Haha not...Columbia is the worst; there's no way to gauge this beastcrackberry wrote:Complete since [strike]9/16[/strike]12/02 here. No word. Though I am on the West Coast, so for all I know, there could be something in the mail.
Columbia 2010 Forum
- TheWire
- Posts: 479
- Joined: Tue Oct 20, 2009 9:24 pm
Re: Columbia 2010
- Kim617
- Posts: 784
- Joined: Wed Oct 14, 2009 9:36 pm
Re: Columbia 2010
Waitlisted today. Not surprised, I actually expected a flat out reject. Oh well.
If anyone is wondering, went complete 12/9 and my numbers are 171/3.7.
If anyone is wondering, went complete 12/9 and my numbers are 171/3.7.
-
- Posts: 165
- Joined: Thu Nov 19, 2009 5:45 pm
Re: Columbia 2010
were you waitlisted via email or snail mail?Kim617 wrote:Waitlisted today. Not surprised, I actually expected a flat out reject. Oh well.
If anyone is wondering, went complete 12/9 and my numbers are 171/3.7.
PS WL is better then reject

- Kim617
- Posts: 784
- Joined: Wed Oct 14, 2009 9:36 pm
Re: Columbia 2010
Snail mail. I guess a soft reject is better than a hard onemeowmeow wrote:were you waitlisted via email or snail mail?Kim617 wrote:Waitlisted today. Not surprised, I actually expected a flat out reject. Oh well.
If anyone is wondering, went complete 12/9 and my numbers are 171/3.7.
PS WL is better then reject

-
- Posts: 895
- Joined: Sun Sep 27, 2009 3:23 am
Re: Columbia 2010
This might sound like a weird question, but what color was the envelope?Kim617 wrote:Waitlisted today. Not surprised, I actually expected a flat out reject. Oh well.
If anyone is wondering, went complete 12/9 and my numbers are 171/3.7.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 34
- Joined: Fri Oct 16, 2009 11:03 pm
Re: Columbia 2010
hold via snail mail....urm 3.6 171...idk
-
- Posts: 32987
- Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2008 9:18 pm
Re: Columbia 2010
+1 and was it moist?blue5385 wrote:This might sound like a weird question, but what color was the envelope?Kim617 wrote:Waitlisted today. Not surprised, I actually expected a flat out reject. Oh well.
If anyone is wondering, went complete 12/9 and my numbers are 171/3.7.
-
- Posts: 895
- Joined: Sun Sep 27, 2009 3:23 am
Re: Columbia 2010
ew.Kronk wrote:+1 and was it moist?blue5385 wrote:This might sound like a weird question, but what color was the envelope?Kim617 wrote:Waitlisted today. Not surprised, I actually expected a flat out reject. Oh well.
If anyone is wondering, went complete 12/9 and my numbers are 171/3.7.
-
- Posts: 32987
- Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2008 9:18 pm
Re: Columbia 2010
Too far?blue5385 wrote:ew.Kronk wrote:+1 and was it moist?blue5385 wrote:This might sound like a weird question, but what color was the envelope?Kim617 wrote:Waitlisted today. Not surprised, I actually expected a flat out reject. Oh well.
If anyone is wondering, went complete 12/9 and my numbers are 171/3.7.
- Kim617
- Posts: 784
- Joined: Wed Oct 14, 2009 9:36 pm
Re: Columbia 2010
Just a plain off-white envelope with Columbia Law School in the left top corner. And it wasn't... moist. Ew.blue5385 wrote:This might sound like a weird question, but what color was the envelope?Kim617 wrote:Waitlisted today. Not surprised, I actually expected a flat out reject. Oh well.
If anyone is wondering, went complete 12/9 and my numbers are 171/3.7.
-
- Posts: 895
- Joined: Sun Sep 27, 2009 3:23 am
Re: Columbia 2010
good, so it's not a VCE and I won't start squealing in delight if I get it only to open it and find a waitlist letter inside.Kim617 wrote:Just a plain off-white envelope with Columbia Law School in the left top corner. And it wasn't... moist. Ew.blue5385 wrote:This might sound like a weird question, but what color was the envelope?Kim617 wrote:Waitlisted today. Not surprised, I actually expected a flat out reject. Oh well.
If anyone is wondering, went complete 12/9 and my numbers are 171/3.7.
Last edited by blue5385 on Thu Feb 11, 2010 5:25 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 895
- Joined: Sun Sep 27, 2009 3:23 am
Re: Columbia 2010
For what reason did you think it could be moist?Kronk wrote:Too far?blue5385 wrote:ew.Kronk wrote:+1 and was it moist?blue5385 wrote:This might sound like a weird question, but what color was the envelope?
-
- Posts: 827
- Joined: Sat Sep 26, 2009 6:07 pm
Re: Columbia 2010
any one have any clue if a hold is better than reserve at this point?
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- $1.99
- Posts: 684
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2010 1:49 am
Re: Columbia 2010
kim, where are you located and what was the post mark on the letter? thanks
-
- Posts: 895
- Joined: Sun Sep 27, 2009 3:23 am
Re: Columbia 2010
I would think so, wouldn't they review held applications before going into the reserve?Joan Hollaway wrote:any one have any clue if a hold is better than reserve at this point?
- gahthelaw
- Posts: 727
- Joined: Sun May 17, 2009 11:30 pm
Re: Columbia 2010
my understanding is that hold is better because you're still technically in the regular applicant poolJoan Hollaway wrote:any one have any clue if a hold is better than reserve at this point?
-
- Posts: 827
- Joined: Sat Sep 26, 2009 6:07 pm
Re: Columbia 2010
i just dont get why people that have higher stats then me are getting waitlisted in that case, guess columbias admissions are holistic after allgahthelaw wrote:my understanding is that hold is better because you're still technically in the regular applicant poolJoan Hollaway wrote:any one have any clue if a hold is better than reserve at this point?

please accept me columbia, i will name my first born after you<3
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 32987
- Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2008 9:18 pm
Re: Columbia 2010
The C in VCE is interchangeable between colored and covered.blue5385 wrote:For what reason did you think it could be moist?
-
- Posts: 895
- Joined: Sun Sep 27, 2009 3:23 am
Re: Columbia 2010
maybe they even use real vomit to stain it that particular lovely shade for the most authentic finishKronk wrote:The C in VCE is interchangeable between colored and covered.blue5385 wrote:For what reason did you think it could be moist?
-
- Posts: 32987
- Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2008 9:18 pm
Re: Columbia 2010
Almost certainly. I'm sure It's the liquid that they form the paper out of.blue5385 wrote:maybe they even use real vomit to stain it that particular lovely shade for the most authentic finishKronk wrote:The C in VCE is interchangeable between colored and covered.blue5385 wrote:For what reason did you think it could be moist?
- booboo
- Posts: 1032
- Joined: Tue Oct 20, 2009 10:39 pm
Re: Columbia 2010
Wouldn't that be a nice anecdote to tell little Columbia when s/he is 12.Joan Hollaway wrote:i just dont get why people that have higher stats then me are getting waitlisted in that case, guess columbias admissions are holistic after allgahthelaw wrote:my understanding is that hold is better because you're still technically in the regular applicant poolJoan Hollaway wrote:any one have any clue if a hold is better than reserve at this point?![]()
please accept me columbia, i will name my first born after you<3
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 895
- Joined: Sun Sep 27, 2009 3:23 am
Re: Columbia 2010
What an interesting technique, I'm really surprised they don't feature that on their website.Kronk wrote:Almost certainly. I'm sure It's the liquid that they form the paper out of.blue5385 wrote:maybe they even use real vomit to stain it that particular lovely shade for the most authentic finishKronk wrote:The C in VCE is interchangeable between colored and covered.blue5385 wrote:For what reason did you think it could be moist?
edit: It's also environmentally friendly to use recycled materials like that.
-
- Posts: 827
- Joined: Sat Sep 26, 2009 6:07 pm
Re: Columbia 2010
booboo wrote:Wouldn't that be a nice anecdote to tell little Columbia when s/he is 12.Joan Hollaway wrote:i just dont get why people that have higher stats then me are getting waitlisted in that case, guess columbias admissions are holistic after allgahthelaw wrote:my understanding is that hold is better because you're still technically in the regular applicant poolJoan Hollaway wrote:any one have any clue if a hold is better than reserve at this point?![]()
please accept me columbia, i will name my first born after you<3



funny part is you think im joking
-
- Posts: 895
- Joined: Sun Sep 27, 2009 3:23 am
Re: Columbia 2010
Better hope it's a she...booboo wrote:Wouldn't that be a nice anecdote to tell little Columbia when s/he is 12.Joan Hollaway wrote:i just dont get why people that have higher stats then me are getting waitlisted in that case, guess columbias admissions are holistic after allgahthelaw wrote:my understanding is that hold is better because you're still technically in the regular applicant poolJoan Hollaway wrote:any one have any clue if a hold is better than reserve at this point?![]()
please accept me columbia, i will name my first born after you<3
- CoaltoNewCastle
- Posts: 316
- Joined: Sun Dec 13, 2009 5:40 pm
Re: Columbia 2010
Parents are of course not getting mail today and may not get it tomorrow, so now vomit-cornered envelope.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login