It really doesn't seem like there are many others. On LSN all the remaining pending complete in November seem to mention being held (if they contain any commentary at all).rockchalk86 wrote:Right here! I thought I was an easy rejection too... guess they are gonna let me sweat it out.of Benito Cereno wrote:how many other people complete before 11/25 without hold or rejection?
Harvard 2010! Forum
- of Benito Cereno

- Posts: 748
- Joined: Sat Oct 17, 2009 6:40 am
Re: Harvard 2010!
-
mockstar

- Posts: 87
- Joined: Tue Jan 05, 2010 5:59 pm
Re: Harvard 2010!
Complete 10/8. Still.of Benito Cereno wrote:how many other people complete before 11/25 without hold or rejection?
- rockchalk86

- Posts: 528
- Joined: Thu Oct 15, 2009 10:16 am
Re: Harvard 2010!
Any theories? I have no clue why they are waiting on me personally... Harvard was a clear Hail Mary. Do they like Americorps? I can't imagine they like it more than their medians.of Benito Cereno wrote:It really doesn't seem like there are many others. On LSN all the remaining pending complete in November seem to mention being held (if they contain any commentary at all).rockchalk86 wrote:Right here! I thought I was an easy rejection too... guess they are gonna let me sweat it out.of Benito Cereno wrote:how many other people complete before 11/25 without hold or rejection?
-
pissantvache

- Posts: 115
- Joined: Thu Jul 23, 2009 2:37 pm
Re: Harvard 2010!
Yeah, i'm UR 11/20, no hold, no rejection, nothing. which is awesome, but...rockchalk86 wrote:Any theories? I have no clue why they are waiting on me personally... Harvard was a clear Hail Mary. Do they like Americorps? I can't imagine they like it more than their medians.of Benito Cereno wrote:It really doesn't seem like there are many others. On LSN all the remaining pending complete in November seem to mention being held (if they contain any commentary at all).rockchalk86 wrote:Right here! I thought I was an easy rejection too... guess they are gonna let me sweat it out.of Benito Cereno wrote:how many other people complete before 11/25 without hold or rejection?
- crackberry

- Posts: 3252
- Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 3:23 pm
Re: Harvard 2010!
You are the new me. Have fun!mockstar wrote:Complete 10/8. Still.of Benito Cereno wrote:how many other people complete before 11/25 without hold or rejection?
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- fidesverita

- Posts: 274
- Joined: Mon Aug 10, 2009 9:04 pm
Re: Harvard 2010!
Has anyone submitted an additional LOR directly to the office without having signed it yourself? (ex: having your professor mail it directly to them rather than the LSAC) I'm worried the LSAC will take forever to process it (or, heaven forbid, lose the letter! It's happened to other people before!).
Does the envelope need to be signed by you? I thought that was only for direct correspondences between you and the office and not necessarily between your letter writer and the office?
I'd call and ask HLS directly... but they're closed now
Does the envelope need to be signed by you? I thought that was only for direct correspondences between you and the office and not necessarily between your letter writer and the office?
I'd call and ask HLS directly... but they're closed now
-
brennanlives

- Posts: 47
- Joined: Sun Oct 25, 2009 10:48 pm
Re: Harvard 2010!
Right here! I thought I was an easy rejection too... guess they are gonna let me sweat it out.[/quote]of Benito Cereno wrote:how many other people complete before 11/25 without hold or rejection?
It really doesn't seem like there are many others. On LSN all the remaining pending complete in November seem to mention being held (if they contain any commentary at all).[/quote][/quote]
UR 11/23, not a sign of life from Harvard! Don't applications close next week, though?
- crackberry

- Posts: 3252
- Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 3:23 pm
Re: Harvard 2010!
Yeah you can do this. V6 did it and his new LOR appeared on his status checker quickly. He signed the outside of the envelope though.fidesverita wrote:Has anyone submitted an additional LOR directly to the office without having signed it yourself? (ex: having your professor mail it directly to them rather than the LSAC) I'm worried the LSAC will take forever to process it (or, heaven forbid, lose the letter! It's happened to other people before!).
Does the envelope need to be signed by you? I thought that was only for direct correspondences between you and the office and not necessarily between your letter writer and the office?
I'd call and ask HLS directly... but they're closed now
-
Kronk

- Posts: 32987
- Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2008 9:18 pm
Re: Harvard 2010!
Have your LOR writer sign over the seal and then sign it yourself at the bottom with your LSAC number and printed name.
- fidesverita

- Posts: 274
- Joined: Mon Aug 10, 2009 9:04 pm
Re: Harvard 2010!
Hmm, the issue is that I'm not living near campus anymore, so physically signing the outside of the envelope could be a problem.crackberry wrote:Yeah you can do this. V6 did it and his new LOR appeared on his status checker quickly. He signed the outside of the envelope though.fidesverita wrote:Has anyone submitted an additional LOR directly to the office without having signed it yourself? (ex: having your professor mail it directly to them rather than the LSAC) I'm worried the LSAC will take forever to process it (or, heaven forbid, lose the letter! It's happened to other people before!).
Does the envelope need to be signed by you? I thought that was only for direct correspondences between you and the office and not necessarily between your letter writer and the office?
I'd call and ask HLS directly... but they're closed now
-
Kronk

- Posts: 32987
- Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2008 9:18 pm
Re: Harvard 2010!
Then I would ask your LOR writer to specifically mention your name and LSAC number in the first line.fidesverita wrote:Hmm, the issue is that I'm not living near campus anymore, so physically signing the outside of the envelope could be a problem.crackberry wrote:Yeah you can do this. V6 did it and his new LOR appeared on his status checker quickly. He signed the outside of the envelope though.fidesverita wrote:Has anyone submitted an additional LOR directly to the office without having signed it yourself? (ex: having your professor mail it directly to them rather than the LSAC) I'm worried the LSAC will take forever to process it (or, heaven forbid, lose the letter! It's happened to other people before!).
Does the envelope need to be signed by you? I thought that was only for direct correspondences between you and the office and not necessarily between your letter writer and the office?
I'd call and ask HLS directly... but they're closed now
- crackberry

- Posts: 3252
- Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 3:23 pm
Re: Harvard 2010!
Have your recommender mail it to you in a sealed envelope with his/her seal across the flap. Then you sign the outside of the envelope and put it in another envelope (with or without your signed LOCI). Then mail to Harvard yourself. Everybody wins.fidesverita wrote:Hmm, the issue is that I'm not living near campus anymore, so physically signing the outside of the envelope could be a problem.crackberry wrote:Yeah you can do this. V6 did it and his new LOR appeared on his status checker quickly. He signed the outside of the envelope though.fidesverita wrote:Has anyone submitted an additional LOR directly to the office without having signed it yourself? (ex: having your professor mail it directly to them rather than the LSAC) I'm worried the LSAC will take forever to process it (or, heaven forbid, lose the letter! It's happened to other people before!).
Does the envelope need to be signed by you? I thought that was only for direct correspondences between you and the office and not necessarily between your letter writer and the office?
I'd call and ask HLS directly... but they're closed now
- fidesverita

- Posts: 274
- Joined: Mon Aug 10, 2009 9:04 pm
Re: Harvard 2010!
Thanks for the tips crackberry and V6! I'll give the office a call in the morning to double check and then choose a course of action.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- crackberry

- Posts: 3252
- Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 3:23 pm
Re: Harvard 2010!
Let me know what they say. I'm about to do this, too. I'm going with the complicated option I just outlined.fidesverita wrote:Thanks for the tips crackberry and V6! I'll give the office a call in the morning to double check and then choose a course of action.
- fidesverita

- Posts: 274
- Joined: Mon Aug 10, 2009 9:04 pm
Re: Harvard 2010!
I'll def let you know. I'm hoping we won't have to go with the complicated option... otherwise it's no different than having the letter sent to and processed (sloowwwlly) by the lsac people!crackberry wrote:Let me know what they say. I'm about to do this, too. I'm going with the complicated option I just outlined.fidesverita wrote:Thanks for the tips crackberry and V6! I'll give the office a call in the morning to double check and then choose a course of action.
- fidesverita

- Posts: 274
- Joined: Mon Aug 10, 2009 9:04 pm
Re: Harvard 2010!
Oh, I might have missed this a few pages back... did they ever get back to you, crack? Is it an official hold or are you still in waiting limbo after JR1?
- crackberry

- Posts: 3252
- Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 3:23 pm
Re: Harvard 2010!
I got held on Jan. 15.fidesverita wrote:Oh, I might have missed this a few pages back... did they ever get back to you, crack? Is it an official hold or are you still in waiting limbo after JR1?
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
Kronk

- Posts: 32987
- Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2008 9:18 pm
Re: Harvard 2010!
Eh. I think it would still be faster. I sent my LOCI and LOR on a Friday and my LOR posted to my status checker by the following Wednesday (if not sooner, I didn't think to check before that). LSAC takes a bunch of processing days and then has to send it to Harvard (who takes it by paper).fidesverita wrote:I'll def let you know. I'm hoping we won't have to go with the complicated option... otherwise it's no different than having the letter sent to and processed (sloowwwlly) by the lsac people!crackberry wrote:Let me know what they say. I'm about to do this, too. I'm going with the complicated option I just outlined.fidesverita wrote:Thanks for the tips crackberry and V6! I'll give the office a call in the morning to double check and then choose a course of action.
- Lmao Zedong

- Posts: 381
- Joined: Sat Feb 28, 2009 12:10 am
Re: Harvard 2010!
bah, you guys are getting me worried about this timing thing too. i've got some stuff to send in (LOR, LOCI, new transcript for slightly improved GPA) but it's still all coming together. pretty big buzzkill if i get a negative or a WL before i can get that stuff in
- crackberry

- Posts: 3252
- Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 3:23 pm
Re: Harvard 2010!
Did you apply to Y or S? Are you dead set on CLS at this point barring an acceptance at H?GargamelITT wrote:bah, you guys are getting me worried about this timing thing too. i've got some stuff to send in (LOR, LOCI, new transcript for slightly improved GPA) but it's still all coming together. pretty big buzzkill if i get a negative or a WL before i can get that stuff in
- Lmao Zedong

- Posts: 381
- Joined: Sat Feb 28, 2009 12:10 am
Re: Harvard 2010!
no Y. applied to S, but i think i'd take C with a significant amount of $ (which i think i should be able to pull) over it and think S is pretty unlikely anyway given unspectacular GPA and softs.crackberry wrote:Did you apply to Y or S? Are you dead set on CLS at this point barring an acceptance at H?GargamelITT wrote:bah, you guys are getting me worried about this timing thing too. i've got some stuff to send in (LOR, LOCI, new transcript for slightly improved GPA) but it's still all coming together. pretty big buzzkill if i get a negative or a WL before i can get that stuff in
feel good about CLS, but i think i'd take HLS in almost any scenario. only a hamilton would have given me pause, and i didn't get one
Last edited by Lmao Zedong on Wed Jan 27, 2010 7:57 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
Kronk

- Posts: 32987
- Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2008 9:18 pm
Re: Harvard 2010!
Did Bailaian (sp?) ever get a JR2?
- crackberry

- Posts: 3252
- Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 3:23 pm
Re: Harvard 2010!
She was held.VoidSix wrote:Did Bailaian (sp?) ever get a JR2?
Last edited by crackberry on Wed Jan 27, 2010 7:58 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Lmao Zedong

- Posts: 381
- Joined: Sat Feb 28, 2009 12:10 am
Re: Harvard 2010!
don't think so. she's my slightly better looking numbers sibling, so i figure i'm in line right behind her if i'm ever gonna get oneVoidSix wrote:Did Bailaian (sp?) ever get a JR2?
- crackberry

- Posts: 3252
- Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 3:23 pm
Re: Harvard 2010!
Cool. Well congrats on CLS if I haven't already said it. I'm sure you'll get $50K+ from them when it's all said and done.GargamelITT wrote:no Y. applied to S, but i think i'd take C with a significant amount of $ (which i think i should be able to pull) over it and think S is pretty unlikely anyway given unspectacular GPA and softs.crackberry wrote:Did you apply to Y or S? Are you dead set on CLS at this point barring an acceptance at H?GargamelITT wrote:bah, you guys are getting me worried about this timing thing too. i've got some stuff to send in (LOR, LOCI, new transcript for slightly improved GPA) but it's still all coming together. pretty big buzzkill if i get a negative or a WL before i can get that stuff in
feel good about CLS, but i think i'd take HLS in almost any scenario. only a hamilton would have given me pause, and i didn't get one
And you may yet get HLS.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login