Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants) Forum
-
Kimikho

- Posts: 3971
- Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2012 7:01 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
That might be a job for attax <3
- andapieceoftoast

- Posts: 439
- Joined: Wed Aug 14, 2013 11:18 am
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
WAIT!!! SO AFTER ALL THAT TROLLING, ATTAX DID GET IN?!?!?scoobers wrote:That might be a job for attax <3
THAT WOULD MAKE ME SO HAPPY
-
dormgirl76

- Posts: 20
- Joined: Fri Jan 03, 2014 3:40 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
I apologize for being so unknowledgable, but what is the timeline for getting a decision? Status checker goes DLS and you get a call if you're in and a letter if you're out?
-
Kimikho

- Posts: 3971
- Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2012 7:01 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
no he didn'tandapieceoftoast wrote:WAIT!!! SO AFTER ALL THAT TROLLING, ATTAX DID GET IN?!?!?scoobers wrote:That might be a job for attax <3
THAT WOULD MAKE ME SO HAPPY
he made some phone calls for people though a couple of days ago, just like out of the blue. AKA he is the world's greatest person.
- vuthy

- Posts: 378
- Joined: Wed Jun 12, 2013 8:55 am
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
Called. Voicemail. Will try later.
- Chalupa-Batman

- Posts: 101
- Joined: Tue Feb 18, 2014 5:47 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
Aahhhh careful how you use the “c" word itt. I almost lost itvuthy wrote:Called. Voicemail. Will try later.
eta: but thanks for being a hero and trying.
Last edited by Chalupa-Batman on Tue Apr 08, 2014 3:37 pm, edited 3 times in total.
-
love4life29

- Posts: 141
- Joined: Tue Dec 17, 2013 11:51 am
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
Thanks for trying!vuthy wrote:Called. Voicemail. Will try later.
- vuthy

- Posts: 378
- Joined: Wed Jun 12, 2013 8:55 am
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
Oh god sorry about that. Didn't even think about that. Will be way more careful w/ next update.Chalupa-Batman wrote:Aahhhh careful how you use the “c" word itt. I almost lost itvuthy wrote:Called. Voicemail. Will try later.
eta: but thanks for being a hero and trying.
- Chalupa-Batman

- Posts: 101
- Joined: Tue Feb 18, 2014 5:47 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
I can't wait to get my dls so I can stop being a neurotic jackass. I guess then I'll just be a regular one.vuthy wrote:Oh god sorry about that. Didn't even think about that. Will be way more careful w/ next update.Chalupa-Batman wrote:Aahhhh careful how you use the “c" word itt. I almost lost itvuthy wrote:Called. Voicemail. Will try later.
eta: but thanks for being a hero and trying.
-
jjmaple8

- Posts: 78
- Joined: Tue Mar 18, 2014 4:00 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
+1Chalupa-Batman wrote:I can't wait to get my dls so I can stop being a neurotic jackass. I guess then I'll just be a regular one.vuthy wrote:Oh god sorry about that. Didn't even think about that. Will be way more careful w/ next update.Chalupa-Batman wrote:Aahhhh careful how you use the “c" word itt. I almost lost itvuthy wrote:Called. Voicemail. Will try later.
eta: but thanks for being a hero and trying.
- Mack.Hambleton

- Posts: 5414
- Joined: Mon Jan 13, 2014 2:09 am
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
looking back we could've just made a poll with still waiting, dinged, and waitlisted as options
- Ryan11212

- Posts: 56
- Joined: Sat Jan 04, 2014 3:06 am
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
Little late to the game on this, but
114
114
-
love4life29

- Posts: 141
- Joined: Tue Dec 17, 2013 11:51 am
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
james.bungles wrote:looking back we could've just made a poll with still waiting, dinged, and waitlisted as options
Looking back we could have not speculated wildly for the last 4 months on this thread about when we were going to hear knowing that we've still not heard a thing.
- redsox

- Posts: 612
- Joined: Mon Jun 08, 2009 1:40 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
Yeah they were trolling Harvard pretty hard re:weather/lifestyle.aboutmydaylight wrote:Yea there was a lot. On the bright side for people itt, literally 9/10 people I talked to had H acceptances as well and were about 50/50 on where they were going.sls3l wrote:I don't know what helps this provides. But approximately 190 students came to ASW...
-
muzzy

- Posts: 488
- Joined: Thu Nov 07, 2013 9:01 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
.
Last edited by muzzy on Mon Apr 14, 2014 5:00 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
love4life29

- Posts: 141
- Joined: Tue Dec 17, 2013 11:51 am
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
This person should make everyone feel great about their prospects:
http://lawschoolnumbers.com/jamm25
http://lawschoolnumbers.com/jamm25
-
californiauser

- Posts: 1213
- Joined: Sun Jul 01, 2012 1:10 am
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
dude must be pissed about the one A- he gotlove4life29 wrote:This person should make everyone feel great about their prospects:
http://lawschoolnumbers.com/jamm25
- koalacity

- Posts: 1162
- Joined: Wed Aug 07, 2013 9:56 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
Right?!?!? His profile strikes fear into my heart.love4life29 wrote:This person should make everyone feel great about their prospects:
http://lawschoolnumbers.com/jamm25
-
Scvaz7

- Posts: 130
- Joined: Fri Jan 24, 2014 12:44 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
The waiting is killing us all
- andapieceoftoast

- Posts: 439
- Joined: Wed Aug 14, 2013 11:18 am
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
Oh for heavens' sakes.love4life29 wrote:This person should make everyone feel great about their prospects:
http://lawschoolnumbers.com/jamm25
- Mack.Hambleton

- Posts: 5414
- Joined: Mon Jan 13, 2014 2:09 am
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
auto rejectlove4life29 wrote:This person should make everyone feel great about their prospects:
http://lawschoolnumbers.com/jamm25
- aboutmydaylight

- Posts: 580
- Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2013 7:50 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
COMBO BREAKER.love4life29 wrote:This person should make everyone feel great about their prospects:
http://lawschoolnumbers.com/jamm25
-
esther0123

- Posts: 331
- Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2012 3:40 am
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
Are we just all waiting for WL and Ding at this point?
Gahhhhhhh
Gahhhhhhh
-
shha

- Posts: 7
- Joined: Sun Oct 06, 2013 3:13 am
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
115? The silence is so bad that it's even making a lurker post.
I hate to be the one asking again, but if my status is still marked "under review" can I be sure that no letter has been sent out yet? I'm an international student so I just don't want be a week behind in receiving a surprise rejection letter.... Which probably wouldn't be a surprise at this point.
I hate to be the one asking again, but if my status is still marked "under review" can I be sure that no letter has been sent out yet? I'm an international student so I just don't want be a week behind in receiving a surprise rejection letter.... Which probably wouldn't be a surprise at this point.
-
Workingtitle

- Posts: 87
- Joined: Tue Nov 12, 2013 6:05 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
116. I'm sure this seemed like a good idea at the time.... but this killed my optimism they're on the fence about me.