
Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants) Forum
- wealtheow
- Posts: 1034
- Joined: Wed Dec 21, 2011 1:45 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
knew i should've saved myself the $125.00
oh wellll

-
- Posts: 141
- Joined: Tue Dec 17, 2013 11:51 am
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
I'm sorry!! I am very disappointed myself. We can hope for an active waitlistwealtheow wrote:knew i should've saved myself the $125.00oh wellll

- t-14orbust
- Posts: 2130
- Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2012 4:43 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
Makes me feel a little better about foregoing the Yale-Marywealtheow wrote:knew i should've saved myself the $125.00oh wellll
-
- Posts: 16
- Joined: Mon Mar 31, 2014 5:47 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
I don't know what helps this provides. But approximately 190 students came to ASW...
-
- Posts: 16
- Joined: Fri Dec 13, 2013 10:42 pm
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- teampeeta
- Posts: 422
- Joined: Sat Jul 13, 2013 7:36 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
+1. Especially as someone who is already out at HY. Was really hoping for a top-3 acceptance. Maybe it just isn't in the cards.fleurdelis2 wrote:That's so disheartening.
- aboutmydaylight
- Posts: 580
- Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2013 7:50 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
Yea there was a lot. On the bright side for people itt, literally 9/10 people I talked to had H acceptances as well and were about 50/50 on where they were going.sls3l wrote:I don't know what helps this provides. But approximately 190 students came to ASW...
- andapieceoftoast
- Posts: 439
- Joined: Wed Aug 14, 2013 11:18 am
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
Dean Deal,aboutmydaylight wrote:Yea there was a lot. On the bright side for people itt, literally 9/10 people I talked to had H acceptances as well and were about 50/50 on where they were going.sls3l wrote:I don't know what helps this provides. But approximately 190 students came to ASW...
If you're reading this, I got rejected from Harvard and like Stanford better anyway!! PLEASE HELP A SISTER OUT!!!
Sincerely,
toast
-
- Posts: 16
- Joined: Mon Mar 31, 2014 5:47 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
I don't think this is unusual.
Last edited by sls3l on Tue Nov 25, 2014 12:02 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Chalupa-Batman
- Posts: 101
- Joined: Tue Feb 18, 2014 5:47 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
Dean Deal, i didn't want to have to do this to you, but...
SHUT IT DOWN!!!
YOU'RE GONNA MAKE SOMEBODY SICK!
SHUT IT DOWN!!!
YOU'RE GONNA MAKE SOMEBODY SICK!
-
- Posts: 488
- Joined: Thu Nov 07, 2013 9:01 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
.
Last edited by muzzy on Mon Apr 14, 2014 5:00 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 16
- Joined: Fri Dec 13, 2013 10:42 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
LOLChalupa-Batman wrote:Dean Deal, i didn't want to have to do this to you, but...
SHUT IT DOWN!!!
YOU'RE GONNA MAKE SOMEBODY SICK!
-
- Posts: 9
- Joined: Fri Mar 14, 2014 11:20 am
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
Edit
Last edited by saskia17 on Wed Apr 16, 2014 3:11 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 78
- Joined: Tue Mar 18, 2014 4:00 pm
- andapieceoftoast
- Posts: 439
- Joined: Wed Aug 14, 2013 11:18 am
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
WOW, that's pretty surprisingsaskia17 wrote:Re: Candor at ASW
I'm generally a lurker, but I feel like Berkeley's Admissions Dean is way more of a loose cannon than Ms. Deal. I went to an admissions event and he made some off-color remark about Canadians and then made some half-assed apology to me about it when it came out that I am a Canadian. It wouldn't stop me from attending, but it was kind of a dick move and I doubt he would have felt as comfortable saying something similar about Mexico.
See that, Faye? I'm defending your honor.
-
- Posts: 77
- Joined: Thu Dec 12, 2013 12:26 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
I think I saw somewhere that Berkeley had publicly advertised that they were done with initial decisions, maybe in an email or maybe on their website. I also don't think it's the same situation as Stanford because I'm pretty sure they've given initial decisions to everyone. It's not like the Stanford possibility that everyone left is just WL or rejection.love4life29 wrote:I thought the same thing at first, but when I went to visit Berkeley I met the dean of admissions informally and he was like yep we're all done admitting people for this cycle - it was a tough one! or something like that, and the way this conversation was characterized seemed similar. Personally, my hope is quickly fading. I'm not sure what incentive an admitted student would have to make this up.
-
- Posts: 141
- Joined: Tue Dec 17, 2013 11:51 am
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
I agree that it's different. I hope it isn't true either! Maybe the person I talked to will be proved wrong and there will be another admit wave, just seems unlikely.truckstop wrote:I think I saw somewhere that Berkeley had publicly advertised that they were done with initial decisions, maybe in an email or maybe on their website. I also don't think it's the same situation as Stanford because I'm pretty sure they've given initial decisions to everyone. It's not like the Stanford possibility that everyone left is just WL or rejection.love4life29 wrote:I thought the same thing at first, but when I went to visit Berkeley I met the dean of admissions informally and he was like yep we're all done admitting people for this cycle - it was a tough one! or something like that, and the way this conversation was characterized seemed similar. Personally, my hope is quickly fading. I'm not sure what incentive an admitted student would have to make this up.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- koalacity
- Posts: 1162
- Joined: Wed Aug 07, 2013 9:56 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
Yeah, Berkeley sent out an email newsletter in March that explicitly said they were finished filling their class and had released all decisions. If I were ranking the admissions offices/processes, Berkeley would be #1.truckstop wrote:I think I saw somewhere that Berkeley had publicly advertised that they were done with initial decisions, maybe in an email or maybe on their website. I also don't think it's the same situation as Stanford because I'm pretty sure they've given initial decisions to everyone. It's not like the Stanford possibility that everyone left is just WL or rejection.love4life29 wrote:I thought the same thing at first, but when I went to visit Berkeley I met the dean of admissions informally and he was like yep we're all done admitting people for this cycle - it was a tough one! or something like that, and the way this conversation was characterized seemed similar. Personally, my hope is quickly fading. I'm not sure what incentive an admitted student would have to make this up.
- neprep
- Posts: 1066
- Joined: Fri Jul 26, 2013 11:16 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
But is it as holistic as HYS's?koalacity wrote:Yeah, Berkeley sent out an email newsletter in March that explicitly said they were finished filling their class and had released all decisions. If I were ranking the admissions offices/processes, Berkeley would be #1.truckstop wrote:I think I saw somewhere that Berkeley had publicly advertised that they were done with initial decisions, maybe in an email or maybe on their website. I also don't think it's the same situation as Stanford because I'm pretty sure they've given initial decisions to everyone. It's not like the Stanford possibility that everyone left is just WL or rejection.love4life29 wrote:I thought the same thing at first, but when I went to visit Berkeley I met the dean of admissions informally and he was like yep we're all done admitting people for this cycle - it was a tough one! or something like that, and the way this conversation was characterized seemed similar. Personally, my hope is quickly fading. I'm not sure what incentive an admitted student would have to make this up.

-
- Posts: 141
- Joined: Tue Dec 17, 2013 11:51 am
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
Who wants to call and set the record straight this week on when we may be finding out?? Anyone brave enough to ask when the WL is coming out?
- Chalupa-Batman
- Posts: 101
- Joined: Tue Feb 18, 2014 5:47 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
There's gotta be a Yale admit itt who can do this. Please?love4life29 wrote:Who wants to call and set the record straight this week on when we may be finding out?? Anyone brave enough to ask when the WL is coming out?
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 105
- Joined: Thu Dec 19, 2013 10:07 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
+1...maybe a Yale admit should take one for the team and make this call for uslove4life29 wrote:Who wants to call and set the record straight this week on when we may be finding out?? Anyone brave enough to ask when the WL is coming out?

- teampeeta
- Posts: 422
- Joined: Sat Jul 13, 2013 7:36 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
Yes, or even better, an admitted student. Doesn't Faye have to indulge most of your neurosis and potentially irritating questions by providing genuine info and a smile? They will still want you to come after all.juicebox wrote:+1...maybe a Yale admit should take one for the team and make this call for uslove4life29 wrote:Who wants to call and set the record straight this week on when we may be finding out?? Anyone brave enough to ask when the WL is coming out?
-
- Posts: 141
- Joined: Tue Dec 17, 2013 11:51 am
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
I think a Yale admit is a great ideateampeeta wrote:Yes, or even better, an admitted student. Doesn't Faye have to indulge most of your neurosis and potentially irritating questions by providing genuine info and a smile? They will still want you to come after all.juicebox wrote:+1...maybe a Yale admit should take one for the team and make this call for uslove4life29 wrote:Who wants to call and set the record straight this week on when we may be finding out?? Anyone brave enough to ask when the WL is coming out?

- bhs12
- Posts: 105
- Joined: Mon Dec 09, 2013 6:03 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
[quote="teampeeta"][quote="juicebox"][quote="love4life29"]Who wants to call and set the record straight this week on when we may be finding out?? Anyone brave enough to ask when the WL is coming out?[/quote]
+1...maybe a Yale admit should take one for the team and make this call for us
[/quote]
Yes, or even better, an admitted student. Doesn't Faye have to indulge most of your neurosis and potentially irritating questions by providing genuine info and a smile? They will still want you to come after all.[/quote]
That was my experience, and that's why I'm inclined to believe what I was told (that direct admits are nearly, if not entirely, done for the cycle). That said, I hope I misunderstood or am for some other reason misinformed. :/
+1...maybe a Yale admit should take one for the team and make this call for us

Yes, or even better, an admitted student. Doesn't Faye have to indulge most of your neurosis and potentially irritating questions by providing genuine info and a smile? They will still want you to come after all.[/quote]
That was my experience, and that's why I'm inclined to believe what I was told (that direct admits are nearly, if not entirely, done for the cycle). That said, I hope I misunderstood or am for some other reason misinformed. :/
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login