Fuck yeah!!!boo_pragmatism wrote:Called, I'm in.
Congrats Boo (and everyone else accepted!)
Fuck yeah!!!boo_pragmatism wrote:Called, I'm in.
+1 million trillion kajillion!!emrose wrote:Fuck yeah!!!boo_pragmatism wrote:Called, I'm in.
Congrats Boo (and everyone else accepted!)
Padimud wrote:Did anyone else get an invite to apply to their JD/MBA 3 year program today? They deferred me like a bulk of the posters here, but then they say this. Is this some sort of message saying, apply JD/MBA or bust??
I got the email 12/3 and I'm still waiting, for what its worth.sukaili wrote:I got the status checker email on 12/1 and haven't gone complete yet, should I be concerned? Anyone else still waiting to go complete?
Want to continue reading?
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
Ah, yes my friend, you are correct. I mislabeled it on purpose because "Prisoner's Dilemma" just sounds cool. Put simply: law school applicants are locked in a game theoretic sub-optimal Cournot-Nash equilibrium.wired wrote: Actually, the Prisoner's Dilemma is set up so that self-interest causes net social welfare to suffer. Blanketing the Top 20 is a personal welfare maximizing decision since no matter what our opponent chooses, it is always a better option. However, you are right, that colluding to both pick "not blanket" would result in a better outcome than "blanket, blanket."
+1.Hopefullawstudent wrote:Ah, yes my friend, you are correct. I mislabeled it on purpose because "Prisoner's Dilemma" just sounds cool. Put simply: law school applicants are locked in a game theoretic sub-optimal Cournot-Nash equilibrium.wired wrote: Actually, the Prisoner's Dilemma is set up so that self-interest causes net social welfare to suffer. Blanketing the Top 20 is a personal welfare maximizing decision since no matter what our opponent chooses, it is always a better option. However, you are right, that colluding to both pick "not blanket" would result in a better outcome than "blanket, blanket."
And that just sucks.
Put simply?Hopefullawstudent wrote:Ah, yes my friend, you are correct. I mislabeled it on purpose because "Prisoner's Dilemma" just sounds cool. Put simply: law school applicants are locked in a game theoretic sub-optimal Cournot-Nash equilibrium.wired wrote: Actually, the Prisoner's Dilemma is set up so that self-interest causes net social welfare to suffer. Blanketing the Top 20 is a personal welfare maximizing decision since no matter what our opponent chooses, it is always a better option. However, you are right, that colluding to both pick "not blanket" would result in a better outcome than "blanket, blanket."
And that just sucks.
INCONCEIVABLE!AngryAvocado wrote:Put simply?Hopefullawstudent wrote:Ah, yes my friend, you are correct. I mislabeled it on purpose because "Prisoner's Dilemma" just sounds cool. Put simply: law school applicants are locked in a game theoretic sub-optimal Cournot-Nash equilibrium.wired wrote: Actually, the Prisoner's Dilemma is set up so that self-interest causes net social welfare to suffer. Blanketing the Top 20 is a personal welfare maximizing decision since no matter what our opponent chooses, it is always a better option. However, you are right, that colluding to both pick "not blanket" would result in a better outcome than "blanket, blanket."
And that just sucks.
It had an acceptance letter, some information about financial aid deadlines (though no mention of any actual scholarship money), a map of Ithaca, an Ithaca restaurant guide, and a copy of the Cornell's alumni magazine, The Forum.tintin wrote:so is the acceptance letter just a letter? or is it more of a packet?
Register now!
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
This is known as the Stag Hunt. Two possible Nash equilibria; not blanketing not blanketing is pareto efficient, but blanket blanket is also a Nash equilibrium. With uncertainty and more than 1 actor, its no surprise we reach that outcome.Hopefullawstudent wrote:Ah, yes my friend, you are correct. I mislabeled it on purpose because "Prisoner's Dilemma" just sounds cool. Put simply: law school applicants are locked in a game theoretic sub-optimal Cournot-Nash equilibrium.wired wrote: Actually, the Prisoner's Dilemma is set up so that self-interest causes net social welfare to suffer. Blanketing the Top 20 is a personal welfare maximizing decision since no matter what our opponent chooses, it is always a better option. However, you are right, that colluding to both pick "not blanket" would result in a better outcome than "blanket, blanket."
And that just sucks.
I like your optimism, Krispy. I haven't been staying up lately to status check at midnight, because I've resigned myself to hearing from them on Christmas Eve day... then if I get a DR before that I'll be estatic... unless its a reject or deferral.krispykitten wrote:2 hours. Today is the day...
Seriously. It's got to be time for team 13. It just has to...beesknees wrote:I like your optimism, Krispy. I haven't been staying up lately to status check at midnight, because I've resigned myself to hearing from them on Christmas Eve day... then if I get a DR before that I'll be estatic... unless its a reject or deferral.krispykitten wrote:2 hours. Today is the day...
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
For the record, if I get in I'll have tshirts made for that game of flag football.krispykitten wrote:Seriously. It's got to be time for team 13. It just has to...
badwithpseudonyms wrote:For the record, if I get in I'll have tshirts made for that game of flag football.krispykitten wrote:Seriously. It's got to be time for team 13. It just has to...
...We also need to get enough 11/13'ers in. So whoever is first to be admitted needs to make the admissions staff aware of our plans.
There is no running from game theory my friend. Once you know it, you see it everywhere. Also, to the person who classified it as the Stag Hunt: you are correct.5ky wrote: Okay seriously guys, I just finished a class on Game Theory. I'm trying to put it behind me and move on with my life, but you aren't helping...
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Already a member? Login
Well, mirdamad and boss are in, so that's 2. COME ONNNN.badwithpseudonyms wrote:I left it open on purpose so as not to jinx anyone.
Hopefullawstudent wrote:There is no running from game theory my friend. Once you know it, you see it everywhere. Also, to the person who classified it as the Stag Hunt: you are correct.5ky wrote: Okay seriously guys, I just finished a class on Game Theory. I'm trying to put it behind me and move on with my life, but you aren't helping...
-HL
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login