Stanford C/O 2019 Applicants (2015-2016 cycle) Forum

Share Your Experiences, Read About Other Experiences. Please keep posts organized by school and expected year of graduation.
Post Reply

Now that everything is pretty much over, what are your thoughts on Stanford Law?

Umm, it's the best fucking school in the entire goddamned world. I will be there this fall and am personally just grateful that I get to post in the C/O 2019 thread, where we actually have a real OP in fliptrip. Eat caca and die, Dcc617. Your parents hate you.
8
8%
It's chill bro, but I was already set on Harvard or Yale anyway. I got my shades on to block out all that shade from CA. Enjoy the earthquakes, hippies.
26
25%
I personally can't stand Stanford, its administration, and especially its admissions office. I waited patiently for 4-7 months only to get waitlisted or rejected less than a week before May. Seriously, go home Stanford, you're drunk (unless you accept me off the waitlist, then I will love you)
24
23%
Meh, I mean, this was a total long shot for me. I just wanted to see what would happen. This is what I thought would happen.
17
16%
I'm totally indifferent to Stanford, because I am super happy with the option I am going with. Grow up, Dcc617. You're embarrassing yourself with this poll.
12
11%
I will be Seymour Asses from Futurama, and Stanford is my Fry. DO YOU KNOW WHAT THAT MEANS? I WILL FUCKING DIE ON THE WAITLIST!
1
1%
I am a lurker. I may not have even applied anywhere this cycle. My motives for lurking this thread are entirely inscrutable and apparently I have nothing better to do with my life.
9
8%
Dcc617, stop making every other poll option about yourself. While you are very handsome, your constant narcissism and self-indulgence has become off-putting.
9
8%
 
Total votes: 106

User avatar
4thand9

Bronze
Posts: 130
Joined: Thu Jun 11, 2015 1:11 am

Re: Stanford C/O 2019 Applicants (2015-2016 cycle)

Post by 4thand9 » Sun Jan 24, 2016 2:28 pm

So I know this is applicant thread, but I figured I could ask and keep this thread on page 1 haha

What are the factors for you guys to choose S over H?

(For me at least, it would be student life, smaller class size, superior clerkship placement in CA / West Coast / 9th C.)

User avatar
lemonparty

Silver
Posts: 1453
Joined: Fri Dec 11, 2015 4:48 pm

Re: Stanford C/O 2019 Applicants (2015-2016 cycle)

Post by lemonparty » Sun Jan 24, 2016 3:57 pm

fliptrip wrote:
Quick Silver wrote:Does anyone think it makes a difference to let Stanford know it's our first choice or do they pretty much assume that anyway about most applicants?
I've been around the block before with Stanford and they definitely do not have the "of course we're your first choice" attitude that H or Y has. They ask for Stanford-specific recommendation letters and it's well known that they like a Stanford-tailored PS. Also, as someone who was admitted last year, I can tell you that you get a strong sense that they think they are fighting a slightly uphill battle to get you to attend. It makes sense because they swim in the pond with the biggest sharks and they have the lowest yield (off the top of my head, I think it's 50%) among them.

The interesting thing about all of this is that Yale (and I have personal experience there too) considers Stanford a far more legitimate competitor/comparison than Harvard.

TL;DR: Let them know you love 'em in your LOCI...can't hurt and might give you the slightest of slightest nudges over the line.
Hey thanks for posting this, very helpful! I always assumed they had the "we're Stanford, of course we're your top choice" attitude, but hearing that they don't actually makes me like them even more. I'll def include this in my LOCI, but I was thinking of waiting until I get waitlisted (IF I'm so lucky to not be straight up ding-ed). Or do you think it's fine to write a LOCI before hearing anything?

User avatar
WinterComing

Silver
Posts: 729
Joined: Fri Nov 06, 2015 11:10 am

Re: Stanford C/O 2019 Applicants (2015-2016 cycle)

Post by WinterComing » Sun Jan 24, 2016 9:31 pm

lemondrop wrote:
fliptrip wrote:
Quick Silver wrote:Does anyone think it makes a difference to let Stanford know it's our first choice or do they pretty much assume that anyway about most applicants?
I've been around the block before with Stanford and they definitely do not have the "of course we're your first choice" attitude that H or Y has. They ask for Stanford-specific recommendation letters and it's well known that they like a Stanford-tailored PS. Also, as someone who was admitted last year, I can tell you that you get a strong sense that they think they are fighting a slightly uphill battle to get you to attend. It makes sense because they swim in the pond with the biggest sharks and they have the lowest yield (off the top of my head, I think it's 50%) among them.

The interesting thing about all of this is that Yale (and I have personal experience there too) considers Stanford a far more legitimate competitor/comparison than Harvard.

TL;DR: Let them know you love 'em in your LOCI...can't hurt and might give you the slightest of slightest nudges over the line.
Hey thanks for posting this, very helpful! I always assumed they had the "we're Stanford, of course we're your top choice" attitude, but hearing that they don't actually makes me like them even more. I'll def include this in my LOCI, but I was thinking of waiting until I get waitlisted (IF I'm so lucky to not be straight up ding-ed). Or do you think it's fine to write a LOCI before hearing anything?
I'm a fellow 0L, so what do I know, but I wouldn't write a LOCI until after you're waitlisted (not that you necessarily will be). I'd worry that putting the cart before the horse and sending one now would come off as desperate and not really make much difference to your app. I feel like one's "continued interest" is assumed before hearing back. Chill out, be patient.

RedWhite&Blonde

Bronze
Posts: 177
Joined: Wed May 13, 2015 11:55 am

Re: Stanford C/O 2019 Applicants (2015-2016 cycle)

Post by RedWhite&Blonde » Sun Jan 24, 2016 10:07 pm

fliptrip wrote:
Quick Silver wrote:Does anyone think it makes a difference to let Stanford know it's our first choice or do they pretty much assume that anyway about most applicants?
I've been around the block before with Stanford and they definitely do not have the "of course we're your first choice" attitude that H or Y has. They ask for Stanford-specific recommendation letters and it's well known that they like a Stanford-tailored PS. Also, as someone who was admitted last year, I can tell you that you get a strong sense that they think they are fighting a slightly uphill battle to get you to attend. It makes sense because they swim in the pond with the biggest sharks and they have the lowest yield (off the top of my head, I think it's 50%) among them.

The interesting thing about all of this is that Yale (and I have personal experience there too) considers Stanford a far more legitimate competitor/comparison than Harvard.

TL;DR: Let them know you love 'em in your LOCI...can't hurt and might give you the slightest of slightest nudges over the line.
Would it be desperate to submit another letter of recommendation? Not waitlisted.

User avatar
lemonparty

Silver
Posts: 1453
Joined: Fri Dec 11, 2015 4:48 pm

Re: Stanford C/O 2019 Applicants (2015-2016 cycle)

Post by lemonparty » Mon Jan 25, 2016 12:01 am

WinterComing wrote:
lemondrop wrote:
fliptrip wrote:
Quick Silver wrote:Does anyone think it makes a difference to let Stanford know it's our first choice or do they pretty much assume that anyway about most applicants?
I've been around the block before with Stanford and they definitely do not have the "of course we're your first choice" attitude that H or Y has. They ask for Stanford-specific recommendation letters and it's well known that they like a Stanford-tailored PS. Also, as someone who was admitted last year, I can tell you that you get a strong sense that they think they are fighting a slightly uphill battle to get you to attend. It makes sense because they swim in the pond with the biggest sharks and they have the lowest yield (off the top of my head, I think it's 50%) among them.

The interesting thing about all of this is that Yale (and I have personal experience there too) considers Stanford a far more legitimate competitor/comparison than Harvard.

TL;DR: Let them know you love 'em in your LOCI...can't hurt and might give you the slightest of slightest nudges over the line.
Hey thanks for posting this, very helpful! I always assumed they had the "we're Stanford, of course we're your top choice" attitude, but hearing that they don't actually makes me like them even more. I'll def include this in my LOCI, but I was thinking of waiting until I get waitlisted (IF I'm so lucky to not be straight up ding-ed). Or do you think it's fine to write a LOCI before hearing anything?
I'm a fellow 0L, so what do I know, but I wouldn't write a LOCI until after you're waitlisted (not that you necessarily will be). I'd worry that putting the cart before the horse and sending one now would come off as desperate and not really make much difference to your app. I feel like one's "continued interest" is assumed before hearing back. Chill out, be patient.
Yeah, fair enough, definitely don't want to come across desperate (even though I am haha). Thanks for the 2cents

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


User avatar
clarf

Bronze
Posts: 183
Joined: Wed Feb 11, 2015 5:00 pm

Re: Stanford C/O 2019 Applicants (2015-2016 cycle)

Post by clarf » Mon Jan 25, 2016 1:30 pm

Stanford law please call
I need to hear you say yes
It's snowing on Mt. Fuji

User avatar
meowmers

Bronze
Posts: 177
Joined: Mon Dec 21, 2015 3:02 pm

Re: Stanford C/O 2019 Applicants (2015-2016 cycle)

Post by meowmers » Mon Jan 25, 2016 2:01 pm

clarf wrote:Stanford law please call
I need to hear you say yes
It's snowing on Mt. Fuji
that's not a haiku
they're seventeen syllables
stanford what is up?

User avatar
nicknar

Bronze
Posts: 127
Joined: Thu Oct 22, 2015 5:49 pm

Re: Stanford C/O 2019 Applicants (2015-2016 cycle)

Post by nicknar » Mon Jan 25, 2016 3:40 pm

meowmers wrote:
clarf wrote:Stanford law please call
I need to hear you say yes
It's snowing on Mt. Fuji
that's not a haiku
they're seventeen syllables
stanford what is up?
not to be a dick, but
the Japanese metrical unit "on"
isn't 1:1 with our syllables

so in English
short/long/short is good enough
for the structure of haiku

what's more important
in making a haiku is the focus
on nature imagery

so nothing I just wrote
counts as a haiku, but neither
does your syllabic pedantry

User avatar
meowmers

Bronze
Posts: 177
Joined: Mon Dec 21, 2015 3:02 pm

Re: Stanford C/O 2019 Applicants (2015-2016 cycle)

Post by meowmers » Mon Jan 25, 2016 3:50 pm

nicknar wrote:syllabic pedantry
har har har nicknar
morae are applicable
in English as well

but you're right tho.

Want to continue reading?

Register for access!

Did I mention it was FREE ?


User avatar
clarf

Bronze
Posts: 183
Joined: Wed Feb 11, 2015 5:00 pm

Re: Stanford C/O 2019 Applicants (2015-2016 cycle)

Post by clarf » Mon Jan 25, 2016 3:51 pm

nicknar wrote:
meowmers wrote:
clarf wrote:Stanford law please call
I need to hear you say yes
It's snowing on Mt. Fuji
that's not a haiku
they're seventeen syllables
stanford what is up?
not to be a dick, but
the Japanese metrical unit "on"
isn't 1:1 with our syllables

so in English
short/long/short is good enough
for the structure of haiku

what's more important
in making a haiku is the focus
on nature imagery

so nothing I just wrote
counts as a haiku, but neither
does your syllabic pedantry
It is no big deal
My last line was from Game Grumps
Stanford loves haikus

User avatar
nicknar

Bronze
Posts: 127
Joined: Thu Oct 22, 2015 5:49 pm

Re: Stanford C/O 2019 Applicants (2015-2016 cycle)

Post by nicknar » Mon Jan 25, 2016 4:05 pm

meowmers wrote:
nicknar wrote:syllabic pedantry
har har har nicknar
morae are applicable
in English as well

but you're right tho.
to be totally honest, I had to google the terms. all I knew was that they weren't exactly syllables, and that American poets take that fact to do more or less whatever they want and call it haiku.

but I like this game.

User avatar
meowmers

Bronze
Posts: 177
Joined: Mon Dec 21, 2015 3:02 pm

Re: Stanford C/O 2019 Applicants (2015-2016 cycle)

Post by meowmers » Mon Jan 25, 2016 4:11 pm

nicknar wrote:
meowmers wrote:
nicknar wrote:syllabic pedantry
har har har nicknar
morae are applicable
in English as well

but you're right tho.
to be totally honest, I had to google the terms. all I knew was that they weren't exactly syllables, and that American poets take that fact to do more or less whatever they want and call it haiku.

but I like this game.
a linguist friend loves to correct folks on morae, which I know nothing about. but on wiki just now i learned a totally fascinating fact: "The first haiku written in English was by Ezra Pound, published in 1913."

wild!

User avatar
EnderWiggin

Silver
Posts: 1217
Joined: Wed Nov 12, 2014 9:55 pm

Re: Stanford C/O 2019 Applicants (2015-2016 cycle)

Post by EnderWiggin » Mon Jan 25, 2016 4:33 pm

I have a sinking feeling that my application is one that Dean Deal let her dog eat

Register now!

Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.

It's still FREE!


User avatar
Draconem

Bronze
Posts: 272
Joined: Tue Dec 01, 2015 11:59 pm

Re: Stanford C/O 2019 Applicants (2015-2016 cycle)

Post by Draconem » Mon Jan 25, 2016 4:54 pm

EnderWiggin wrote:I have a sinking feeling that my application is one that Dean Deal let her dog eat

+1.

User avatar
Hildegard15

Gold
Posts: 2161
Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2015 6:26 pm

Re: Stanford C/O 2019 Applicants (2015-2016 cycle)

Post by Hildegard15 » Mon Jan 25, 2016 5:02 pm

I can't believe I'm the only one who picked the option about hating law school admissions....

Image

User avatar
Dcc617

Gold
Posts: 2744
Joined: Mon Oct 13, 2014 3:01 pm

Re: Stanford C/O 2019 Applicants (2015-2016 cycle)

Post by Dcc617 » Mon Jan 25, 2016 5:36 pm

Hildegard15 wrote:I can't believe I'm the only one who picked the option about hating law school admissions....

Image
I can't believe other people think I'm handsome! (eek it's working!!!!)

User avatar
texasellewoods

Bronze
Posts: 398
Joined: Wed Jun 10, 2015 10:29 am

Re: Stanford C/O 2019 Applicants (2015-2016 cycle)

Post by texasellewoods » Mon Jan 25, 2016 5:39 pm

Speaking of the poll... where is the post deleter thing?

Get unlimited access to all forums and topics

Register now!

I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...


User avatar
QuentonCassidy

Silver
Posts: 592
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2015 3:58 pm

Re: Stanford C/O 2019 Applicants (2015-2016 cycle)

Post by QuentonCassidy » Mon Jan 25, 2016 5:40 pm

Dcc617 wrote:
Hildegard15 wrote:I can't believe I'm the only one who picked the option about hating law school admissions....

Image
I can't believe other people think I'm handsome! (eek it's working!!!!)
"Other people" being your six alts ;)

User avatar
Hildegard15

Gold
Posts: 2161
Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2015 6:26 pm

Re: Stanford C/O 2019 Applicants (2015-2016 cycle)

Post by Hildegard15 » Mon Jan 25, 2016 5:42 pm

Dcc617 wrote:
Hildegard15 wrote:I can't believe I'm the only one who picked the option about hating law school admissions....
I can't believe other people think I'm handsome! (eek it's working!!!!)
They are only picking it because they feel bad for you. :P These people don't know that you haven't figured out how to smile in photographs.

User avatar
Dcc617

Gold
Posts: 2744
Joined: Mon Oct 13, 2014 3:01 pm

Re: Stanford C/O 2019 Applicants (2015-2016 cycle)

Post by Dcc617 » Mon Jan 25, 2016 5:45 pm

QuentonCassidy wrote:
Dcc617 wrote:
Hildegard15 wrote:I can't believe I'm the only one who picked the option about hating law school admissions....

Image
I can't believe other people think I'm handsome! (eek it's working!!!!)
"Other people" being your six alts ;)
Image

User avatar
Dcc617

Gold
Posts: 2744
Joined: Mon Oct 13, 2014 3:01 pm

Re: Stanford C/O 2019 Applicants (2015-2016 cycle)

Post by Dcc617 » Mon Jan 25, 2016 5:47 pm

Hildegard15 wrote:
Dcc617 wrote:
Hildegard15 wrote:I can't believe I'm the only one who picked the option about hating law school admissions....
I can't believe other people think I'm handsome! (eek it's working!!!!)
They are only picking it because they feel bad for you. :P These people don't know that you haven't figured out how to smile in photographs.
Image

Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.

Register now, it's still FREE!


User avatar
Hildegard15

Gold
Posts: 2161
Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2015 6:26 pm

Re: Stanford C/O 2019 Applicants (2015-2016 cycle)

Post by Hildegard15 » Mon Jan 25, 2016 5:51 pm

Dcc617 wrote:
Hildegard15 wrote:
Dcc617 wrote:
Hildegard15 wrote:I can't believe I'm the only one who picked the option about hating law school admissions....
I can't believe other people think I'm handsome! (eek it's working!!!!)
They are only picking it because they feel bad for you. :P These people don't know that you haven't figured out how to smile in photographs.
Image
....Not the route I thought you were gonna go in your response. I expect more biting witticism from you DC. You're getting soft.

User avatar
pterodactyls

Silver
Posts: 520
Joined: Thu Aug 06, 2015 5:27 pm

Re: Stanford C/O 2019 Applicants (2015-2016 cycle)

Post by pterodactyls » Tue Jan 26, 2016 12:25 pm

Do people actually get in to Stanford or is it just a myth?

User avatar
pterodactyls

Silver
Posts: 520
Joined: Thu Aug 06, 2015 5:27 pm

Re: Stanford C/O 2019 Applicants (2015-2016 cycle)

Post by pterodactyls » Tue Jan 26, 2016 12:29 pm

4thand9 wrote:So I know this is applicant thread, but I figured I could ask and keep this thread on page 1 haha

What are the factors for you guys to choose S over H?

(For me at least, it would be student life, smaller class size, superior clerkship placement in CA / West Coast / 9th C.)
If I am faced with that choice, I will go outside and do cartwheels.

Until then, I'm not going to bother to consider it. At this point, I would be ecstatic to get waitlisted by one of them.

ProductofUnreality

Bronze
Posts: 425
Joined: Wed Jan 06, 2016 7:29 pm

Re: Stanford C/O 2019 Applicants (2015-2016 cycle)

Post by ProductofUnreality » Tue Jan 26, 2016 1:01 pm

Well I've decided to throw my hat into the ring. Not optimistic with GPA<25% and 50%<LSAT<75%, but figured I'd take the gamble even this late.

Good luck everyone!

Seriously? What are you waiting for?

Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!


Post Reply

Return to “Law School Acceptances, Denials, and Waitlists”