Not optimistic, though.
-
- Posts: 135
- Joined: Sun Oct 06, 2013 4:51 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
I was also at Berkeley's asw and I heard of 3 people waitlisted
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 189
- Joined: Tue Apr 02, 2013 7:51 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
I can't believe there have been any waitlists if it hasn't been reported on here given the count of applicants on this thread.teenybean wrote:I was also at Berkeley's asw and I heard of 3 peoplewaitlistedwho either don't know how to read or lie through their teeth.
-
- Posts: 4475
- Joined: Wed Jan 29, 2014 6:19 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
so, million dollar question, if you hear early that you are on the wait list...does this mean you are higher or lower on their list of people?
- Mack.Hambleton
- Posts: 5414
- Joined: Mon Jan 13, 2014 2:09 am
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
yeah the 100+ on here and everyone on LSN.sasquatchsam wrote:I can't believe there have been any waitlists if it hasn't been reported on here given the count of applicants on this thread.teenybean wrote:I was also at Berkeley's asw and I heard of 3 peoplewaitlistedwho either don't know how to read or lie through their teeth.
-
- Posts: 135
- Joined: Sun Oct 06, 2013 4:51 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
I hope it's a lie...I was just reporting.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login