Stanford C/O 2019 Applicants (2015-2016 cycle) Forum
- 4thand9
- Posts: 130
- Joined: Thu Jun 11, 2015 1:11 am
Re: Stanford C/O 2019 Applicants (2015-2016 cycle)
So I know this is applicant thread, but I figured I could ask and keep this thread on page 1 haha
What are the factors for you guys to choose S over H?
(For me at least, it would be student life, smaller class size, superior clerkship placement in CA / West Coast / 9th C.)
What are the factors for you guys to choose S over H?
(For me at least, it would be student life, smaller class size, superior clerkship placement in CA / West Coast / 9th C.)
- lemonparty
- Posts: 1453
- Joined: Fri Dec 11, 2015 4:48 pm
Re: Stanford C/O 2019 Applicants (2015-2016 cycle)
Hey thanks for posting this, very helpful! I always assumed they had the "we're Stanford, of course we're your top choice" attitude, but hearing that they don't actually makes me like them even more. I'll def include this in my LOCI, but I was thinking of waiting until I get waitlisted (IF I'm so lucky to not be straight up ding-ed). Or do you think it's fine to write a LOCI before hearing anything?fliptrip wrote:I've been around the block before with Stanford and they definitely do not have the "of course we're your first choice" attitude that H or Y has. They ask for Stanford-specific recommendation letters and it's well known that they like a Stanford-tailored PS. Also, as someone who was admitted last year, I can tell you that you get a strong sense that they think they are fighting a slightly uphill battle to get you to attend. It makes sense because they swim in the pond with the biggest sharks and they have the lowest yield (off the top of my head, I think it's 50%) among them.Quick Silver wrote:Does anyone think it makes a difference to let Stanford know it's our first choice or do they pretty much assume that anyway about most applicants?
The interesting thing about all of this is that Yale (and I have personal experience there too) considers Stanford a far more legitimate competitor/comparison than Harvard.
TL;DR: Let them know you love 'em in your LOCI...can't hurt and might give you the slightest of slightest nudges over the line.
- WinterComing
- Posts: 729
- Joined: Fri Nov 06, 2015 11:10 am
Re: Stanford C/O 2019 Applicants (2015-2016 cycle)
I'm a fellow 0L, so what do I know, but I wouldn't write a LOCI until after you're waitlisted (not that you necessarily will be). I'd worry that putting the cart before the horse and sending one now would come off as desperate and not really make much difference to your app. I feel like one's "continued interest" is assumed before hearing back. Chill out, be patient.lemondrop wrote:Hey thanks for posting this, very helpful! I always assumed they had the "we're Stanford, of course we're your top choice" attitude, but hearing that they don't actually makes me like them even more. I'll def include this in my LOCI, but I was thinking of waiting until I get waitlisted (IF I'm so lucky to not be straight up ding-ed). Or do you think it's fine to write a LOCI before hearing anything?fliptrip wrote:I've been around the block before with Stanford and they definitely do not have the "of course we're your first choice" attitude that H or Y has. They ask for Stanford-specific recommendation letters and it's well known that they like a Stanford-tailored PS. Also, as someone who was admitted last year, I can tell you that you get a strong sense that they think they are fighting a slightly uphill battle to get you to attend. It makes sense because they swim in the pond with the biggest sharks and they have the lowest yield (off the top of my head, I think it's 50%) among them.Quick Silver wrote:Does anyone think it makes a difference to let Stanford know it's our first choice or do they pretty much assume that anyway about most applicants?
The interesting thing about all of this is that Yale (and I have personal experience there too) considers Stanford a far more legitimate competitor/comparison than Harvard.
TL;DR: Let them know you love 'em in your LOCI...can't hurt and might give you the slightest of slightest nudges over the line.
-
- Posts: 177
- Joined: Wed May 13, 2015 11:55 am
Re: Stanford C/O 2019 Applicants (2015-2016 cycle)
Would it be desperate to submit another letter of recommendation? Not waitlisted.fliptrip wrote:I've been around the block before with Stanford and they definitely do not have the "of course we're your first choice" attitude that H or Y has. They ask for Stanford-specific recommendation letters and it's well known that they like a Stanford-tailored PS. Also, as someone who was admitted last year, I can tell you that you get a strong sense that they think they are fighting a slightly uphill battle to get you to attend. It makes sense because they swim in the pond with the biggest sharks and they have the lowest yield (off the top of my head, I think it's 50%) among them.Quick Silver wrote:Does anyone think it makes a difference to let Stanford know it's our first choice or do they pretty much assume that anyway about most applicants?
The interesting thing about all of this is that Yale (and I have personal experience there too) considers Stanford a far more legitimate competitor/comparison than Harvard.
TL;DR: Let them know you love 'em in your LOCI...can't hurt and might give you the slightest of slightest nudges over the line.
- lemonparty
- Posts: 1453
- Joined: Fri Dec 11, 2015 4:48 pm
Re: Stanford C/O 2019 Applicants (2015-2016 cycle)
Yeah, fair enough, definitely don't want to come across desperate (even though I am haha). Thanks for the 2centsWinterComing wrote:I'm a fellow 0L, so what do I know, but I wouldn't write a LOCI until after you're waitlisted (not that you necessarily will be). I'd worry that putting the cart before the horse and sending one now would come off as desperate and not really make much difference to your app. I feel like one's "continued interest" is assumed before hearing back. Chill out, be patient.lemondrop wrote:Hey thanks for posting this, very helpful! I always assumed they had the "we're Stanford, of course we're your top choice" attitude, but hearing that they don't actually makes me like them even more. I'll def include this in my LOCI, but I was thinking of waiting until I get waitlisted (IF I'm so lucky to not be straight up ding-ed). Or do you think it's fine to write a LOCI before hearing anything?fliptrip wrote:I've been around the block before with Stanford and they definitely do not have the "of course we're your first choice" attitude that H or Y has. They ask for Stanford-specific recommendation letters and it's well known that they like a Stanford-tailored PS. Also, as someone who was admitted last year, I can tell you that you get a strong sense that they think they are fighting a slightly uphill battle to get you to attend. It makes sense because they swim in the pond with the biggest sharks and they have the lowest yield (off the top of my head, I think it's 50%) among them.Quick Silver wrote:Does anyone think it makes a difference to let Stanford know it's our first choice or do they pretty much assume that anyway about most applicants?
The interesting thing about all of this is that Yale (and I have personal experience there too) considers Stanford a far more legitimate competitor/comparison than Harvard.
TL;DR: Let them know you love 'em in your LOCI...can't hurt and might give you the slightest of slightest nudges over the line.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- clarf
- Posts: 183
- Joined: Wed Feb 11, 2015 5:00 pm
Re: Stanford C/O 2019 Applicants (2015-2016 cycle)
Stanford law please call
I need to hear you say yes
It's snowing on Mt. Fuji
I need to hear you say yes
It's snowing on Mt. Fuji
- meowmers
- Posts: 177
- Joined: Mon Dec 21, 2015 3:02 pm
Re: Stanford C/O 2019 Applicants (2015-2016 cycle)
that's not a haikuclarf wrote:Stanford law please call
I need to hear you say yes
It's snowing on Mt. Fuji
they're seventeen syllables
stanford what is up?
- nicknar
- Posts: 127
- Joined: Thu Oct 22, 2015 5:49 pm
Re: Stanford C/O 2019 Applicants (2015-2016 cycle)
not to be a dick, butmeowmers wrote:that's not a haikuclarf wrote:Stanford law please call
I need to hear you say yes
It's snowing on Mt. Fuji
they're seventeen syllables
stanford what is up?
the Japanese metrical unit "on"
isn't 1:1 with our syllables
so in English
short/long/short is good enough
for the structure of haiku
what's more important
in making a haiku is the focus
on nature imagery
so nothing I just wrote
counts as a haiku, but neither
does your syllabic pedantry
- meowmers
- Posts: 177
- Joined: Mon Dec 21, 2015 3:02 pm
Re: Stanford C/O 2019 Applicants (2015-2016 cycle)
har har har nicknarnicknar wrote:syllabic pedantry
morae are applicable
in English as well
but you're right tho.
- clarf
- Posts: 183
- Joined: Wed Feb 11, 2015 5:00 pm
Re: Stanford C/O 2019 Applicants (2015-2016 cycle)
It is no big dealnicknar wrote:not to be a dick, butmeowmers wrote:that's not a haikuclarf wrote:Stanford law please call
I need to hear you say yes
It's snowing on Mt. Fuji
they're seventeen syllables
stanford what is up?
the Japanese metrical unit "on"
isn't 1:1 with our syllables
so in English
short/long/short is good enough
for the structure of haiku
what's more important
in making a haiku is the focus
on nature imagery
so nothing I just wrote
counts as a haiku, but neither
does your syllabic pedantry
My last line was from Game Grumps
Stanford loves haikus
- nicknar
- Posts: 127
- Joined: Thu Oct 22, 2015 5:49 pm
Re: Stanford C/O 2019 Applicants (2015-2016 cycle)
to be totally honest, I had to google the terms. all I knew was that they weren't exactly syllables, and that American poets take that fact to do more or less whatever they want and call it haiku.meowmers wrote:har har har nicknarnicknar wrote:syllabic pedantry
morae are applicable
in English as well
but you're right tho.
but I like this game.
- meowmers
- Posts: 177
- Joined: Mon Dec 21, 2015 3:02 pm
Re: Stanford C/O 2019 Applicants (2015-2016 cycle)
a linguist friend loves to correct folks on morae, which I know nothing about. but on wiki just now i learned a totally fascinating fact: "The first haiku written in English was by Ezra Pound, published in 1913."nicknar wrote:to be totally honest, I had to google the terms. all I knew was that they weren't exactly syllables, and that American poets take that fact to do more or less whatever they want and call it haiku.meowmers wrote:har har har nicknarnicknar wrote:syllabic pedantry
morae are applicable
in English as well
but you're right tho.
but I like this game.
wild!
- EnderWiggin
- Posts: 1217
- Joined: Wed Nov 12, 2014 9:55 pm
Re: Stanford C/O 2019 Applicants (2015-2016 cycle)
I have a sinking feeling that my application is one that Dean Deal let her dog eat
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Draconem
- Posts: 272
- Joined: Tue Dec 01, 2015 11:59 pm
Re: Stanford C/O 2019 Applicants (2015-2016 cycle)
EnderWiggin wrote:I have a sinking feeling that my application is one that Dean Deal let her dog eat
+1.
- Hildegard15
- Posts: 2161
- Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2015 6:26 pm
Re: Stanford C/O 2019 Applicants (2015-2016 cycle)
I can't believe I'm the only one who picked the option about hating law school admissions....


- Dcc617
- Posts: 2744
- Joined: Mon Oct 13, 2014 3:01 pm
Re: Stanford C/O 2019 Applicants (2015-2016 cycle)
I can't believe other people think I'm handsome! (eek it's working!!!!)Hildegard15 wrote:I can't believe I'm the only one who picked the option about hating law school admissions....
- texasellewoods
- Posts: 398
- Joined: Wed Jun 10, 2015 10:29 am
Re: Stanford C/O 2019 Applicants (2015-2016 cycle)
Speaking of the poll... where is the post deleter thing?
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- QuentonCassidy
- Posts: 592
- Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2015 3:58 pm
Re: Stanford C/O 2019 Applicants (2015-2016 cycle)
"Other people" being your six altsDcc617 wrote:I can't believe other people think I'm handsome! (eek it's working!!!!)Hildegard15 wrote:I can't believe I'm the only one who picked the option about hating law school admissions....

- Hildegard15
- Posts: 2161
- Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2015 6:26 pm
Re: Stanford C/O 2019 Applicants (2015-2016 cycle)
They are only picking it because they feel bad for you.Dcc617 wrote:I can't believe other people think I'm handsome! (eek it's working!!!!)Hildegard15 wrote:I can't believe I'm the only one who picked the option about hating law school admissions....

- Dcc617
- Posts: 2744
- Joined: Mon Oct 13, 2014 3:01 pm
Re: Stanford C/O 2019 Applicants (2015-2016 cycle)
QuentonCassidy wrote:"Other people" being your six altsDcc617 wrote:I can't believe other people think I'm handsome! (eek it's working!!!!)Hildegard15 wrote:I can't believe I'm the only one who picked the option about hating law school admissions....

- Dcc617
- Posts: 2744
- Joined: Mon Oct 13, 2014 3:01 pm
Re: Stanford C/O 2019 Applicants (2015-2016 cycle)
Hildegard15 wrote:They are only picking it because they feel bad for you.Dcc617 wrote:I can't believe other people think I'm handsome! (eek it's working!!!!)Hildegard15 wrote:I can't believe I'm the only one who picked the option about hating law school admissions....These people don't know that you haven't figured out how to smile in photographs.

Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Hildegard15
- Posts: 2161
- Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2015 6:26 pm
Re: Stanford C/O 2019 Applicants (2015-2016 cycle)
....Not the route I thought you were gonna go in your response. I expect more biting witticism from you DC. You're getting soft.Dcc617 wrote:Hildegard15 wrote:They are only picking it because they feel bad for you.Dcc617 wrote:I can't believe other people think I'm handsome! (eek it's working!!!!)Hildegard15 wrote:I can't believe I'm the only one who picked the option about hating law school admissions....These people don't know that you haven't figured out how to smile in photographs.
- pterodactyls
- Posts: 520
- Joined: Thu Aug 06, 2015 5:27 pm
Re: Stanford C/O 2019 Applicants (2015-2016 cycle)
Do people actually get in to Stanford or is it just a myth?
- pterodactyls
- Posts: 520
- Joined: Thu Aug 06, 2015 5:27 pm
Re: Stanford C/O 2019 Applicants (2015-2016 cycle)
If I am faced with that choice, I will go outside and do cartwheels.4thand9 wrote:So I know this is applicant thread, but I figured I could ask and keep this thread on page 1 haha
What are the factors for you guys to choose S over H?
(For me at least, it would be student life, smaller class size, superior clerkship placement in CA / West Coast / 9th C.)
Until then, I'm not going to bother to consider it. At this point, I would be ecstatic to get waitlisted by one of them.
-
- Posts: 425
- Joined: Wed Jan 06, 2016 7:29 pm
Re: Stanford C/O 2019 Applicants (2015-2016 cycle)
Well I've decided to throw my hat into the ring. Not optimistic with GPA<25% and 50%<LSAT<75%, but figured I'd take the gamble even this late.
Good luck everyone!
Good luck everyone!
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login