WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle) Forum
- DoveBodyWash

- Posts: 3177
- Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2011 4:12 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)
2.9% tuition increase for Fall 2014
Brings total up to $49,752
Brings total up to $49,752
- Ricky-Bobby

- Posts: 1151
- Joined: Wed Dec 18, 2013 12:42 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)
Well at least 3% is better than some schools. Still not awesome.cusenation wrote:2.9% tuition increase for Fall 2014
Brings total up to $49,752
- chuckbass

- Posts: 9956
- Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2011 9:29 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)
I really want them to use WUSTL more in their marketing but maybe they're smart and trying to avoid the inevitable WUSTLUT references...Lebrarian_Booker wrote:rion91 wrote: WUSTLUT?
ahahahahaha, I read that as meaning something TOTALLY different....
- Lebrarian_Booker

- Posts: 649
- Joined: Tue Nov 05, 2013 1:05 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)
--ImageRemoved--
- couchpizza

- Posts: 111
- Joined: Sat Nov 16, 2013 8:19 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)
Anyone here ever email admissions? How long do they usually take to get back?
- chuckbass

- Posts: 9956
- Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2011 9:29 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)
Usually within a few hours in my experience.couchpizza wrote:Anyone here ever email admissions? How long do they usually take to get back?
- CookieDough

- Posts: 404
- Joined: Mon Oct 28, 2013 7:55 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)
24 hours here with an apology for being late responding.scottidsntknow wrote:Usually within a few hours in my experience.couchpizza wrote:Anyone here ever email admissions? How long do they usually take to get back?
- chuckbass

- Posts: 9956
- Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2011 9:29 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)
That's cute that they consider 24 hours "late."CookieDough wrote:24 hours here with an apology for being late responding.scottidsntknow wrote:Usually within a few hours in my experience.couchpizza wrote:Anyone here ever email admissions? How long do they usually take to get back?
- couchpizza

- Posts: 111
- Joined: Sat Nov 16, 2013 8:19 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)
Lol cool, hopefully they get back to me tomorrow. Thanks for the info guys.
- rion91

- Posts: 969
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2011 12:58 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)
This is goldLebrarian_Booker wrote:--ImageRemoved--
- njdevils2626

- Posts: 536
- Joined: Tue Mar 04, 2014 9:53 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)
Hey guys, quick question. I'm writing up a thank you follow-up email after my interview earlier today. I was wondering if I should send it to the admissions email or to the personal email of my interviewer? I'm thinking the latter is the proper route, but not 100% sure
- LET'S GET IT

- Posts: 1343
- Joined: Mon Apr 22, 2013 12:19 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)
I vote for the personal e-mail.njdevils2626 wrote:Hey guys, quick question. I'm writing up a thank you follow-up email after my interview earlier today. I was wondering if I should send it to the admissions email or to the personal email of my interviewer? I'm thinking the latter is the proper route, but not 100% sure
- chuckbass

- Posts: 9956
- Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2011 9:29 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)
I'd agree. If you're trying to thank your interviewer it would make sense to just email them directly, and I really don't think that they'd mind at allLET'S GET IT wrote:I vote for the personal e-mail.njdevils2626 wrote:Hey guys, quick question. I'm writing up a thank you follow-up email after my interview earlier today. I was wondering if I should send it to the admissions email or to the personal email of my interviewer? I'm thinking the latter is the proper route, but not 100% sure
- LET'S GET IT

- Posts: 1343
- Joined: Mon Apr 22, 2013 12:19 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)
Now that Scotty agrees with me I'm seriously reconsidering my opinion.scottidsntknow wrote:I'd agree. If you're trying to thank your interviewer it would make sense to just email them directly, and I really don't think that they'd mind at allLET'S GET IT wrote:I vote for the personal e-mail.njdevils2626 wrote:Hey guys, quick question. I'm writing up a thank you follow-up email after my interview earlier today. I was wondering if I should send it to the admissions email or to the personal email of my interviewer? I'm thinking the latter is the proper route, but not 100% sure
- CookieDough

- Posts: 404
- Joined: Mon Oct 28, 2013 7:55 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)
Scotty is right 180% of the time.LET'S GET IT wrote:Now that Scotty agrees with me I'm seriously reconsidering my opinion.scottidsntknow wrote:I'd agree. If you're trying to thank your interviewer it would make sense to just email them directly, and I really don't think that they'd mind at allLET'S GET IT wrote:I vote for the personal e-mail.njdevils2626 wrote:Hey guys, quick question. I'm writing up a thank you follow-up email after my interview earlier today. I was wondering if I should send it to the admissions email or to the personal email of my interviewer? I'm thinking the latter is the proper route, but not 100% sure
- chuckbass

- Posts: 9956
- Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2011 9:29 pm
- sublime

- Posts: 17385
- Joined: Sun Mar 10, 2013 12:21 pm
- BlackCanary

- Posts: 192
- Joined: Mon Feb 17, 2014 4:39 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)
I really thought I had accidentally sent mine before it was ready and was beyond horrified. Guess that's what's I get for writing it on my way to work.sublime wrote:Just make sure there aren't any typos.
And definitely send to the person who interviewed you.
- njdevils2626

- Posts: 536
- Joined: Tue Mar 04, 2014 9:53 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)
Thanks for confirming my first instinct guys, hoping for good news so I can join you all as admits soon!
- sublime

- Posts: 17385
- Joined: Sun Mar 10, 2013 12:21 pm
- DoveBodyWash

- Posts: 3177
- Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2011 4:12 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)
".....I'm learning towards a career in transactional work..."sublime wrote: Hah. Cuse and I both definitely sent out cover letters to a shitton of firms that had typos. But it isn't likely than any would have hired us anyway. And it didn't appear that anyone actually read them. So fuck it, I guess.
Should have been "leaning towards"
That typo was literally in 9 out of 10 of my cover letters...epic fail.
- LET'S GET IT

- Posts: 1343
- Joined: Mon Apr 22, 2013 12:19 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)
Good luck! And Scotty, I was only joking.njdevils2626 wrote:Thanks for confirming my first instinct guys, hoping for good news so I can join you all as admits soon!
- sublime

- Posts: 17385
- Joined: Sun Mar 10, 2013 12:21 pm
- LET'S GET IT

- Posts: 1343
- Joined: Mon Apr 22, 2013 12:19 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)
So busy studying you didn't have time to proof read your cover letters? Yeah, go with that. Lol. Pretty sure I caught an even worse error in my PS after I sent it out to all the schools I applied to.sublime wrote:cusenation wrote:".....I'm learning towards a career in transactional work..."sublime wrote: Hah. Cuse and I both definitely sent out cover letters to a shitton of firms that had typos. But it isn't likely than any would have hired us anyway. And it didn't appear that anyone actually read them. So fuck it, I guess.
Should have been "leaning towards"
That typo was literally in 9 out of 10 of my cover letters...epic fail.
That attention to detail is clearly why we did well last semester.
- chuckbass

- Posts: 9956
- Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2011 9:29 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)
/dedsublime wrote:cusenation wrote:".....I'm learning towards a career in transactional work..."sublime wrote: Hah. Cuse and I both definitely sent out cover letters to a shitton of firms that had typos. But it isn't likely than any would have hired us anyway. And it didn't appear that anyone actually read them. So fuck it, I guess.
Should have been "leaning towards"
That typo was literally in 9 out of 10 of my cover letters...epic fail.
That attention to detail is clearly why we did well last semester.