Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017) Forum
- ood's_brother

- Posts: 111
- Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2017 1:23 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
Last night I had a dream of my DING EMAIL. I remember reading it.
I woke up thinking it had happened.
And yes it did say thank you for the edible arrangements.
I woke up thinking it had happened.
And yes it did say thank you for the edible arrangements.
-
pragmaticpoet

- Posts: 70
- Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2017 6:46 am
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
does anyone know what time JS2's usually go out if they do...lol or am i just way too anxious rn
-
Anon.y.mousse.

- Posts: 599
- Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2016 5:35 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
I think they usually start around 10:30ish if it's a morning wave.pragmaticpoet wrote:does anyone know what time JS2's usually go out if they do...lol or am i just way too anxious rn
- Kinch08

- Posts: 309
- Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
I don't know that much about the GRE, but I'm pretty sure that I knew a bunch of people who got more-or-less perfect scores on it. 178-180 on the LSAT seems to me like it's for people who are really out there stunting, whereas a "top" score on the GRE just kind of means you're smart but not necessarily "special." I'm not saying that a 179 means you're going to be wildly successful in Law School, but it does at least mean that you're ridiculously good at taking the LSAT.
Losing that stratification at the top would make the whole admissions process a lot less fun IMO.
Maybe I'm full of crap and don't know anything about the GRE, though--I'm just going off of the little that I've heard, so maybe a perfect 1600 (is that right?) is actually lower than a 180.
Also it would suck to go to HLS and then have it slip out of the HYS tier while you're there. Obviously that isn't going to happen, but if it did and you chose it over $ at CCN you'd probably be pretty upset.
Losing that stratification at the top would make the whole admissions process a lot less fun IMO.
Maybe I'm full of crap and don't know anything about the GRE, though--I'm just going off of the little that I've heard, so maybe a perfect 1600 (is that right?) is actually lower than a 180.
Also it would suck to go to HLS and then have it slip out of the HYS tier while you're there. Obviously that isn't going to happen, but if it did and you chose it over $ at CCN you'd probably be pretty upset.
Last edited by Kinch08 on Thu Mar 09, 2017 11:39 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
VapidP

- Posts: 244
- Joined: Wed Nov 23, 2016 10:11 am
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
I think part of the reason why there exist so much anecdotal evidence for many more people getting perfect scores on the GRE is because many more people take the GRE. I know many more GRE takers than LSAT takers and I know a ton of LSAT takers.Kinch08 wrote:I don't know that much about the GRE, but I'm pretty sure that I knew a bunch of people who got more-or-less perfect scores on it. 178-180 on the LSAT seems to me like it's for people who are really out there stunting, whereas a "top" score on the GRE just kind of means you're smart but not necessarily "special." I'm not saying that a 179 means you're going to be wildly successful in Law School, but it does at least mean that you're ridiculously good at taking the LSAT.
Losing that stratification at the top would make the whole admissions process a lot less fun IMO.
Also it would suck to go to HLS and then have it slip out of the HYS tier while you're there. Obviously that isn't going to happen, but if it did and you chose it over $ at CCN you'd probably be pretty upset.
That being said, the GRE is stupidly easy when compared to the LSAT and even the GMAT.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- KateMcKitten

- Posts: 353
- Joined: Fri Feb 03, 2017 1:07 am
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
At least you knew it didn't end up in the worker's lounge.ood's_brother wrote:Last night I had a dream of my DING EMAIL. I remember reading it.
I woke up thinking it had happened.
And yes it did say thank you for the edible arrangements.
- CHyde

- Posts: 207
- Joined: Sun Jul 17, 2016 10:17 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
.
Last edited by CHyde on Thu Mar 09, 2017 5:19 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
Pozzo

- Posts: 1918
- Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2015 3:36 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
The pilot isn't starting until next cycle, so I don't see why it would impact the rest of this cycle.CHyde wrote:Given the release of the new GRE pilot program, do you think H will prioritize 173+ over 170-172s for the remainder of the year? Essentially, will applicants who had a 50% chance last cycle have a 30-40% chance this cycle?
-
BEng,MBA,FRM,JD(?)

- Posts: 333
- Joined: Mon Mar 28, 2016 11:17 am
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
He max score has been 340 for a long time now. Gre is much easier. But obviously that's relative merit as well. You get percentile ranks. But you are right. LSAT has about 7-8 points at the 99th percentile (173-180 I guess). In gre, it's a lesser range.Kinch08 wrote:I don't know that much about the GRE, but I'm pretty sure that I knew a bunch of people who got more-or-less perfect scores on it. 178-180 on the LSAT seems to me like it's for people who are really out there stunting, whereas a "top" score on the GRE just kind of means you're smart but not necessarily "special." I'm not saying that a 179 means you're going to be wildly successful in Law School, but it does at least mean that you're ridiculously good at taking the LSAT.
Losing that stratification at the top would make the whole admissions process a lot less fun IMO.
Maybe I'm full of crap and don't know anything about the GRE, though--I'm just going off of the little that I've heard, so maybe a perfect 1600 (is that right?) is actually lower than a 180.
Also it would suck to go to HLS and then have it slip out of the HYS tier while you're there. Obviously that isn't going to happen, but if it did and you chose it over $ at CCN you'd probably be pretty upset.
- poptart123

- Posts: 1157
- Joined: Thu Jun 11, 2015 5:31 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
Doesn't matter to me because I can't math that's why I'm going to law school plain and simple.
- CHyde

- Posts: 207
- Joined: Sun Jul 17, 2016 10:17 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
.
Last edited by CHyde on Thu Mar 09, 2017 5:19 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Sarastro

- Posts: 389
- Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2016 3:25 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
Well they don't seem to want it badly enough to give me a JS1.CHyde wrote:I suppose its an indication of H's desire to raise their medians again to 173 (i.e., drop low lsats in favor of high GRE)...so I'm just speculating that we may see that desire materialize in the rest of this cycle.Pozzo wrote:The pilot isn't starting until next cycle, so I don't see why it would impact the rest of this cycle.CHyde wrote:Given the release of the new GRE pilot program, do you think H will prioritize 173+ over 170-172s for the remainder of the year? Essentially, will applicants who had a 50% chance last cycle have a 30-40% chance this cycle?
BUT WHO KNOWS...
Unless they do.
In which case, you've got my number, H.
- TudoBem

- Posts: 364
- Joined: Sat Sep 24, 2016 4:21 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
waiting and waiting...since 11/15. No JS1. Expecting my first ding , hopefully a WL.
Should I visit? I will be in Boston next week. Any thoughts?
Should I visit? I will be in Boston next week. Any thoughts?
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
dyebri

- Posts: 267
- Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2017 1:42 am
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
Visits don't get reported. It's useless. And you'll just have wasted money because everyone knows if you get in you'll go regardless of what you think of campusTudoBem wrote:waiting and waiting...since 11/15. No JS1. Expecting my first ding , hopefully a WL.![]()
Should I visit? I will be in Boston next week. Any thoughts?
-
jaketp123

- Posts: 9
- Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2017 4:34 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
pragmaticpoet wrote:taxman14 wrote:Thoughts on JS2 possibilities today?
Really hoping for it
Is there any chance of someone with a JS1 done on 2/23 hearing back in this wave or no?
In the same boat my friend. Good luck!
-
Mackgal

- Posts: 107
- Joined: Mon Nov 28, 2016 9:13 am
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
Anyone else losing hope that they'll ever hear from Harvard before April. Each day that passss I commit myself to having to wait for April 1st to get any news 
-
dyebri

- Posts: 267
- Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2017 1:42 am
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
Did you get a js1Mackgal wrote:Anyone else losing hope that they'll ever hear from Harvard before April. Each day that passss I commit myself to having to wait for April 1st to get any news
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
Mackgal

- Posts: 107
- Joined: Mon Nov 28, 2016 9:13 am
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
Yup I had it first week of Januarydyebri wrote:Did you get a js1Mackgal wrote:Anyone else losing hope that they'll ever hear from Harvard before April. Each day that passss I commit myself to having to wait for April 1st to get any news
-
potterotter

- Posts: 352
- Joined: Wed Sep 07, 2016 1:37 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
---
Last edited by potterotter on Mon Mar 13, 2017 11:56 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- hellohalo

- Posts: 516
- Joined: Fri Jun 17, 2016 3:53 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
Glad there's someone in the same boat with me. Good luck to all of us. We made our efforts. Now it's their turn to decide. So just keep yourself busy and let the decision come when it comes.Mackgal wrote:Yup I had it first week of Januarydyebri wrote:Did you get a js1Mackgal wrote:Anyone else losing hope that they'll ever hear from Harvard before April. Each day that passss I commit myself to having to wait for April 1st to get any news
-
kiwi50

- Posts: 133
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2016 12:41 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
.
Last edited by kiwi50 on Wed Mar 22, 2017 5:05 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
dyebri

- Posts: 267
- Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2017 1:42 am
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
hellohalo wrote:Glad there's someone in the same boat with me. Good luck to all of us. We made our efforts. Now it's their turn to decide. So just keep yourself busy and let the decision come when it comes.Mackgal wrote:Yup I had it first week of Januarydyebri wrote:Did you get a js1Mackgal wrote:Anyone else losing hope that they'll ever hear from Harvard before April. Each day that passss I commit myself to having to wait for April 1st to get any news
I had mine the first week of February. Is there anyone here that had one the same time as me and do you think we'll hear back in the next wave
-
jaketp123

- Posts: 9
- Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2017 4:34 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
I received my JS1 about 2 weeks after yours on 2/24. I am hopeful though. Aren't there only a few JS2 waves left?dyebri wrote:hellohalo wrote:Glad there's someone in the same boat with me. Good luck to all of us. We made our efforts. Now it's their turn to decide. So just keep yourself busy and let the decision come when it comes.Mackgal wrote:Yup I had it first week of Januarydyebri wrote:Did you get a js1Mackgal wrote:Anyone else losing hope that they'll ever hear from Harvard before April. Each day that passss I commit myself to having to wait for April 1st to get any news
I had mine the first week of February. Is there anyone here that had one the same time as me and do you think we'll hear back in the next wave
-
AllHailKingMao

- Posts: 113
- Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2017 12:38 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
I had mine at the same time as you and I haven't heard back. Tbh, speculating doesn't really help at all-- either you're right and you're not surprised, or you're wrong and depressed. Let's just ride it out! 22 days until April 1, we've made it this far!jaketp123 wrote:I received my JS1 about 2 weeks after yours on 2/24. I am hopeful though. Aren't there only a few JS2 waves left?dyebri wrote:hellohalo wrote:Glad there's someone in the same boat with me. Good luck to all of us. We made our efforts. Now it's their turn to decide. So just keep yourself busy and let the decision come when it comes.Mackgal wrote:Yup I had it first week of Januarydyebri wrote:Did you get a js1Mackgal wrote:Anyone else losing hope that they'll ever hear from Harvard before April. Each day that passss I commit myself to having to wait for April 1st to get any news
I had mine the first week of February. Is there anyone here that had one the same time as me and do you think we'll hear back in the next wave
- SybillAnnDorsett

- Posts: 1719
- Joined: Mon Oct 31, 2016 12:59 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
what happens april 1st
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login