Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants) Forum
-
isaiah1992

- Posts: 163
- Joined: Thu Oct 03, 2013 11:41 pm
-
kathj06

- Posts: 220
- Joined: Thu Mar 07, 2013 3:50 pm
- applicantx

- Posts: 19
- Joined: Mon Nov 25, 2013 9:43 pm
-
muzzy

- Posts: 488
- Joined: Thu Nov 07, 2013 9:01 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
.
Last edited by muzzy on Mon Apr 14, 2014 5:04 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Cocoblues

- Posts: 321
- Joined: Sat Dec 28, 2013 10:18 pm
-
webbdp3

- Posts: 79
- Joined: Tue Oct 22, 2013 11:47 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
48, for science
- kitkat288

- Posts: 79
- Joined: Sat Dec 07, 2013 5:43 pm
- Balthy

- Posts: 665
- Joined: Sat Apr 03, 2010 12:28 pm
- tparks

- Posts: 76
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2012 2:01 am
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
I honestly wasn't expecting the number to get to 50. I think its pretty safe to say that we are all presumptive rejects at this point.
- Balthy

- Posts: 665
- Joined: Sat Apr 03, 2010 12:28 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
tparks wrote:I honestly wasn't expecting the number to get to 50. I think its pretty safe to say that we are all presumptive rejects at this point.
- dobryden

- Posts: 45
- Joined: Wed Jun 13, 2012 4:43 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
I always miss the fun conversations!
51!
51!
- hellomellow

- Posts: 227
- Joined: Mon Jan 06, 2014 2:35 am
- koalacity

- Posts: 1162
- Joined: Wed Aug 07, 2013 9:56 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
I disagree with your second point (though I agree with the first). We have multiple Yale admits/Ruby (and Hamilton/Vandy/etc) recipients/extremely qualified applicants among us.tparks wrote:I honestly wasn't expecting the number to get to 50. I think its pretty safe to say that we are all presumptive rejects at this point.
-
saskia17

- Posts: 9
- Joined: Fri Mar 14, 2014 11:20 am
- Chalupa-Batman

- Posts: 101
- Joined: Tue Feb 18, 2014 5:47 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
54
Mighty Stanford, goddess of false palms, accept this, my 50th post as a sign of my dedication. It is a humble offering, i know, but if it pleases you and i am granted acceptance i promise to adorn your thread with mediocre humor.
Mighty Stanford, goddess of false palms, accept this, my 50th post as a sign of my dedication. It is a humble offering, i know, but if it pleases you and i am granted acceptance i promise to adorn your thread with mediocre humor.
-
Ben Reilly

- Posts: 107
- Joined: Sat Feb 06, 2010 2:08 am
- wealtheow

- Posts: 1034
- Joined: Wed Dec 21, 2011 1:45 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
Fiddy six.
-
paperrev

- Posts: 97
- Joined: Wed Sep 25, 2013 12:18 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
Oh my, are there ACTUALLY 56 other people still under review???!!! And for a second, I actually had a small sliver of hope that I'd get in hahaha.
Numero 57 here. Under review since 1/14. Surprised that I'm still here, given my LSAT score...
Numero 57 here. Under review since 1/14. Surprised that I'm still here, given my LSAT score...
- TheMostDangerousLG

- Posts: 1545
- Joined: Thu Nov 22, 2012 4:25 am
-
Huffy

- Posts: 8
- Joined: Tue Jan 21, 2014 7:50 pm
- Tariffs

- Posts: 95
- Joined: Sat Jun 08, 2013 1:55 pm
-
W$RKliveWELL

- Posts: 191
- Joined: Sun May 05, 2013 1:17 am
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
sixty one. Just waiting on it.
Last edited by W$RKliveWELL on Mon Apr 07, 2014 8:26 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
loveduck

- Posts: 18
- Joined: Sun Feb 02, 2014 3:19 pm
- vuthy

- Posts: 378
- Joined: Wed Jun 12, 2013 8:55 am
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
Even scarier: TLS probably represents, what, 15-20% of applicants at most?paperrev wrote:Oh my, are there ACTUALLY 56 other people still under review???!!!
- Mack.Hambleton

- Posts: 5414
- Joined: Mon Jan 13, 2014 2:09 am