Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants) Forum
-
- Posts: 3971
- Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2012 7:01 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
That might be a job for attax <3
- andapieceoftoast
- Posts: 439
- Joined: Wed Aug 14, 2013 11:18 am
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
WAIT!!! SO AFTER ALL THAT TROLLING, ATTAX DID GET IN?!?!?scoobers wrote:That might be a job for attax <3
THAT WOULD MAKE ME SO HAPPY
-
- Posts: 20
- Joined: Fri Jan 03, 2014 3:40 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
I apologize for being so unknowledgable, but what is the timeline for getting a decision? Status checker goes DLS and you get a call if you're in and a letter if you're out?
-
- Posts: 3971
- Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2012 7:01 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
no he didn'tandapieceoftoast wrote:WAIT!!! SO AFTER ALL THAT TROLLING, ATTAX DID GET IN?!?!?scoobers wrote:That might be a job for attax <3
THAT WOULD MAKE ME SO HAPPY

he made some phone calls for people though a couple of days ago, just like out of the blue. AKA he is the world's greatest person.
- vuthy
- Posts: 378
- Joined: Wed Jun 12, 2013 8:55 am
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
Called. Voicemail. Will try later.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Chalupa-Batman
- Posts: 101
- Joined: Tue Feb 18, 2014 5:47 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
Aahhhh careful how you use the “c" word itt. I almost lost itvuthy wrote:Called. Voicemail. Will try later.
eta: but thanks for being a hero and trying.
Last edited by Chalupa-Batman on Tue Apr 08, 2014 3:37 pm, edited 3 times in total.
-
- Posts: 141
- Joined: Tue Dec 17, 2013 11:51 am
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
Thanks for trying!vuthy wrote:Called. Voicemail. Will try later.
- vuthy
- Posts: 378
- Joined: Wed Jun 12, 2013 8:55 am
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
Oh god sorry about that. Didn't even think about that. Will be way more careful w/ next update.Chalupa-Batman wrote:Aahhhh careful how you use the “c" word itt. I almost lost itvuthy wrote:Called. Voicemail. Will try later.
eta: but thanks for being a hero and trying.
- Chalupa-Batman
- Posts: 101
- Joined: Tue Feb 18, 2014 5:47 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
I can't wait to get my dls so I can stop being a neurotic jackass. I guess then I'll just be a regular one.vuthy wrote:Oh god sorry about that. Didn't even think about that. Will be way more careful w/ next update.Chalupa-Batman wrote:Aahhhh careful how you use the “c" word itt. I almost lost itvuthy wrote:Called. Voicemail. Will try later.
eta: but thanks for being a hero and trying.
-
- Posts: 78
- Joined: Tue Mar 18, 2014 4:00 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
+1Chalupa-Batman wrote:I can't wait to get my dls so I can stop being a neurotic jackass. I guess then I'll just be a regular one.vuthy wrote:Oh god sorry about that. Didn't even think about that. Will be way more careful w/ next update.Chalupa-Batman wrote:Aahhhh careful how you use the “c" word itt. I almost lost itvuthy wrote:Called. Voicemail. Will try later.
eta: but thanks for being a hero and trying.
- Mack.Hambleton
- Posts: 5414
- Joined: Mon Jan 13, 2014 2:09 am
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
looking back we could've just made a poll with still waiting, dinged, and waitlisted as options
- Ryan11212
- Posts: 56
- Joined: Sat Jan 04, 2014 3:06 am
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
Little late to the game on this, but
114
114
-
- Posts: 141
- Joined: Tue Dec 17, 2013 11:51 am
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
james.bungles wrote:looking back we could've just made a poll with still waiting, dinged, and waitlisted as options
Looking back we could have not speculated wildly for the last 4 months on this thread about when we were going to hear knowing that we've still not heard a thing.

Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- redsox
- Posts: 612
- Joined: Mon Jun 08, 2009 1:40 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
Yeah they were trolling Harvard pretty hard re:weather/lifestyle.aboutmydaylight wrote:Yea there was a lot. On the bright side for people itt, literally 9/10 people I talked to had H acceptances as well and were about 50/50 on where they were going.sls3l wrote:I don't know what helps this provides. But approximately 190 students came to ASW...
-
- Posts: 488
- Joined: Thu Nov 07, 2013 9:01 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
.
Last edited by muzzy on Mon Apr 14, 2014 5:00 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 141
- Joined: Tue Dec 17, 2013 11:51 am
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
This person should make everyone feel great about their prospects:
http://lawschoolnumbers.com/jamm25
http://lawschoolnumbers.com/jamm25
-
- Posts: 1213
- Joined: Sun Jul 01, 2012 1:10 am
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
dude must be pissed about the one A- he gotlove4life29 wrote:This person should make everyone feel great about their prospects:
http://lawschoolnumbers.com/jamm25
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- koalacity
- Posts: 1162
- Joined: Wed Aug 07, 2013 9:56 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
Right?!?!? His profile strikes fear into my heart.love4life29 wrote:This person should make everyone feel great about their prospects:
http://lawschoolnumbers.com/jamm25
-
- Posts: 130
- Joined: Fri Jan 24, 2014 12:44 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
The waiting is killing us all
- andapieceoftoast
- Posts: 439
- Joined: Wed Aug 14, 2013 11:18 am
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
Oh for heavens' sakes.love4life29 wrote:This person should make everyone feel great about their prospects:
http://lawschoolnumbers.com/jamm25
- Mack.Hambleton
- Posts: 5414
- Joined: Mon Jan 13, 2014 2:09 am
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
auto rejectlove4life29 wrote:This person should make everyone feel great about their prospects:
http://lawschoolnumbers.com/jamm25
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- aboutmydaylight
- Posts: 580
- Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2013 7:50 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
COMBO BREAKER.love4life29 wrote:This person should make everyone feel great about their prospects:
http://lawschoolnumbers.com/jamm25
-
- Posts: 331
- Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2012 3:40 am
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
Are we just all waiting for WL and Ding at this point?
Gahhhhhhh
Gahhhhhhh
-
- Posts: 7
- Joined: Sun Oct 06, 2013 3:13 am
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
115? The silence is so bad that it's even making a lurker post.
I hate to be the one asking again, but if my status is still marked "under review" can I be sure that no letter has been sent out yet? I'm an international student so I just don't want be a week behind in receiving a surprise rejection letter.... Which probably wouldn't be a surprise at this point.
I hate to be the one asking again, but if my status is still marked "under review" can I be sure that no letter has been sent out yet? I'm an international student so I just don't want be a week behind in receiving a surprise rejection letter.... Which probably wouldn't be a surprise at this point.

-
- Posts: 87
- Joined: Tue Nov 12, 2013 6:05 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
116. I'm sure this seemed like a good idea at the time.... but this killed my optimism they're on the fence about me.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login