There must be a reason for it. I don't know what, but imagine they have a counter built into the status page that keeps track of the number of times you checked your status!! that's sickfish52 wrote:I really do wish that it would email us with our DLS.... it's so cruel and unusual to make us constantly refresh our status checker. I'm knocking years off my life with this nonsense!
my optimism is giving its place to evil thoughts. lol.
This would be a bit of information I hope they can't see. That might be slightly embarrassing...SLS2011 wrote:There must be a reason for it. I don't know what, but imagine they have a counter built into the status page that keeps track of the number of times you checked your status!! that's sickfish52 wrote:I really do wish that it would email us with our DLS.... it's so cruel and unusual to make us constantly refresh our status checker. I'm knocking years off my life with this nonsense!
but that would be worth like 200 LOCIs!cardinals1989 wrote:
This would be a bit of information I hope they can't see. That might be slightly embarrassing...
Or a trip to a certain sort of hospital...misterbingley wrote:but that would be worth like 200 LOCIs!cardinals1989 wrote:
This would be a bit of information I hope they can't see. That might be slightly embarrassing...
I picture all of us in that "What's your number?" Prudential commercial holding up signs with a number. Except the number isn't our retirement number, it's the number of times we've checked the SLS status checker. 1,000,000 sounds about right.cardinals1989 wrote:This would be a bit of information I hope they can't see. That might be slightly embarrassing...SLS2011 wrote:There must be a reason for it. I don't know what, but imagine they have a counter built into the status page that keeps track of the number of times you checked your status!! that's sickfish52 wrote:I really do wish that it would email us with our DLS.... it's so cruel and unusual to make us constantly refresh our status checker. I'm knocking years off my life with this nonsense!
Want to continue reading?
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
Haha. I haven't checked the status checker all that much. It's super stressful.ExpectLess wrote:I picture all of us in that "What's your number?" Prudential commercial holding up signs with a number. Except the number isn't our retirement number, it's the number of times we've checked the SLS status checker. 1,000,000 sounds about right.cardinals1989 wrote:This would be a bit of information I hope they can't see. That might be slightly embarrassing...SLS2011 wrote:There must be a reason for it. I don't know what, but imagine they have a counter built into the status page that keeps track of the number of times you checked your status!! that's sickfish52 wrote:I really do wish that it would email us with our DLS.... it's so cruel and unusual to make us constantly refresh our status checker. I'm knocking years off my life with this nonsense!
These are things a healthy, normal person says.Knock wrote:
Haha. I haven't checked the status checker all that much. It's super stressful.
24 more days to go!
i wonder what it's like to be this well-adjustedcardinals1989 wrote:These are things a healthy, normal person says.Knock wrote:
Haha. I haven't checked the status checker all that much. It's super stressful.
24 more days to go!
There are 34 acceptances on LSN for this year. Do you think that number fits with your stats?[/quote]Vuvuzela!!! wrote:I had a quick glance at last year''s LSN data. 50 of the acceptances had a reported decision date. 12 of those acceptances have a decision date later than today. So if that is any kind of guide, Stanford leaves a little less than 25% of their acceptances for the second review.
I'm sure some of you will be hearing. Good luck.
Edit: 2009 data was 43 acceptances with a decision date, and 11 of those 43 with a date later than today (they start the 24th). So I think the 25% figure is a good estimate, unless LSN has a strange reporting bias.
They go tomisterbingley wrote:i wonder what it's like to be this well-adjustedcardinals1989 wrote:These are things a healthy, normal person says.Knock wrote:
Haha. I haven't checked the status checker all that much. It's super stressful.
24 more days to go!
Register now!
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
I'm guessing this week will be quiet. Everything will start to blow up next week and the two weeks after that.cardinals1989 wrote:Pretty silent today on this thread. I'm guessing the next two weeks are going to be really busy, though.
Not gonna lie, turned on iTunes for Ke$ha after that one.bdubs wrote:I'm guessing this week will be quiet. Everything will start to blow up next week and the two weeks after that.cardinals1989 wrote:Pretty silent today on this thread. I'm guessing the next two weeks are going to be really busy, though.
Nothing says Stanford Law like Ke$ha. Who wants to shop her head onto Dean Deal?neonx wrote:Not gonna lie, turned on iTunes for Ke$ha after that one.bdubs wrote:I'm guessing this week will be quiet. Everything will start to blow up next week and the two weeks after that.cardinals1989 wrote:Pretty silent today on this thread. I'm guessing the next two weeks are going to be really busy, though.
This is blasphemy of the first order.d34dluk3 wrote:Nothing says Stanford Law like Ke$ha. Who wants to shop her head onto Dean Deal?neonx wrote:Not gonna lie, turned on iTunes for Ke$ha after that one.bdubs wrote:I'm guessing this week will be quiet. Everything will start to blow up next week and the two weeks after that.cardinals1989 wrote:Pretty silent today on this thread. I'm guessing the next two weeks are going to be really busy, though.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
Yeah, I was torn between horror and irony on that one.cardinals1989 wrote:This is blasphemy of the first order.
I think she is just finishing the sandwich she packed for lunch today--calls should start coming out any minute.fish52 wrote:Alright Dean Deal... it's noon in Cali....time to start making phone calls..!
Haha.. wait until you start doing ASWs and meet people "considering" Yale.. well adjusted many of them are not. Unless I have seen a tremendously unrepresentative sample, the idea of Yale being "laid-back" does not compute.r6_philly wrote:They go tomisterbingley wrote: i wonder what it's like to be this well-adjustedHarvardYale?
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Already a member? Login
I was being funny. They go to UVA.tkgrrett wrote:Haha.. wait until you start doing ASWs and meet people "considering" Yale.. well adjusted many of them are not. Unless I have seen a tremendously unrepresentative sample, the idea of Yale being "laid-back" does not compute.r6_philly wrote:They go tomisterbingley wrote: i wonder what it's like to be this well-adjustedHarvardYale?
This reminds me of knock's super-creepy valentine we sent him.d34dluk3 wrote:Nothing says Stanford Law like Ke$ha. Who wants to shop her head onto Dean Deal?neonx wrote:Not gonna lie, turned on iTunes for Ke$ha after that one.bdubs wrote:I'm guessing this week will be quiet. Everything will start to blow up next week and the two weeks after that.cardinals1989 wrote:Pretty silent today on this thread. I'm guessing the next two weeks are going to be really busy, though.
That was actually where I got the idea.Dany wrote:This reminds me of knock's super-creepy valentine we sent him.d34dluk3 wrote:Nothing says Stanford Law like Ke$ha. Who wants to shop her head onto Dean Deal?
d34dluk3 wrote:That was actually where I got the idea.Dany wrote:This reminds me of knock's super-creepy valentine we sent him.d34dluk3 wrote:Nothing says Stanford Law like Ke$ha. Who wants to shop her head onto Dean Deal?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
