Solicited?muaythaifighter wrote:chicago was the only CCn that gave me a fee waiver. hope i get in!
Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle) Forum
-
- Posts: 66
- Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2011 8:55 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
- Hawkeye Pierce
- Posts: 1261
- Joined: Tue Sep 21, 2010 12:18 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
I don't believe Chicago gives out solicited fee waiver. Applicants can, however, request reimbursement for the fee if a waiver is granted post-submission.
-
- Posts: 66
- Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2011 8:55 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Oh, so they only send them out? I see.
And they've already been sending them out, for this cycle?
And they've already been sending them out, for this cycle?
- Blessedassurance
- Posts: 2091
- Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2011 3:42 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
OuiAnd they've already been sending them out, for this cycle?
-
- Posts: 973
- Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2011 8:46 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
These status checker things are interesting. Does everyone have their seat deposit line filled out in their Chicago "fees" area? I noticed I have one below the line for the admissions fee. Then on Harvard's the numbers are all wrong. I have a line only for the application fee and it says $85 due $0 paid, but I def had to pay to submit on LSAC.
It seems like they are all the same, but they can choose what to display. It throws me off how the information is wrong though.
It seems like they are all the same, but they can choose what to display. It throws me off how the information is wrong though.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 835
- Joined: Mon May 30, 2011 12:21 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Just submitted even though I have no chance whatsoever. Good luck all! 

- Tiago Splitter
- Posts: 17148
- Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2011 1:20 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
From the medians thread:
This takes me from yards to miles below the 25% GPA. I'd ED but now Northwestern is offering a full ride to ED admits.
wjs98 wrote:Chicago came to my school for recruiting day:
LSAT:
75th/25th: 173/167
Median: 171
GPA:
75th/25th: 3.94/3.71
Median 3.87
Looks like the Ruby helped get that GPA median up to absurd levels.
This takes me from yards to miles below the 25% GPA. I'd ED but now Northwestern is offering a full ride to ED admits.
-
- Posts: 973
- Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2011 8:46 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
This skips them over Columbia and puts them in almost the exact range of Stanford (173/167, 3.94/3.74) - shoot shoot shootTiago Splitter wrote:From the medians thread:
wjs98 wrote:Chicago came to my school for recruiting day:
LSAT:
75th/25th: 173/167
Median: 171
GPA:
75th/25th: 3.94/3.71
Median 3.87
Looks like the Ruby helped get that GPA median up to absurd levels.
This takes me from yards to miles below the 25% GPA. I'd ED but now Northwestern is offering a full ride to ED admits.
- Dany
- Posts: 11559
- Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2009 3:00 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Jeez those GPA stats are insane.Tiago Splitter wrote:From the medians thread:
This takes me from yards to miles below the 25% GPA. I'd ED but now Northwestern is offering a full ride to ED admits.wjs98 wrote:Chicago came to my school for recruiting day:
LSAT:
75th/25th: 173/167
Median: 171
GPA:
75th/25th: 3.94/3.71
Median 3.87
Looks like the Ruby helped get that GPA median up to absurd levels.
The new profile card is up if anyone cares: --LinkRemoved--
- Samara
- Posts: 3238
- Joined: Wed May 11, 2011 4:26 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Welp, there goes my 0.00001% chance of admittance. Combined with NU's ED news, this is not a great day.
-
- Posts: 80
- Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 11:02 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Woah, seriously reconsidering this whole not ED'ing thing. Does anyone think those numbers will come down at all next cycle? I know there have been a few discussions on TLS about fewer LSAT takers.
- Xifeng
- Posts: 2553
- Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2011 3:59 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Holy craaap that is insane
good luck guys!

- Dany
- Posts: 11559
- Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2009 3:00 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
The LSAT numbers didn't change much from last year to this year, so I doubt they'll be that different this cycle either.bball1997 wrote:Woah, seriously reconsidering this whole not ED'ing thing. Does anyone think those numbers will come down at all next cycle? I know there have been a few discussions on TLS about fewer LSAT takers.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Tiago Splitter
- Posts: 17148
- Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2011 1:20 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
LSAT median isn't the problem.bball1997 wrote:Woah, seriously reconsidering this whole not ED'ing thing. Does anyone think those numbers will come down at all next cycle? I know there have been a few discussions on TLS about fewer LSAT takers.
Rubenstein money (20 full scholarships per year) has allowed them to steal high GPA candidates from HYS. They don't appear intent on raising the LSAT numbers, even letting the 25th go down to 167. When bildungsroman got in off the waitlist I figured they just needed more reverse-splitters, but it appears that's all they were going for the whole time.
25th percentile GPA up from 3.59 to 3.71. Nuts.
- dakure
- Posts: 450
- Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2011 1:04 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Expect the LSAT median to stay the same or increase one point and the GPA median to stay the same next year. With the NU debacle, the lower end LSATers with high gpas are going to get sucked away because of the ED process.Dany wrote:The LSAT numbers didn't change much from last year to this year, so I doubt they'll be that different this cycle either.bball1997 wrote:Woah, seriously reconsidering this whole not ED'ing thing. Does anyone think those numbers will come down at all next cycle? I know there have been a few discussions on TLS about fewer LSAT takers.
- soj
- Posts: 7888
- Joined: Sat Jan 16, 2010 11:10 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
LSAT median might fall if applications drop again and peer schools step up $$ (cross fingers).
- Dany
- Posts: 11559
- Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2009 3:00 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
soj wrote:LSAT median might fall if applications drop again and peer schools step up $$ (cross fingers).

Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- Tiago Splitter
- Posts: 17148
- Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2011 1:20 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
I was hoping they would be trying to one up Columbia by throwing out a 176 75% LSAT but it was not to be.
- soj
- Posts: 7888
- Joined: Sat Jan 16, 2010 11:10 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
It would be a really good thing for us applicants if it happened.Dany wrote:soj wrote:LSAT median might fall if applications drop again and peer schools step up $$ (cross fingers).
- Dany
- Posts: 11559
- Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2009 3:00 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
You're not allowed to go to NYC.soj wrote:It would be a really good thing for us applicants if it happened.Dany wrote:soj wrote:LSAT median might fall if applications drop again and peer schools step up $$ (cross fingers).

-
- Posts: 80
- Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 11:02 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
As long as they want to keep LSAT scores constant though, there will still be fewer people with high LSAT and GPA combinations. It seems to me like they will still have fewer people to choose from who would hold up their LSAT 75th percentile and a GPA in their range, even if they are going to get a higher yield because of scholarship money.Tiago Splitter wrote:LSAT median isn't the problem.bball1997 wrote:Woah, seriously reconsidering this whole not ED'ing thing. Does anyone think those numbers will come down at all next cycle? I know there have been a few discussions on TLS about fewer LSAT takers.
Rubenstein money (20 full scholarships per year) has allowed them to steal high GPA candidates from HYS. They don't appear intent on raising the LSAT numbers, even letting the 25th go down to 167. When bildungsroman got in off the waitlist I figured they just needed more reverse-splitters, but it appears that's all they were going for the whole time.
25th percentile GPA up from 3.59 to 3.71. Nuts.
As I said though, this is definitely making me rethink my decision to not apply ED. It seems like there would be a significant difference, in terms of probability of admission, between being over both medians (and above one 75th percentile) and now being above a 75th percentile and below median.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Tiago Splitter
- Posts: 17148
- Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2011 1:20 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
I wouldn't ED if my GPA was over the 25th. LSAT well over 75th doesn't seem to matter for Chicago. 180 might as well be 174.As I said though, this is definitely making me rethink my decision to not apply ED. It seems like there would be a significant difference, in terms of probability of admission, between being over both medians (and above one 75th percentile) and now being above a 75th percentile and below median.
I get the impression that sub 3.6 (3.7?) GPAs are auto-dinged without ED or URM status. Even an LSAT crushjob won't save us now.
Last edited by Tiago Splitter on Tue Sep 20, 2011 6:43 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- soj
- Posts: 7888
- Joined: Sat Jan 16, 2010 11:10 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Don't worry, I didn't get a waiver from Fordham.Dany wrote:You're not allowed to go to NYC.soj wrote:It would be a really good thing for us applicants if it happened.Dany wrote:soj wrote:LSAT median might fall if applications drop again and peer schools step up $$ (cross fingers)./huffs petulantly
jk<3
- elibrarian
- Posts: 336
- Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2010 11:49 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Wow. I am heartbroken.
-
- Posts: 66
- Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2011 8:55 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
I'm sick. My GPA went from near-75th to the median. I can't believe I don't have a strong GPA any more 
The worst part is that they took 14 fewer students. Why didn't they take the full 205?
What was that about full ride to NU ED students?

The worst part is that they took 14 fewer students. Why didn't they take the full 205?
What was that about full ride to NU ED students?
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login