bigcoffee ftw!gahthelaw wrote:unfortunately i probably wont be around to participate since instead of going to law school i am going to have to start working at starbucks again or something. if i really kick it into high gear i think i can make manager by 25.puppins wrote:I can't wait to hold helm down, ruffle his hair a little, and force him to watch gg.gahthelaw wrote: so does this mean that you're catching up so that you, me, clem, and puppins can all watch gg together next year?
U Chicago 2010 Forum
- Helmholtz

- Posts: 4128
- Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2008 1:48 pm
Re: U Chicago 2010
- ClemCarter

- Posts: 248
- Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 9:09 am
Re: U Chicago 2010
Helmholtz wrote:I made it through about a minute and a half of the pilot before realizing I probably should be studying for finals. I'm still open to the possibility of watching and catching up, though. Unless people on here spoil it by giving away the plot...............gahthelaw wrote: so does this mean that you're catching up so that you, me, clem, and puppins can all watch gg together next year?
Spoiler alert: Serena sleeps with everyone.
- Helmholtz

- Posts: 4128
- Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2008 1:48 pm
Re: U Chicago 2010
Wait, are we still talking about gossip girl?puppins wrote:but you have to hold his feet while I hold his arms!gahthelaw wrote:unfortunately i probably wont be around to participate since instead of going to law school i am going to have to start working at starbucks again or something. if i really kick it into high gear i think i can make manager by 25.puppins wrote:I can't wait to hold helm down, ruffle his hair a little, and force him to watch gg.gahthelaw wrote: so does this mean that you're catching up so that you, me, clem, and puppins can all watch gg together next year?
- puppleberry finn

- Posts: 1035
- Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2009 7:03 pm
Re: U Chicago 2010
Helmholtz wrote: Wait, are we still talking about gossip girl?
- Helmholtz

- Posts: 4128
- Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2008 1:48 pm
Re: U Chicago 2010
Guest star?ClemCarter wrote:Helmholtz wrote:I made it through about a minute and a half of the pilot before realizing I probably should be studying for finals. I'm still open to the possibility of watching and catching up, though. Unless people on here spoil it by giving away the plot...............gahthelaw wrote: so does this mean that you're catching up so that you, me, clem, and puppins can all watch gg together next year?
Spoiler alert: Serena sleeps with everyone.

- gahthelaw

- Posts: 727
- Joined: Sun May 17, 2009 11:30 pm
Re: U Chicago 2010
i guess i could rearrange some shifts. i mean my client roster is so big (i make great lattes) that i'm not even worried about podunk things like billable drip coffees anymore.puppins wrote:but you have to hold his feet while I hold his arms!gahthelaw wrote:unfortunately i probably wont be around to participate since instead of going to law school i am going to have to start working at starbucks again or something. if i really kick it into high gear i think i can make manager by 25.puppins wrote:I can't wait to hold helm down, ruffle his hair a little, and force him to watch gg.gahthelaw wrote: so does this mean that you're catching up so that you, me, clem, and puppins can all watch gg together next year?
- ClemCarter

- Posts: 248
- Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 9:09 am
Re: U Chicago 2010
Helmholtz wrote:
Guest star?
-other serena-
Well-played, sir. Well-played.
- puppleberry finn

- Posts: 1035
- Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2009 7:03 pm
Re: U Chicago 2010
<3 <3 <3 yaygahthelaw wrote: i guess i could rearrange some shifts. i mean my client roster is so big (i make great lattes) that i'm not even worried about podunk things like billable drip coffees anymore.
- kittenmittons

- Posts: 1453
- Joined: Sun Nov 15, 2009 1:24 pm
Re: U Chicago 2010
HopefulUG: You're paper should be five words: lawl at John Maynard Keynes
-
hesitantstyle

- Posts: 62
- Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 1:32 pm
Re: U Chicago 2010
anyone else go under review today?
-
aluminummonster

- Posts: 14
- Joined: Tue Dec 08, 2009 6:46 pm
Re: U Chicago 2010
is there any concrete reason to believe that just because a new batch of people went under review today, ED'ers will hear back this week?
- babaghanouj

- Posts: 278
- Joined: Sun Jun 21, 2009 9:20 pm
Re: U Chicago 2010
No.aluminummonster wrote:is there any concrete reason to believe that just because a new batch of people went under review today, ED'ers will hear back this week?
Welcome aboard.
http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/v ... =7&t=98250
- AngryAvocado

- Posts: 774
- Joined: Sun Jul 19, 2009 11:22 pm
Re: U Chicago 2010
Don't think so. Columbia didn't start accepting people until after next week last year, and I don't see any reason why things would be different this year.aluminummonster wrote:is there any concrete reason to believe that just because a new batch of people went under review today, ED'ers will hear back this week?
- CardinalRules

- Posts: 2332
- Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2009 5:20 pm
Re: U Chicago 2010
What does Columbia's trends have to do with Chicago???AngryAvocado wrote:Don't think so. Columbia didn't start accepting people until after next week last year, and I don't see any reason why things would be different this year.aluminummonster wrote:is there any concrete reason to believe that just because a new batch of people went under review today, ED'ers will hear back this week?
-
02082010

- Posts: 1645
- Joined: Sat Feb 07, 2009 5:10 pm
Re: U Chicago 2010
I assume he meant Chicago, but ED'ers will change to decision pending either at the end of this or at the end of next week. Done and done.managamy wrote:What does Columbia's trends have to do with Chicago???AngryAvocado wrote:Don't think so. Columbia didn't start accepting people until after next week last year, and I don't see any reason why things would be different this year.aluminummonster wrote:is there any concrete reason to believe that just because a new batch of people went under review today, ED'ers will hear back this week?
-
02082010

- Posts: 1645
- Joined: Sat Feb 07, 2009 5:10 pm
Re: U Chicago 2010
Yup. It'll go decision pending, calls will go out (sometimes over two or three days) and then everyone else will change to decision mailed.boo_pragmatism wrote:They call the acceptances and snail mail anything else, right?hopefulundergrad wrote:I assume he meant Chicago, but ED'ers will change to decision pending either at the end of this or at the end of next week. Done and done.
- crackberry

- Posts: 3252
- Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 3:23 pm
Re: U Chicago 2010
Is that true for RD too or just ED?hopefulundergrad wrote:Yup. It'll go decision pending, calls will go out (sometimes over two or three days) and then everyone else will change to decision mailed.boo_pragmatism wrote:They call the acceptances and snail mail anything else, right?hopefulundergrad wrote:I assume he meant Chicago, but ED'ers will change to decision pending either at the end of this or at the end of next week. Done and done.
-
02082010

- Posts: 1645
- Joined: Sat Feb 07, 2009 5:10 pm
Re: U Chicago 2010
Same for everyone.crackberry wrote:Is that true for RD too or just ED?hopefulundergrad wrote:Yup. It'll go decision pending, calls will go out (sometimes over two or three days) and then everyone else will change to decision mailed.boo_pragmatism wrote:They call the acceptances and snail mail anything else, right?hopefulundergrad wrote:I assume he meant Chicago, but ED'ers will change to decision pending either at the end of this or at the end of next week. Done and done.
- ontologyfail

- Posts: 143
- Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2009 11:53 pm
Re: U Chicago 2010
Anyone know if they make international calls?boo_pragmatism wrote:They call the acceptances and snail mail anything else, right?hopefulundergrad wrote:I assume he meant Chicago, but ED'ers will change to decision pending either at the end of this or at the end of next week. Done and done.
-
02082010

- Posts: 1645
- Joined: Sat Feb 07, 2009 5:10 pm
Re: U Chicago 2010
Probably an email with your decision attached with a PDF, if you're admitted of course. Otherwise probably UPS or Fedex.ontologyfail wrote:Anyone know if they make international calls?boo_pragmatism wrote:They call the acceptances and snail mail anything else, right?hopefulundergrad wrote:I assume he meant Chicago, but ED'ers will change to decision pending either at the end of this or at the end of next week. Done and done.
- gahthelaw

- Posts: 727
- Joined: Sun May 17, 2009 11:30 pm
Re: U Chicago 2010
ugh really? too skinny and bird-y looking to meechoi wrote:<3 Jenny Humphrey. So hot.
-
0L Hoping for 1

- Posts: 1322
- Joined: Sun Jan 25, 2009 9:36 pm
Re: U Chicago 2010
+1111gahthelaw wrote:ugh really? too skinny and bird-y looking to meechoi wrote:<3 Jenny Humphrey. So hot.
She looks gross.
--ImageRemoved--
- gahthelaw

- Posts: 727
- Joined: Sun May 17, 2009 11:30 pm
Re: U Chicago 2010
also prepubescent looking, no matter how much makeup they put on her0L Hoping for 1 wrote:+1111gahthelaw wrote:ugh really? too skinny and bird-y looking to meechoi wrote:<3 Jenny Humphrey. So hot.
She looks gross.
--ImageRemoved--

- AngryAvocado

- Posts: 774
- Joined: Sun Jul 19, 2009 11:22 pm
Re: U Chicago 2010
Yep, meant to say Chicago. Glad to hear it changes to Decision Pending...that's should relieve some of the randomness/anxiety of waiting (unlike CLS/NYU...grrr).hopefulundergrad wrote:I assume he meant Chicago, but ED'ers will change to decision pending either at the end of this or at the end of next week. Done and done.managamy wrote:What does Columbia's trends have to do with Chicago???AngryAvocado wrote:Don't think so. Columbia didn't start accepting people until after next week last year, and I don't see any reason why things would be different this year.aluminummonster wrote:is there any concrete reason to believe that just because a new batch of people went under review today, ED'ers will hear back this week?