bigcoffee ftw!gahthelaw wrote:unfortunately i probably wont be around to participate since instead of going to law school i am going to have to start working at starbucks again or something. if i really kick it into high gear i think i can make manager by 25.puppins wrote:I can't wait to hold helm down, ruffle his hair a little, and force him to watch gg.gahthelaw wrote: so does this mean that you're catching up so that you, me, clem, and puppins can all watch gg together next year?
U Chicago 2010 Forum
- Helmholtz
- Posts: 4128
- Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2008 1:48 pm
Re: U Chicago 2010
- ClemCarter
- Posts: 248
- Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 9:09 am
Re: U Chicago 2010
Helmholtz wrote:I made it through about a minute and a half of the pilot before realizing I probably should be studying for finals. I'm still open to the possibility of watching and catching up, though. Unless people on here spoil it by giving away the plot...............gahthelaw wrote: so does this mean that you're catching up so that you, me, clem, and puppins can all watch gg together next year?
Spoiler alert: Serena sleeps with everyone.
- Helmholtz
- Posts: 4128
- Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2008 1:48 pm
Re: U Chicago 2010
Wait, are we still talking about gossip girl?puppins wrote:but you have to hold his feet while I hold his arms!gahthelaw wrote:unfortunately i probably wont be around to participate since instead of going to law school i am going to have to start working at starbucks again or something. if i really kick it into high gear i think i can make manager by 25.puppins wrote:I can't wait to hold helm down, ruffle his hair a little, and force him to watch gg.gahthelaw wrote: so does this mean that you're catching up so that you, me, clem, and puppins can all watch gg together next year?
- puppleberry finn
- Posts: 1035
- Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2009 7:03 pm
Re: U Chicago 2010
Helmholtz wrote: Wait, are we still talking about gossip girl?

- Helmholtz
- Posts: 4128
- Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2008 1:48 pm
Re: U Chicago 2010
Guest star?ClemCarter wrote:Helmholtz wrote:I made it through about a minute and a half of the pilot before realizing I probably should be studying for finals. I'm still open to the possibility of watching and catching up, though. Unless people on here spoil it by giving away the plot...............gahthelaw wrote: so does this mean that you're catching up so that you, me, clem, and puppins can all watch gg together next year?
Spoiler alert: Serena sleeps with everyone.

Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- gahthelaw
- Posts: 727
- Joined: Sun May 17, 2009 11:30 pm
Re: U Chicago 2010
i guess i could rearrange some shifts. i mean my client roster is so big (i make great lattes) that i'm not even worried about podunk things like billable drip coffees anymore.puppins wrote:but you have to hold his feet while I hold his arms!gahthelaw wrote:unfortunately i probably wont be around to participate since instead of going to law school i am going to have to start working at starbucks again or something. if i really kick it into high gear i think i can make manager by 25.puppins wrote:I can't wait to hold helm down, ruffle his hair a little, and force him to watch gg.gahthelaw wrote: so does this mean that you're catching up so that you, me, clem, and puppins can all watch gg together next year?
- ClemCarter
- Posts: 248
- Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 9:09 am
Re: U Chicago 2010
Helmholtz wrote:
Guest star?
-other serena-
Well-played, sir. Well-played.
- puppleberry finn
- Posts: 1035
- Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2009 7:03 pm
Re: U Chicago 2010
<3 <3 <3 yaygahthelaw wrote: i guess i could rearrange some shifts. i mean my client roster is so big (i make great lattes) that i'm not even worried about podunk things like billable drip coffees anymore.
- kittenmittons
- Posts: 1453
- Joined: Sun Nov 15, 2009 1:24 pm
Re: U Chicago 2010
HopefulUG: You're paper should be five words: lawl at John Maynard Keynes
-
- Posts: 62
- Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 1:32 pm
Re: U Chicago 2010
anyone else go under review today?
-
- Posts: 14
- Joined: Tue Dec 08, 2009 6:46 pm
Re: U Chicago 2010
is there any concrete reason to believe that just because a new batch of people went under review today, ED'ers will hear back this week?
- babaghanouj
- Posts: 278
- Joined: Sun Jun 21, 2009 9:20 pm
Re: U Chicago 2010
No.aluminummonster wrote:is there any concrete reason to believe that just because a new batch of people went under review today, ED'ers will hear back this week?
Welcome aboard.
http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/v ... =7&t=98250
- AngryAvocado
- Posts: 774
- Joined: Sun Jul 19, 2009 11:22 pm
Re: U Chicago 2010
Don't think so. Columbia didn't start accepting people until after next week last year, and I don't see any reason why things would be different this year.aluminummonster wrote:is there any concrete reason to believe that just because a new batch of people went under review today, ED'ers will hear back this week?
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- CardinalRules
- Posts: 2332
- Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2009 5:20 pm
Re: U Chicago 2010
What does Columbia's trends have to do with Chicago???AngryAvocado wrote:Don't think so. Columbia didn't start accepting people until after next week last year, and I don't see any reason why things would be different this year.aluminummonster wrote:is there any concrete reason to believe that just because a new batch of people went under review today, ED'ers will hear back this week?
-
- Posts: 1645
- Joined: Sat Feb 07, 2009 5:10 pm
Re: U Chicago 2010
I assume he meant Chicago, but ED'ers will change to decision pending either at the end of this or at the end of next week. Done and done.managamy wrote:What does Columbia's trends have to do with Chicago???AngryAvocado wrote:Don't think so. Columbia didn't start accepting people until after next week last year, and I don't see any reason why things would be different this year.aluminummonster wrote:is there any concrete reason to believe that just because a new batch of people went under review today, ED'ers will hear back this week?
-
- Posts: 1645
- Joined: Sat Feb 07, 2009 5:10 pm
Re: U Chicago 2010
Yup. It'll go decision pending, calls will go out (sometimes over two or three days) and then everyone else will change to decision mailed.boo_pragmatism wrote:They call the acceptances and snail mail anything else, right?hopefulundergrad wrote:I assume he meant Chicago, but ED'ers will change to decision pending either at the end of this or at the end of next week. Done and done.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- crackberry
- Posts: 3252
- Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 3:23 pm
Re: U Chicago 2010
Is that true for RD too or just ED?hopefulundergrad wrote:Yup. It'll go decision pending, calls will go out (sometimes over two or three days) and then everyone else will change to decision mailed.boo_pragmatism wrote:They call the acceptances and snail mail anything else, right?hopefulundergrad wrote:I assume he meant Chicago, but ED'ers will change to decision pending either at the end of this or at the end of next week. Done and done.
-
- Posts: 1645
- Joined: Sat Feb 07, 2009 5:10 pm
Re: U Chicago 2010
Same for everyone.crackberry wrote:Is that true for RD too or just ED?hopefulundergrad wrote:Yup. It'll go decision pending, calls will go out (sometimes over two or three days) and then everyone else will change to decision mailed.boo_pragmatism wrote:They call the acceptances and snail mail anything else, right?hopefulundergrad wrote:I assume he meant Chicago, but ED'ers will change to decision pending either at the end of this or at the end of next week. Done and done.
- ontologyfail
- Posts: 143
- Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2009 11:53 pm
Re: U Chicago 2010
Anyone know if they make international calls?boo_pragmatism wrote:They call the acceptances and snail mail anything else, right?hopefulundergrad wrote:I assume he meant Chicago, but ED'ers will change to decision pending either at the end of this or at the end of next week. Done and done.
-
- Posts: 1645
- Joined: Sat Feb 07, 2009 5:10 pm
Re: U Chicago 2010
Probably an email with your decision attached with a PDF, if you're admitted of course. Otherwise probably UPS or Fedex.ontologyfail wrote:Anyone know if they make international calls?boo_pragmatism wrote:They call the acceptances and snail mail anything else, right?hopefulundergrad wrote:I assume he meant Chicago, but ED'ers will change to decision pending either at the end of this or at the end of next week. Done and done.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- gahthelaw
- Posts: 727
- Joined: Sun May 17, 2009 11:30 pm
Re: U Chicago 2010
ugh really? too skinny and bird-y looking to meechoi wrote:<3 Jenny Humphrey. So hot.
-
- Posts: 1322
- Joined: Sun Jan 25, 2009 9:36 pm
Re: U Chicago 2010
+1111gahthelaw wrote:ugh really? too skinny and bird-y looking to meechoi wrote:<3 Jenny Humphrey. So hot.
She looks gross.
--ImageRemoved--
- gahthelaw
- Posts: 727
- Joined: Sun May 17, 2009 11:30 pm
Re: U Chicago 2010
also prepubescent looking, no matter how much makeup they put on her0L Hoping for 1 wrote:+1111gahthelaw wrote:ugh really? too skinny and bird-y looking to meechoi wrote:<3 Jenny Humphrey. So hot.
She looks gross.
--ImageRemoved--

- AngryAvocado
- Posts: 774
- Joined: Sun Jul 19, 2009 11:22 pm
Re: U Chicago 2010
Yep, meant to say Chicago. Glad to hear it changes to Decision Pending...that's should relieve some of the randomness/anxiety of waiting (unlike CLS/NYU...grrr).hopefulundergrad wrote:I assume he meant Chicago, but ED'ers will change to decision pending either at the end of this or at the end of next week. Done and done.managamy wrote:What does Columbia's trends have to do with Chicago???AngryAvocado wrote:Don't think so. Columbia didn't start accepting people until after next week last year, and I don't see any reason why things would be different this year.aluminummonster wrote:is there any concrete reason to believe that just because a new batch of people went under review today, ED'ers will hear back this week?
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login